comparemela.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For SFGTV CCII 12115 Commission On Community Inv
Transcripts For SFGTV CCII 12115 Commission On Community Inv
Transcripts For SFGTV CCII 12115 Commission On Community Investment And Infrastructure 20151206
Existing relationship with mohcd in a former mou to formally write down the properties in place so just to give you a summary of scope of services ocii will track and recorded the income in a manner that is acceptable to moh city theyll combine with with their properties and report to hud marry well report to moh within 60 days our use of
Program Income
and obtain announcing prior approval for how well spend the
Program Income
well also not at that particular time
Program Income
restrictions and written by hud both any documents and transfer any sale precedes for the properties to mohcd in return mohcd had report on the income to hud as they now do and review the proposed expenditure
Program Income
and make sure that all of the proposed uses within the hud requirements the length of the contract will be until it is terminated or until the properties are transferred to the city and there are no financial exception e implementations because no funds are transferred merely a practice and the approval well present this to the
Oversight Board
and could go to the difgs thats the summary ill be happy to answer any questions great, thank you. Do we have any comments from the public on this item. We do not. Anyone here wishing to speak on the item hearing none and seeing none, ill turn to my fellow commissioners for any questions or staff on this particular item. I just have a question so like i wanted to clarify so were still monitoring this. Of course well still monitor. Of course this is basically just a rather of responsibility. Actually, these are the existing responsibilities in the current world we live in were responsible for tracking how we spend over income and responsible 40 for making sure our expenditures are within the guidelines set by hud, however, a secondary level of hud mohcd is the one that combines the data with the rest of the city and reports on behavior the two agencies together their sort of a second level of compliance because they have to report to hud and make sure they want a document were doing everything correctly but as ocii wants to make sure we are doing everything correctly internally we track to make sure that all the funds are used correctly. Do we get a regular reporting a regular reporting to the commission . To the commission that im not sure do we had a regular report. Certainly in terms of expenditures and revenues as part of budget process you see that as part of proposed budget the yerba buena revenues and the refers from the marriott that come in and the proposed expenditures but certainly in future budget presentations we can perhaps isolate the program as part of our annual workshops for your consideration. Youll see that expenditure in the rough under y b g in the other category because it is lease revenue expenditure but in terms of a particular isolates report how the income is used youll see a tendency in the budget. We could as part of report for mohcd provide that report encouraging to the commission foyer its information and review any issues that we need to be looking at or monitoring. Well, id like is that the fact that the hud audit came back completely free of no finding an indication ear doing everything right to subsequent the books and the finds is a nice pat on the back. Thats good to know. If have any future audits well make sure to let you know. Thank you. Any other questions. Commissioner singh. Are we making any money out of those four projects. All the revenue must be returned and kriejd into the community theyre not profit making enterprises in the sense the agency diverts the income in yerba buena gardens e garners we projected 8. 5 million in revenue but given the
Capital Expenditures
we spent 11 million we dipped into the capital reserve to fund the
Capital Improvements
. So at this time we dont get any money. We generate 8. 5 million in yerba buena gardens but we spend the expenditure no profit. Whats the reason to cancel the properties why. Because the law requires we transfer all of the our assets as part of winding down process in the
Property Management
plan that is currently reviewed by the department of finance. Governor jerry brown has mandated whether those are parks or housing streets or roads we transfer them to a third party in this case, the properties will be transferred to the city to oversee and enforce the restrictions. How much money are we talking about. You said 8. 5 for yerba buena. For yerba buena. Is that when you say yerba buena is that the marriott. Uhhuh. So all the properties 4 properties. It is you might know them as basically the marriott, moscone north the metron and the east and west cafe the sanity regular immigrants park 8. 8 but it is you know. And why did we go over 11. The
Capital Improvements
but to continue to invest we adopted into the reserves f that is exactly what capital reserve are for you accommodate the
Capital Investments
to that are required. The facilities are almost 20 plus years old and rest on top of moscone and the improvements and the
Public Safety
and the lighting improvements around the children facility and followup with a list of on expenditures were that were part of approved fiscal budget. Eventually this will go off the annual budget is there a projection. We hope to transfer in the spring pending the approval. Soon okay. All pending approval. Thank you. Okay i just want to thank the staff i mean for going through a clean audit. Thank you. Thats a lot of work and dealing with moving parts and making sure that everything is good so it is great governance we commend you. May i have a motion. Moved. Commissioner singh. Great madam secretary call the roll on this item. Commissioners, please respond when your name is called commissioner pen commissioner mondejar commissioner singh commissioner bustos madam chair rosales a absent i have 4 is and one absent. Great. Call the next item. The the next order of business is 5 c workshop regarding a proposed 5 year extension of residential a and certifies as authorized in the
Property Owner
and
Preference Program
certificate of
Preference Program
discussion. Madam director. Thank you, madam secretary. Commissioners you had an update the certificate of
Preference Program
at our june meeting earlier this year now in advance of requesting our consideration of a extension another 5 year extension of the existing cop program we wanted to provide you with an opportunity as well as the members of the public to comment on the status marie the director of the inclusion for the maichls along with other meowed staff to provide an update before you we ucsfs e im going to turn it over to the staff we want to t up the presentation. Good afternoon jeff white
Housing Program
manager like director bohe said this is a workshop on the cop program that youre going to be hearing in two weeks at our meeting 2, 3, 4 two weeks i want to point out that will expire january 31st, 2016, the program as now is approved it has to 5 year extensions well be proposing one in two weeks at your next meeting the
Property Owner
and
Occupant Program
is the certificate of preference or the cop program for short provides preferences for displaced persons in at large and sales of housing within the former redevelopments project areas with the citywide projects consistent with ocii or meowed
Development Finding
the cop program implements the stalling for the redevelopments agencies to give the microfilm housing for the agencies assistants from the households are displaced by redevelopment projects the evidence of a certificate households justifies the certifies that violates under the housing law on june 3rd, 2008, the
Redevelopment Agency
authorized the rules for the cop program that became effective in objectivity of that year the rules expelled the cop program until january 1st, 2016, and provides the agency not approve more than two 5 year extension ocii authority to limited to the enforceable obligations as a wiped down of affairs those enforceable obligations limit the applicable of the cop to displace people only through the memorandum of understanding between ocii and
Mayors Office
of housing and
Community Development
assists in implementing the cop program as director bohe mentioned in june of this year mohcd presented its annual report to the commission the report outlined the continues relevance of the program and the needs to insure the certificate of preference holders have the need to experience their certify ill now im going to turn it over to my colleague to talk about the impact and status and results and if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them and barbara is here with mohcd i said to point out we handed outline an informational memo on the neighborhood preference that the board of supervisors approved at the
