Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the april 19, 2016, oikdz thank you call item one. Ordinance for the human did care in the Tobacco Sales ordinance. Supervisor peskin youre up the sposh of this piece of this item. Thank you, madam chair and supervisor wiener this origin about have one long term business in district 3 from the aufrsz piece of legislation give you a little bit of background a couple years ago the board of supervisors passed an ordinance that limited the number of Tobacco Sales permits per district to 45 per district district 3 as most supervisorial district has in excess of that number of what the legislation was developed no ability for an individual with a valid existing permit to move to another location in this particular instance the individual who is hsa had this longterm institution is actually the victim of rent increases and found another location interesting enough in a property he was ones previously located in and i think actually as i look back on code section 19 h1 thing that occurred which is that district 3 is significantly different than the rest of the city in one go profound way i know that supervisor wiener is about to hear which is that by night we have the same number of residents as every other district in the city again day by virtue of downtown and virtue of the remarkable number of tourist that come to the Northeast Corner of city we have hundreds of thousands for people by day and had i been around representing district 3 in those days, i might have made an amendment it district 3 should have gun allowed a more significant number but the business is nominated for inclusion in the legacy business registry the binding is in operation id like to take the opportunity with no breaks in excess of two years for over a quarter of a century it is a Family Business run by the box family and employees a number of individuals i think this measure is in the Public Interest we should go forward that concludes my presentation. Tell you why not move to Public Comment at this time ive got some cards in front of me by that calling names welcome just a reminder you have 2 minutes. Im benefit the owner of the business in San Francisco thank you for giving me this opportunity im a little bit nervous and allowed to do my best this is a Small Business it is a Family Business ive been in San Francisco for over 20 years almost 26 years i would gratefully appreciate if you consider allowing me to move into this new to it location ive occupied in the past back in 199 1990s early 1990s in the embarcadero and this would allow will continue to flourish my business and allow me to support my family and like i said, im married ive got two kids and have to put my kids through college this is really my livelihood and hoping ill able to move to my original location as i was displaced by the new owner of the building i was in they jacked the rents so much i couldnt afford and had to give up the space i would gratefully appreciate youre considering this and move up permit thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker. Good afternoon my name is fernando thank you for having me. I work with benefit since i was in my mid 20s and hes taught me how to run a Small Business owner if you guys give him the chance to move into a location literally across the street that would be great hes taught me everything in running a business i feel like anything hes done i owe to be there for him in this regard i hope you guys let him move into the location to continue to grow his Small Business thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello, im stanley kohlman that customer of benefits i commute from fremont and do construction in the city when im downtown i like to stop by on the way out of town to get a cigar to enjoy in going down beetle it is convenient in moving just a couple hundred feet away is more ill appreciate not to drive out of my way to find a cigar ive joined. His employees theyve courteous and professional and i appreciate that much thank you very much thank you. Next speaker. Hi i am ann marie im with culdesack jars central here on behalf of the Boston Properties he was and tenants on embarcadero in the early 90s well to welcome him back to the Embarcadero Center he adds to our current tenant mix and we countering have regional and national and other tenants we want in support of locals we have seeing a influx of National Tenants to the district but want to support the local theyre a local business where a relationship with Boston Properties a complimentary and have interesting base in the financial district their locate across the street from the where they want to locate thank you for considering this and letting them come back to Market Street square. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi, im peter a Real Estate Broker and known benefit and his broth and his broth passed away i know they came as immigrant and been working hard and entrepreneurial particularly how the cigar is going and ive stopped by there for a cigar and hope you grant the use permit theyre looking for thank you anyone wish to comment 0 on item one seeing none, Public Comment is closed supervisor peskin anything any last remarks. Thank you, madam chair for scheduling this and be willing to sends it as a Committee Reports at the full board of supervisors if theres no objection pending supervisor wieners comments i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation as a Committee Report inform april 12th. Well take that under consideration. Supervisor wiener. Thank you, madam chair im happy to support this i think very limited expectation i was a cosponsor of i think you madam chair of the legislation that was really designed to reduce the number of tobacco outlets that a very, very important piece of legislation we need to reduce in certain neighborhoods the number of tobacco outlets about there are times exceptions to consider i think this one of them im told this not an outlet it sells cigarettes or seeing none, Public Comment is closed r e e cigarettes this is an existing family owned business the kind of business to support in San Francisco o San Francisco and not adding to the number of tobacco outlets it is simply allowing a long time existing use to move a few hundred feet away from something outside of their control in terms of landlord i think whether it was raising represented or bring in a higher paying tenants that so often happens into our neighborhood businesses those days unfortunately, this is a Good Opportunity for us to support a small family owned neighborhood business without undermining our goals in the legislation around reducing but number of tobacco outlets im happy to support this and send it out with a positive recommendation. Thank you seeking a seeing no other Public CommentPublic Comment is closed. There is a motion made to send this to the full board did you want to lets do that unanimously. That motion passes unanimously this item will be going to the full board madam clerk item 2. Amending the Green Building for the requirements of for energy. Thank you supervisor wiener is the author of this item item 2 well speak and lead the discussion going forward. Okay. Thank you very much madam chair this legislation will help us to meet our goal in california aggressive goal to move towards a new and renewable future in a way from fossil fuels the increase of solar energy in San Francisco the legislation is simple and straightforward in any Construction Projects between one and 10 stories in height will be required to install solar lemons on the projects rooftops either solar panels for electrical or heating the legislation was considered and supported unanimously by both the Building Inspection Commission and the commission on the environment today californias existing state building codes on title 24 requires month new construction to designate 15 percent of rooftop area quote unquote solar ready free of obstacles and enbunts a future owner Felt Building is consider to place solar panels on the roof the legislation before us today takes us to the next step by saying that in San Francisco instead of the roof 15 percent of roof being solar ready that rather 15 percent needs to be Solar Installed meaningless the solar panels for electricity will be placed as part of the project colleagues in an era were remind daily and how are you or by the minute of a rapidly changing wliement it is critical important we do the best we can locally and ultimately at a state level internationally and nationally to make our environment more sustainable reducing energy accumulations and Carbon Emissions is a result of more sustainable city this legislation which focuses on solar is the first part of what will be a two part effort to promote San Francisco rooftops added to the city the next expands the provision to promote greener roofs in general id like to thank the staff of the department of the environment their support on the legislation and also thank andrea for his work colleagues no initial questions or comments id like to invite up barry from the Investment Infrastructure to make a brief presentation. Im may we have on behalf of our decoration to recommend our approval for this ordinance the goal of the city encap sludz in the zero waste 50 percent of trips by sustainable modes of transportation and 100 percent Renewal Energy and carbon back into our trees and soil 0 so it 100 Percent Renewable Energy for the resources and continued improvement in terms of efficiency San Francisco has lead the way and adopted the standards more consistent nanny other city in california and bring the recommended to you in the future were talking about the office how to develop the generation resources and San Francisco, of course, is a leader there for the citys a facility for the 100 percent electricity and confusing sf for the electricity option for a wide variety of constituents this ordinance represents. Pleases speak into the mike thank you. Excuse me the ordinance represents one more straightforward and pragmatic step towards that goal its been demonstrated highly cost fiscal the ordinance is a product of considerable throughout the key question have been cost and benefits since 2008 the cost to install is gown 50 percent and the analysis that was conducted by the department of the environment in part of the light recognizes thats cost fiscal on all buildings weve analyzed with an San Francisco climate zone conducted 1984 meetings with a way variety of sfrrld with the department of building inspection and the building departments commission and held numberable meetings particularly with the