Transcripts For SFGTV Planning Commission 10815 20151011 : c

Transcripts For SFGTV Planning Commission 10815 20151011

Lot or effect or be active in the final process lots of people are troubled by theyre moving loss of theyre of what we preserve to be theyre moving mid block or rear yard open space. One way to be involved attend a meeting to go it gives us and the neighbors to learn and participate dribble in future improvements meetings often take the form of open houses or focus groups or other stinks that allows you or your neighbors to provide feedback and ask questions the best way to insure youll be alerted the Community Meetings sign up for the notification on the website by signing up using youll receive the notifications of existing request the specific neighborhood or project type if youre language is a disability accomodation please call us 72 hours before the event over the events staff will receive the input and publish the results on the website the notifications bans feedback from the public for example, the feedback you provide may change how a street corridors looks at or the web policy the get started in planning for our neighborhood or learner more mr. The upcoming visit the plans and programs package of our we are talking about with our feedback and participation that is important to us not everyone takes this so be proud of taking ann good afternoon and he welcome to the Planning Commission regular hearing like to remind the public to and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. If i could take roll commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner johnson and commissioner richards. Commissioner hillis is expected to arrive shortly and commissioner moore is expected to be absent commissioners, the first item on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance at the time of publishing the agenda no item phenomenon continuance, however, under our discretionary review calendar item 9 and 11 have both been withdrawn item 9 barker street request for discretionary review has been withdrawn and case no. At 2529 union street request for a discretionary review has been withdrawn you need to take no action of those matters commissioners that places us under commissioner matters for adoption of draft minutes there is one small error on the meeting time it is not called the the meeting will come to order others 94 p. M. But 12 05 p. M. Any comments on the draft minutes with those changes i dont see any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner wu move to approve. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to approval of the draft minutes pr commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and place us on item 2 commissioner questions or comments. Commissioner richards. Several things first, you may notice having i have an accent i got braces i wont be offended if you ask me to repeat second we have sometimes department of Human Resources drs the dr requester is requesting the Building Permit application because of a massing i know your plan submittal guideline dont require a 3d rendering maybe staff get the word out to the current planner when there is a massing issue we strongly suggest to the project sponsor to include a 3d we ask them and that will help out the process third theres an interesting article burn mid market pea all the things on urban design is a good read it talk about the projects coming before us if you have a chance please try to read it and people talk about displacement in San Francisco is interesting we this thing as world problem but an article last friday after the last commissioner about a serial cafe in london you pay for a high price bowl of keeping you informed rally nvenlth not the enough units being created in longing will london commissioner antonini. Very supportive of commissioner richards decision to engage in orbiting Domestic Work laughter other things i wanted to ask in terms of design that in the future wherever possible if we can be looped into projects whether theyre first come forward in their design stages and get a productive of them we get go into the unfortunate situation excellent projects that do all the right things in housing and retail and Affordable Housing and the design is really bad it is like sometimes, we sculpt them here it takes a long time and expensive for everyone to rework the fourth project 0 so if we accounted get a productive that you have to enjoy the design and appreciate the design or may not at least well get a has to do with head start along those links i the fourth go at the request of some neighborhood members to go and see a project that was goes to be before us next week i think part on pennsylvania and part on texas a pdr Housing Project spend some time listening to neighbors concerns on that particular project. Commissioner richards and i q guess what commissioner antonini is saying i visited the same project 739 pennsylvania and third street is the other portion when i met with the representative of the project manager i said hey, we have a Good Building on indiana did you take a look at the buildings design we kind of poernd over that the project sponsor said the same things and coming here next week we know that former commissioner is working with the project sponsor and not trying to redesign the building again we get a peak a little bit of a Temperature Check thanks. Commissioners, if theres nothing further we can move on to Department Matters item 3 department matter. Commissioners you have one many