Some of the solutions in the option 3 we have sufficiently balanced the interests were not suggesting that officers should never be able to view the video and not suggesting we distrust them im mindful of some of the documents i did of these olden to me in one of the comments the officers made i troubled me i want to go back some of the reports do indicate drove are harm caused by distrust starting with the policy we distrust your Police Officers one of the pieces from the experts there is a detrimental that blocking the information bound to send offers a message of distrust i want to say tonight this decision around option 3 not to send a motioning message of distrust but identify this is an investigations investigations are fluid and need to have safeguards in place colleagues, any followup before i entertain a commission. Commissioner dejesus. The audit is a critical part in investigation 3 it is new and should have a timeframe for that audit 6 months or 8 months or a year a timeframe that is concrete and an audit done to see the indications or the policy in practice so leaving it fluid is disconcerting i dont know that is something that goes into the policy but an admissible policy 6 months from when it is finalized to bring that back to the commission to look i think well have to have the evaluation to look like whether an Academic Institution one thing i think weve observed there is 5 studies done outside the United States of Body Worn Cameras and the intentions i think there is an opportunity for this department to partner within Academic Institution and do some of the stooufd in San Francisco of the issues schedule that for a conversation but agree to bring that back after the policy is implemented after 6 months any other comments colleagues. So my i will cleaner a motion oh, commission wong. I want rely what commissioner president loftus said the comment of officer john evans made a strong statement in not a about a trust issue i think that at the end of the day this will strengthen the officers lead investigates and given the chief of police this discretion will allow for the discretion and for the publics trust, in fact, had a the officer did at that moment at that time those involved in ois investigations weve seen cases the officer says something that was his prospective and not what actually happens not because the officer is lying a got you or intentionally lying that prospective at that moments precisely because of the tunnel vision is the moment but the substantive belief we need to capture the officer was generously in fear of his or her life i believe that this is going to create a stronger investigation and increase the Public Confidence in our police force so i do want to say to all the officers that testified in no way on any issue here reflect any level of distrust of our police force and colleagues so the language i wanted to suggest i think weve talked about around f one would be to have it read for the above allowed circumstances the member shall not view the Body Worn Camera or reporting subject to the discretion of the chief of police or his or her diego scratching anti from airbnb or the lead criminal investigator on scene and pick up on the listed incidents neither reporting suspect but the chief of police or his or her diego instead of the lady investigator shall have the transparency and true findings to show you. The witnesses and or do i have a motion good evening chief welcome. Do i have a motion to approve option 3 with thoamendms commissioner turman. Thank you commissioner president loftus based on the investigations and restatements to version 3 and with the full analysis this is a measure we need to take in order to incur the public trust and the protection of officers and the public i move we adopt version 3 with the changes as so read by you moments ago. Dont i have a second and 4 seconds wow. Any discussions . Okay sergeant kill shaw please call roll do you need clarification. Im going to call for a second again do we have a second. Second. Thank you, commissioner. On the motion to do you want me to read the whole paragraph the motion that the paragraph reads for the above listed circumstances the members will not view the Body Worn Camera subject to the chief of police or his or her diego theyre at outset neither the reporting officers more the suspects or officers the chief of police or his or her designee should have the fairness the true finding to show all the parts or Body Worn Camera to the witnesses or part of the investigation commissioner president loftus how do you vote. Commissioner turman yes. Commissioner marshall i would say yes. Commissioner dejesus how do i vote on the motion. Pass. Commissioner mazzucco how she passed. Commissioner mazzucco how do you vote on the motion. Yes. And commission wong yes. And commissioner melara how do you vote well go, go back. No. The is have it. Okay may i have make a statement i really want to thank the commissioners will you hold up that binder for those first time i get people come in and say you guys dont say anything you guys all those things read so ive got to thank you it took a long time to get here we crafted a policy from scratch wonderful commission. Commissioner melara. Are were going to vote on this policy. Yeah. That was the language on the full policy do we need another vote or allinclusive. I thought youre