Affordable Housing be developers that indicated in many cases ahead of the ordinance in terms of of the new properties and the result is reasonable and practical it building on a state coat and Cost Effective and therefore the department of the environment recommends your approval thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you why not go to Public Comment. Oh, supervisor peskin do you want to q ask a question. On to supervisor wiener on page of a provision a new provision that says any new building of Group Occupancy with electric data progressing will be the exempt from the Energy Exemptions by the sections mentioned can you explain why that is in there. I think ill ask mr. Hooper to explain that provision. Sure that was inserted at the request of the stakeholder that was responsible for city agency that is developed some data centers and the main issue is practicality the data center is served by a network of individual rooftop units across the rooftop it is changing to reserve a space for the solar. So if it was just for one Public Agency presumably and not heard from the rest of the Stakeholder Community why did we write such a broad exemption. To facilities today that are stand alone data centers one under construction it is theyre used type in general to be constructed i think the impact is small but so if if i may respect through the charge to supervisor wiener i think we should probably better define Electronic Data Processing because clearly the way staff is presenting it, it is a very narrow definition but the way it is written it seems like it could apply to a broad swap of building types we need to look at language i mean Electronic Data Processing could be a lot of people do everyday and but i think there is a section between data progressing and a processing central we have to define is it so this is not end up being an unat the end broader will that so supervisor thank you for bringing that up why not over the next week weigh take a look at appropriate clarifying language it is fairly intend to an narrow category and to be a valid point you raised so well work on the language i dont think that it would be a substantive amendment. The comment it is good it staff is here were requiring that installation of solar which im absolutely supportive of should we consider the impact of on buildings that will be required to install that when other buildings will ultimate shadow those installations is it fair for us to say you have to install those and next to a 10 Story Building we permit a 80 Story Building that shadows that roof is that a fair thing to do i dont think expect to answer that but a conversation 3 is had at department of the environment and start having at the board of supervisors as we start mauntd the installation. If you have a comment on that. Sure two parts it is an insightful question weve thought about a little bit this is part of the reason the trailing legislation were working with the Planning Department on will provide living roofs as a compliance option so the developer will have more fleblthd how a taller building in the solar system to be constructed between the 15 or 20 years after construction the other factor we looked at was that the given the economic imperative to build to whatever the height to build to at a give time it is going to be less frequent that somewhere comes to past we need first a new building subject to the ordinance and then a new building after that to be built the first building so were depending on second building being permitted construction and delivered within the first 15 or 20 years after the initial building a of story was completed given the construction timeline will be relatively aware but a living we are as i to build on what i mentioned briefly any opening remarks were working on trailing legislation that will provide an Opening Statements instead of instead of the 15 percent solar could choose thirty percent for green roof and so if youre building a building i already shadow that might not might be a good choice to give you that flexibility. If i may if youre building a building that is shadowed under this version the ordinance will not apply. All right. Thank you very much 3 cards in front of me calling names . Good afternoon. My name is a Jeanine Carter the cofounder of a Solar Building firm and im also a member of the board of directors our state trade organizations for Solar Installer and rooftop solar state of california and im here in support of this legislation San Francisco has always been a leader in he and continues to be a leader with groundbreaking legislation this is where we need to go as a planets im pleased to be here in supportive and lancaster, california both have mandate and theres no reason why San Francisco shouldnt lead the way for the large city and state rooftop solar is eloquent and efficient way to deal with greening and decategorization of the supply when the panels are generating 2rb89 they serve the trouble load of the building so when i plug my electrical car in when the sun is shining my car is driving on sunshine there is no better way to drive the Clean Green Energy in San Francisco than providing four generation and rooftop solar it is the democracy of our Electricity Supply thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon delaney from bright like