>> thank you,. next speaker, please. >> madam president, before the next speaker, i will remind the audience there is no applause in support or if you are not interested in hearing further about an item, you may use your supportive fingers, please? >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, president breed and supervisors. you might get too hungry for easter dinner at 8:00, your anticipating that easter's going to be great. and you'd like that chocolate easter basket, and it's really chocolate cramped -- that is why the easter bunny, that is why easter bun is a champ! here comes city peter cottontail, hopping down the city hall bunny trail, hipitiy hop, easter's on its way. maybe if you are have good, he'll bring lots of easter-eggs your way. well, you know what? for some, affordable housing you found a new place to dwelling in a city hotel. you wish you had affordable housing and you can hardly wait, but if you don't have funding, it's going to be too late. you are like the housing guys -- -- some easter baskets may be larger, and some easter baskets may be small and remember give lots of things in the basket, make it really tall. go ask city alice and she'll know and you'll have lots of easter dinner and it's great, and you are gaining weight -- go ask city alice - [speaker not understood] >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> good evening, supervisors. with easter soon approaching, i am here to deliver a message to you all, in this room and in tvland, from our heavenly father who stated open thy mouth and i will speak for you. i'm appealing to all members of the clergy to do the same this easter sunday while giving your service and please be sure to speak on the rapid and senseless killings taking place in america by citizens and peace officers. you can make an impact. these killedings are desensitive eyesing our society. easter is a golden opportunity to bring the topic to the light of day, as it is a special day, when the entire world shows up to worship. i am asking the san francisco city government, dedicate this easter weekend as a day of remembrance for all of the young teens and peace officers who have lost their lives to violence and handguns. i propose that the government sounds the city alarm and let the bells toll at 10:00 a.m. to mark this event. i am also asking that all caring and concerned citizens send prompts to clergy to speak about gun violence. let's us fall down to our knees and lift our face for the rising sun, oh, lord have mercy on me, let us break break together on our knees. it ain't no harm in getting together. thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good evening. my name is andrew king. i am a native here, san francisco. my reason for being here is unfortunately it's not a good reason -- i work for the city and county of san francisco for 27 years. unfortunately i had to retire, due to a serious health condition. i was very blessed to be able to purchase some properties here in the city. but i have a strong concern of unsolved homicides. i am a firm believer that all lives do matter. i believe we were created all by god. black lives matter also. and something is not right for people -- for the young men to get killed, and unsolved homicides. it's like you can come to the city of san francisco or the city of oakland, and if you want to get away with murder, you can do it. we don't know -- who is killing her children? some say the police, say some seas black-on-black crime, but whoever it is, it has to stop. i know sala, very good friend of hers and have known her for some time and known her son. and i can't believe he is gone. four young men killed in a car and still there is no answer to who killed these men? i don't think no one has the right to take any life, no matter black, white, asian, whatever race you may be. but something is wrong in this community when you have unsolved homicides. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> michael fisher is my name and i want to reiterate what charlie walker was talk baton rouge i talking about and saying that the killing is very bad in san francisco, and it has to stop. along with people shooting each other, we have people putting poison in the ground. we need you to really, really pay attention to what is gone on and now that you are abreast of it, we were told some of you didn't know about it and you know about it now. we would ask that you really pay attention and think about it on your way back home or before you leave here today and walk out the front door to think about it. it was on tv not too long ago and said he was paid to do it. that is bad. killing is bad. so just think about it and kind of work with us. i'm a member of the blue-ribbon coalition, blue -- thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> i agree with what charlie walker was saying about the contamination at bayview-hunters point and also a member of the blue-ribbon coalition. and i want you to know it's not just the contamination that we have to worry about, but we have young black men not getting jobs. i go to the sites and see hundreds of men working there and maybe one, two older black men working on their way to retirement. it's not equaling out a balance. the older ones that are being retired and those replacing them are not black and something needs to be done about that. that is all i have to say about that. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, my name is gary bauers with bauers transportation and to thank the board for the time you have given me. i started as a single limousine 20 years ago and over the years i have built a company with strong support of wonderful employees who i consider my family. i have spent vast majority of time with them in the city of san francisco and i have been a great tenant for san francisco and port of san francisco since 1996 for over 20 years. supervisors, may be aware of the many challenges that face business owners in san francisco, particularly those with employee/s workers that are not high-tech employees. payroll taxes and other costs make it challenging to stay in san francisco. most of my competitors are not in the city of san francisco and not invested in the city in the way i have. and continue to do. in august and september of last year, the teamsters asked us -- we agreed to let the teamsters come in and have them vote or keep it wait we have done for 27 years. after weeks' of meetings with the teamsters and chauffeurs to make the case on their situation, on september 30th, the secret ballot and election with chauffeurs, only 25 of the 79-80 chauffeurs voted to bring in the teamsters as they are very clear and still very clear on the chauffeurs voted and choose not to have the teamsters represent them. it's employees respects and decisions. we have had decisions -- we have had discussion and conversations with the teamsters and will continue have conversations >> madame president, the speaker's time has concluded. >> thank you and feel free to submit your comments to the entire board. thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, bart gleason with the teamster's union and following up on what you just heard. i want to appreciate supervisor peskin coming out today, and putting that resolution, and as well, everybody on the board; who has lent their ear to the situation. they have been engaged in an organizing campaign, the likes of which none of us have seen certainly in decades around here and really something that is reflective of less enlightened parts of the world. it includes termination of drivers for union organizing, which started in october of '14 and continues today. the erection of a company union, that took us months to fight, and indeed, the election that mr. bauers referred to which was held in august to this day, the national labor relations board still refuses to certify because of the egregious conduct that took place all through the that campaign. i would tell you that what we have witnessed is a a business model that says anything goes and the rules don't apply to me. i hate to tell you unfortunately this business model soon enough will spill into the streets of san francisco to the bus stops and other painted passenger zones that these shuttle buss are pulling into. we don't ask anything of this company that the other responsible operators have agreed to. but unfortunately, again, we're confronted with the business model that is toxic and oppressive to the driver and frankly a subsidy for substandard work and we'll continue to report on the progress with this company for the next coming months thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good evening, supervisors. doug block, representing 12,000 teamsters in the city and county of san francisco including those in the audience. i'm so proud of this city today. whether it was honoring donna levitt, whether it was supervisor campos talking about the organizing e campaign of 900 workers at taylor farms or those in front of bauers buses with supervisor peskin or labor harmony by supervisor wiener. this is all about labor justice and i find it ironic of the hundreds of shuttle bus drivers that have organized with the teamsters and joined the middle-class through strong contracts the one fighting the strongest is the home-grown company that we just heard from. if anything, in my opinion, that should be the one outfront, because it has enjoyed work here, that is very san francisco. from sales force to outside lands to bay to brakers, bauers is part of the san francisco institutions and as such we feel they should up hold labor standards as well. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> did you just cut in line, ace? >> [ laughter ]. >> just kidding with you. >> madam clerk, please start his time over. >> i want to give honor to my sisters here. hi jazz. i know she didn't want me to say it. item talking about the feel no more -- yeah. you know i'm talking about the feel no more. yeah. i'm talking about about the feel, feel, feel oh, lord, i can't feel it no more. yeah. i'm talking about the feel no more -- can you hear me queen bee? >> yes. >> i'm talking about the feel no more, yeah. listen, i have got about a minute. i just wanted to say i came last week to let everybody know that i retired from community activist and now i'm an entrepreneur and filmore ambassador and will try to bring stability with the help and endorsement of my queen. because i know it's election-year and she is going to need boots out there and i'm getting ready to put all the problems into a capsule to have a solution to the pollution. we need some legislation to make it happen, queen bee. i'm just tickled black that i'm in the filmore and have opportunity to bring a marvin gay review this year. i need the support of the legislators, oecd, mayor's office of neighborhoods and all of the different agencies over one little property, one little property. and i have been trying my best to find out how do i get in? i want to do a marvin gay review and have my insurance and everything and yours truly -- so y'all just stay tuned. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good evening/good afternoon. my name isloranda smith. my oldest brother, donald smith -- i don't know if can i can put his picture here? sfgovtv, please there is >> so this is my oldest brother. he worked for the san francisco housing authority as an inspector in section 8 housing primarily in the bayview-hunters point area. he died of cancer. his cancer metasized all over his body and i'm asking that the people consider cleaning up the shipyard here in hunters point. shut it down. the people who live there now, let them find another place to live until this is cleaned up. i also had the privilege of having another family here, the family of chris carpenter, who is going to use my venue to have their repath this coming friday. they are coming up behind me. i'm just asking you -- he was one of the whistle-blowers at the shipyard and to have pray for his family, as well as mine. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> first i would like to thank the board of supervisors for adjourning the meeting last week in my husband's christopher carpenter's honor. in 2006, he work as a laborer in the bayview-hunters point shipyard yawn chris would often come home and explain about the unsafe working conditions at shipyard. chris strongly felt they were not putting his safety or any of the other workers' safety as i priority. chris would express to me how he was trained to protection his gear, complete suit and respirator and daily were not given complete protective way. on one occasion we went to hotel and chris bought his own recipiate respirator. chris continues to express his fears about working on the ship yards with hazardous conditions. we just purchased a home and one day chris noticed that duster was blowing and monitor and poles were not sounding. he asked the worker who was using the backhoe to stop digging while he found the foreman to ask him to water the ground as trained to do so before he continued digging. the supervisor was upset that chris, a regular worker was questioning him about his work, digging and asking him to follow protocol. chris stopped working at lenoir, but the itching continued and after silver visits to dermatologiologists and biopsies showed nothing he was diagnosised with t-cell lymphoma at stage iv that started on the outside of his skin and worked in. my husband felt a long hard battle for two years and six months after being diagnosed. sunday march 6th at 2015, at city of hope in los angeles. i watched the family members -- and blood pressure and oxygen-levels come down [ inaudible ] >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> yes, my name is pamela -- national council jewish women, also a friend and family member -- i have been lucky enough to been with chris carpenter and loranda. i live in daly city and we had a fundraiser and members came from bayview who all will different forms of the cancer. i witnessed this as all age groups and i calleds abc news and able to get chris' story on the news, because it didn't seem like anybody was listening. i know some of you supervisors really care about this. you have the political power. there is an environmental committee that meets once a month. cancer doesn't wait once a month. we have loranda smith's aunt and uncle who have cancer and i call on all of you, because supervisor cohen, while she wants to do the right thing, she needs everyone in this room to support her and use legislative power and elected official policy to come forward to the state lovell as i know is monitored by mark leno and others. we have to do something like they are doing in flint,michigan, because it's unacceptable and as a survivor of cancer, it doesn't matter who you are and what your background is, watching this, it could have been avoided. we can avoid more and do the right thing. stop the development and get the systematic part and clean it up and maybe it won't work, but maybe it will. these lives matter, all lives matter and chris carpenter and loranda smith and her family matter, as well as all of these in bay view. join together with the policy power to step up and have the courage. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> yes. my name is james glover. this morning the stuff that happened in brussels is going to happen in san francisco, because people keep overlooking the disenfranchised people. that is where radicals -- that is where you find their people among the disenfranchised. for the last couple of years i have been pushing this business proposition to hire 700 people. but i always get these looks. you know, it's like can he do it? i have got somebody working with me, but the thing is it's a systematic problem in the system. because you constantly overlooking people -- supervisor campos with the navigation center. it's cool to have a navigation center, but while you are navigating that center to get to a room, you still don't have a job. so the navigation, you are just going through the motions i have sent a few of you emails to show that i do -- i could hire 700 people off the streets and nobody said well, i wonder if he can really do that? nobody, not one of you has just came and said, can you really do that? how can you do it? right? you don't ask. because i don't talk the business lecture time; right? i don't have all of the catch words that the little tech words that people use to get people's attention and let them know they have got something. so i'm going to leave my card. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> yesterday's i was on the show on kf ax and my call was deleted from the show and to talk to you about it to some degree. i mentioned a poor woman by the name of cathy o'brien who wrote the book called "transformation of america and access denied for reasons ever national security." there is sex trafficking happening all over. on my tv shirt with alex jones interviewing senate decamp and i know as a christian, god on the day of the judgment, all the secrets are going to be open. really, all of the secrets are going to be opened. i would like to talk today also about luke chapter 13. i was listening on february 12th to rc sprouls on renewing your mind on providence and evil and talked -- let me put it this way and this is not a personal threat, because i asked this to people individually and on the streets. so don't be afraid and hopefully you know me and wouldn't do anything bad. what would you say if i asked you did you thank god that every time a cop drives by that he doesn't turn on the siren, pull you over and shoot you dead than a hammer for your sins? you would say you thanked god for that today and if you asked the question, every time you walk under a bottleding that didn't kill you pore your sins, did you thank god for that? if you read the chapter of luke, these people came to christ and tomb him about the tragedy and jesus responded, do you think they were more evil than anybody else? nay, unless you repent, you will likewise perish. the perspective everybody ought to have, really, because this is what god says, jesus says this -- two minutes. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> tom gilberty. last week our starting point, hand picked mayor and went into my perceptions of the cog in the political machine and power -- -- glorified cheerleader for anything corporate, uber, nfl, corporate buses. and then associated with pay-to-play better than the mafia. and the only contributions i'm aware of is the willie brown article in the chronicle before the election about how a hotel -- he watched the developers go downstairs and supposedly contribute $1.2 million. but that must have been to a super pac fund and not to mayor lee. and the other contribution i'm kind of aware is the fda taping lee's aknowledging taking $20,000 from the fbi. after being professionally laundered. anyway, mayor lee is very presidential. he reminds me of reagan, reagan fired flight controllers, and muni drivers after they got $0.25 had to pay $25 to park in a muni yard for their shift. white house solar panels came down under president reagan and mayor lee didn't sign clear until pg&e and puc bad press. [speaker not understood] trickle down to the poor. we need a new direction. thank you. >> thank you very much. are there any other members of the public that would like to provide public comment at this time? seeing none, public comment is closed. [ gavel ] madam clerk, can we go to the without reference to committee items please. >> items 25-30, are being considered for adoption without committee reference. roll call vote may enact these athletes and in a member objects to have these considered separate life. >> supervisor cohen. >> i would like to sever item 27. >> supervisor tang. >> item 25. >> all right, well, supervisor yee? >> >> supervisor mar? >> sever item 26, please. >> 26 and what else? >> 29. >> i guess we'll go one at time. 25 gleiz. >> 25 is an resolution to urge governor jerry brown to declare a state of emergency on hotel th to help coordinate region and state wd responses to the growing crisis and provide supplemental state assistance to cities and counties to provide needed supportive services. >> supervisor cohen, is this your item? >> supervisor tang. >> supervisor tang. >> i would like to defer to the author first to speak. >> all right. supervisor -- you have all of these names up here. hold on. supervisor kim. >> thank you, president breed. two weeks ago i introduced a resolution calling on our governor to declare a state of meth to help cities and counties throughout california to decrease homelessness. this is a crisis that has been years in the making, a little over 30 years with many contributing factors, including changes to prixs that fund affordable housing, including seeing 50% reduction in funding for hud, in the '90s and '80s, et cetera. today california home to 21% of the entire nation's homeless population, which numbers at 600,000, roughly. and jurisdictions around the states have already mobilized to address this problem, including the city of los angeles. and through supervisor campos, here in san francisco, in requestinganes from the governor, i'm asking the state to recognize that this is not a problem just in area urban cities such as san francisco and l.a., but it is an issue that crosses city and county lines. in san francisco alone, we have -- while the vast majority of individuals become homeless in the city, still close to 30% of our homeless population becomes homeless outside of the city and response can oalleviate suffering -- we know counties in california that do note have a 365-day shelter system and where are these individuals left to go, but in the cities that provide these services and shelters. my resolution calls on the state to work with local governments on a coordinated response to include both short-term and long-term solutions. because we know this is issue is not local and the solution must be regional and statewide. to look at an inventory of surplus public properties. making these available for standing up shelters designed specifically for communities of need, including individuals identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, esbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or questioning and finally in the long-term, investing in solutions that we all know can end homelessness and that is an immediate investment in affordable housing. so that municipalities can put shovels in the ground on affordable housing projects that have been in the pipeline. and, in fact at our association of bay area governments meeting we discussed a regional housing trust fund to help production of affordable housing in the bay area region. part of that is looking at the universe of all affordable housing projects that are in the pipeline, and just need gap funding in order to put shovels in the ground. i have one such project in my district that has been entitled and gone through the community process. and environmental review. and literally is just -- and has gotten some state and federal funding and just waiting for gap funding of $17-18 million to finally build this project. we should be expediting projects to quickly house people and not let my district stand alone in a homeless emergency occuring throughout the state. it's not just rising in san francisco, but rising in city of los angeles and quite frankly throughout the country in austin, new york and hawai'i. we know that housing is the crisis and to recognize my colleagues co-sponsors to the resolution currently supervisors cohen, campos, peskin, mar and los avalos, thank you for your support. supervisor wiener thank you madam president. i think it's important for us to view homelessness and many parts of our housing crisis and mental illness and substance-abuse as a statewide issue and not just limited to one city or one region. so calling on the state to do more is important. there is one whereas clause in this resolution however that i think goes beyond that. it's whereas clause starting page 1 line 22. going to page 2, line 2. which criticizes the city of san francisco or criticizing recent efforts to "remove the homeless through sweeps." and we know that in san francisco we recently had a real challenge along and around division street with ten encampments and the city ultimately address with a strong effort to transition people into shelter, into housing. so i distributed an amendment that removes that whereas clause and replaces with language stating the following "whereas city of san francisco correctly declared the tent encampment on division street a public health hazard and correctly removed the division street encampment, since that encampment was unsafe, unhealthy and unsanitary for the occupants, as well as surrounding neighbors and whereas tents are not a viable housing policy, and it should be the policy of the city and county of san francisco to transition people living in tents from those tents into shelter, and housing." so that is my first amendment. and the second amendment is regarding the resolved clause, first one talking about surplus public property. which we of course unanimously placed surplus property ordinance on the ballot that the voters passed and i supported and included an exemption for parks and neighborhood open space. i would just ask that on page 3, line 3, after "properties statewide." we include "except for parks and neighborhood open space." so those are my two amendments separate amendments that i would like to offer. >> supervisor wiener is that a motion? >> two separate motions. >> two separate motions. >> okay. >> so we have a second on those two motions. second each motion. both motions by supervisor cohen. supervisor tang. >> thank you. i also did want to acknowledge supervisor kim and really trying to bring this attention to the state-level. i think they certainly have not been doing -- at state-level not, as much as what san franciscans have been pushing to in dealing with the homeless issue. the only reason why i'm not supporting this particular resolution and my comments really are also aligned in terms of the local declaration that has been proposed as well; is that i don't feel it's actually changing what we are able to do at a local-level. so again, it does not go to say that i don't think homelessness is not an incredibly important issue that we need to work on and have been working on, but to make a declaration of emergency should be for the natural disaster emergency situations, reserving that right for that. but also, just trying to acknowledge that we have done so much in san francisco. there is more that we can do. so that is really my comments around today's resolution. >> supervisor kim. >> thank you acting chair. i just wanted to express as the author of this resolution that i do not support the first motion to amend. i think there is a disagreement amongst board about city-authorized sweeps and certainly agree that tent encampment is not a viable housing policy, we also need to ensure that we have places to put these residents and frankly families. there are families in those tents under division street. if we don't have shelters for these residents and families to simply sweep them only moves these residents to your doorsteps and that is exactly what happened when the city did the sweep on division street a couple of weeks ago. i got many emails soon after the sweeps because residents had been moved away from underneath division street, straight into the doorsteps of many of our residents. and so moving the "problem" around, does not get rid of homelessness, but merely shifts it to a different corner. while i would like to make sure that no one has to sleep in their tents under division, i don't support declaring that sweeps are appropriate policy. if you cannot support the whereas clause as currently exists in the resolution that you simply vote against the resolution. the ebteding amendment i do believe that open space and parks are not considered "surplus property." but to make it clearer is important, i can accept that motion to amend in the resolution. >> >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. a couple of thoughts. first i want to recognize the work that the san francisco interfaith council has done here in san francisco. they have been on the frontline as service providers, well-before this board stepped into action. the interfaith council was instrumental in helping get the first navigation center up off the ground, and operational. so i just wanted to take a moment to recognize that leadership. the second thing, i want to push back on some of the comment that supervisor tang mentioned, voicing the main reason she would not be supporting this measure because it's not changing anything on the local-level and i want to push-back that sometimes change is not great in sweeping. you may not see the manifest ations of change immediately and certain routes will change a perception and i think when you have a different attude or changing thought or perception, that, in fact, is change and the ind of change in thinking and focus that we need to be seeing in order to see change manifest itself. there needs to be a change in conversation sew that is the reason why i'm supporting this measure. i'm also interested in supporting the amendment that supervisor wiener is proposing, because i do believe that people have a place to go and that we have opened up locations. during the first days of the sweep around division, folks were just -- were dispersed. and there was a misconception there was no place for them to go, but there is certainly pier 80 is opened and not quite at capacity at least not to the best of my knowledge as of right now as i am making these statements. not quite at capacity and therefore, there is room to get people off of the streets so we can triage them and get of connect them to services and figure out a long-term plan. with that i will also say there should also be an effort to move the rvs that are also occupying the streets, and moving several those vehicles to also to pier 80 which also has capacity and i don't know if anyone has taken a moment to visit the site. i would encourage you to take a look at the site, encourage you to also actively engage in the conversations that we're having citywide to create navigation centers in each one of our districts. each one of our districts need to shoulder the responsibility of this housing crisis. thank you. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you. first of all, i want to say that i really appreciate any of any colleagues' efforts to address this issue in one form another and certainly, especially appreciate supervisor kim's efforts for this resolution. however, there is a piece of this where it's a little bit troublesome for myself; that is seems like this resolution, although it's a resolution can translate to the state having too much authority over local jurisdictions, and i really prefer us to make our own decisions locally about what we should be using our land for? so today, i will not be able to support this particular resolution. >> supervisor peskin? >> thank you, mr. chairman. through the chair to supervisor wiener, this is a recital -- and i don't want to try to mediate between you and supervisor kim, but as an individual who has been on division street in the last four days, and been notice surrounding neighborhood in the last four days i believe this recital is an accurate state of events. since the tents have been removed from division street they have been dispersed in the neighborhood and you need only go two blocks in either direction to see tents on sidewalks where they were not previously before. so i think this is just a statement of fact; perhaps the two of you could negotiate this here in public, which wouldn't hurt my feelings. the only thing in the second in your recital is a kind of statement of opinion, which is the word "correctly." but it is a fact that the city of san francisco declared the tent encampment on division street, done by executive branch of government a public health hazard and remove those tents. that is a statement of fact. i think the previous recital is a statement of fact. as to the third one, that is an issue of policy, but i think that supervisor kim's first statement is a fact. >> thank you, supervisor peskin. supervisor campos. >> thank madam president. i simply note on the removal of the language that supervisor kim has in the resolution i think along the lines of what supervisor peskin was saying, i'm not sure what the problem is with the language that is here? if you actually look at -- there is an article that sf weekly did following the sweeps of folks from division street and in that article it's very clear that while indeed housing may have been provided for some of the people removed from division, that a lot of people who were removed from division were not actually given a place to go. and that, in fact, they were simply pushed over to some of the smaller streets. so i just don't think that it is accurate to say what is here. so i will be voting against the first amendment, because of that. >> first amendment to this legislation, not the first amendment itself. >> thank you for that clarity, supervisor campos. [ laughter ] supervisor wiener. >> i just first of all want to reiterate what supervisor -- thank you -- what supervisor cohen said, and actually when i was on a forum speaking with sam dodge and jennifer freeden bach a few weeks ago and supervisor was kind enough to call in and it's not accurate to suggest there was nowhere for people to go. think our office of hope and human services agency have done really not to mention interfaith council and all of the these amazing cbos that we have have done heroic work in trying to transition people off the streets out of tents into shelters. so i appreciate the comments, but i think that the amendment is appropriate. and i think we should vote on them. >> okay. i don't see any other names on the roster. but i'm trying to take a moment to read the amendment. no other comments? okay. just a second. so your motion was to strike this particular line out of supervisor kim's resolution and to secondly add the two whereas clauses? >> correct. the paper is the one motion and the other motion is the one that supervisor kim, i believe accepted. >> okay. i just need to ask supervisor kim a question, because it was my understanding specifically in the resolution that you have whereas recent efforts to remove the homeless through sweeps without providing viable options for both emergency shelter and permanent shelter -- so it was my understanding that an option for an emergency shelter was offered in this particular case. can you clarify with that because i'm really uncertain about that? >> yes. there has been a lot of discussion whether pier 80 was really a viable option for many of the individuals in encampment? i think there were multiple perspectives even from the mayor's office, the mayor's office sam dodge, who is now the interim director of hope himself came and stateded at a hearing at budget committee pier 80 wasn't effective space because they didn't have bathrooms and showers and no good public transit to that location and frankly, just cold and austere and not very welcoming environment and not a place he really wanted to continue to use as a permanent shelter site without some significant, i think, improvements to that site. that is why the mayor's office has been examining other options for navigation center. but it was an option that was out there. i'm not sure if we had enough spot s available at pier 80 for all the tents that we saw on division street. i think everyone in this chamber agrees that we don't want to see any of our residents sleeping in tents under freeways, but also agree sweeping them just moves them to certain of different corners and against the regulations developed by the interagency council on homelessness. as to the amendments that supervisor wiener has put forward, this is my first time seeing them. if i had an opportunity perhaps yesterday or even this morning, perhaps we could have worked out a compromise on this language. i'm seeing it for the first time today after this hour. so i just cannot support this language at this time. and frankly, we veted this resolution with many different stakeholders and i would be afraid to make these changes without going back to the stakeholders again, to talk about tent encampments which is frankly, a very controversial issue, in our homeless advocate community. >> to go back to my concern, the only thing i would say, yes "viable" could be left to interpretation. so "viable options." that is kind of really hard to define specifically without understanding or -- i mean, my understanding the shelter did have rest rooms which were port-a-potties at the location. and i'm not 100% certain about the shower situation, but there were restrooms. and then i think the concern i have about the whereas clause for supervisor wiener's is "whereas tents are not a viable housing policy," and i don't know if i necessarily agree with that and wanted to put that on the table. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to speak to -- from questions that you raised, president breed. at the time of the sweep it was approximately happening about one week after pier 80 opens. and it was also during the same -- just a few days prior to that, i visited the pier 80 site myself and my staff. and they had completed the bathrooms, as well as the showers, president breed. so. >> that was before the sweep? >> yes. >> okay. >> it was before the sweep. i agree with you. i think by definition of what "viable" "viable is a relative term and one thing that i think we're in agreement with is what is "unviable and undesirable," to allow people to languish in the cold on the streets in a tent. that is not a viable option. to get people out of the elements and this is a multi-layered approach and i'm a co-sponsor and i too haven't had an opportunity to fully digest supervisor wiener's amendments up until just now reading them just like supervisor kim. these amendments are actually very simple. there is like, four sentences, two whereas clauses. one is four sentences and the other has three lines and the other is four lines. so it's not that complicated and i feel like it's more a declarative statement about the encampments that were on division that are no longer on division. >> okay. >> thanks. >> thank you. supervisor wiener, no comments? shoot, this is tough. >> not really. not really, supervisor. >> all right. supervisor tang. >> can i just suggest that perhaps for supervisor wiener's first set of amendments he proposed that we remove the word "correctly." and that it is then even more factual, i guess. >> excuse me, one second supervisor wein. wiener, can you please explain, supervisor tang? ? >> the word"correctly" was used twice in there and i'm just proposing that perhaps we strike the word "correctly." okay >> supervisor wiener. >> the wording of this is very intentional and i think it's clear. it's not factual, but actually a criticism of what our city agencies did in terms of the transition from away from the tent encampment on division street. it's very clear. so this is a statement that the city was correct to do that; that allowing tent encampments to proliferate is not okay and not humane and the city was correct to do that. so that was i have intentional and i think appropriate. >> supervisor avalos. >> i kind of see that as not a factual statement, but if we were to say that whereas the city of san francisco may have or may have not correctly declared the tent encampment on division street a public health hazard, and may have or may have not correctly removed division street, then i think it would be kind of factual. >> thank you for making this evening more complicated than it already is, supervisor avalos. supervisor wiener. >> you know, i think -- i think there are people who have different opinions. there are people who have definitely advocated that we should have let the tents just stay, and that the city was wrong to remove the tents. i don't agree with that. i think what the city did was correct. it was the right way to proceed in terms of not allowing what was growing into an unsafe and unhealthy situation both for the tent occupants and for the surrounding neighborhoods by not allowing that to continue and providing notice, declaring it a health hazard and transitioning people, whether it's to pier 80 or elsewhere, that that was the correct thing to do. so that, i think, this is an appropriate whereas clause. and i think we should go on record and say that, because it was the correct thing to do. >> supervisor wiener, is it necessary to have the two -- i know you said it's deliberate. but i find the two "correctlies" unnecessary, because the whereas makes the point clearly. so is it necessary? i'm just asking if it's something that could possibly be removed based on what supervisor tang suggested? >> well, i think people can think whatever they want. i put in this there because i personally and i think a lot of people believe that the city was correct not to allow the tent encampment to continue to be there, and to proliferate and to grow and that the city was correct to take action. i think this board should go on record, agreeing, that the city was correct to take action and to transition people from the tents. >> but the whereas basically make that clear without necessarily adding "correctly" in it, from my perspective, i guess. >> if you remove the word "correctly," then it's not saying that the city was correct to do that. and i understand why people who want to remove this, who may -- some people may disagree with what the city did and if you disagree with what the city did, then i totally understand why you would want to remove those words. in one agrees it was the correct thing to do, to remove the tents from division street, those words should be in there, we should say that the city was correct in doing this. >> madam president? >> call the roll. >> i make a motion to call the roll. we need two seconds for that >> and eight votes >> second. >> two seconds. >> second by supervisor cohen. forget it, call the roll on the amendment to strike the first line which would be the first whereas clause. only the motion to strike that completely, call the roll. >> and motion to replace with -- >> i thought there were two separate amendments. >> the paper is one motion. the separate motion is the surplus property section that supervisor kim, i believe, has agreed to. this is one amendment to strike and replace. >> oh, okay. thank you. all right, call the roll on the first amendment. >> page 1 line 22 striking that paragraph and replaysing with those two paragraphs from the piece of paper submitted by supervisor wein and second by supervisor cohen, supervisor breed? >> >> i'm still thinking about it. i will say that i don't agree with the amendment. so i'm torn right now. i'm just going say no. >> breed no. supervisor campos? >> no. >> campos no. >> supervisor cohen? >> aye. >> >> >> cohen aye. >> thank you. >> supervisor kim? kim no. supervisor mar? >> no. >> mar no. supervisor peskin. >> peskin no. >> supervisor tang? >> aye. >> tang aye. >> supervisor wiener? >> aye. >> wiener aye. >> supervisor yee? >> no. >> yee no. >> supervisor avalos? >> no. >> avalos no >> there are three ayes and seven nos with supervisors breed, campos, kim, mar, peskin, yee and avalos in the dissent. >> okay the amendment fails [ gavel ] . madam clerk, what was the second? >> the second motion made by supervisor wiener, seconded by supervisor cohen on page 3 line 3. i believe supervisor wiener after property statewide -- except for parks and open space. >> except for parks and -- yes. >> okay. >> okay, i'm sorry, i need to pull up the resolution to understand that specifically. >> okay. >> madam president, i think we can take that without objection. >> okay. colleagues can we take that amendment without objection, without objection the amendment passes. [ gavel ] >> and on item 25 as amended, madam clerk, please call the roll. >> madam president. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a question to the city attorney. as i indicated before, i support all of this resolution, except for that one whereas clause that was not amended per my motion. and so to the city attorney, is it possible to divide the question so that we vote separately on that one whereas clause on page -- starting on page 1, line 22? >> deputy city attorney jon givner, you can divide if they stand a[hro-efpblt/] here the whereas clause could not stand on its own, if the rest of the resolution failed, but the whereas clause passed. , it would not be a resolution that could stand on its own. so the question cannot be divided in this case. >> okay. this item needs eight votes in order to pass. >> thank you. so just madam president, as i mentioned, i support this entire resolution extend for that one whereas clause. i cannot support that whereas clause and so as a result i'm going to be votes against the entire resolution and my rationale is different from what supervisor tang articulated, but i will vote-no, because i believe that how the city approached the tent encampment on division street was correct and this is critical of that decision and i can't support a resolution that levels that, what i believe, to be an incorrect criticism. >> okay. 25 neets eight votes madam clerk please crawl kaufeldt the roll on item 25 as amendsed supervisor breed -- i apologize, it was not amended. >> it was amended. >> my apologies mad president. breed aye, supervisor campos? >> aye. >> campos aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor kim? >> aye. >> kim aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> particular aye. >> supervisor peskin peskin aye. >> supervisor tang? >> tang no. >> supervisor wiener. >> no. >> supervisor yee? >> no. >> yee no. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> avalos aye. >> there are seven ayes and three nos with supervisors tang, wiener and yee in the dissent. >> so this item needs eight votes to pass. >> rescind the vote. >> unfortunately it fails. [ gavel ] >> supervisor kim? >> madam clerk, is it possible you said there is an opportunity to rescind the vote and send it to committee? >> >> once the vote is rescinded a number of things can happen to the item. >> i will make a motion to rescind the vote. >> supervisor kim has made what she famously does a motion to rescind the vote and it was seconded by supervisor cohen. colleagues can we take that out objection? without objection the vote has been rescinded >> supervisor kim. >> i am going to make the motion to send this to committee >> it goes to committee, let's move to item 26 madam president at this point we would need a second and majority. >> seconded by supervisor campos. colleagues can we take that out objection? without objection this item will go to committee. item 26, please. >> item 26 is a resolution to urge the california department alcoholic beverage control to deny alcohol license application of non-traditional alcohol retail businesss in the city. >> supervisor mar. >> thanks [-frpbts/], i month continue to april 5th. >> seconded by supervisor avalos, colleagues we take that out objection? without objection this is continued tot meeting of april 5 2016. next item. >> item 27 istrousing support california state senate bill 1286 author by senator mark leno, increasing government transparency by allowing the public to access information on police mic conduct and misuse of force. >> supervisor chomp. >> i would like to continue this item to the april 12th board meeting. >> supervisor cohen has made a motion to continue to april 12, 2016, seconded by supervisor avalos, colleagues can we take this without objection? without objection this item is continued to april 12, 2016 meeting. [ gavel ] did anyone ask for these other items to be taken off? >> which ones? >> 29. >> all right. madam clerk, can you please call item no. 28. >> 28 resolution to declare march 19th, 2016 as arbor day 2016 in the city and county of san francisco. >> roll-call vote. >> on item 28. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> breed aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> campos aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> cohen aye. >> supervisor quim? >> aye. >> kim aye. >> supervisor mar. >> mar aye. >> supervisor peskin. >> peskin sai. >> supervisor tang? >> aye. >> tang aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> wiener aye. >> y [sao*-er/]. >> y aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> ten ayes item is adopted resolution. >> item 29. >> an resolution to urge our children our families council to convene a chronic [a-bts/]eism working group and action develop within six months of their first meeting. >> supervisor yee. >> we just had a hearing on this recently and it's something that has been a problem for the san francisco unified school district for many years now. when i first pointed out this as a problem in 2010, in which we started -- we -- all right, the school board or school district started focusing on this particularly issue. there were some improvements made, but then it has gotten a little flat. during the hearing it was pretty obvious it's still a problem. why is it a problem? i want to make sure that people understand what i am talking about when we talk about chronic absenteeism is which students miss at least 10%, sometimes, as much as 50%, but at least 10% of the school year, whether it's excused or unexcused. some people get it confused with truancy and when we look at the very young, people don't really know this, the very young are having the problems. at the time in 2010 we were focused on kindergarten, because that is the only data that we had. we had schools, and it's pretty obvious, the schools that had the highest percentage of chronic absenteeism were the schools that were failing at the time and still remains the same. the school requests the highest absenteeism today are the schools that score the lowest. it's a direct correlation. it's a problem. we're seeing by the time they reach 3rd-grade, the same kids that are missing school are not reading at grade-level and when they are not reading at grade-level, research shows those are the kids that will be dropping out. we have got do something about it today. what i have asked for is for us to really focus on it, considering that now the school district has developed a very good data system; to collect data, and it's realtime data, that will tell you which students are actually missing school? we need a partnership between the school district, the city and community group to work together. this is an issue -- people always talk about the other end of the spectrum, when people are failing, 24 this is where they start failing. so i just want to make sure that we focus, and i'm asking for a work group. the school district was at the hearing. first five was at the hearing. the department of children, youth and families were there and our staff from family council was there. people were there and they knew, and what i said we're going create this work group and pretty much everybody seems to be in agreement. so i hope you support me, because i really feel if we're going do something about achieving opportunity in the gap, this is where it starts. i'm just asking for a work group to work together to actually figure out a good plan and some strategies that really work and to implement these things. and i'm giving them six months. so colleagues, please, i hope you can support this. >> thank you. supervisor yee, thank you for your leadership on this issue. colleagues, can we take item 29 same house, same call without objection, the resolution adopted unanimously. please read item no. 30. >> item 30 is a motion to approve final map 8326 a six-unit residential condominium project located at 1267 chestnut street. >> same house, same call? without objection, the motion is approved unanimously. [ gavel ] . all right. seeing no imperative items from supervisor mar, madam clerk, please read the inpeople ram. >> today's meet willing adjourned many meming of the follow, beloved individuals at the suggestion of president breed and supervisor cohen and on behalf of the entire board of supervisors, for mr. percy pinkney, and ms. claudette brown a. the at suggestion of supervisor campos on behalf of the entire bird board of supervisors on the victims of terrorist attack in brussels belgium and in memory of mr. welton flynn. >> that concludes our business today >> . thank you, colleagues, we're journeyed [ gavel ]that dr. heffernan from san francisco state university is with us tonight to set the context of the larger look at the issue before we dive deeper into some of the tools that might be one might not be used around this issue. with that, i would love to introduce peter basco. >> testifier: thank you. if we could have the visitation for item number 7? ugly head and adduce myself my name is peter basco biodiversity corridor at the dept. of environment.. i've been there for 2 years and i work under jen jackson the wonderful jen jackson are healthy toxic reduction manager. i'm happy to be here and i also went to actually think the commission for passing resolution back in 2011 specifically analogy and promoting the importance of san francisco's diversity which led to hiring the active involvement of the program. thanks for that. still waiting for the presentation to come up. having technical difficulties. presentation number one for item number 7, 7a.i'm not a good joke teller. i told anthony that before i came here today. i guess were ready to go. so, thanks again for this opportunity it in a nutshell, what i do and what our program does is to foster the conservation frustration stewardship of the cities local nature and biodiversity to my aunt by the same token to connect san francisco to do our best to connect to nature and their neighborhood. these are 2 sides of the same coin. because in today's day and age not only do people need nature and is more and more research coming out on that every day but also nature needs people. to take care of it to heal it heal the damage that humans have done to it for a long time across the globe. so what we are trying to do is evil a healthier culture of what note wake nature stewardship. we do this into spheres. so, the slide on the right illustrates the parks and natural areas open spaces that's twin peaks where kind of a reservoir of our indigenous biodiversity besides and then, also the built environment is an opportune to connect people to nature right in the neighborhood. so, we also have the opportunity to invite people into wild nature, but then as i said, to try to empower them to bring that wild nature into their own neighborhoods. so we have it every sickle day of their 365-24 7. so, really what our program does is hold division for a more bio diverse san francisco. just like one of the other spheres of the department work with play a citywide role in supporting and promoting this work. so supporting many organizations and agencies for collaboration convening in order to think about how to better connect people to nature , was the best way to bring nature into the built environment that i have the privilege as well as representing this incredible movement in international network and conferences for example, and so i could spend all my time promoting all this wonderful work that's going on in san francisco. it would go a long way to achieve the goals of all these organizations. so, despite is one of my favorites because-i'm going to grab some water. i'm sorry. this is my favorite slide because it introduces the richness of a quarter-century of natural resources stewardship and volunteer-based ecological restoration in san francisco. so, this is agencies, many jurisdictions, city state and federal many organizations. probably even missing some. my apologies to anyone who's missing on the slide but the slide should does only include folks doing on the ground habitat restoration and stewardship. this doesn't even include the huge. of people doing education. at the unified school district for example in all their partners and all the other local organizations and community groups connect people to nature in their neighborhood. so, were going to move on to another slide could unfortunately people at slide could from the wonderful image slide to the bullet slide. this is just to give you a sense of slapshot really a long history of policymaking behalf of san francisco's nature and biodiversity. so, from the san francisco barcodes from back in the 70s or 80s. i don't remember when i was from but basically disturbing animals. promoting not disturbing wildlife enterprise. i'm to go over i handful of these just highlight a few. this is really to show the rich history of this city supporting our local nature and biodiversity. the sustainability plan in the late 90s and really a guiding document for sustainability vision as a city as well as guiding the department in its work since the 1990s. bundle production element goes back to the 1980s and is devoted to giving instructions to the city about natural resource conservation at a lot of people don't know we have environmental protection elements but there it is. this is an interesting one which i recently uncovered the urban design element is actually some of the strongest language with respect to natural areas. just reading the 2nd boat natural areas in the city to remain in their original state or your place will and must not be further diminished. so, also we have the recreation open space element or the rows which was recently updated. maybe you're familiar with that. that was in 2014. that has an objective with many policies that are devoted to really strengthening our policy around promoting around local nature and connecting people to it. within the rows, there are references to urban force plan as well as agreeing connections plan, both of which also more specifically promote bringing nature into the built environment. sold green urban force in the vision of 24 green connections were creating walkable likable habitat rich corridor in the city. now they became a cool tool we would work with the planning to barman in collaboration with other agencies and that's called the san francisco plant finder and with that we encourage and try to empower folks select appropriate plans to plant in their community and back yard and front yard local project to really create resilience and tolerance in san francisco. one of the green connections, one of the 24 decisive agreeing harris street corridor and that is a great illustration on the potential for the intersection the relationship between the parks and natural areas and the built environment. this butterfly that only is not corridor in the presidio is only building in the hills above the sunset but in these little street parks are wrong along the avenue. so is one of my favorite examples of nature in the city. this is a one of the sites. you can see san francisco state who signed up to monitor the butterfly over, and see how the restoration of these little urban sites are progressing. than him to show you a few slides illustrating the worker on the city on the part of other entities, agencies and organizations in a turnover to dr. after that. this is grandview park. this is also the northern end of the green street corridor. this is better than the city working with a much page department. then twin peaks this is recreation plan society which has been having workdays and natural areas on wednesdays since 1990 or 1991. in 1994 this is part of san francisco property audubon as a turkic school education program out at pier 94 and of course national park service working with volunteers and interns managing the plant on the 17 coastal bluff. then, out of the presidio they have a triumphant national park service conservancy and so his presidio trust work with student volunteers at mountain like they recently have been weeding the lake and restoring native fauna which is amazing and finally when of our newest local storage of programs is [inaudible] just to give you a stock shot of what's going on around the city. now, with pleasure introduce dr. john happen at which a professor of biology at san francisco state and former chair of the leave for 15 years and all jump into the next presentation. i'm hill available for questions. >> testifier: thank you, peter thank you to the question for this opportunity to speak to you tonight about something near and dear to my heart. the sustaining and enhancing biodiversity in this wonderful city i live in good i moved to san francisco in 1977 and i got a job at san francisco state like many people sort of fixing our mind reference point when we first visit a place or see something good since that's the way it is a mess away should be forever. if you're one of the native americans that first moved >> we have asked them to put it up. 7b. there it is. >> testifier: if you are one of the first native americans to make it into san francisco 10,000, 12,000 years ago thursday will be a quite a different place. you could walk out to the islands the short of san francisco. this would've been no san francisco day or river. the sacramento river with an antidote over next to the-get quite a different spot and if you walk out onto those planes you have seen things like this. large animals, mastodons chine sloths creatures that are now extinct. actually when they went extinct within a few hundred years after this artist rendition came into being. so san francisco has been a place of change. it's been a place that has seen a lot happening over the last 10-15,000 years which is an instant in geological time. where did those animals go? there went extinct all over the north america. it's called the pleistocene deck station. when not exactly sure. it could've been the arrival of the humans overhunting which is still a problem in some areas where diseases we might've brought in that we now see affecting our own species as easy diseases around orchid and climate change of various sorts about them. the glaciers were melting and climate was changing rapidly. so, many scientists believe were at a time now with the even greater risk of extension at the end of the pleistocene than those mammoths and saber toothed tigers when nixon. the time and were called the sixth-grade extension. with great extension to gut the dinosaurs. 