First Reading
and back for the final read today and we dont know how that my impact the ocii project as it is still being discussed so im going to turn it over to m mirna. Im
Marie Benjamin
and nice to see you guys and give you the good news of what were doing with the cop program so first ill start with some updates on the program. Lets see if i can there we go so currently there was over 6 thousand people that were displaced and entitled to the certificate we think a moveable number because some people were not on leases but actually lived in the household; right . And so if they can prove they lived in the household well give them a certificate because they were displaced so the current we know of 4 thousand 1 hundred and 38 individuals who are eligible or who were eligible for a certificate of preference and currently, we know that over 16 hundred h have been deceased since in this year we have an additional hundred and 25 certify holder this year from july first 802014 to now over a year about 18 months we have identified one and 25 certify households through the outreach through mohcds outreach so those are the new people that will coming back into the use certifi certificates and there are almost 6 hundred certificates never been used by the holder and like i said thats a moving number because if you can show me from youre
School Records
or from your medical recordings or some other records you lived in the property it is we have a sight record of being displaced we will surely give that person a certificate since mohcd took took over the program in 2012, we have seen a steady increase no folks using the certificates people getting housed with their certificates and were finding it is growing everyday lately there were 73 new certificates issued no 2015 95 cop application for housing applications for housing doors they were housed but people are trying to get housed with the certificate and 23 people actually housed in 2015 we had one person only one this year person that had moved out of city was living if richmond and move forward back this year we always think those are successes people come back to the city. Were really working more and more with our current certificate of preference now we are building relationships with the 5 hundred and 93 we are being able to help them maneuver the
Affordable Housing
in
San Francisco
this is aint an easy thing anyone even if you know all about it, it is not an easy thing were able to provide better resources for certificate of preference holders now we recently worked in collection with
San Francisco
aids foundation in
San Francisco
a foundation and they had a program that they were providing kind of like a section 8 certificate but it is a private housing voucher that allowed the people to spend thirty percent of their income on rent and rather the certificate takes the rest of the rent for them and weve been able to right now up to now able to get 4 people in
Affordable Housing
that they otherwise couldnt afford we say
Affordable Housing
you still have to have a minimum income and many of the cop folks dont make that medium income especially the seniors to be able to hook them up to this certificate theyre able to be housed with now is a big deal two 80 and 1184 projects person able to house certificate of preference holders that otherwise we couldnt have housed at those projects so to be able to provide those resources to people as they need them we have been working with bayview
Hunters Point
with other projects as well and kathy davis and her team have been the ohoh i dont want to say underdog but the bulldog findings and asking about their
Family History
to see if they would be eligible for certificate of preference theyve gotten 200 people to apply for the neighborhood folks to apply for that housing and not all are certificate of preference holders but their identifying neighborhood people that will who and helping assisting them to be able to apply and assisting the certificate of preference holders who are need assistance in assessing their information to qualify for the certificate to say a
Great Partnership
were continuing to work working closely with them and as they identify other neighborhood people that could qualify for this. And jeff mentioned briefly well, ill gone to the next thing so the cop extension this certificate of
Preference Program
as jeff mentioned is you guys are required to review and approve extension every 5 years in the
California Law
requires that required that the cop
Program Sunset
two years after the project area expires so this would have been 2011 so in 2008, the ocii or im sorry the
Redevelopment Agency
Commission Voted
to extend the program for another period of time with 5 year reviews and approval the extensions so the program would expire then in 2026 so review and extend now and looking at that in two weeks and again before you again should you decide to extend it in 20021 we are the
Mayors Office
of housing and
Community Development
are strongly encouraging you to extend the certificate of
Preference Program
in january alone those certificates say expire january 2016 so this has our folks in the hair on the back of their neck they think expires whats happening in january alone 6 lotteries schedule but their certificates say xiegz in 2016 were poised to send out communication to folks letting them know that is extends you might have
Heard Community
people got a letter said it expires we in past years sent out a letter it did expire but it will be up for renewal well make sure that this is explained in in a very clear way that even though the next certificate cest la vie another
Expiration Date
that it will be before you in 20021 we are working with certificate of preference holders once theyre in housing i want to tell you this story recently worked with nonprofit providers who theyre one the certificate of preference holders was being evicted and theyre being evicted because they did not an agreement when they moved in they would have to come up with a i believe like a 2 thousand
Security Deposit
but paid half of it and reached it out to
Catholic Charities
to come up with the catholic which i shouldnt r charities the households was being evicted like notified for eviction because they hadnt paid the other part of their
Security Deposit
so they reached out to brooke on our teem and we made a big commotion and able to stop the eviction and unclear to clear up the mess by whatever miscommunication was caused that kind of thing happens a lot not with justice cop households but folks if they dont have an advocate hair just evicted it is a powerful thing a certificate of preference holder reached out to us were building relationships with those folks and we are letting them know we have an ear we dont want anyone to be displaced or losses the precious housing they gained 0 the last thing i want to say is that this legislation that the board board of supervisors is here area that jeff mentioned the neighborhood preference legislation should it pass what their hearing a 40 percent preference neighborhood preference in all sponsored
Affordable Housing
should that go through this body consider that same following that same legislation it will greatly help a lot of folks that are in the project areas that you guys are continuing this to be able to identify told you the story where kathy is saying sign up sign up sign up loneliness half of the people are certificate of preference holders but those other folks in this neighborhood will greatly benefit from the lottery system by a neighborhood preference id like to this is not before you so im just throwing it in. Questions . Thank you. Public comment first. Are there any
Public Comment
s. On this item. 5 b . Good afternoon, commissioners and communities im oscar a native the bayview
Hunters Point
i served on the joint house in 1968 that came up with the certificate of preference and when we came up with the certificate of preference i im a certificate holder f when we came up with the certificate of preference we tried to get everyone that recent part of
Program Income<\/a> and obtain announcing prior approval for how well spend the
Program Income<\/a> well also not at that particular time
Program Income<\/a> restrictions and written by hud both any documents and transfer any sale precedes for the properties to mohcd in return mohcd had report on the income to hud as they now do and review the proposed expenditure