that in support of this ordinance a very simple way to encourage the solar jobs in San Francisco as well as increases our captain for this generation thank you, thank you. Next speaker good afternoon my name is brendon the director of the u. S. Green policy of Northern California office here to express mire organizations sport for the proposed ordinance for better roof requirements the council has over 12 though organizational members and credentialed professionals since the inception of our system both green roofs and energy have been a design of Green Building in the public and private segments San Francisco is an early lead San Francisco is closing on 6 millions square feet of report by the range as San Francisco the second best market for the green market where 40 percent of the buildings have a certification cal green raise the professional buildings in the sate and yet with climatic change adding global risk everyday with the california zero waste were a Global Leader it is clear we need to raise the bar again, the solar provides clean energy and reducing the Green House Gas emissions and costs have dropped in the recently years as technology is moving into a different scale they help with the San FranciscoEntertainment Commission run offices the requirement makes the sustainable use in an area where the state has scarce resources in an industry investing the math with the estimating given the risks that is important that Government Policies to improve the performance are crafted the staff proposals that meaningful and a step in moving forward awhile having better perform of the building. Thank you. Any other speakers seeing none, Public Comment is closed on this item. Supervisor peskin your name was on the. Oh, no. Supervisor wiener colleagues thank you for hearing this and for the members of the public that came out and all the people that will been doing amazing work for solar incur here in San Francisco but around the state and country a stricken been many fights and but it is an industry that is moving in a good direction and one that will make our city and state for sustainable as we continue to combat climatic change i ask we i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Correct me if i am wrong does this item need to no, thats item 3. A motion has been made without objection so moved i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation madam clerk item 3. The general plan for the downtown area plan blocks one and two of the transbay plan. So colleagues this is an item that we continued from our meeting last week we had a Planning Department and representatives from ocii to present. Madam chair, i want to indicate that the board of supervisors and this committee is no in receipt of the jean plan amendment regards to the Affordable Housing bonus plan. Thank you very much for that update please take it away. Good afternoon. Im jewish with the Planning Department so the item before you today is the amendment this is relate to an item before the full board as the community as a whole with the transbay change to block one before i go into the details for the general plan mainstreamed we are not to put it into context ill im going to turn it over to for the ocii manager that will give you an overview of the block one and ill be back to explain how this general amendment fits into the context. Thank you. Thank you josh chair cohen and supervisor peskin and supervisor wiener im shawn i work with ocii the project manager for transbay and like to introduce jose campos and jim morales with the General Council of ocii as josh mentioned today, youll be taking action on is general plan amendment tomorrow the redevelopment for transbay block one will be coming before the board the purpose to increase the height if two to four hundred feet an block one i that would be helpful to provide background and the block one project 1994 the board of supervisors established the transbay area in 2002, the draft eir was published in 2003 the redevelopments agency published a development and in 2004, it was certified and the 2005 it was adopted also in 2005 the rincon hill plan was adopted and in 2012, the Transit Center plan was adopted the gray area in the middle of the slide is the transbay plan area it is boundary is following blighted conditions within the area at the heart of redevelopment is the transbay Transit Center it is gifted into 3 zones one by the controls and Design Guidelines to the plan and zone one ocii has the land use jurisdiction two is by the planning code and the the larger rectangle area in red is the Transit Center adopted in 2012 which unsustainable increased the heights of the buildings in the area the affordability within transbay Assembly Bill 812 and the transbay required 25 percent b be affordable the reDevelopment Plan requires the individual projects within zone one and two 15 percent affordability on site within zone one are 12 blocks of various stages of Development Block 64 hundred and 79 affordable units and blocks 7, 8 and 912 affordable unit and about to begin construction and bloke 5 is office space under construction and the from the sales of the 11 to 12 is the construction of Transit Center. Bloke one is located on fulsome street between main and spear streets this slide shows block one proposed Development Program on the parcels