motion probation officer vote on the changes. So one thing were thank god to just so everything is clear a pro is that will come back with the department of Human Resources i want to say that a lot of this process has been about not choosing sides that was one of the Police Officers said there is too Much Division lets move Forward Together im incredibly grateful if theres a part of policy you dont take youre ball and go home but i want to thank you for everything youve done. Sergeant, next item. Public comment on all matters pertain to closed session including the Public Comment to hold item 7 in closed session. So is there any Public Comment on all matters pertaining to item 7. Good evening. Thank you. Thats okay. I had a question if the cleaving will be going into the closed session with you. Not a q and a just yourself comments. Well, i mean where you choose do answer the question for the records im concerned this is regulatory when the agency being regulated is sitting and participating you know on the panel with the people that are supposed to be doing the regulation especially it is something the public is not able to witness what is twong it is important you mediated by yourselves and not the Police Meeting with you in closed session and after tonights meeting process that needs to be open to the public the public has a right to know what is being done with their tax dollars im disturbed this may be closed off to the public and ask for clarification on that and obviously again, if you choose to answer is up to you folks finally thank you to commissioner dejesus for her vote and tough being the loan voice of the demanding accountability but this is important i hope the rest of you will think about that he and youre conscious and communities and take a cue in doing stronger accountability. Thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment on this matter hearing none Public Comment is closed. Vote on whether to assert the Attorney Client with the San Francisco administrative code action. Do i have a motion so moved all in favor, say i. I. Opposed . That motion carries sergeant were in close were in closed commission were back under open session and back on the record you still we have quorum. Thank you please call the next item. Vote to disclose any or all items for the San Francisco administrative code action. Colleagues a motion not to that motion carries sergeant, next item. Item 9 adjournment action item. Do i have a motion. I move all in favor, say i. I. Opposed . Were adjourned id like to thank the staff the Police Commission our District Attorneys Office for all of everything i do everyday and other on these meeting for wednesday, december, 2, 2015, my mame is mark farrell and i will be chairing this committee and i amed joined by tang and supervisor eric mar, and i want to thank the members of sgtv, do we have any announcements silence all cell phones and Electronic Devices files should be submitted to the clerk, items acted upon tonight will be appear on the december, 8, 2015, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. All right. So, those members of the public that be here we have a relatively long agenda today. I will say up front that we are going to make sure that all of the jail item goes last today. So we make sure that we get everyone through so everyone is aware in terms of timing, mr. Clerk, could you call item one . Authorizing San Francisco department of health to accept the grant for 518 from Gilead Science incorporated. We have bph here to speak. Good morning, my name is kate cline and i am the director of hiv and immigrated services which is a program of the department of Public Health, jail House Services division. I am here to provide information and answer any questions that you might have, i also have with me, mel who is the medical dreker of jail House Services and andy, who runs the hep c clinic at ward 86. We have been awarded 517,000 by Gilead Sciences to treat prisoners in the San Francisco county jail for hepatitis c. The project which we are calling chip, curing hiv and incarcerated patients is a one year, pilot demonstration, project that will be conducted in two urban jails in the San Francisco county jail and in the santa clara. The Pilot Project will be funded by gilead investigator, sponsored research, you it, and it is intended to treat, 100 hep c, positive prisoners in the county jail. The purpose of this project is to assess the feasibility of initiating treatment with county jail prisoners while they are in custody and the jail setting. This is a group of people who are of high risk for hepatitis c and frequently have less access to this very costly treatment. This grant will allow us to start treatment, with hep c positive clients. And in San Francisco, the average length of stay is 24 days. This will allow us to start people and to test people to start them on the hep c and drug and, upon release, we are funded to offer service and we have two navigater whose will move people when they were released from custody to provide support so that people can complete the 8 to 12 week treatment, the drug we are using is havvoni and it is an fda approved drug and 98 percent effective in curing hepatitis c. It is a real life changer. Jail settings offer an opportunity to screen for hcv to initiate treatment, and to link patients to community, hcv treatment