Sunset area so this money will be used to bring our positions up again to Fulltime Position and adding an additional ftes shared amongst the 3 sites a floater within the two sites. Okay any questions . Maybe a summary statement how much fulltime staff and how many are increased. So each sites as had a points 8 ftes so were increasing two a one full fte and alexander an additional one were addressing adding one. 6 across the two sites. Okay. Any other questions. The math probably works it seems like a significantly large budget item than similar appropriations for other agencies is there any difference in compensation model or overhead or something that contributes to a bigger cost per increase. Im not an expert i think there increased Fringe Benefits bringing people up to fulltime fte and agency and sites by agency ill not be able to answer an analysis that is more for budget to answer im sorry, i do know there is more indirect cost because what agency. Depends upon the agency. My question is this. I wont be able to answer that. The total cost. A significant bigger bump for other agencies that seems like a lot of money trying to understand the justification for is it. It is more do i believe and youre adding less than two additional people in other cases youre bringing people up to one it looks like a lot of money for one agency. I know ill not be able to offhand with selfhelp ill not be able to answer that question than with some the contracts theyre adding indirect costs with the initial budget with last year that maybe the reason but id have to get back with you. Someone here from budget that can perhaps answer the question. We have two sites just with this. Ohio commissioners and director were adding a one like because in the beginning they have a larger amount thats why were adding the one fulltime employee and then the two yes i dont have full answer of that maybe i can collect the information from the contractor but theyre adding the fulltime employee and commissioners. Theyre going from 2. 4 to 4 across the 3 locates so and the question from commissioner sims it that that increase which is about more than doubled even though youre not doubling the number of staff perhaps once you get fulltime employees benefits go up and other costs for them this is the understanding the question that is being asked if you dont have it thats okay. Also look at it there is an increase of supervisor costs were adding another fte florida there is costs it is a combination this is it is probably all legitimate im uncomfortable with the explanation a. Please. Thank you. Good morning. Im Martha Petersen in looking at how thirty this model has been budgeted it look like roughly with you increase 4. 2 ftes for each agency that comes out to roughly 31,000 across the board, however, with selfhelp we are doing that 2 it is 31,000 for each position getting increased but for selfhelp were spreading it across 8 positions the grand total is one point of people total ti thousand dollars if you look at thats how much selfhelp is charging when you it is actually coming out less than how we been compensating other agencies so for the amount of people that are increasing the amount of staff it is less than what we are giving me to other agencies so so if i understood it is normally 31 thousand thorough a. 2 ftes your you increasing if you multiply by that it is much more. Across the entire model it looks like it is more but there is more staff increased so it looks like in the scale is larger it is actually no does that help. Yes. Question talked about funder go sites at this time with the selfhelp. There are 3 sites. 3 oh. Yes. Any other questions is that clear. Yes. Thank you. Public comment at this time . Okay im looking at the budget and from last year to this year i see where the increase is going with the Catholic Charities ive increased their staff if you look at the line item theyve added a new person from a 17,000 person to a 36,000 person and 33 salary to 36 and thirty thoughts to 36 so my calculations im not sure what they were talking about is more than one. 6 increase in ftes the way the salaries with written on the budget page and then ramp went up to. Im sorry what. Rent by 21 thousand thats a different figure if year to year. Any are we waiting for the Budget Committee any comments from the Budget Committee at this time . Oh. Commissioner sims has a question also so. She mentioned the rental property from 7 thousand to 11 thousand plus it is a 4,000 difference. Commissioners and she mentioned the rental property theres by angle average of 4,000 along those lines he was comparing the previous operation items and some of them identify the property rentcontrolled units equipment for this one i was wondering if im missing something in terms of Property Rentals across other agencies. Hi i cant answer that. It is how they budget it those sites have different budget may not charge represent it is the difference across the board in how agencies account for those things. Okay. Is there answer from the Budget Committee on oh, commissioner sims question. I cannot help but feel my understanding was that staff would be pretty well addressed from case report it sounds like as though it there were extended dial around controversy and some level of debate around some of those Budget Allocation i dont feel that staff is as prepared to present some of the things as i thought they might be so im age concerned. I think that the first concern was that everybody that all of the sites go from where we were. 8 to one fulltime person im sorry, im sorry were not more presented from the jason and my conversations about the sheer numbers at selfhelp sites we need to increase it by more so they can address the niece of people waiting in line for the services thats was jasons intent in adding that extra. 