Program Income<\/a> and make sure that all of the proposed uses within the hud requirements the length of the contract will be until it is terminated or until the properties are transferred to the city and there are no financial exception e implementations because no funds are transferred merely a practice and the approval well present this to the
Oversight Board<\/a> and could go to the difgs thats the summary ill be happy to answer any questions great, thank you. Do we have any comments from the public on this item. We do not. Anyone here wishing to speak on the item hearing none and seeing none, ill turn to my fellow commissioners for any questions or staff on this particular item. I just have a question so like i wanted to clarify so were still monitoring this. Of course well still monitor. Of course this is basically just a rather of responsibility. Actually, these are the existing responsibilities in the current world we live in were responsible for tracking how we spend over income and responsible 40 for making sure our expenditures are within the guidelines set by hud, however, a secondary level of hud mohcd is the one that combines the data with the rest of the city and reports on behavior the two agencies together their sort of a second level of compliance because they have to report to hud and make sure they want a document were doing everything correctly but as ocii wants to make sure we are doing everything correctly internally we track to make sure that all the funds are used correctly. Do we get a regular reporting a regular reporting to the commission . To the commission that im not sure do we had a regular report. Certainly in terms of expenditures and revenues as part of budget process you see that as part of proposed budget the yerba buena revenues and the refers from the marriott that come in and the proposed expenditures but certainly in future budget presentations we can perhaps isolate the program as part of our annual workshops for your consideration. Youll see that expenditure in the rough under y b g in the other category because it is lease revenue expenditure but in terms of a particular isolates report how the income is used youll see a tendency in the budget. We could as part of report for mohcd provide that report encouraging to the commission foyer its information and review any issues that we need to be looking at or monitoring. Well, id like is that the fact that the hud audit came back completely free of no finding an indication ear doing everything right to subsequent the books and the finds is a nice pat on the back. Thats good to know. If have any future audits well make sure to let you know. Thank you. Any other questions. Commissioner singh. Are we making any money out of those four projects. All the revenue must be returned and kriejd into the community theyre not profit making enterprises in the sense the agency diverts the income in yerba buena gardens e garners we projected 8. 5 million in revenue but given the
Capital Expenditures<\/a> we spent 11 million we dipped into the capital reserve to fund the
Capital Improvements<\/a>. So at this time we dont get any money. We generate 8. 5 million in yerba buena gardens but we spend the expenditure no profit. Whats the reason to cancel the properties why. Because the law requires we transfer all of the our assets as part of winding down process in the
Property Management<\/a> plan that is currently reviewed by the department of finance. Governor jerry brown has mandated whether those are parks or housing streets or roads we transfer them to a third party in this case, the properties will be transferred to the city to oversee and enforce the restrictions. How much money are we talking about. You said 8. 5 for yerba buena. For yerba buena. Is that when you say yerba buena is that the marriott. Uhhuh. So all the properties 4 properties. It is you might know them as basically the marriott, moscone north the metron and the east and west cafe the sanity regular immigrants park 8. 8 but it is you know. And why did we go over 11. The
Capital Improvements<\/a> but to continue to invest we adopted into the reserves f that is exactly what capital reserve are for you accommodate the
Capital Investments<\/a> to that are required. The facilities are almost 20 plus years old and rest on top of moscone and the improvements and the
Public Safety<\/a> and the lighting improvements around the children facility and followup with a list of on expenditures were that were part of approved fiscal budget. Eventually this will go off the annual budget is there a projection. We hope to transfer in the spring pending the approval. Soon okay. All pending approval. Thank you. Okay i just want to thank the staff i mean for going through a clean audit. Thank you. Thats a lot of work and dealing with moving parts and making sure that everything is good so it is great governance we commend you. May i have a motion. Moved. Commissioner singh. Great madam secretary call the roll on this item. Commissioners, please respond when your name is called commissioner pen commissioner mondejar commissioner singh commissioner bustos madam chair rosales a absent i have 4 is and one absent. Great. Call the next item. The the next order of business is 5 c workshop regarding a proposed 5 year extension of residential a and certifies as authorized in the
Property Owner<\/a> and
Preference Program<\/a> certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> discussion. Madam director. Thank you, madam secretary. Commissioners you had an update the certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> at our june meeting earlier this year now in advance of requesting our consideration of a extension another 5 year extension of the existing cop program we wanted to provide you with an opportunity as well as the members of the public to comment on the status marie the director of the inclusion for the maichls along with other meowed staff to provide an update before you we ucsfs e im going to turn it over to the staff we want to t up the presentation. Good afternoon jeff white
Housing Program<\/a> manager like director bohe said this is a workshop on the cop program that youre going to be hearing in two weeks at our meeting 2, 3, 4 two weeks i want to point out that will expire january 31st, 2016, the program as now is approved it has to 5 year extensions well be proposing one in two weeks at your next meeting the
Property Owner<\/a> and
Occupant Program<\/a> is the certificate of preference or the cop program for short provides preferences for displaced persons in at large and sales of housing within the former redevelopments project areas with the citywide projects consistent with ocii or meowed
Development Finding<\/a> the cop program implements the stalling for the redevelopments agencies to give the microfilm housing for the agencies assistants from the households are displaced by redevelopment projects the evidence of a certificate households justifies the certifies that violates under the housing law on june 3rd, 2008, the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> authorized the rules for the cop program that became effective in objectivity of that year the rules expelled the cop program until january 1st, 2016, and provides the agency not approve more than two 5 year extension ocii authority to limited to the enforceable obligations as a wiped down of affairs those enforceable obligations limit the applicable of the cop to displace people only through the memorandum of understanding between ocii and
Mayors Office<\/a> of housing and
Community Development<\/a> assists in implementing the cop program as director bohe mentioned in june of this year mohcd presented its annual report to the commission the report outlined the continues relevance of the program and the needs to insure the certificate of preference holders have the need to experience their certify ill now im going to turn it over to my colleague to talk about the impact and status and results and if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them and barbara is here with mohcd i said to point out we handed outline an informational memo on the neighborhood preference that the board of supervisors approved at the
First Reading<\/a> and back for the final read today and we dont know how that my impact the ocii project as it is still being discussed so im going to turn it over to m mirna. Im