to complete the treatment. Should you have further questions, i would like to direct you to our medical representatives as well. Okay, thank you very much. I dont see any questions and thank you for your presentation, so far no budget analyst, moving on po Public Comment, seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you. I think this is a good service to provide, and so i would like to make a motion to send forward this resolution with a positive recommendation to the full board. Motioned by tang and he coulded by mar and take that without objection. Could you call item two. Resolution authorizing the Fire Department to accept and expend staffing for adequate, fire and Emergency Response grant in the am of 8 million from the federal Emergency Management agency to hire, 36 new firefighters. Thank you, welcome. Good morning. Joanne white, San FranciscoFire Department and we are here on the good bit of news today. We are respectfully requesting your approval for the item before you, which is an accept and expend of a fiscal year, 14 staffing for adequate fire and Emergency Response called the safer grant. Came from fema in the amount of 8 million, for the hiring of firefighters. We are actually pleased to bring this before you today. We had applied for this grant over the course of the last five years, we were persist ant in this case, it paid off. This grant will cover the salary and benefit cost of 36 new firefighters. That we will be hiring in january of 16, including the Academy Training cost. With this award, our department will be able to add an additional h2, Firefighter Academy to the current hiring plan, approved by the Mayors Office with the department, now schedule to conduct, five firefighter academies over the current fiscal years. This will result in the potential hiring of approximately 270 new members over that twoyear period. The grant will also increase the hiring plan to 7 academies over the next three years. And nine over the next five fiscal years. The new hires will assist the department in preparing for a large anticipated wave of retirements over the next three years and as well as reduce the department uses of over time to not be able to fund the academy during the economic down tourn, there is no matching requirement for this grant and the personnel cost for the 36 new employees will be 100 percent covered by the grant for the 2year, performance period, after which the department will absorb the 36 members into the operation and staffing. The academy for these safer funded new hires is anticipated to begin on january, 25, 2016. And happy to answer any questions that you might have. Thank you, chief. Any questions . Seeing none we will move on to Public Comment for item two. Does anybody wish to comment on this . Seeing none, closed. Could i have a motion to send to forward. Motioned by mar and seconded by tang and we can take that without objection. Could you call item three. Ordinance retroactively authorizing the office of economic and Workforce Development to accept and expend a grant in the amount of 1 million from the California Department of education through the city college of San Francisco for the California Career Pathways trust grant. Thank you. We have michael carr here to speak on this item. Good morning and thank you, farrell and mar and tang. This is a wonderful opportunity to present or to receive this grant. The goal of the ccpt grant which is the california, Career Pathways trust grant to build a robust, partnership between, employers and schools and Community Colleges to better prepare the students for the 20th century workplace and to improve the transition into the training employment. San francisco applied as a coalition, which required three partners, and of those three partners was city college of San Francisco, the San Francisco unified school district. And oewd. We received city college received a grant in the total amount of 6 million and is subcontracting to oewd to serve as the Business Partner and so the amount that we are receiving is 1 million. And 56,000 for the fiscal year of 1516 and year, 1617. This is a Great Partnership and i know that you have a long meeting today i will cut my presentation short and answer any questions if you have them at this time. Thank you, mr. Car. By the way i want to welcome you, this is the first time appearing as the new head of the Workforce Development in the city. Welcome. Thank you. Colleges questions . I just like to be added as a cosponsor next to tang for being the lead sponsor on this thank you so much. Thank you for your support sir. Thank you. With that we will move on to Public Comment, anybody wish to comment on item three . Okay, seeing none, closed. Colleagues could i have a motion to move this forward. So moved. We can take that without objection. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, could you call item, 4 through 20 together . 4, resolution, approving amendment number one to the department of Public Health contract for the services with alternative Family Services to extend the contract by two years. Five, resolution approving amendment number one to the department of Public Health to extend to two years, and amendment number one to the contract and services with central city, house to extend by two years. 7, approving amendment to the department of Public Health contract with Commu