65 million years ago. so just to put that in perspective, none of us are safe from events that might affect us. even though willing organisms on the planet are susceptible to extension. severn billion people on this planet doesn't protect us necessarily for being potentially in the same place in front careful about how we steer our planet. now much of the biodiversity planet is grounded in 36 biodiversity hotspots. these are found around the world. these are areas that many unique species and hotspots of that are also greatly threatened in terms of increased extension for the fauna and flora in those etiquette if you look at that blue arrow, that's pointing to northern california and the san francisco bay area. we are part of one of those biodiversity hotspots. a spot where there are many unique organisms but animals found nowhere else in the world. the part of the fabric of life that provide a variety of services and so on. we of course also a major urban area. we earn area that is made up of a highly educated electorate. with many environments all interests and goals. we are place of innovation. a place where solutions come to mind and to fruition. a place where hopefully we can survive and come up with ways attorney around the biodiversity crisis is imminent that were in with at this point. what are things to cause things to go extinct breed about 5 major things. these include habitat loss and fragmentation did we see that among things. moving habitat overkill and overfishing. not as big a problem in san francisco today. perhaps earlier introduced species. san francisco and speak san francisco bay have the dubious ascension of the more the places that the largest species in the plan. and this disrupts natural ecosystems in various ways. now were doing with human caused climate change as well on top of all that. this butterfly on the left is the -butterfly once found only in san francisco now extinct but it's given its name as a conservation icon to the society which is an international conservation organization. so, why should we care about this? with the will of nature or are intrigued by biodiversity the services from the biodiversity area. many of these things are important. only highlight a few good pollination of plants. if you like fruits and vegetables and things like that on your table, then thank you abe or a hummingbird for some creature like that. if you like an area mosquito free think of a damsel 5 were some other creature making its life even on those creatures keeping in track and reducing transmission of diseases and also the biodiversity creates genetic resilience another resilience to change climate change and other kinds of events. provides additional resources to my education opportunities, research opportunities, just the opportunity to see amazing things. i guess is a sexual kid back in texas, have things in my backyard ignoring my parents if i had had that opportunity to come close and face-to-face with biodiversity, who knows what i might be. i might be a stockbroker or thank you. most larger animals not only the hundred pound animals in the places seen but many others since then. there are no players left in san francisco except last month are quite a few in the financial district i think as things oneself in the stock market but i think the bulls are back now. there are some survivors. some of you may have some of these in your backyard. i know i do good skunks and possums and creatures of that sort. we have lost were some creatures that just hanging on. the san francisco garden snake was pure. it's in the world, one found in san francisco now has gone only down in the peninsula is hanging on the future sites did the mission blue butterfly again a conservation icon for the bay area is hanging on by a clock, if you will ever top of twin peaks. many people were making efforts to make sure it stays there for years to come. there are also winners. unfortunately many of these winners are invasive species. if you have ants commence your picnic automates your house at night these probably non-native ants were artificially transmitted from argentine. argentine ant was common because policy we made of ants that are not invasive and they get pushed out by these creatures and those native answer actually important things to like for the butterfly because they part of that fabric that is so poured to us. invasive plants. this one of the major issues in of california especially san francisco things like the so-called bermuda buttercup which comes from the keep region of south africa now been passed around the world. if a plant back in the beautiful, but also very invasive. as mobiles that it produces underground so when you pull it up it comes back in 5-tenfold from the bolts are down below and chokes out other vegetation. so much as been lost but the good news is there still time to turn things around. isn't a concerted effort intrinsic action from whole variety of folks. people talked about some groups in san francisco were already involved in making those efforts. the good news is we saw a lot of species surviving in san francisco even in the so-called urban jungle as i sometimes like to call it. by graduate students have documented 128 species of spiders in the presidio. i don't open a viewer spider foes arachnophobia is certainly something that's common in humans with a love-hate relationship of spiders but these are really important features and we have a few in san francisco for helping control other creatures that might otherwise be out of balance and there not been arrested most spiders are not harmful to humans at all. if only one species in this area the black widow spider that's potentially harmful. all the rest of them really our allies and the food chain. san francisco there's many many native bees. 66 species of these in the presidio along. many people think of these only of honeybees. honeybees are european there brought to san francisco and the gold rush days by the early colonists to this area but we have a large number of native bees in fact more efficient than honeybees in pollinating backyard plants and natural plants in various areas around the city and around california. as many you have heard probably lots of pollinators is now a worldwide concern in the recent un report picking out a couple weeks ago. there are even species unique to san francisco that are hiding in plain view. they have a escaped our attention for years. san franciscan was recently rediscovered in the presidio during construction project on doyle drive. it thought to be extinct by now transplanted from the construction site to other areas of the presidio. again, it's going to take all of us working together for nonprofits, to businesses to common citizens to make a difference to things like the green history project pollination corridor and a median strips and so on. habitat restoration can work. this is crissy field. crissy field used to be a vast wasteland. with only a few palm trees and leaves. the stored to a wonderful marshland and wetlands now provides green habitat that is resilient to climate change as ocean levels rise and also habitat for a whole variety of species including 20 species of these. you may figure out him and entomologists will be small creatures. green building wiener about them early. they can be part of the mix as well provide all kinds of services to us. including places like for plants and animals to live in the city that otherwise would not have habitat for them. then our natural areas which are among our crown jewels. in the san francisco and natural pantheon. this is my backyard. i love going to the park. one of my reason my wife and i but a house there in 1977 was was right next to glen park canyon. so we were willing to go well into debt paying $70,000 for that house. one of the better investments actually we've ever made. the great place for my daughter to grow up as well. in fact, it's really a lucky child with hands-on expense with nature. this my daughter. she's lucky she's been taken around the world that we have traveled but in fact, most of our children now in san francisco and around the world grew up in urban environments and expense nature nearby to them and biodiversity nearby. perhaps nearby in a vacant lot in natural area the green rooftop whatever it might be but unfortunately some of them expensive on their cell phones. what we really want to show you all over is to have the opportunity to have hands-on experience with nature to learn with it and bond with and become part of the solution for conserving biodiversity and to celebrate it as they grow and mature through their lies. they can see amazing things right here in san francisco. they don't have to go to the amazon or something like that. they can see a stick insect like this caterpillar doing a remarkable job of looking like a stick, a plane stick not moving until maybe you probe a little bit you find out it's actually an inch worm that can wiggle away and live to queue another leaf maybe tomorrow. or come in contact with something like this. this is a sphinx moth. wonderfully camouflaged on a tree in glen park canyon but if you get close to it at your nose up to it and just touch it, this is what it does. growing up its wings and it's wonderful threat display playing like it's a really tough treacher and hoping that you're a bird that doesn't like big eyes and will fly away be scared by this thing so i can live. ability to compose windows and those with nature's web biodiversity gets to our children and that's the heritage i hope will leave for them. so, several take-home message. biodiversity provides many services for all of us including brazilians of the basic the face of climate change. i believe really sincerely that all children deserve the experience biodiversity in their neighborhoods close by where they can actually learn about these things. perhaps go into education, environmental education or just know about it as they grow up. working together worldwide we can prevent a 6th mass extinction actually believe san francisco can be a leader in finding solutions to this crisis. we are an amazing city. some amazing people. an amazing opportunity. so, thank you i appreciate the opportunity to talk you and thanks again. >>[applause] >> president omotalade thank you so much. thank you so much for that presentation. i'm going to open up to my fellow commissioners for comment. i would like to first just say so much of my childhood was spent outdoors but i truly appreciated a presentation because there were very few childhood memories that i can actually remember where i was and outdoors exploring a plane with nature working at garden with my grandparents just exploring beautiful things that is planet earth. so thank you for that. i think we should, as are responsible to make sure children in the future have those exact same opportunities. so, fellow commissioners, comments? questions? >> commissioner stephenson: i've a huge question. i want to be talked about here before many times and when we look at biodiversity and you give a great perspective on some of the past present and future, how do we assess the importance in how we-what we stress, i guess in terms of helping how things were how things are right now and how things are in the future. the city right now in the middle climate change where plants used to work here may not be able to thrive here. and where plants that we could bring in work that could thrive here might help with carbon mitigation efforts as such. how do we start to prioritize that approach or what approach? what is the best signs out there today with regard to looking toward the future and think about biodiversity? >> testifier: i'll start off in a let dr. time and if he wants to. i went to a really great conference last january in san jose of the california plant society. really one of it they don't do it every year. but incredible breath of talks about science and climate science. one of the big take-home things i took home from that is that yes, the climate is changing it yes it's getting hotter. though the jury is out how that could affect the fog city talk what the coast here in san francisco the jury is out in terms of effort up more fog or less fog. last summer was up crazy less fog summer. who knows. also the heterogeneity of the bay area in general is incredible. so, how we go about doing the logical restoration is really case-by-case just continue what were doing and i think there are some folks who are promoting maybe in the case of altitude, more straightforward case where this plant uplands that are this also did in this plant them at this all today because the creatures are going up so that's a little bit more straightforward but here withers amount of engineering and uncertainty about the fog it just continue to do what we are doing just another reason to do to increase our ecological restoration efforts because the healthier ecosystem is more resilient the face of climate change and that uncertainty. i think that's the best i can do with that. perhaps profess. perhaps the doctor something to add >> testifier: let me see what i connected having one amazing things about san francisco are microclimates we have. the fact that we have a variety of organisms. some thinkers that maybe the same be she's adapted to slightly different climates in different parts of the city. these are potentially the lottery tickets we have out there. some of those may be winners. some of them may be losers as the climate changes. at this point we don't know exactly what that change is going to be. we know with pretty good certainty the temperature is going to be hotter on average and the weather is going to be more variable. but that leaves us a lot of latitude in terms of what that might mean on any particular day. so, i think in terms of design one of the important things we need to think about is the opportunity for organisms to move, which cities make difficult so think about corridor. certainly think about that in planning the city. and those kinds of things i think can help. we are also lucky that if you look to the south we actually have a fairly large arena open space to the south of san francisco. back in the reservoir of plants and organisms that might move northward up the peninsula but did not completely isolated from the ability for some natural movements to take place. it's a difficult job description being odd. knowing how to manipulate what creature is going to be in the right place at the right time is still something were trying to figure out as going to take a lot of research and trial and error in some cases for that to work through as well. >> president omotalade commissioner wald >> commissioner wald thank you. in addition to thanking the doctor for introducing us to biodiversity indisputable slides and as reminders of my childhood which was also spent largely outdoors, i want to thank peter, really for documenting the rich political history of this city when it comes to biodiversity. in some of the policies you showed on your slide were brand-new to me , but taken together they reminded me again-i'm not to ask a question-they reminded me again how many people really in san francisco care so much about local nature and biodiversity and over what extended period of time they have been concerned and to bring us back to what prof.