Marie Benjamin<\/a> and nice to see you guys and give you the good news of what were doing with the cop program so first ill start with some updates on the program. Lets see if i can there we go so currently there was over 6 thousand people that were displaced and entitled to the certificate we think a moveable number because some people were not on leases but actually lived in the household; right . And so if they can prove they lived in the household well give them a certificate because they were displaced so the current we know of 4 thousand 1 hundred and 38 individuals who are eligible or who were eligible for a certificate of preference and currently, we know that over 16 hundred h have been deceased since in this year we have an additional hundred and 25 certify holder this year from july first 802014 to now over a year about 18 months we have identified one and 25 certify households through the outreach through mohcds outreach so those are the new people that will coming back into the use certifi certificates and there are almost 6 hundred certificates never been used by the holder and like i said thats a moving number because if you can show me from youre
School Records<\/a> or from your medical recordings or some other records you lived in the property it is we have a sight record of being displaced we will surely give that person a certificate since mohcd took took over the program in 2012, we have seen a steady increase no folks using the certificates people getting housed with their certificates and were finding it is growing everyday lately there were 73 new certificates issued no 2015 95 cop application for housing applications for housing doors they were housed but people are trying to get housed with the certificate and 23 people actually housed in 2015 we had one person only one this year person that had moved out of city was living if richmond and move forward back this year we always think those are successes people come back to the city. Were really working more and more with our current certificate of preference now we are building relationships with the 5 hundred and 93 we are being able to help them maneuver the
Affordable Housing<\/a> in
San Francisco<\/a> this is aint an easy thing anyone even if you know all about it, it is not an easy thing were able to provide better resources for certificate of preference holders now we recently worked in collection with
San Francisco<\/a> aids foundation in
San Francisco<\/a> a foundation and they had a program that they were providing kind of like a section 8 certificate but it is a private housing voucher that allowed the people to spend thirty percent of their income on rent and rather the certificate takes the rest of the rent for them and weve been able to right now up to now able to get 4 people in
Affordable Housing<\/a> that they otherwise couldnt afford we say
Affordable Housing<\/a> you still have to have a minimum income and many of the cop folks dont make that medium income especially the seniors to be able to hook them up to this certificate theyre able to be housed with now is a big deal two 80 and 1184 projects person able to house certificate of preference holders that otherwise we couldnt have housed at those projects so to be able to provide those resources to people as they need them we have been working with bayview
Hunters Point<\/a> with other projects as well and kathy davis and her team have been the ohoh i dont want to say underdog but the bulldog findings and asking about their
Family History<\/a> to see if they would be eligible for certificate of preference theyve gotten 200 people to apply for the neighborhood folks to apply for that housing and not all are certificate of preference holders but their identifying neighborhood people that will who and helping assisting them to be able to apply and assisting the certificate of preference holders who are need assistance in assessing their information to qualify for the certificate to say a
Great Partnership<\/a> were continuing to work working closely with them and as they identify other neighborhood people that could qualify for this. And jeff mentioned briefly well, ill gone to the next thing so the cop extension this certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> as jeff mentioned is you guys are required to review and approve extension every 5 years in the
California Law<\/a> requires that required that the cop
Program Sunset<\/a> two years after the project area expires so this would have been 2011 so in 2008, the ocii or im sorry the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a>
Commission Voted<\/a> to extend the program for another period of time with 5 year reviews and approval the extensions so the program would expire then in 2026 so review and extend now and looking at that in two weeks and again before you again should you decide to extend it in 20021 we are the
Mayors Office<\/a> of housing and
Community Development<\/a> are strongly encouraging you to extend the certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> in january alone those certificates say expire january 2016 so this has our folks in the hair on the back of their neck they think expires whats happening in january alone 6 lotteries schedule but their certificates say xiegz in 2016 were poised to send out communication to folks letting them know that is extends you might have
Heard Community<\/a> people got a letter said it expires we in past years sent out a letter it did expire but it will be up for renewal well make sure that this is explained in in a very clear way that even though the next certificate cest la vie another
Expiration Date<\/a> that it will be before you in 20021 we are working with certificate of preference holders once theyre in housing i want to tell you this story recently worked with nonprofit providers who theyre one the certificate of preference holders was being evicted and theyre being evicted because they did not an agreement when they moved in they would have to come up with a i believe like a 2 thousand
Security Deposit<\/a> but paid half of it and reached it out to
Catholic Charities<\/a> to come up with the catholic which i shouldnt r charities the households was being evicted like notified for eviction because they hadnt paid the other part of their
Security Deposit<\/a> so they reached out to brooke on our teem and we made a big commotion and able to stop the eviction and unclear to clear up the mess by whatever miscommunication was caused that kind of thing happens a lot not with justice cop households but folks if they dont have an advocate hair just evicted it is a powerful thing a certificate of preference holder reached out to us were building relationships with those folks and we are letting them know we have an ear we dont want anyone to be displaced or losses the precious housing they gained 0 the last thing i want to say is that this legislation that the board board of supervisors is here area that jeff mentioned the neighborhood preference legislation should it pass what their hearing a 40 percent preference neighborhood preference in all sponsored
Affordable Housing<\/a> should that go through this body consider that same following that same legislation it will greatly help a lot of folks that are in the project areas that you guys are continuing this to be able to identify told you the story where kathy is saying sign up sign up sign up loneliness half of the people are certificate of preference holders but those other folks in this neighborhood will greatly benefit from the lottery system by a neighborhood preference id like to this is not before you so im just throwing it in. Questions . Thank you. Public comment first. Are there any
Public Comment<\/a>s. On this item. 5 b . Good afternoon, commissioners and communities im oscar a native the bayview
Hunters Point<\/a> i served on the joint house in 1968 that came up with the certificate of preference and when we came up with the certificate of preference i im a certificate holder f when we came up with the certificate of preference we tried to get everyone that recent part of
Housing Authority<\/a> to be a certificate person if that in 1967 we came up under the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> the joint housing was a watch do you go dogging for hud to make sure the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> didnt do what they did in the western edition and those certificates are for anyone who was in that housing when we the housing was turned over to the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> like my daughter and son are certificate holder one was 2 and one 5
Certificate Holders<\/a> we have a problem with the certificate of preference because most of parents i was a young parents the parents were older im asking for the certificate of preference to be brought over to grandkids those certificate of preference holders now a lot of the certificate of preference holders
