Yes. And commissioner pearlman. Yes. So moved commissioners. That motion moves unanimously. Commissioners that places us on general Public Comment. At this time members of the public may address the commission on the items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction Commission Exceptions and with respect to agenda items your opportunity so address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. Okay. Seeing no one from the public to speak on items not on the agenda we will close Public Comment. Commissioners that places Us Department matters. Number one rec reak report. Good afternoon tim frye, Department Staff. The report is in your packets as you have seen. There is a short matter about our attendance about the preervation awards in anaheim last month and i am happy to answer questions if you have them. Item 2 review of the past event at hat Planning Commission staff report and announcements. Commissioners tim frye again, staff, just a few things to share with you. There is no formal report order raing the Planning Commission however i wanted to make you aware at the board of supervisors the lgbtq cultural strategy resolution passed narm nam and the Planning Department has been directed to work with the Mayors Office for a working group to outline a cultural strategy citywide for the Lgbtq Community which you will see after we have actually prepared something but that should be the deadline of having a Progress Report or Implementation Plan is six months from yesterday so you will be seeing that shortly. I also wanted to make you aware that the lgbtq Historic Context statement is the civic center of a governors preservation award and that will occur next month so congratulations to the consultants and the Department Staff that worked on that effort. Also 140 lane and the gift shop and the proas Presbyterian Church pending this was scheduled at the Land Use Committee on monday. There was hold up in the language of the ordinance and sponsorship and theyre ironed out so staff is representing you monday at Land Use Committee. We dont anticipate there to be any changes to the designations as they move forward and finally as i mentioned before 4411 minet street, the historic our significant building under article 11 of the planning code that is part of the 5m project has some fire damage that is currently being evaluated and repaired primarily by Architectural Resources group. There was an email out lining some of the intermediate scopes of work that are going to occur just to make you aware in case members of the public or yourself have questions. Were also doing a site visit in the next weeks and there a second phase of report and we will give you an update on that and that concludes my comments unless you have any questions. Thank you. Seeing no questions we will move on. Commission matters, item 3 president s report and announcements. No report. Item 4 commission comments and questions. Commissioner pearlman. So i have a couple of things. I had a conversation with mr. Andrew june us on the two projects, the 1028 Market Street eir and the valencia property. I had conversations with him. I have questions about the franklin Street Building and just curious as to what the process is to respond to this letter . Commissioners if would like to formally respond to the letter that is you know your prerogative. We have to schedule it at a future hearing. The project is currently under going Environmental Review, so it maybe a bit premature to have discussions about the historic status of the building but we could provide you some material in advance in regards to our evaluation of the property. Yeah, that was really my question what is the process . I read through this and read through the material and you know i might not have been on it but how the staff incorporates Something Like this and how it gets evaluated. Sure. There is an eir associated with the project currently so the hpc would have an opportunity even without this there is an eir required. Well, there is an eir and with the resources under the demolition you would review it under the comment and review period. Thank you. Thats it. Seeing nothing further commissioners we can move on to the regular calendar item. Item 5. 2014. 024env, 1028 Market Street. This is the review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact report. Please note that this public hearing is attended to assist the commission in its preparation of comments on the Draft Environmental Impact report and comments made by members of the public at this hearing will not be considered comments on the Draft Environmental Impact report and may not be responded to in the final eir. The Planning Commission will have a public hearing on october 27 for the eir and written comments for the Draft Environmental Impact report will be accepted until november 7, 2016. Good afternoon commissioners. I am from the Planning Department staff and eir coordinator for the 1028 Market Street project. Also joining me is the senior planner, our Historic Preservation specialists and tina tam senior preservation planners. Members of the project sponsor team are present as well. The review period for this draft eir began on we have not received any comments for the Historic Resources so far want the commissioner members were sent electronic calls of the draft eir and reports for the project and included a Historic Preservation [inaudible] evaluation parts one and two and prepared by gpa consultants in january 2016 and the response by the Planning Department in august 2016. The Commission Secretary just handed out two page handout which i will refer you to later. I wanted to mention copies of the handout are available for members of the public on this table to my left. Today we are here to provide an opportunity for the commission to receive public testimony, to discussis historic issues with the project and formulate any comments you wish to forward to the environmental officer of the eir and i will provide you with findings of the draft eir in regards to Historic Resources. The project at 1028 Market Street includes the demolition of the existing commercial building and construction of 127foot building and residential units and other uses and within the Market Street theater and lost National Register district and the eligible tenderloin lgbt tq Historic District. The existing commercial building was constructed . 1907 and considered to be a contributing structure to both districts noted in the draif draif and eir for the project. And consists of lost and theater buildings and on Market Street forming the corridor and significant with the development of Motion Picture houses in the city. Also its a commercial corridor and because it contains a fine concentration of pre and post fire architecture designed by San Franciscos most prominent architects. The district is geographically small and over a city block and whichs 30 structures and 20 of which are [inaudible]. The eligible tenderloin lgbtq districts have properties with association of the development of San Francisco as the center of lgbtqk activity which was right before the 1906 fire and earthquake and the building was used a Movie Theater from the 20s to the 90s and the building was the site of two popular lgbtq businesses during the 40s and 50s. The draft eir concluded that the proposed project would result in two unavoidable impacts to Historic Resources, both in relation to the Market Street theater and loft district and the first is for the demolition of the building and adverse effect on the market market theater and district. This is due to several facts. One that the Market Street theater and loft district is small in size