-nick said, it seems to me well, to me it is very important for us to protect and preserve the legacy, the biodiversity legacy that we have now. the native plants and the remnants indigenous populations of both flora and fauna. that we have here in the city and the opportunities that we have 2 approve that just because you're a city doesn't mean that we can't have nature and indeed to be defined in a way what it means to be a city and a city that cares as much about preserving ecological communities as we do about preserving cultural communities, and that when we see that housing crisis that faces so many people in san francisco that in nature there is an equivalent crisis. that has been brought about by human action, but also by things that are beyond our control. i think you both, really for making me at least feel worse obstacle that i did before i came here to do what i can to protect and preserve what is left in san francisco. >> president omotalade: i like to have a few more comments. as i look at this nature and biodiversity and the city i also have to look at it through an equity lines. i see that just nature and biodiversity in the green on this map is fairly well represented on the west side of the neighborhoods on you side i think we still challenges of their those communities are just as deserving biodiversity in their densely probably edited areas is the less populated website is what guy would challenge us to consider before thinking not about just the preservation and also the creation of more green and open spaces. >> commissioner wald laceration side of the discussion. >> president omotalade absolute. anything else commissioners before open up to public comment hearing none, open up to public comment and so first name i have here [calling names] >> testifier: before i begin may i make a request? for making this request of a grandmother. as a lady here with young children could just about to go to the playground. abducting to do with her but i told her that i would text her when she put in a request for public comment and i think she's going under number 8. she is very young children with her. is it possible for me to text her and ask her to come to make whatever, that she wants to make? >> president omotalade i don't know is that for agenda item 7 >> testifier: that's i don't know she's for 7 or 8. >> president omotalade were happy to have her for 7 or 8. >> testifier: i will texture them. thank you limits. this is concerning item 7. i asked if there's a reasonable argument that the environment department in this commission as to allow the use of 2 or one herbicides based on policy 4.2 of the roads recreational space him and for the city's charter or for the natural areas mission which is protected remnants of native plants. i will say briefly, no the answer is no. neither the general plan for the rose nor the natural area program assumes spring. in fact, in the natural areas program mission statement talks about volunteer stewardship, not herbicides as part of their original mission. despite the biodiversity program to the contrary there is in fact no scientific evidence that biodiversity be enhanced by eliminating so-called invasive plant species. in fact, the chief scientist of the nature conservancy, peter-has gone on record that california has 21% more species due to our non-native naturalized so-called aliens being added. i have reference for that specific reference and his source, which came out of the just and manual have actual numbers if you're interested. there is also considerable scientific evidence that there are similar amounts of biodiversity, in the canopy of such an non-native trees such as eucalyptus is need other native trees. the sources for this are many studies that i can quote but briefly, one by dr. joe mcbride he talks about at the commonwealth club in 2014, and one by dov sax. a massive study by robert stebbins in the 80s. one by--and are written for a street counsel with dr. mcbride. san francisco actually retains 97% of its native plants since 1850. there's only 19 of 6 under 95 plants existing in san francisco in 1850 that have gone extinct. the source for that is a journal of the global ecology and biogeography in 2011 that is actually the extinction. i can provide the sources if you wish. thank you >> president omotalade thank you. next next speaker, please. san francisco forest alliance. >> testifier: i would like to thank you today for taking this subject up. i would like to also say that in terms of time spent in backyards i believe the natural areas program uses a lot of pesticides and so we do want our children to enjoy i know this is getting into item made by the terms of the biodiversity, i want to piggyback what she said and say we are not god. the climate change, the climate change issue is stronger today than ever. today's front-page headline i like to enter this into the record from james hansen, questions about how soon we will pass the point of no return in which we look and consequences that cannot be reversed on any timescale that people care about. consequences include sea level rises of several meters which we estimate could incur this century. or latest next century it possible fuel omissions continue at a high level. that would mean lots of coastal cities most of the world's large cities in all their history. this is today. this is breaking news today. i've got 3 articles from 3 different sources regarding this study. these reports by one of the world's top climate scientists was referencing this. so, here's another one. this is the actual report itself. i spelled the super storms evidence from paleoclimatic data, climate modeling modern observation that 2°c will global warming could be dangerous. so, when we have in the terms of and the purposes of biodiversity, trying to manage in a godlike way our natural parks and putting our children in danger because of the pesticides that are there, then i'm questioning the role biodiversity. i'm questioning, as your question or not she's not here right now-how this all plays into a new playground where new frontier in terms of, change. i believe san francisco should lead-it's a city that leads in every other way and we should lead-ugly speaking again on item 8, we should lead in terms of allowing the green mass in our parks to be given a value not to be felling them and not to be managing them as god. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. ron parker from the san francisco forest alliance. >> testifier: good evening commissioners. thank this time i'm a resident of district 735 years and i use the city parks quite frequently. this inquiry might. as canyon park lake merced and mclaren park. several videos were sent you recently. i can assume you looked at them but anthony was good enough to send this to you. one of which included a san francisco dot worker in natural areas program speaking on the video. when he spoke about was specifically encoding and my observing him bring herbicides about davidson he said he's enhancing the biodiversity by spraying the weed patches to protect the plants that involve here. i selectively applying herbicides. that's a quote directly from this worker. what is interesting about this statement is he is trying to protect the plants that involve here. that implies to me, there is no certainty it's going to work. is going to have to reapply the herbicide again and again in the fax hold this to be true. he also spoke about the plants they've all fear which implies the non-natives evolved over time. will be more of a pertinent statement that expect him to say he's trying to protect the plants are native here. my point is about the workers use of the word diversity. we just heard a great presentation mr.-and the professor from san francisco stated my point is much more understanding of the word biodiversity should be brought forth. i've not heard a definition of that tonight. i had some slides. i saw some people sponsor that what does this mean? is it specifically meaning invasive plants are evil? and must be destroyed with chemicals. is that what biodiversity means. what the public would say myself or someone from the fan alliance means biodiversity means not using the herbicides in trying something other than a chemical to go after something that is viewed undesirable in the native areas of our city parks. so biodiversity from genes, from species to ecosystems that was on the side. many services working together with biodiversity? i would welcome your definition of that. or put it in writing. began omotalade thank you. next speaker, dr. jennifer-california inst. for biodiversity. >> testifier: my name is jennifer erskine. i am a plant ecologist. i focus on weeds and natural areas and very narrow fax on diversity both the effects of the species and the effects of removal i did my doctoral work and now the currently executive director of the nonprofit that looks, teaches using rigorous science and the outdoors to teach children science. so, i want to start and say that most scientists define nonnative species as those which have arrived here before-not before on-site. with or after european explorers arrived. so that is what the scientific researchers consider as an nonnative species. so just so that is defined for the group. i want to thank peterand dr. have to not for the presentation. my focus is not on the herbicide aspectinvasive species could affect the versed. specifically such species though the greens invading those issues related to pieces such as acacia, and those 2 in particular. leguminous species are nitrogen pictures but they increase nitrogen in the soil and make more nitrogen available in the soil. which changes the whole soil dynamics. the species native to many of our coastal environments have not evolved to have this increase nitrogen availability, yet the non-native species that are invading have the ability to take advantage of this increase nitrogen availability in the soil. so, we are finding that many of these varmints and dated by nitrogen fixers are becoming more invasive non-native species. so, even when restoration occurs if the spaces are not treated and removed its difficult to get native species to come in. it's really important for luminous species to be controlled. i also wanted to mention that in the first presentation it was discussed and 2 of you commissioners discussed the recreational use of native areas. of these areas. the desire to- >> president omotalade thank you. >> testifier:. i worked for several years was deeply involved in forest watershed restoration. i know a lot about restoration and biodiversity. i grew up in the sierra mountains. truly natural areas. the presentations we saw looked great. what they didn't show you was the incredible dark side that the biodiversity movement has become since its beginnings which were just about to making sure we stop using endangered species. they've turned into a frankenstein monster that is about wiping out massive tracts of 150-year-old trees in san francisco and east bay pacifica to try to get old habitats to come back to hope that we can replace biodiversity that way. these are 150-year-old forests that are biodiversity in their own right. they are standing the test against human destruction and we have dr. situation people think there's biodiversity to destroy 150-year-old forest. i sent you an e-mail around 1 pm. hopefully it got you. it has some good links in it. the key problem i want to deal with is to removal of trees. there's other problems with the natural areas program and bio efforts towards biodiversity but the removal of trees is the big one that you can see from what i e-mailed you that it causes massive increases in greenhouse gases going into the atmosphere pacifica, alone, getting rid of those trees will increase greenhouse gases to the chain of adding 555 cars to the road. the east bay hills if we accomplished getting rid of those trees the biodiversity folks want would increase-it be the equivalent of adding 15,000 cars to our california highways. so, the number one threat to biodiversity on this planet, the one we need to be most worried about, is the global climate crisis and global warming that's been induced which has the potential to be like another extension extension which could wipe out 90% of life is spent that the biodiversity threat. trying to cut down trees to restore of diversity is absolutely extinct insane way to try to solve a problem and it's incredibly counterproductive. we need to stop cutting down trees as part of this program. >> president omotalade: next speaker, please. >> testifier: thank you so much for allowing us to go early. we appreciate get my name is jesse rapier on the mom that i run a preschool in the dooley valley and him the according urban out the cultural lines. as a mom preschool teacher am very concerned about any use of pesticides on speaking on item number 8. very concerned about any pesticides or herbicides in san francisco parks. also as a preschool teacher i would say that what most parents that come to my business are looking for for the kids for their city kids is a nature experience. time outside time playing in the dirt could weave all these wonderful parks natural areas all over san francisco and it's terrible that i think mike is there and i don't worry about putting him on the ground to run around in such things. so, specifically, [inaudible] in san francisco for number of reasons but specifically we love to ask not to target edible plants get all the kids i know, every 3 old i note knows this plans. this is a what you call it-they'll love it the sour flavor is very appealing to them. by understanding it's a plan targeted with herbicides >> i like the sour grass. >> you want them despite? no because they run over to it and eat it. specifically asked not target any notes edible nut target especially the sour grass and i'll say it addition to being a mom and a preschool teacher, i am a native plant enthusiasts and i am up wildlife enthusiast because about wildlife enthusiasts mineta plant enthusiasts. spain pesticides and herbicides in order to achieve a perfect state of native plants is totally misses the point to my mind. that's not the way to add biodiversity. it's not the way to increase flora and fauna in the city. as we were the organizers does other things you can do besides using chemical sprays. that's what we're asking for. because we give out the bugs that we care but the birds that i still run a native plant garden. i live right next to that lot for 5 years and so only 4 species of birds ever there. we have tons of plans that were not native. while it was a farm we saw 40 species of birds. so thanks very much for your time. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. >> testifier: we need to pick our battles. the the spencer plans for spivak are unsustainable. the flora and fauna that arrived here since 1769 are here to stay. they can be removed from that small natural area, but there'll always come back and we really shouldn't keep on polluting our parks with toxic chemicals and try to bring that back. my key point here is you see all the people in the room that all here for one thing in particular jersey the importance of its and with the-about to be approved and the plan greatly expanded was the use of these negative methods. older to point out some testimony and jake-from prozac confirm when asked the question whether any non-native plants properly removed and they never come back, and there are none. let's give up on that. have a natural areas program and take care of our natural heritage but using some of these methods is just not the way to go. it's not working. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. item 7. >> testifier: so the biodiversity in san francisco is amazing. we all know it and we all love it. one of the reasons i love being here is the redwoods about the coastal scrubs. the chaparral. it's amazing. there's a lot of rare and endangered species there makes san francisco unique. these are the species we only find here in this area. theirs are also our responsibility. i think people who didn't know about the species realize that what do we do about biodiversity loss be. there's very little i can do about the elephant but i can do a lot about the species in my backyard. so, i started to volunteer and i really love with the open spaces doing. i love that they're bringing people out. the connecting them with the plants and animals and people are becoming connected to the cities and some 8 amazing ways. i really love what you said about creating more open spaces and creating parks for kids to play in the mets break up summit concrete and that create pores green spaces. also, i would say let's not also forget the animals that were here good let's not forget those that are been trying to survive. let's include that into creating these more parklands. when you mentioned climate change and what to do about that, it makes me nervous when i start thinking about creating anything is going to bind the hands of our land manager. because i don't think it's going to be one solution. i think it's going to be a whole lot of many different solutions . with our biodiversity, with all of these unique ecosystems we are going to have to find many unique solutions and i really just encourage more staff, more funding like all that stuff and also let's not find the hands of our land management. they're very educated and am really impressed with them. they're very knowledgeable that things are moving in the right direction. we need to support them >> president omotalade thank you. him and to call up the next 3 speakers. caen >> testifier: on a san francisco resident of 15 years i started out as a dog walker in the city using all these parks and open spaces as my place of business and also my recreational habitat. i want to thank the commission for inviting these presentations from peter pascoe dr. hafford. the city has a long history of protecting its biodiversity in leading the way it's the appeal we need to continue and expand our efforts in that direction. the organization that peter mentioned that were on the slide are very familiar to me. i began engaging in stewardship in san francisco my early 20s and i was really mesmerized by the vision within the city to preserve these areas. appreciate peter reminding us that rich history of leadership by san francisco and conserving biodiversity allergy to continue that tradition. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. not here? we will move on to- public comment is closed. [calling names]. public c batch22:16:55 [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. [calling names]. >> testifier: good evening my personal expense i was up presidio park spent i have to tell you, was it a real life change that i have retired from the business career by that time. but what we learned about the environment and how it is so integrated was really one of the best educations i could've had free of charge. just saturday mornings 9-12 pm in the rain. but we were able to see firsthand and be a part of transformation of a landscape that wasn't broken down park parking lot full of trash and broken rails at the edge of san francisco bay into this beautiful place that attracted species that have not been there in many many years. when i think audubon also recorded the fact that the western blue board erred returned on the habitat of data plans in part of the presidio after 100 years that would not have happened if we hadn't returned the native habitat to that particular area. soak i support the indigenous plant species for what they represent because they are indigenous to the area. i believe that we should also trust the intellectual and scientific capability of the people that we have put in charge of a biodiversity program to use signs carefully and best management practices using the best tools that they can as safely as they can to control invasive species that prevents our native species from growing. >> president omotalade thank you. [calling names]. >> testifier: my name is jonathan winter. i'm sure as the ipm coordinator for the open space. which is a collection of preserved 23 preserves just south of here taken about 16,000 acres. what i want to speak to you today about is not only am i core data am also a citizen of the san francisco 2 young children and san francisco public schools. i got my masters degree at usf my masters degree bogus on biodiversity and i want to point out there is -we've been talking about diversity and what exactly that is. but i think most people understand biodiversity as a species number of species we have but also ask population of those species. so it's an interaction with the population and also number of species. the study that was done in the presidio shows creek percent of the population, which is don native invasive were taken of approximate 66% cover the native area. so, i think we need to make sure we are very clear about our wording here. what is non-native and what is invasive? nonnative means they were brought here originally from europeans and invasive is a subset of those nonnative. that something that we have to keep in mind. that we are targeting those 3% that are doing the most damage and not going after every single species we see. traditional use of herbicide is one of many tools using a program. when the other tools that are used, but it's a necessary tool. to make sure we do not lose what we consider temporary loss of these areas. the loss of habitat over time great a fax on the rest of the biodiversity from our flora and fauna. most concerns i've heard from citizens is the fact that pesticides of being dangerous in the thing to keep in mind that is typically due to broadcast spray. this is not something natural lands we do spot spring. it's minimal amount of pesticide used in these areas to get his job done we want to get done. the last thing i just want to say is spirit discount scientific evidence focused on a narrow focus of a few studies and not too tight hands of the land managers that have done so much studying and working the land for so long. >> president omotalade bt [calling names].thank you. [calling names] >> testifier:good evening commissioners. my name is sorry. as a resident volunteer with various stewardship or limbs and the city i want to share with you my 2 excitement about our cities embracing the importance of biodiversity. san francisco has joined many other cities he's in the world to help embrace biodiversity is an important issue for our survival. biodiversity mean you see it everywhere in san francisco in open spaces and parks as was discussed earlier. biodiversity addresses the issues concerning our natural heritage. we will have a much more resilience and healthier environment in the city to live if we can sport a beautiful maine in the ecosystem and the native plants and the native birds is what will survive here because they belong to this area. i have a great opportunity to give school children educational walks in nature and natural habitats and help them connect to urban ecology. i get to witness firsthand the light in the eyes and enjoyment of our youth by connecting them to nature telling about the existing biodiversity. many my hope is a mother and as an educator is the program of biodiversity gets fully supported by our city and by this commission. so we can have a real effective management of all our land, not just our parks and open spaces but beyond that across the different departments. i also want to say, i don't believe supporting biodiversity is playing god. i've heard that a few times tonight. i personally believe it's addressing equities for nature. our local nature and equity for ourselves. if we cannot allow major to have a space how can we allow equity among ourselves speak. i find our natural heritage terry telling about who we are and if our next generation will not have access to that they'll be incredibly sad. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. here? >> testifier: i'm jill fehrenbacher. the local mom. activist and journalist. i want to speak to biodiversity and say i appreciated presentation we saw earlier. i think that every sickle person in this room supports biodiversity. they've mostly people care deeply about the environment. where all environmentalists. that's why were at this meeting. i think where there is disagreement is over what biodiversity means.. the definition of its and basically what that means. to me, biodiversity means having as many species as much like in an area as possible. herbicides are the very definition of them . herbicides bean plant killer. when you kill species you lose biodiversity. something i think is important to point out and if you talk to the scientists, they'll agree with you, the herbicides that are being used do not selectively only target non-native species. they are broad herbicides. they kill everything they come in contact with. they kill not only plans but they have toxic affect on animals as well. mammals,, insects and each herbicide is different and you can read all the details on each one and understand how they affect different flora and fauna but they affect pollinators. they affect if you spake garland on native california poppy or-it will kill those plans as well. so, herbicides do not relate to advocate for the fact that herbicides do not support biodiversity. they distort biodiversity. that's the main thing i want to say. i also like our speaker earlier, i also moved to glen canyon area for the candidate i love that. i love bringing my children into the canyon and i think that we are doing a real disservice if in the name of biodiversity we are intending to kill any different species that live in that area. so thank you. >> president omotalade bt thank you. [calling names] >> testifier: the natural areas program >> president >> omotalade is your microphone on? >> testifier: sorry. the natural areas program targets of 40 different species for herbicide use. first i want to focus on as many of the speakers before me have done is-. this is the only species now that requires the use of-, which is an herbicide probably even worse than-. as long as been following this issue, the hapless and capitals to was by a high priority of alternative. but that same it's [inaudible] that abuse has been substantially reduced. right now in the last 2 years except for one mistake at glen eagle the main use of this has been on the natural areas. i like to suggest this is a bad idea for several reasons. first, it's a plant that will live long as we just saw. i'm sorry all these pictures are so small. i don't exactly why that was a series of 4 pictures showing children and of course you saw the real ring only minutes ago. spring this exposing them to the pesticide which is not approved for crop use. it also provides nectar for wildlife. that's a butterfly the bugs provide food for gophers which are an animal at the bottom of the food bed good everything from coyotes to fox is due out. that's a honeybee. that's a picture i took today and need to be on it. secondly, there's no reason to believe the herbicide is useful. it seems to dominate the landscape when simpler but it dies down in summer. other plans become quite evident. in fact, some studies suggest the [inaudible] which benefits grass. quite frequently other plans do intermingle with it. many of these species are-but different species of plants with differently. so let me show you this is california poppy going with it. this is lupine growing with it. these are both as it happens species that like [inaudible]. normal plans like lupine or copy our body are >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. [calling names]. >> testifier: hello. denise willie member of california plan society speaking as an individual type. i want to first address the definition of biodiversity because it was gone by scientists we'll will submit he was referring to indigenous species. that is, species that evolved in a particular place. natural biodiversity. what is managed by biodiversity hotspot? as you are from the dr. california is one of 35 internationally recognized biodiversity hotspots and that refers to native were digitally species in california. so, when you hear the word biodiversity, keep in mind that it's the indigenous species that are most at risk whether a person is referring to native and non-native species were strictly native and indigenous species. were not at risk of the world losing catalase were sour grass we are at risk of losing many species that live in california and only in california. the california society catalog maybe 63-over 6200 species of plants native to california for approximately 1/3 were over 2100 species of those native plants are at risk and threaten by human activities. where to start? plants are primary producers. all they need is some light and air and lands a little bit of water. then you have editors predators and people we do plants. as a food web, food chain whatever that starts with plants. that's where we start because this area of san francisco is very hot very much part of that biodiversity hotspot. we need to protect the plant. we need to protect the plants that are indigenous to san francisco. now the city has already identified 32 significant natural resource areas. those are open spaces. those are the areas that are being managed by the natural resource division of spivak parks and recreation these the places we need to start. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. [calling names] >> testifier: good evening. i want to thank peter and prof. for their presentation this evening. i've been a resident of san francisco for about 25 years and 20 of those years i've been involved in doing part of maintenance and 15 of those resource management and working with a number of different volunteer groups. school groups, adults, children. all pull back some of the information that prof. talked about but the wonderful biodiversity we haven't san francisco. going from the western regions we have absolutely beautiful doing communities. we have old woodlands remaining in san francisco, lovely grasslands throughout central san francisco and then in the eastern regions of san francisco as well as traits are lovely but merced and rock outcrops. to speak in part to your point about not having green spaces on the eastern regions of san francisco i think that's reflective of the development that occurred here. we are fortunate enough that the central eastern or central western and southeastern areas were developed later and higher peak that remain as lovely diverse biologically rich communities that support a diversity of both resident and migratory animals species. some of them rare and endangered as prof. mentioned the mission new butterfly. not only are these areas important for wildlife but also important for our enjoyment. the native plants we have we also have in space of plants and the invasive plants that have the tendency to outcompete our native plants requires responsible land management that responsible land management includes mostly doing mechanical removal of invasive species. earlier, there was discussion about removal of plants in the key family. this number of other plans very easily removed by hand. mustard added shannon some we also addressed with herbicides are easily addressed initially by removing part of the vegetation and following up later with an herbicide application. i want to finish off just saying i support promoting and protecting our biodiversity for the future and by decreasing habitat loss by managing invasive cc and preserving our existing open spaces. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. [calling names] >> testifier: thank you very much. i'm chris joyner am so excited to see so many people here actually addressing this extraordinarily important issue for 21st century which is biodiversity that to manage it properly. break complex issue. i would like to thank john heffernan for introducing that to me complex at sf state where i was a master students and following that up with nature conservancy group and the people here in san francisco. now i run an organization that does the children outside and educate staff at sf unified and many other districts about the importance of science, good science, nature, natural history of biodiversity. it comes from a passion as many rest of spoken about going up in the wilderness to open the wilderness in san francisco the spring of 1967-present some lucky to been here through the changes but as dr. haffner said the land has to go back further to understand the system going on. i want to say this issue about pesticides, herbicides and 11 address it again it's very complex one that would be good to those that have knowledge of the abilities to restore what came before through mechanical works as christopher said, and through continual stewardship as many others will say here that jake-over 80 years ozone committed work and i would say is a time and a place for all factors to get into play because we are a green city. their strength biodiversity is beauty and biodiversity. positive future lies in maintaining biodiversity at the issue at hand is habitat loss and invasive and the distraction of biodiversity of course the actual elephant in the corner is global warming. their strength and preserving the diversity for addressing the challenges of global warming and why bother has presented many times that i want talk about it is simplistic term legacy to her students, we have a refuge it's our sponsor blue jacket that refuge open to use-it's a place for outdoor recreation are an inspiration to the natural laboratory food water and shelter for ourselves and technological downtime as we look down so much major member to look up in a bird chirping will help that. and great opportunities for creative thought and restoring our cognitive memory has been described in the literature that we are freiwald services with water carbon nitrogen so i like to close by saying that expose you to unlock your wii because you were that she give you know some to empower not only ourselves but our youth to maintain our home as stewards and no biodiversity is not one that is all that together we must work together to doubt and that dirty. >> president omotalade tan thank you. next speaker, please. [calling names] >> testifier: my name is greg spark. i looked into them. when i was a kiddies to play over diamond heights which is now developed. we see water snakes amoxil is but i feel like i'm really from an ancient time i'm only 67. so it's been very painful to watch so much of the open space where i used to play as a kid and for all of us wherever we used to play as a kid return to those sites and you see that much of the open space is now gone. it's a worldwide problem. i volunteer at the natural areas program and the national park service and it's very rewording to see how to manage these remnant habitats. so learned a lot from these when managers and i would recommend that if you're not aware of how to do habitat restoration, just go out and volunteer and you learn so much and you become very connected to the natural world of san francisco. if you do it enough it becomes very spiritually rewarding because you can watch how we have repaired the damage that was done in the past and restored habitat allowing nature to come back and become part of the habitat. also a small native plant nursery in golden gate park where i propagate san francisco native plants that i give those plans out to the public for free because i know the importance of native plants. it implants are the foundation of all the ecosystems. without the nato plans you lose all the native species. so we need to propagate native plants, trust the land managers who work on this on a daily basis so questions were asked earlier, what should we do? to save biodiversity in san francisco? on this planet? number one, deal with the burning of fossil fuels. this commission should do whatever it can to reduce dependence on automobiles and once we reduce their people out of their cars and get amount mutiny or bicycles, walking can be a joy. then we can move the asphalt and concrete and create wildlife ordinance community gardens could san francisco could be a paradise. we should as the environmental commissioners that you are you should strive for sustainable san francisco where we don't have to burn fossil fuels, where we can restore habitat for wildlife and weekends with and enjoy a sustainable world. we have the ability. >> president omotalade thank you. next speaker, please. [calling names] >> testifier: my name is william murphy. i am a member of the san francisco hatch house harry's. we are a running club. the last 4 years we have been that one workers. we don't know any science that we don't know any of that stuff it we've been doing things like eradicating himalayan blackberries from you 70 marsh and mclaren park. this last saturday 6 of us spent 2 hours pulling radishes off of bernal hill. so, not talking about big picture and those kinds of things. the small pictures, there are a few people in this city who run the natural areas program who are working with the only a few people like us to do things like maintaining bernal hill as a grassland. 2 main town you so may marsh as a marsh. none of those things will be that way if the radish grows like it can. radishes probably it is not non-native. i believe it's actually the same powerplant we would find anywhere in san francisco, but bernal hill is now a native area as a grassland. so, you need tools besides just us fleeing them to make it stay grassland. we've taken an entire area of you 70 marsh and pulled blackberry which is what looked like they were talking about blood and sweat to get those things out of there. there are now wholesale firms in that area. so, i hear i'm here to support those managers of the natural areas program and whatever tools they need and if that means a tiny bit of pesticides and herbicides, let them have it. >> president omotalade thank you. rascal. any further public comment? >> testifier: i did put in a card for the next item but i want to throw in a quick comment on this item to address a question that commissioner stephenson wrote earlier. with climate change how do we undertake conservation. it is a new and developing science .johnson director of california invasive plant counsel. the national fish and wildlife service led a collaborative effort between the federal government and stakeholders to develop a national framework for climate adaptation for fish and wildlife plants. one of the upper level recommendations is to address existing ecological stressors mainly invasive species. that's one of the recommendations for allowing data biodiversity to adapt but the state wildlife action plan that was just recently revised to engage invasive species as the top threat to native wildlife in california. >> president omotalade thank you. one other hand please come forward. >> testifier: jackson. you had me before i spoke to the policy committee meeting recently that written a lot. i don't the commissioners must be weary soul out of consideration i might get really reassure. this item and the next item all i want to say is don't restrict the program from using tools that are essential to it. herbicides are essential to. that's all. thank you. >> president omotalade thank you. please come up. >> testifier: my name is victoria hammond did i have to point out to everybody who is saying the tiny tiny bit of roundup and garlic that we use in the parts the last time their records available was 2014 and p parks and recreation alone explained sprayed roundup 174 times in city parks and 79 times in the natural areas. so just to put that into perspective, where all for biodiversity. were all environmentalists in europe but we've got to find another way to do it without these toxic chemicals that are killing people. >> president omotalade thank you. yes? >> testifier: i have a question for the drug. i understand this presentation was scheduled and supported by you because on march 8 international women's day about the biodiversity it i think the biggest concern was about health impact of herbicides. so, i do hope that you would invite-the doctor began to speak those limited to 3 min. each to speak about dangers of herbicides. that's one ticket i hope it will happen before this is approved. now, there was a given the definition of native as something which was here before arrival of europeans. just kind of selective random point in time and saying whatever was there before the europeans arrived was good and after europeans arrived is bad. you can select different times. if this wonderful presentation which was showing mastodons and camels here and why native is something which started at the time europeans arrived, why not go back in time ends restore whatever was there? as you probably heard many times, crisis right now is trying to restore the-which is on this earth in 7th century. so this which is going on is kind of a string of things. you're inserting something which probably was there and nobody knows exactly what was there but it's okay to use. toxic. also the commission that you are talking about being [inaudible] don't be so much because [inaudible] i can tell you, since the 90s i haven't seen a single ladybug in my neighborhood. the number of butterflies is going down. i don't remember when i saw the last dragonflight and there's much less these bees on the plants in the front yard than it used to be. of course there are [inaudible] i don't have time but i'm saying that all this biodiversity it's very good things for chemical companies. san francisco should be opposing it is not supporting [inaudible]. >> president omotalade thank you. i think the gentleman behind you is first. >> testifier: my name is richard dotzler. listening to comments i really hope that the panel the city does come up with a really operational definition of biodiversity. i think the it's incorrect to assume that introduced plants are invasive plants. that native plants are not invasive to the circumstances. you can look very quickly and san francisco you look at meta-lake and northlake in marin county you look at [inaudible] these are all places that are overridden by beta plants as well. i think that san francisco is a city of on native plants. for years many animals, many birds over 162 species of regular recurring birds in san francisco the overlying majority use them to nest in cavities of the streams the higher limbs of trees. to season these trees. out of all the species of animals, the berkeley birds are gone as well. so, i hope we include non-native plants as part of biodiversity. or change the word biodiversity because that's not what biodiversity means. if there are subspecies that are runaways of particular [inaudible] under, change or we should take care of them. we are creating a culture here where people first asked is that a plant native or non-native pivots native and they write off as being invasive and let's kill it. let's poison it. that's not the right thing to do. i think it's important again we come up with the definitions we follow the policies to keep san francisco a bio diverse environments. >> president omotalade thank you. yes? >> testifier: nancy smith. the longtime resident of san francisco could all be very brief. i think part of this discussion suggests we can make a distinction between diversity and natural biodiversity. we wonderful parks like the civic center rate outside. like large areas of golden gate park will begin of concerts and we also have very few natural areas we want to protect natural biodiversity. there, i think we should rely on intelligence and expertise for land managers to do the best job they can and with various techniques they need to maintain those areas. >> president omotalade thank you. i'm going to do one last call for public comment before i close public comment. public comment on this matter is closed. >>[gavel] >> president omotalade there is no action item on this. so we can now move to the next item on the agenda. >> clerk: next item is approval of resolution file 2016 03 adopting the 2016 reduced risk pesticide list per city properties. under the environment though the department maintains a reduced this pesticide list identifying those pesticides may be used on city properties subject to restrictions they spent 3 documents are draft resolution file 2016 003 restrictions on most hazardous herbicides modified postings signed for pesticide treatment 2016 reduced risk pesticide list. the sponsors debra rafael director. the speakers dr. chris geiger. integrated pest management program manager. by mental specialist with the san francisco international airport tim ramirez land and resource management manager san francisco public utilities commission, lisa wayne open-space manager san francisco rep parks and recreation department to show you mix an integrated pest management specials with her, do public works. this item is discussion and action. >> president omotalade director would you like to introduce this one as well >> testifier: yes. tonight you have an action item before you is coming back to you after 2 months of extensive work. in light of the new designation regarding the harm of one of the products on our list, you asked us to revisit the protections put in place to protect the health of workers in the health of the public. we have done that. so, what you will hear tonight is a summary of the extensive amount of time that our staff and our staff and our department from across the city has spent with a truly good and safe efforts to ask the question what else can be done. you challenged us to find additional restrictions to put additional protections in place and to ask the question, is it necessary? what you will hear is our recommendations to you about how we move forward. i would like to before i asked chris to start, how they to remind you and everyone that this is not a fixed moment that is the end of a discussion. it's a point in time. that the law the ordinance says on an annual basis this commission must ask the same set of questions. that we will continue to come before you as new information becomes available, as new opportunities for removal of items from the list come new additions we might want to put on the list. this is very much a living document and i'm interested to hear what not only this geiger has to say but also what all the other permits. i asked him, we hasn't specifically to come tonight because there were a lot of questions last commission meeting about what is it really look like and so we want to answer that question for you, not from our perspective but from the perspective of the professionals what hast with taking your guidance and making it real in the field. with that, chris you may start. >> testifier: good evening. back again and i want to thank the commissioners for a lot of great conversation and question and thank the members of the community also. it has been a very long but i think ultimately a productive conversation but these restrictions.

Related Keywords

New York , United States , Glen Park , Kwazulu Natal , South Africa , Oakland , California , Argentina , Texas , Brazil , Bayview , Bay View , Michigan , Brussels , Bruxelles Capitale , Belgium , Sacramento River , San Francisco , Grandview Park , Berkeley , Daly City , Presidio Park , Marin County , Maine , Lake Merced , Glen Canyon , Pacifica , San Francisco State University , San Francisco Bay , Spain , Jersey , Hawaii , Bermuda , Northlake , Brazilians , Americans , America , Argentine , William Murphy , Los Avalos , Bart Gleason , Chris Joyner , Jen Jackson , Joe Mcbride , Claudette Brown , Los Angeles , Welton Flynn , Donna Levitt , Peter Basco , Ron Parker , Jerry Brown , Andrew King , Charlie Walker , Michael Fisher , Denise Willie , Nancy Smith , James Glover , Elisa Wayne , Willie Brown , James Hansen , Jennifer Erskine , John Heffernan , Alex Jones , Debra Rafael , Chris Geiger , Robert Stebbins , Donald Smith , Percy Pinkney ,