People Library<\/a> for example, navy when the certificate of preference first came in existence in 1968 i served with our chairperson at that time a lot of the those people moved back to the south and other places theyve never gotten their certificate of preference and at the same time gave us a certificate of preference each person in the age ever 18 and older received 45 hundreds with the certificate of preference so in many cases a lot of people bought homes and i put additional money on mine but a lot of people like moved to sacramento or ann intoxicate and other places like that and theyre not being contacted or knowing how to get in contact with them knowing they have the privilege of coming back as certificate of preference and allowed those in essence i have several friends ive informed that live in sacramento a couple of them have applied like dr. Davis we know im asking the commission to please try to extend to grandkids i know know i to give a certificate of preference for grandkids. What the lady that spoke before me i dont know her name but the thing theyre doing with the board of supervisors there are looking at giving people in the
Housing Authority<\/a> to have certificates in the western edition and
Hunters Point<\/a> when you look at the certificate of preference and we did a thing where youre talking about now the 5 extensions we did a thing from jointly housing took our time to do that but a lot of people in soma had certificate of preference and it never came up their certificates to be extended i would like this commission to look at that project also by the way, a lot of monitored that lived in overseeing areas and relocated should be entitled to have the certificates updated with that thank you, very much. Thank you, mr. James any other speakers seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is closed and ill turn to any fellow commissioners any questions not an action item i dont think. Okay. Benjamin. So the extension. Yeah. Was this for all projects or particular projects. The cop extension for all ocii projects i may have suicide this question about the soma projects or
Yerba Buena Center<\/a> projects if i recall the response was it was expired. It is not that it has expired by the legislation that created is certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> happened after the displacement of it in the yerba buena area and it was not included in the legislation in the 60s and 70s. So those and why were they not included do you have a i dont have information. No. It is such a shame that these families were for the able to take advantage of these extensions and im sure im pretty much they didnt know about it so it always takes an advocate or advocates or an
Advocacy Organization<\/a> to help them understand their rights and what theyll do to at least include them so does this mean this is it we as a commission or for what what well not be able to come up with something for them because i know there are some families in soma that were not aware not having the capacity to you know advocate for themselves and their fellow residents in the area what, we do. I would refer back to you all in the
Legal Council<\/a> and figure out youre options i can the certificate of preference as it stands now with the certificate the different or types of certificates only include those project areas that are covered by those certificates and the and cant be expanded for other project areas only to be used for those particular projects people that were displaced from those projects. If i may commissioner mondejar and commissioner bustos the preference for displaced persons as ms. Benjamin described comes from
California Law<\/a> so in order to create
California Law<\/a> is invest in invested in the status certain displaced person may have a displacement for housing where yerba buena or other areas we implemented those policies both for businesses as well as for displaced lowerincome persons in the production of
Affordable Housing<\/a> and
Business Opportunities<\/a> in yerba buena and other project areas and separately and apart from that separate specific certificates for western edition and
Hunters Point<\/a> that happened after in time it is not that people in south of market didnt have an opportunity in fact, state law said a priority more
Affordable Housing<\/a> created for displaced lowerincome persons that was already provided and implemented as part of the projects in terms of commissions ability to expand or do something above and beyond what is vested in state law that is a more difficult question were under this disillusion the city has adopted a certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> the city as ms. Brej e benjamin said adopted by priorities certainly as part of citys analysis there can be an analysis of other priorities and if any that come out of recommendations one were constrained by financing or were sort in a box if the disillustration law not necessarily we cant do thing but were constrained by state law and certainly whatever program is implemented across the city because members of the public dont see one building and ocii want to have a consistent program one that can be implemented to provide the best opportunity for the public thats why were still reviewing and analyzing the prelims for who pays for it how does that work with existing contract and the contractors contracts that are established a lot to consider before making a recommendation or providing an answer to youre question. Wow. laughter . Well, i just feel there should be something we could do i dont know what and illegal were able to do because especially today with housing being difficult especially in the seldom area a lot of filipinos live too so i dont know. I sort of think we should be discussing or considering some kind of a help we can provide i dont know what that means and hope any fellow commissioners are with me on this. If i may currently a lot of building in the soma area. And more and more to come a neighborhood preference in the soma area is beneficial to the
People Living<\/a> in that neighborhood they would get a 40 percent chance higher than the rest of the city population and so and how do we what outreach how do we put out this information you know is there any specific program communication. Remember it is on this being heard today by the board ones is the solid if i had an outreach plan to make sure that
Everybody Knows<\/a> that they have. Commissioner singh. You started that 16 hundred and 14 and can we extend the certificate with children like oscar said. These people are deceased. Many of their children will be certificate households if in theyre in the household of deceased person they will have theyre already have a certificate as far as changing the cellist certificate of
Preference Program<\/a> to increase to expand to grandchildren that i believe you cant do because the program is because you dont have the authority to do that under the state of california and maybe director bohe can explain that the way the disillustration of
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> ocii does not have as far as i understand didnt have the legal right to expand the program. So it means their certificates which is not used then just. When they pass away. Yeah. And you is it 5 hundred and other have not used the certificate do you know the reason. Well many are waiting for the right place to apply for many of them cvs have applied before and might not have qualified for whatever and many are working on their qualification to apply for the future so of them are housed and not ready to move a lot of folks honestly we tubed with waiting for the shipyard and waiting for more development in their where they want to live so that 5 hundred and 93 are for the people that cant use the certificate theyre holding on to it until a property is developed they want to live there. Commission theyre not qualified what is the qualification you need. It is like any rental situation you have to be able to pay the rent and you have to or in the rent for rental unit you have to qualify for minimal credit no eviction history and when im saying recent eviction history or recent a nonpayment of a landlord some of the barriers or recent criminal convictions some of the barriers that keep people out of housing not the entire 5 hundred plus or the yornt some are waiting for a homeowners opportunity the qualifications for a homeowners opportunities are more significant as you can imagine qualify for a mortgage and have all the ducks in a row with down payment what i say qualifications thats the kind of qualifications. Thank you. I want to thank you for your presentation i enjoyed hearing the story of people that moved to richmond and able to move back i heard the aids foundation what other organizations are you working with to help individuals that you mentioned like down payment assistance and the certificate of preference where the preference of where people want to live and specifically for the shipyard, etc. So those that get a location they dont want theyre not taking up that spot. Great question the later part ill do is shorter they dont take up a spots on the list they hold into their certificate to apply for a particular opportunity and then use their certificate they you wouldnt apply unless they want that place and yeah, so the other patrons we work are many we work with different partners for rental preparedness and f hd c and meta and