our packet i have no additional announcement number 4 board of appeals and past supervisors and the Historic Preservation commission. Good afternoon aaron starr Planning Department at the intersection weeks land use the technical amendments sponsored by the mayor and the Planning Commission was heard with this fanfare it was referred to the board with a with a positive recommendation and interim controls for signs and Transit Center planned areas was continued to december 10th to have anymore outreach and the tsf was heard thank you ludicrously the proposed tsf was heard owe october 5th and more comments for the proposal at that weeks hearing they talked about the fees and the amount of garrett and the applicable of the hospitals and post secondary institutions the committee added increasing the fee rate by an additional one dollars per square feet to 8. 74 to 19. 04 square feet modifying the grandfathering that the projects that fold after the ordinance will pay hundred percent of the tsf rather than the 50 per and removing the hospital exemption adding the exemption for post secondary you institutions and increasing from 8 hundred to 15 hundred grow square feet and an update every 3 years afternoon 5 years and add the Planning Commission to the study be conducted sooner and sdrishg the Planning Department and the Controllers Office inform about the feasibility of the sxheekz e impact fees about the geographies this item was continued until october 19th so the ordinance can be voted on and also at the land use hearing a hearing on the states on legalization of transmittals in was supported by supervisor wiener this hearing was to review the states of legalization of illegal units that was sported pie supervisor chiu and became fetish in may of 2014 they provided the supervisors with the interim controls schaejz with the possibility tax reassessment no Public Comment on this item since 2014 approximately 200 and 40 applications and 62 permits issued and 9 completed the committee discussed the potential ways to increase the use allowing multiple units to be legal vusz those ordinance with the dbi fees legal listing unwarranted unit pass in Program Since that was a hearing with no action 9 committee voted to table the item following the hearing at the full board supervisor kims inclusionary housing unit passed it second reading and it is on the quatro special use district was received and the report was accepted you, however, the moratorium has not been extend and there were no introductio introductions. Questions. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. Sorry i have a question on the transit charges i when i understand that is still in committee and forwarded to the dpob; is that correct. The sign for the transit districts. Correct. It was continued until the 18 im sorry the 10 so they could do more outreach. So any question is more procedural i read there was at least one supervisor trying to raise the amount significantly for the various categories of the transit fees housing and pdr and commercial and if there were to happen and the board were to pass somethings a higher amount or before they vote does it come back to use it significantly changed from the time we considered it and given our support audience youre talking about the tsif. Not increasing the fees i believe this commission had it into go up to 3 percent the board didnt increase it only one dollar per square feet i dont know that were. Within the range we had allowed them to consider so i forget the details new i understand. And the board of appeals did meet late night last time on 678 appeals on box those on the public rightofway on the public poles it was defended those last night on 5 of them the appeals were granted and the permit were denied because of noticing issues and the of one to a later data jurisdiction request thats before i the discretionary review the permit was issued earlier this year there were two appeals filled the board amazing uphold the permit with a request that was denied definitely under construction over the course of the construction regarding the penthouse you recall you took off the top floor but allowed the penthouse to remain and the we did determine the building inspection determined it was constructed per plan were on appeal earlier this year year with the jurisdiction findings question they can do it only an trooirld case the city intentionally or inenvironmental the board denied the jurisdiction request and i believe minimally visible and any other questions ill be happy to to discuss them thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners tim frye to share the results of yesterdays Historic Preservation commission the first item the Commission Considered was a Community Sponsored landmark designation for tennessee street the commissioners may remember this site as the Commission Approved a project for partial demolition of the warehouse building and the construction of 69 residential units in october of 2014 of the application from the member of the Community Suggested there was new information that that warrants the status for the building the commission reviewed the new information felt it building didnt rise to a level to warrant landmark designation and voted unanimously not to add it to the landmark Designation Program as a result it will precede with that condition the commission 10 provided review and comments on 1126 Howard Street a california registrationed building on Howard Street that wanted to use the 809 planning code