the top 2 3rds owned by ocii consists of 35 thousand square feet purchased by ocii in 20031 3rd or four parcels owned by tishman duo to the zone little sites have to be zoned together regarding the proposed block one project the developers is proposing a health from three to four hundred feet a mixed use owner consisting of three hundred plus units the benefits are increases the total Housing Units and three to four more units in the tower, 40 percent will be affordable didnt consists of 4 hundred plus units for households between one and 20 percent ami the units will be dispersed in the tower a separate homeowners sfoeshgs the bmr residents we found insignificant shadow impacts on the parks the purposes of the slide to show the benefits of the 4 hundred height verse the three hundred height limit the far right hand is 73 more units with the 44 more units will be bmr which represents translates into one and 20 more residents this view is of the proposed project looking west from embarcadero and fulsome and this is a view from the bay bridge and it shows what the skyline about look like with the proposed project along with the projects currently in planning and with that, i thank you and i am sorry to josh. Thank you shawn so, now do e you have the context for block one in the veerments area and ill focus on the general plan before you on the screen is map 5 the height map in the downtown plan when the transbay Redevelopment Area was adopted in 2005 some amendments were adopted as part of this effort and this included adjusting the height on the height mass and as you can see zone one of the redevelopment in red and were there previously heights on the downtown plan indicated p d x the amendments made at the time removed that to reference the downtown transbay nfl an oversight and not lablgd about that indication as neither of the sites in her t 2 b x were the height and once the Development Plan was adopted again, heres the block noted on the left out of that amendment with the block one and a small piece of going block two as you can see this for the transbay r50er789 the height currently of block one is 3 and block 2 one of 5 theyre out of sync with the general plan and discovered that oversight when we did the consistency finding for the proposal for block one and revised by the office to make it consistent for block one we needed to correct this oversight to reference the plan and erase the other nonapplicable of the height thats what is proposed and an additional notion to the map removing the label from the assessors oversees block from the following lots 37 and lot 4 replace that with see the tribute plans it is as simple as that and the Planning Commission needs to make the amendment to adjust the consistency finding for the changes to block one so this is a precondition of making that finding for block one height amendment not determine the outcome of the amendment only brings the general plan in conformity with the general plan so that that concludes my presentation. And ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Good thank you very much i appreciate your prediction e presentation and thank you for being flexible see if any questions from the colleagues supervisor wiener none supervisor peskin none lets go ahead and take Public Comment anyone wish to comment feel free i have calling names please come on up and speak at this time. Good afternoon madam chair and supervisors my name is adrian representing carpenters local 22 about 3200 xarpdz here in San Francisco normally i come up and speak about jobs ill get to that in a minute this provides housing it is belowmarketrate housing Affordable Housing for San Francisco and thats really what is more and more most important in San Francisco today we hope you would forward this amendment to the board of supervisors it is going to provide jobs, benefits, health, welfare for young san franciscans carpenters at a local 22 and other locals and a place to work and much needed housing for San Francisco to add to that marketrate housing we need the housing thank you. Good afternoon supervisors supervisor cowen and supervisor peskin and supervisor wiener im a resident of rincon hill and here to represent the neighborhoods and communities groups in opposition to increasing the height from three to four feet ill talk about the compliance the district plan with the Environmental Impact reports and the financial deal compliance the triplet is not enacted after review to make sure all the buildings conform to the principles of the plan most importantly building heights tripling to the waterfront with a view from the northern prospective as the highest point with the tower block one was designated to be three hundred feet it didnt conform to the stepping down that will required to conform to the height limits specifically the gap at 200 and 14 feet eat plaza 200 plus and infinity at three hundred plus allowing a one hundred feet from the prospective of the waterfront it is illicit one block away the out liar is a mr. Sartipi the developer of block 4 across the street on howard at main and beal will come before planning to approve the additional one hundred feet makes it urban liken the block 4 will request from 4 to 5 hundred feet the city has failed to ask for a revised eir the 2006 eir is out dictated and not assess