and the contributors are low. The existing building is prominently located right in the center of the district. It constitutes a large amount of the street frontage on the one city block that comprises the whole district so the demolition of the building would essentially split the district into two. Also the demolition of the building would alter the low high rhythm of buildings in the district. The second impact is related to the new construction which would adverse effect on the district. This is because the replacement building would not be commissioner pating rest compatible with the district. There are two mitigation measures identified for the 1st district excuse me, the first impact the demolition impact the first measure requires the project sponsor to under take the survey of the structure and including measures and photography and a historic report. The subject requires the project sponsor to have a permanent display of materials and architectural features of the originally Market Street building and the relationship between the threarkt and the loft district. While the litigation measures would reduce the impact to the Historic District the impact would be unavoidable. No mitigation has been identified for the second impact and as such the construction impact is significant and unavoidable. No impact was identified to the eligible tenderloin lgbtq district and said findings made that the loss of one contributing structure within the district which is currently defined as the entire tenderloin neighborhood and portions of Market Street would not have adverse effect on this district. The draft eir and excuse me, analyzed four projects alternatives, the no project alternative, full preservation alternative and a partial alternative and Compatible Design alternative. These alternatives were developed in sult consultation with the committee. Staff submitted a member to the arc in advance of a hearing before the arc on april 6, 2016. At the arc Meeting Committee members provided feedback on the alternatives proposed at that time. The feedback was incorporated into a revised set of alternatives were were analyzed and both alternatives would have sig kaptd impacts to the resources. The impact related to new construction would remain significant and unavoidable. However, the impact related to demolition under the under this alternative would be reduced because portions of the existing structure would remain. Under the Compatible Design alternative the impacts from demolition are significant and unavoidable but with construction its reduced compared to the proposed project. Earlier i mentioned the handout before you. This is a summary table included in the deir that provides a summary compare son of the projects with the alternatives so the first page provides comparison of the building envelope, the structure and the characteristics of the building and height and mapping and the Development Program that would be accommodated within each alternative, and the second page compares the impacts of Historic Resources from each alternative so this table actually proved to be useful during the discussion of the arc which why its provided to you again. Before i conclude i would like to remind everyone a public hearing on the deir before the Planning Commission is on the 27th and comments from the draft eir must be submitted earlier at the Planning Commission hearing or the planning review officer by 5 00 p. M. On november 7. After the Planning Commission hearing the Planning Department will publish comments and responses document which will contain the responses to all relevant comments of the draft eir and followed by the certification of the eir. This concludes my presentation. Were available for questions that you have. Otherwise i suggest that the item is open for testimony and comments on the deir. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioners right off the bat any comments . Didnt we see this at arc. Yeah, back in april. Okay. I just wanted to make sure. No commissioner comments at this time. We will take Public Comments. Any members of the public wish to speak on this item . Yes, please come on up. And if you just give us your name and you have three minutes. My name is lisa swronner and i am the executive director for urban solutions so were a Nonprofit Organization that does retail leasing work. We bring new businesses into the neighborhood and we have been working in the Central Market and tenderloin area and the south of market for 24 years. Tim its nice to see you when im not wearing the hat of the [inaudible] Neighborhood Association so hi. So in my other life im also the president of the alamos Neighborhood Association so i am very conscious and aware how important it is that we have our Historic Preservation. Right, thats why we have the districts but i wanted to point out in the area here in the Central Market and tenderloin area that you know were under just incredible, incredible change, right, and during this time that tide water has been a really Great Community member, and has made a huge effort reaching out to folks in the area and things are changing and asking what can we do to engage all the folks that are here . And i think thats important to recognize because you know the outreach from a developer standpoint is kind of unprecedented. Well, we realize were in the new neighborhood and what would make sense . From my understanding that the eir rightly points out there is no sense preserving the existing building as it is and because it doesnt have a lot of historic integrity. Were not talking about the victorian in alamo square that we spent a lot of time on and this is a different sort and its my opinion that there was a previous suggestion that you they build a series of smaller buildings but that doesnt make sense when were in a time of a huge housing crisis, and you know now theres an opportunity to build a bigger building and provide more housing and at the same time you know put some sort of interpretive programs and sort of something in the lobby, in the area of the building that acknowledges and protects and celebrates the history of the neighborhood and the lgbt area that is there and i think that theres a way that we can do both of those things and you know tide water in the past has shown their ability to interact with the neighborhood with the 1 for the arts program where you know they had all these open things in the lobby and people were voting on what art to do there so i think they would be engaged in making this happen as a way of building something and new housing that we need while also preserving and respecting the integrity and the history of the area. Thank you. Thank you. Any other members of the public wish to speak . Seeing none. Public comment is now closed. Bring it back to the commission. Commissioner pearlman. I want to thank the last speaker because thats pretty much where i come down. You know we saw this in front of the Architectural Review Committee and the staff report that i r was put together and the building in of itself doesnt have a lot of integrity relative to its use and it wasnt originally designed or built as a theater. It was built as a commercial building so the association to the Market Street theater and loft district is sort of a weak connection, so i dont think that and we talked through a lot of this in the arc hearing back in april. So when i look at this i think that you know i have been very concerned about the proposed project because i do think its out of scale with the district and theres a lot of Design Elements that are inconsistent as well with the district and Market Street in general, not just this particular bloc