to allow the retail to office space so for the Rehabilitation Plan be development to assure the longtime preservation of the building the Commission Voted amazing in support of Rehabilitation Plan and gives a positive recommendations to this commission to grant the change of use when this item is before you in a future hearing the commission reviewed and gave a positive recommendation for the 3 mile contracts theyre for 722 signer street to the square and the post street to the National Register knob hill apartment hills and 807 morgan the Interest Rate to the jackson squad car all 3 get a substantial tax savings for their commitment to a rehabilitation and Maintenance Plan to preserve those building and finally, the commission gave a final and positive recommendation to the board of supervisors at the lookeron san marcus after the cal house was designed by the husband and wife team that designed the Golden Gate Bridge and the building is considered one of the most more than struts structures in San Francisco they amended the resolution and want to extend the period and how the mother of the com portion is a as a significant person because of her association with the will often guard and the commission and the chief of the department of International Relations of San Francisco State University it information will be included in the recommendation to the board of supervisors that concludes my remarks unless you have questions. No commissions well move on to general Public Comment this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. I do have one speaker card. Okay georgia. Yeah. That was i who appealed that last night and the jurisdiction i want to say again looking forward i hope here it is i dont know what you guys tendency look at the hearing you talked about very, very small one of you talked about a glass structure minimal not visual from the street it is visible from the street looking forward i want to say that hope in the residential guidelines come up before you that perhaps something in there more detail of the penthouse stair penthouses on roof maybe a larger area and maybe not on singlefamily units like this is so thats all i really came to talk about today again is another building that had a demo that well, i lost my paper oh, here it is this is the house on chaerls and here open google architecture a 19 hundred square feet how is it is actually, the size of my house i bet the size of most peoples houses it is gone and that is the permit said horizon radiation on all floors roof deck and a excavation at the rear yard application for the planning approval im sorry building inspection submittal shall be direct evidence and addition to add the becomes and kitchens and surprisingly under additional permit the price was 4. And 80,000 i mean, i felt last week those are demolitions theyre saying cooperate it is really a demolition a whole new building the permit fee should be higher if this is a demolition section 317 i think has problems but i also think that is there to be used and a matter of cooperating somehow with the Planning Department and Planning Commission maybe the issue is scrutiny maybe someone about change the facade it is a totally different building those two, that to me is animosity an additional totally new building so i dont know oh, the other thing i thought about what commissioner richards just said the 3d reddish is a good idea has a dr that will be helpful thank you very much and have a great day. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello commissioners tony proud barrierer wearer from 35 years ago and thank you about the Building Design commissioners there were many loss ends and Planning Department staff preservation was confusing i want to clear up a couple of issues the first on the date of the baseline the hearing last week staff was moving from completion in 2013 for a plan approved in 2008, you need to have a earlier baseline the plan took 10 years and ceqa is clear about this we didnt have it last week section of the sucking says the baseline is normally you need a big reason not to use the baseline the date of the preparation of the think eir i have here a copy of the preparation and the date is march 9, 2005 a full 8 years and many hundreds of units built before the count that Planning Department staff was trying to show you last week so i dont know why they ignored that they know there is the babies in the walk youll have to ask them why the Different Numbers and the challenge the page from the study that was in the nexus for impact fees in the eastern neighborhoods plan and than in 2007 the right hand column has a need for the impact for the needs based on the future development of the are eastern neighborhoods plan you know of the future recipe residents and it is 4 acres instead of one acre for parks and middle school we have nun a whole love childcare spaces we know the New Brunswick were underserved in the transit in the eastern neighborhoods we need more transit lines to this day commissioners eight years later no effort from the city no effort to add funding for the 4 acres of parks and stalled on this ever since the eastern neighborhoods without to chart question had this speckle how it got reduced in the funding find eastern neighborhoods going and again 7 different times i know we have a saying this much infrastructure and this Much Development it is without this information you have to ask the Department Staff why it was left out in this presentation thank you. Is th

© 2025 Vimarsana