the impact on traffic and noise to say true for a three hundred foot not true for a 4 hundred foot on the does the city has thats it thank you very much is there any additional Public Comment on item number 3 nope okay. Is there a motion we need to send this specifically to the committee as a whole on the reDevelopment Plan amendment. Do we know yet what the district supervisors position is on this project or any of the issues raised for weve heard comment and received a letter ive not every gotten a sense of what supervisor kims position is on this. Supervisor kim has not indicated here position my Office Reached out to her last week and today, we dont have a firmer conformation on this issue. Was it they said she didnt have a position or sending out a response. We got no response i know as i mentioned she announced she gotten a commitment of 40 percent and others vertical is doing 20 percent the taxpayers are pagan for the other 20 percent thats the last i heard i know that supervisor peskin in terms of. Supervisor peskin has indicated hes reserve his remark forces tonight with supervisor kim at the full Board Meeting this is a reminder well be sitting as a committee as a whole. So tomorrow. Well hear it. Tomorrow hear the full merits fsd project. Thats correct ill have a few questions to ask staff specifically about the concerns i have about the shadow additional shadows i have questions about the evaluation of the parcels versus the transbay plan area but i will wait until tomorrow. So madam clerk i think we need to have a motion; is that correct . Yes. For Committee Report we have a motion to go forward to the full board as a Committee Report i need a motion. All right. By supervisor peskin and the decision was unanimous call item 4. An ordinance commiserating in honor of the childhood home of andy garcia the wonderful district of district 11 has joined us supervisor avalos. Thank you chair cohen and, yes its been a long time in working and strange trip here we are with legislation before us to authorize the installation of sidewalk plaques at two locations in the combhoir close to the home of jerry garcia born and raised in San Francisco on august 1st, 1942, is with greens and the grateful dead are associated with the hate ashbury garcia grew up in the conspiring district the first 5 years on amazon avenue and after hesitate fathers death jerry and his brother moved in with their grandparents think harrington street it was an important part of his child the garcia wrote a childhood story called harrington street the 3 by 3 blonde plaques will be on Mission Street theyll get the most foot traffic and encourage the businesses to be with two the two plaques on mission cord and working with the garcia family with the plaques and we have mr. Murphy had will be here during junior embarrassing in the amphitheater was part of theatre part two a lot of work people have been doing to honor the legacy of jerry garcia in San Francisco in the excelsior beth volunteered her time and corps the herb classic picture with the Heritage House by the affirmative mike guzman the Civic Design Committee is scheduled to review the design were working with the engineering garcia family with the sign of the second plaque on the corner of amazon but have herb green photo as well were working with artworks to forge the plaques theyll be ubers the same process with the plaques for the rainbow walk in the castro this waves the permit and inspection fees and added to the location one on mission and harrington and one on amazon for the sites and last year, we set aside funding in the budget to be able to have for construction for the first plaque be using if you have any questions, well be happy to answer theming for the second plaque we hope to go in later this year commemorating the homes of jerry garcia for the unique contributions to the social and cultural life and helped to promote the k30ir district in how it is in his form actually years of san franciscan best known throughout the years colleagues admit my presentation if youre interested ill pass out maps of the first location and have andy putdown it on the overhead and pass those to you and open up for Public Comment. Supervisor avalos congratulations this is existing news from district 11 congratulations i grew up in the season part of neighborhood and frequented the mclaren park with the jerry garage amphitheater that is an existing time to have one of the natives commemorated this is excellent i know there are Community Organizations and more will take place to come to fruition i want to applaud the neighbors in the chamber and i know others are possibly watching open up for Public Comment come to the podium youll have 2 minutes to speak whether your in favor or opposed of this legislation and come on to the microphone of the podium over here. Well. Hi my name is jackie harbor i flew in from San Diego California for this meeting i will be underlying out this evening jerry garcia is a Ripple Effect in any lives were here to represent him when we passed away i couldnt come where i was living to be at the field to represent him, i thought that was important to be here i brought a copy of the book i dont know how to get this on the overhead. You can too the thing on our right. The overhead projector. Sfgovtv there we go. I brought a