Consumer Credit<\/a> and asian inc. The veterans acquit center homeownerships sf a hud approved
Counseling Agency<\/a> do rental housing those agencies sit down with folks and run their credit and look at it their barriers identify what barriers to meet the eligibility requirements and work with them oneonone to resolve those issues sometimes it is just you know sometimes it is hard it is hard life is hard to reach those goals theyve set for themselves with the
Housing Council<\/a> but they have a
Housing Council<\/a> there to have access to be their cheerleader and meet their financial goals it is one of the leaders in the register readiness work and do you go great outreach in the communities to get more people in their doors that live in the communities they serve and providing whatever resources they can to help folks. I hope i answered youre question. Great i wanted to ask about the new certificates so you know the goal for us to say lets move and expand another 5 years its been set at current certificates have an expiration cat in the new certificate of preference the certificates would it be possible to sort find out of in parenthesis if it expires on this date but can be extended so we dont get caught up in a situation people think i have a piece of paper and it expired its worthless put a note, however, to do it so is that but is subject for renewal for another 5 years that will be helpful if we can do that legally it is great. You mentioned the homeowners and rentals it is go to see that do we have the breakdown how many folks weve been able to hope with the certificate of preference that actually were able to buy a back and forth belowmarketrate house. We have within the ownership of the past year in 2013 we housed someone and in 2014 only one in a resale. So 2 in 3 years . A lot of the certificate of preference holders they actually go to rentals more than they would from homeowners. Do we know why . Because of the market. It is hard for the counselors to hard to come up with the down payment and have to have money towards the asking price if in the credit they dont have the credit they cant secure a preapproval loan or just dont have the 5 percent of funds. Actually im sorry brooke 3 percent of their own money and you cant can get 2 percent the down payment has to be 5 percent so some kind of a gift for the 5 percent even and then we are able to provide much down payment assistance to help folks we recently had someone purchasing in the first phase of shipyards slightly over income we talked about that a recent
Commission Meeting<\/a> but so frustrating when folks with a little bit over income but opportunities for that household in another phase of shipyard but not the first phase theres homes being built at multiple levels of affordability but the first ones were not they were at a lower level of affordability than the households we work with her also to provide down payment assistance to purchase and purchase someplace else shes waiting for the home in the neighborhood she wants. We think about things in the
Current Situation<\/a> in
San Francisco<\/a> where the housing crisis is going introduce the roof but i tend to go back what were people thinking when the redevelopment first happened and you know, i heard numbers that the majority of people that would in the w actually owned their own buildings and they were not renters they had built their assets to purchase the home a dear friend of mine a grandmother had a 60 unit building this is the city said basically were taking over they were going to demolish it and gave her 6,000 i know we cant go back but i think that is important as we do this work that you know were making people go through hoops that maybe if they were not displaced in the first place they would be richer through redevelopment people assets were taken away and communities i mean neighbors and neighborhoods they were told you have to move and given a small you know change basically to do that so you know, i on the beauty of us today, we could our goal and our intent is to make right what was wrong and i think the more we do to lessen the barriers given the fact all the wealth that was taken away the better and it goes back to i think mr. James comments a comment we during the redevelopment actually supervisor breed and i with
Commission King<\/a> sat there reminded us that you know why cant say it go to the grandkids and stepped it the least we can do the grandkids would be living in
San Francisco<\/a> if not pushed out; right . The family home is you know for hardcore san franciscans i mean, im in the house that my grandfather had less likely people would have moved so i think you know we should be able to either we have a discussion with some of our members of the board of supervisors and so grateful for supervisor president london breed for putting this forward it is just music to my ears it was something weve been talking about through redevelopment and maybe if this is the body that can do that maybe we can go and set up meetings and get topaz to help us and tiffany with the board of supervisors to sort plead the case how this will hope correct the wrongs in the past and i think that is important to do that so im well be talking about it more and probably need youre help you know the people that are out there who holding certificates when it comes to getting people ready you know homeowners sf is a phenomenal organization you know professionally i work with them a lot and all the organizations you mentioned im a big fan mob weve talked about this before about the possibility of holding a workshop by bringing up in some of the partners where we just say on this day maybe a saturday and were in bayview at the center or somewhere we say that were going to have workshops that talk about certificate of preference who qualifies and who doesnt and well have partners from the nonprofits who will be there of we do something in the spring to control our efforts to get people the right information that may be helpful and wards to the soma district you know thats another communities that was wiped out some of the filipino brothers and sisters that i know my brothers godmother used to live there and pushed out you know maybe we could have a conversation or fourth figure out a way with supervisor president london breed to see how we can get the information to the residents the former residents commissioner mondejar you have an network an organization that would be helpful to utilizes some of the resources to get to people we have to help one another and just in the same way working with the
San Francisco<\/a> aids foundations most people especially during the early 80s with who were living and dying here you know need housing a block from any house a house that actually, my aunt purchased and most of folks were gay and living with hiv and now theyre there contributing to the mission so maybe we could more discussion i know this is a workshop but we i know love to partner with you in any way we can we have networks of friends and to utility to get the word out so thats all i have to say on that thats great, thank you thank you. Madam secretary the next item, please. The next order of business item 6
Public Comment<\/a> on nonagenda items. Are there any speakers. I do mr. James. Good afternoon oscar james 3 things i want to speak on one i want to mention commissioner singh was also a part of commission that fought along with
Commission King<\/a> in extending the certificate of preference before the commission was dissolved one of the main things i want to speak on one of the commissioner secretary crawfordes subtle commissioner cranshaw for the record passed id like this commission to close in honor of her for thirty years the executive secretary one of my things we fed leave people not as many at clyde commissioner bustos as you did they did but we served several hundred people at sfonz we and my wife and church does every year ive seen so many people
Homeless People<\/a> coming in who have been born in bayview
Hunters Point<\/a> or
Cinco De Mayo<\/a> daily or western edition coming in for food and i know youve seen many at who are homeless he work with the
Redevelopment Agency<\/a> over 40 years i served or more on the
Mayors Office<\/a> task force with the acre that was turned over to the city and served on model cities we were over mission bay that was turned over to the bay for the hospital and the warriors and this and that but none has came up with anything to make sure those
Homeless People<\/a>s have descent housing you have the 5 hundred plus acres in the bayview