3 to each the 3 sites that were looking at today, i have reviewed the numbers with him and feel strongly we need to do that im sorry it is not clear how to looks at in footstep budget why those numbers were not having a bettered understanding im not sure weve been very clear that selfhelp needs the increase in terms of their personnel. Since theres a discrepancy here this is why we have a Budget Committee i know the meeting you dont need but those kinds of things can be accounted at that time, im thinking of like im sending Something Else to the Budget Committee many say the kind of thing that needs to be worked out with the Budget Committee and go back to the Budget Committee to really look at it and clarify so when we get to the Commission Meeting you know those doubts had a third accounting in terms of what needs to be done so im looking at my budget and wondering is this something that i would hate to table at this time but im want to worry about the pleasure to send it back to the Budget Committee for a review pending which pleasure how strong we feel about this at this time id like to hear from you commissioners. To begin with can we weve approved the other parts of overall im not sure we can table one part. Each item you can vote on each item i dont know but we vote on each item to either table or action or approve that so you can table things and send it by a, to the Budget Committee we dont want to interrupt their operations it might be necessary if youre not thoroughly satisfied with the answers were getting today and the skrerpz we have before us from the budget so im new to this but that question came up when we reviewed the packet so i know there was the addition to make hold the. 8 pegs or positions to one my understanding why two 0 agencies got one fte more than others my understanding was that there was more traffic through the sites and more of a program need thats why it was handles definitely than good evening from point a to point ftes we added one whole fte so selfhelp and the half to the other agencies thats i mean it is more than an explanation of needs in terms of Services Required at the sites thats the justification. I also wanted to point out with a lot of the sites they were not operating on july 1st some of the operating experience we look at the 36 thousand theyre paying for Fulltime Positions last year we were not paying able to hire at sunset not hiring someone on july 1st there is a looks like a large increase in what theyre being paying each position but now their fellowship staffed from july to june in 2016 were paying an actual Fulltime Position a lot of the sites were not up and running in july. Commissioner sims. Well, my comment would be that in large part were asked to trust the analysis and Due Diligence and work that is done by the department in preparation of those proposals that sounds significant conversation from riders in the community and the staff around this package i wouldnt want to embarrass anyone but far more prepared with granule discussion so were not left with a trust me vote rather than a vote with full confidence all the information is fully evaluated and appropriate. Any others comments from commissions on this tell me any further unreadiness okay did you have a comment . Public comment at this time . Yeah. Good morning. Im nick with the Senior Services and looking over i dont want to barbara program your instructions were to this money would be used to bring staff from point a up to fulltime this is how the money would be used i look at the operating expense detail of the program youre talking about now theyve using the this increase for increase in rent and we were not told to use the money for operating expense increases so im just wondering how they were able to do that and we were not . Anybody want to staff . Can you explain that . So id like to refer to eileen. Elaine i dont have the prior years budgeted to see the years rent thats not my contract maybe they had an increase this year they submitted to us last year those contracts go on for 3 years so i really cant verify if this is an increase the ad r. C. Funding sfoordz only increased the staff from 8 to one thats it not other areas what was the fringe benefit and the indirect youre going to bring a person with fulltime benefits so far as i am concerned, there were on increases for staff. Okay. That increase in rent was authorized prior to this ad back fund has nothing to do with with the ad back funding the staff 36,000 a term of the remainder of the contract youre looking at 70 thousand. Huge increase if other programs so they have 70 thousand increase with the fringe and indirect that is why the money is Municipal Court higher than you see in the other contracts one thing to point out this question why this one is so much more than the others. Thank you. Uhhuh. Any other comments from the commissioners . Are you ready to vote Public Comment we heard from the public on this yes okay. Ill call the question are you ready . All in favor, say i. I. Of approving that budget and presented say i and. I. Opposed . The is have it so that motion carries the last item requesting an authorization to modify the Grant Agreement with two works under the provision of asian and disabled Research Center for the period of july one 2015 through june 30th, 2017, an additional amount of 20 thousand plus plus a 10 percent contingency hold on a revised total not to exceed amount of one hundred and 54,000 a motion to discuss. So moved. Second. Okay. Your on. Great so our last item this is for two works to bring over or their position to a fulltime positi position. Okay too works is on the last year so any comments from the commissioners . Any comments . Okay Public Comment on this one . Public comment hearing none ill call for the vote. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . Is have it so that motion carries we have announcements any announcements . Thank you. It is actually a question i thought maybe the contract staff might know on the other add back weve been waiting to hear is the Community Services they also received an ad back we were wondering can we have any information about timing on this one . This is Public Comment not eelena im working on the ad back funding planning to present to commission no november were accounting all the fuentes 22 agencies involved and 1. 5 million plus in add back fund amongst the 22 agencies for 5 hundred thoughts and one Million Dollars so going to finalize the budget tomorrow and meeting and presented in november. Okay. Thank you. Uhhuh. Any others announcements announcements Public Comment . Any Public Comment hearing none can i have a motion to adjourn. So moved and second. Thank you it is approved were adjourned to address these concerns, i have made a series of amendments to the resolution that capture the spirit of the policy but would allow continued conversation with the task force and other stakeholders about how we do metering. I believe strongly that the city needs to start developing toes to help create Affordable Housing. In our Housing Element alone, we talk about building a 60 affordable, but we are currently not doing that. It is important to start the discussion about creating tools of measuring our Affordable Housing and creating tools to enforce that. I grew up in new york city, one to my parents who had immigrated here to the u. S. Actually, i started really becoming active in working with the community when i was in high school. Came out to california for college, went to stanford. I was always politically involved. When i was a college student, i worked on the initiative to get rid of affirmative action in our public government system. Currently, we have 3 legislative items that are pending. The first is going to be coming to a final vote on tuesday, our midmarket uptown Tenderloin Task exemption legislation. It is basically an incentive to encourage businesses to come to midmarket. In particular, where we have the highest commercial vacancy. And then when i graduated, moved out to San Francisco about 12 years ago. I always loved Sanford Cisco in college, and i just wanted to try it out. I started working in Economic Development policy. I was a Community Organizer for six years. I worked with young people, parents, and families around issues that concern our neighborhoods, whether it was improving muni lines, Affordable Housing, public schools, or just Planning Issues in neighborhoods. We just had a hearing last week, and we are trying to do some work around bedbug enforcement, which is a major issue in the tenderloin and of hill and 63. A hearing will actually be on thursday, april 7, 10 30. Were doing our first hearing on pedestrian safety. I think Public Safety is a huge concern. It ranges from both lowlevel crimes to pedestrian safety, and so that is a really important issue to me. We are probably more than double what every other district has. And that are preventable. And we can do better. District 6 is one home to one of the most diverse constituencies. We have the poorest residents in San Francisco. We have lgbt. We have immigrants, people of color, youth, and a high proportion of seniors in the city as well. We heard that people want to see more jobs, want to see access to more jobs for our residents. We want to see more preventive instead of just reactive. We want to see afterschool programs versus the Police Picking them up because they are out on the street, which i think our chief agrees with. I actually ran for the board of education in San Francisco and got to serve a term on our school board. What really surprised me was how much i enjoyed it. I loved it. I love meeting with families, meeting with youth, meeting with teachers, visiting schools, and getting a deeper understanding of what it means to make our system work better. The one thing i really enjoyed was i got to run within a district instead of citywide, was that i really got to know voters and residents. I actually enjoy campaigning more because i had time to knock on doors and the voters individually. Id love it. I actually really enjoyed being out on the field. So i spent a lot of time doing it because i got to really get a deeper understanding of what people care about and what peoples concerns are and also what people loved about the district and the city. I was talking with the mayor yesterday. He was very interested in seeing how the good work with our office how he could work with our office. I would love to see how we could support Small Businesses because they are the heart at San Francisco. They provide 60 07 of the jobs in Sanford Cisco, and they provide it locally, and they are not going to offshore their jobs any time. I am not an opponent of cleaning up the tenderloin. I love the tenderloin. I love what is right now. I recognize we have a diversity of books that live there and people do not want to see open drug dealing. I do not have a problem with people lit think people out on the street socializing. I think that is good. That to me is more you know, it is part of the character of the neighborhood. I get to represent one of the most exciting and dynamic