copy of Jerry Garcia Harrington bingo during my travels the reason i came to support in idea that has been and thank you for your time and i appreciate all that youre here to do there is a lot of people in the world that couldnt be here today to tell you how important jerry and his life taught us to be kind and loving to mother earth and representing many thank you. Thank you for being here welcome and id like to welcome the next speaker. Thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors my name is linda i live in district 11 im very much in support of this project and the chair of a group calls friends and advocates of the amazon mentioned in the legislation a group that took on a role of the custodian well monitor the care and upkeep and work with the dpw to do actually repair other needs if this should arise were very excited about this this is a project that we talked about and advocated for since 2003 we hope that the engineering plaque will be part of eventually come on excelsior walk of familiar simple other walk of fame and the boasting trail we have much to celebrate and were proud of the work that supervisor avalos has done to support our efforts to support that history our neighborhood has had very many people in this over the past years and many more to come to be deferring for plaques like this this is particularly cbos close to our hearts because of the work in the community to support jerseys legacy and community what with the meaningless of the amphitheater and many projects we are grateful to supervisor avalos in 4e7 us get historic street names like china and india are part of that walk of fame so thank you and hope this passes. Thank you. I also want to thank you for working so many years as well as our volunteering for the friends and advocates of the excelsior to do the everyday maintenance upkeep that is great youre continuing that work thank you. Hello my name is wayne at first when i saw the white rablts i thought that was doing o something for fall canning in her my wife karen at the time knew couldnt come today knew jerry garcia in Elementary School and middle school and high school by meeting him in the excelsior she said that jerry father owned the Grocery Stores in Mission San Juan and ray ramos would meet jerome embarrassing on mission and harrington street to walk to the middle school and smokey how did she know that shes good friends with ramos wished him a birthday i think that is appropriate to have 3 plaques honoring the memory of jerry garcia in the excelsior thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. My minds a rachel and i just wanted to say thank you to the communities im new to San Francisco and the way you guys preserved the history and legacy of the values and just this is the most amazing place ill grateful to people like tom and people that keep the music and Community Alive those plaques will be a nice addition so people can be curious the history and learn about the legacy and not question but be desired i appreciate anyone you to do to expire love and other legacies. Thank you. I think i said mike murphy but tom murphy. Thank you, supervisors this is been a like john said a long strange trip but all good things and all good times it has been to the jerry garcia and the statistic and jeremy pollack for helping that and supervisor avalos and malia cohen for scheduling that and jackie from traveling from san diego thank you this is an important project that embraced the city we have been blessed over the 50 plus years to have this a great deal of dead oriented from San Francisco hopefully we can embrace more and protect them in the long haul this is truly a San Francisco moment spent a lot of years in the making and appreciate you guys supporting this thank you. Also that to thank you for your hayward with the general annual jerry garcia day. I want to show what the current the first design and jerry any pollack will bring this up. Public comment is closed. Jeremy all yours. Okay i poet by green and in the background jerry garcia made for this house or it was a festivity. It is a photo of house from that was in the examiner article that mike allowed us to use the Public Commenter showed the coffer of the book on harrington street that was also a quote if jerry garcia himself and the Jerry Garcia Family approved the design it is modest by beth burn we sent when she was leaving her job we gave her an accommodation shes proud of working on that and in support of family and it is very famous photograph of jerry garcia with kissing his fingers. Mr. Pollack. It does it justice thank you. A motion colleagues to move with a positive recommendation made by commissioner peskin and well take that without objection. That item passes unanimously congratulations to all the folks that work hard were almost there. Thank you for your cosponsorship chair cohen. Thank you madam clerk, is there any other business before this body . Theres no further business. Almost this meeting is adjournedse spbed by the office thorf meeting. Speaker are requested but not requiremented to state their name. Please deliver speaker cards to the Commission Secretary prirep prior the apruching the lectern. There is a sign in sheet at the front table for those that would like to be added to the mailing. Sf gov tv if we can have our slide, please