Hunters Point<\/a> for us the
Alice Griffith<\/a> and mission bay on both of those developments they can build highrise for homelessness in those two areas and come up with the funds the shipyard the city got for one dollar and all the money that lennar will be making and the occ will be making you guys come up with one building in both of those areas to house the homeless and the mayor act like hes concerned and other this problem goes ongoing for the grace of god im not homeless or anyone sitting here are not homeless we looking for the people of
San Francisco<\/a> it is a concern of mine and i talked with kathy davis they have a couple of housing for seniors
Homeless Housing<\/a> how know but thats not helping the problem it helps one or two people but not helping all the people in the communities and the way the economics is coming into
San Francisco<\/a> i owned my home for that over thirty years i may lose it am i going to cry about the homeless it is time to cry about the homeless now i look this commission and the board of supervisors to do something about that problem you see on this seat youre good people sitting on the seat they could have picked none better but try to looking at this problem so, please look at it and god bless you. Anyone else
Public Comment<\/a> is closed. Madam secretary next item. The next order of business item 7 report of chair. No report. Okay not at this time the next order of business is item 8 report of executive director madam director. Just a couple of announcements commissioners we have received a appeal to youre certification of the
Golden State Warriors<\/a> event center e. R. An appeal we filed a response to the appeal largely from the
Mission Bay Alliance<\/a> folks that were here at the time of the certification for the approval of the warriors project the board of supervisors pursuant to the rules will be hearing that calendar for next tuesday and other appeals to the city action and appeals to the tentative maps we expect the board to hear that should the boards firmer the certification of the eir and an appeal tot to the
Planning Commission<\/a> actions and appeals wed like to be working in concert with the city and
City Attorney<\/a> to respond to we wanted to alert you to the appeals hearings if and when litigation well review it in closed session on any litigation that comes our way and then in terms of the forward calendar you have that in youre packets we have our next meeting in two weeks commissioner singh indicated election of officers along with a consideration of extension of the certificate of preference along with other actions we need to accomplish before the end of the year and looking forward to january we have planned as you recall in the mission bay there is another
Housing Project<\/a> that is coming up that will provide for 50 unions for formally
Homeless Veterans<\/a> and 50 unions for families and to the scored to plowshares a negotiation agreement and predevelopment loan before you and certainly in january we expect to bring draft requests for proposals for two sites in the candle stick point and lennar is developing that site and those sites are over 200 units and clobbering in terms of consolidated needs of the
Mayors Office<\/a> agenda and expect to have one the developments a set aside for formally homeless persons we have to partner with the city they dont have the income and the city has a step forward to provide a local operating
Subsidy Program<\/a> because typically the formally homeless residents dont have enough money in support of costs of building the city will is to have an operating subsidize the capital from you but the staying city has to commit thats part of ordinance before you in the coming year. Thank you, madam secretary next. The next order of business item 9 commissioners comments or questions and commissioner bustos. Any questions . Matters i just want to as we adjourn this meeting again sort of echoing oscar james request to end this meeting in the memory ofes subtle crawford we have
Commission Secretaries<\/a> that do a lot of work and work with personalities and work hard and they you know they try to keep things moving for her commitment to redevelopment and her contempt to the communities i would be in favor unanimously that we can close this meeting in her memory and her honor madam secretary. Next item. The the next order of business is item 10 closed session none. The the next order of business is item 11 adjournment commissioner bustos. We adjourn in her honor may i have a motion and second. Great, thank good afternoon welcome to the
San Francisco<\/a>
Transportation Authority<\/a>
Personnel Committee<\/a> meeting im supervisor wiener the chair of the committee to my right is supervisor katie tang your vice chair and to my left is madam chair rosales. Mr. Clerk, any announcements . The roll call is now done move to item 2. Roll call. You want want to do roll call. Commissioner avalos supervisor tang supervisor wiener. We have quorum okay. Technical 2. Approval of the minutes of december 2, 2014, an action item any, any changes to the minutes from almost a i dont know any
Public Comment<\/a> on item 2 seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is closed. And i guess call the roll commissioner avalos supervisor tang supervisor wiener the minutes are approved item 3. Recommend a program ends york clarification and any clarifying two positions an action item. Ms. Wong
Deputy Director<\/a> for the finance administration in may 2014 you may recall this
Committee Approved<\/a> the staff reorientation for the staff capability with the existing workload issues and the session planning will at the time, we added 8 new position for the
Transportation Authority<\/a> from 4 three to four 1 hired 7 of the 8 positions weve been monitoring importantly the workload management for the practices that have viewed since the implementation of the enterprise system back in september 2015 that was system has been simplified a number of procedures in the agency would those two items in mind well seeing seeking to reclarify the
Transportation Authority<\/a>
Organization Chart<\/a> two
Senior Engineer<\/a> one in the policy and programming that is a
Senior Engineer<\/a> well to reclarify to a
Program Analyst<\/a> and a position within the senior position within the
Capital Project<\/a> to the program and reclarify that we have a
Job Description<\/a> on the attachment one for the
Program Analyst<\/a> and this
Program Analyst<\/a> will be working to support the analyticalic work and monitor and assist with
Data Management<\/a> and program managing we have a
Job Description<\/a> on the troichlt of the principle planner and we have a proposed
Organization Chart<\/a> well be reclarify the two senior to one
Program Analyst<\/a> and one in the program and policy decision and one principle planner in that position in terms in terms of cca this didnt go before them in terms of the the reclassification the engineer clarification to a
Program Analyst<\/a> will save 49 thousands 20 and the reclassification from the engineer to a transportation planner will have no cost savings no additional cost because the exact same similarly position with that, ill be happy to answer any questions great. Thank you very much colleagues, any questions or comments on item 3 seeing none, any
Public Comment<\/a> on item 3 seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is closed. And okay a motion to approve a second and ca colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order. For the selection job clarifications an action item. On to item 4 what i have before you is a rough
Salary Survey<\/a> by the cove and associates in december 2014 the commissioner avalos asked for a salary for the executive director that is in align with the salaries so for the entire agency so weve had a
Salary Survey<\/a> in f 2012, 2013 the last for the executive director was in fiscal year 2006 now koffman and associates we used for the last survey in 2013 they kept to the same medicine metrological to scare survey the positions and asked them to look at 15 positions because the other 9 portions were within the series of the 15 from that point the results indicate that from that point we identified which agencies to a compare the agencies to the alameda the contra costa
Transportation Authority<\/a>, the
San Francisco<\/a>
Municipal Transportation Agency<\/a> and the metropolitan and the
Santa Clara Valley<\/a> and the san mateo
Transportation Authority<\/a> those are the 6 agencies we compared in terms of results 87 positions were blow the market medium, however, we are seeking a salary range income not the actual compensation increase for the position those will be provided at the time of the evaluation but seek an increase in 3 position those positions that are 9 percent below the market medium the executive director position or the
Senior Engineer<\/a> position and senior planner position i would like to and take our attention to attachment number one which has 3 different pages it is the
Salary Survey<\/a> data from cove and associates that indicates the 6 compare active agencies the different positions their compared to in the monthly salaries and the
Effective Date<\/a> of those increases the next promoted increase the next percentage of increase and were the
Transportation Authority<\/a> is grant number 5 for the executive director out of the various agencies and the bottom ranging for the
Senior Engineer<\/a> and senior planner position. The next item id like to show you is a comparative agency table you have a document on at our desks if we can put that on the screen for additional reference for this item a table put together listing 3 agencies and indicates the number of
Board Members<\/a> and staff the sales tax whether or not those agencies have a c m a a transit operators how much
Sales Revenue<\/a> for 20142015 and in addition how much expenditures for 20132014 and fiscal year 20132014 was the common data for all the agencies more so this item was put before you a frame of reference of agencies were comparing them two. Continuing on within the memo there is table one as i indicated were only looking at increasing the sailors for positions blow the 9 percent of the market medium that those 3 positions we were walk through and one this is translating into 6 different positions at the
Transportation Authority<\/a> because of the series we have an engineering series a principle engineer and
Senior Engineer<\/a> a planner transportation planner that starts off with a principle and a
Senior Transportation<\/a> planner and senior planner and then in terms of the cca the item didnt go before the cca in terms of fiscal impact those are only the salary and the increases are made at the staff preference performances evaluation with that, he shouldnt this is a lot of data to absorb were looking to propose the increases in table one table with an the proposed increases for the position that the
Transportation Authority<\/a> this represents 6 positions out of 024. Okay thank you very much. Colleagues questions or comments okay. Seeing none well move to
Public Comment<\/a> any
Public Comment<\/a> . Seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is clos closed. Motion to approve second and colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order. Well move to item 5 introduction of new items any items introduced colleagues . Seeing none, is any
Public Comment<\/a> on item 5 seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is closed. And that is an informational item any general
Public Comment<\/a> seeing none,
Public Comment<\/a> is closed. And then item 7 is adjournment so were adjourned thank you tuesday, december 1, 2015, of the same force and effect board of directors ms. Bloomer commissioner singh director borden director heinecke is anticipated shortly director nolan director rubke directors please be advised if director ramos burglary not be here please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, planning code are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room
Planning Department<\/a> staff microphone on vibrate cause drurpgs please turn off approval of the draft minutes for the september i. Opposed . Okay. Thank you. Item 5
Communications Directors<\/a> please be advised that the
Steering Wheel<\/a> la settlement be removed from the agenda and staff requested that changes to the thirty stockton corridor be removed and no discussion of anticipated litigation in closed session today item 6 introduction of new or
Unfinished Business<\/a> by
Board Members<\/a>. Seeing none. Dwoshgz report. Good afternoon director reiskin i actually dont have a report ill address you under item 12 viewing giving us an update. Thank you very much ms. Bloomer i think we have a street going to the
Advisory Committee<\/a> report mr. Weaver is not here today so item 8 item 9 general
Public Comment<\/a> this time, members of the public may address the commission items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when well start with wade hudson. Good afternoon mr. Hudson. Good can i im the editor of taxi talk inform to reduce the congestion and pollution a number of ride going book and cars the traffic engineers adams one car to the street can cause a traffic jam as a
Ripple Effect<\/a> thousands of riders cars are double parked causing a parking lot the c puc the local government limited the number of cars to minimize the cars congestion and screening the drivers the people of
San Francisco<\/a> must reestablish local control over our streets streets are not private property theyre a public resource that must be regulated doing business 0 on public streets is not on private property limiting cars will benefit the riders who are having a hard time financially in so doing see encourages the drivers to get more skill that applies to taxi drivers the first for san franciscans to persuade your local officials to limit the riders cars once they make that commitment they can figure out a way to achieve that with a local ordinance or court action or state action or other method so i ask you to limit the number of ride booking cars thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Herbert wiener. And hes the last person under general
Public Comment<\/a>. Good afternoon mr. Wiener. Herbert wiener i wish to pressed my concern over the lack of efficient travel plans at the bus stop not operating and you dont know when the busses are going to arrive or not not everyone has a corrupt or call 511 and our traffic panels had been operating one not able example 32 and geary street which is a main cross point the travel panel is there no information on the travel panel and also metal panels that should be in operation now with the passing of proposition of the ballot plenty of money to fund this and the mta owes the public in a timely notice to have people plan according im expressing in my concerns and hopefully work on this as quickly as possible thank you. Anyone else wish to address the board under. Not seeing any, arrest plaintiff the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, ive received no requests from the members of the public so the consent calendar before you the 10 point one be moved forward. Is there a motion under the consent calendar. Move to approve the second. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . The is have it okay. Thank you you next item. The possible example for super bowl 50. Director reiskin. Peter our planning director the point of contact for the region on the super bowl is here to give you an update on the status of that effort. Good afternoon mr. Albert. Good afternoon peter from mta and going to be presenting ive a highlevel of overview for the planning for the super bowl city in
San Francisco<\/a> and a plug id like to and this is information that will continue to be developing as we go along but to get the word out before important privacy on the super bowl events and encourage people to stay tuned on the website as we make more and more progress lets just this in the super bowl city and the nfl will be posted were looking at 9 days of events in downtown
San Francisco<\/a> they will be textbook to twelve hours along longing and free to the public super bowl city is free and the nfl is a ticket event but they have all this in common their meant to be something for the region and the country ill go date by date how that unfolds but some of the key components in those fence with games activations and get toe meet the nfl heros in the past and present and things for children and for diehard nfl fans and shops the hours of those two events are pretty similar in midday to evening to the nfl experience will be starting at tension on sunday and 3 00 oclock other days super bowl city is 10 or 11 oclock in the morning theyll change well working closely with the committee that whether there is concerts this night or that night but the power point of this slide were doing this definitely to make sure the events kick in and go into the night so commuters and visitors how may not be interested in the nfl experienced of super bowl city want to go to","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia601207.us.archive.org\/14\/items\/SFGTV_20151206_103000_CCII_12115_Commission_on_Community_Investment_and_Infrastructure\/SFGTV_20151206_103000_CCII_12115_Commission_on_Community_Investment_and_Infrastructure.thumbs\/SFGTV_20151206_103000_CCII_12115_Commission_on_Community_Investment_and_Infrastructure_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240623T12:35:10+00:00"}