Transcripts For SFGTV 20150323 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For SFGTV 20150323

We have rosemary the chef Housing Inspector to give the presentation good morning members of the board this was before you in november and december it was continued from january to february to today to give ms. Lobe time to work with the Mayors Office of housing so with you have at the back of our revised staff report an email from the Mayors Office of housing dated march 9 of this year indicated theyve cant go forward without proper signatures ill look forward to the comments until the Property Owner has had an opportunity to see the process and ill be more than happy on rebuttal to give the departments position thank you. Ms. Lobe our up. I dont have a lot to say this is all Public Record i have private information im not going to share. Your name, maam. Im not going to give my name anyone that wants to stalk someone could go online i cant give personal information to move this forward i can do it in confidentiality if i could do an closed session meeting and i dont know didnt happen still not going to happen i cant defend myself in public there are things that are happening and putting abatement on this property is holding me back i cant get insurance its like the less you have the less you have everyone has lawyers except me like a Cash Checking service the poor people have to pay to get their checks cashes cashed the rich people they get perks for having money in the bank so this is where i feel im at is im fortunate that i almost have a house the way youre dealing with that i doesnt i dont have a lawyer or representation and there are things that are happening to make it happen but the Mayors Office has problems and Mayors Office of housing not the Mayors Office i dont know about that though ive tried to contact the mayor himself and they dont respond to my emails or phone calls in order to get some help its not as bad as it sounds things are taking longer than and the abatement is really, really bad because all the companies and Insurance Companies and the banks they look on line for everything so every time you do things like that it is harder i have things to share but not on record i cant do it theres reasons i explained to rosemary without off record ill share off record not think record. Commissioner walker from our documents here basically, their waiting for a signature from the Mayors Office of housing for them to Going Forward whats happening with that. I cant share this Information Online on the whole world i can share it but not share it with the with whole world can hear it. If rosemary can come up for a rebuttals please. So as you can see is from the emails from the Mayors Office theres another individual on title we need that signature before we go forward thats what is the holding it up and mrs. Lobe cant go got p i have a so so many other cases this is a record thats been continued 6 times at this time you dont see any way clear for us to well have permission to the appeals board to proceed do with the holding weve give the Property Owner adequate time to proceed that didnt mean after the order is issued and enforced she cant followup with the Mayors Office at this stage he know the Mayors Office is understaffed and they cant evaluate with that matter. Can i ask you the mechanics of having a 1257bd order presents a problem with the Mayors Office of housing. Thats a good question were more happen to sub donate to meet with that but at this staged they cant moved well work with them in a subordination providing we get the documents weve be happy to work with the Property Owners on that. I just had a question so because theres another person on the title was that person or contacted by the Mayors Office are they aware of the n o b theres another Property Owner. The interviews into to the contract information thats on record. What the Department Just the i just said. Im doing everything i can it takes time the department is just very good at 0 following exactly what they think they should be doing without toougs i have proof im moving forward not on in signature but the document i did not realize it was a copy rather than an original i had already contacted legal that people and the other person im waiting for a response i cant say anything more ive done everything i can at the moment this is basically it is punishing me for things it is out of my control at the moment i explained at the beginning theres problems all they do is Pay Attention to people that want to punish me by fighting the how is it is a catch22 in my neighborhood anyway so youre just helping the process to punish me rather than assist the Mayors Office of housing has problems which i accidently didnt realize we are trying to make they can pass it through i brought the document with me and in fact, im not sure they needed the document but i did bring it it happened to be a copy i did not realize rather than notaries i did not realize that or have it redone they can punish me all they want but every time they do it makes it harder thats a catch22 im going to turn around and find someone had will help me and you can put everything you wanted i pay im a taxpayer im the one that pays those peoples salaries to punish me so i dont need to share high personal information for the whole world to know about so expressing every thing that is happening in my life is not necessary moderating. Thank you mrs. Lobe. Commissioner did you want to make a motion. Mrs. Lobe how long in your mind would a continuance need to be for you to get your side in place . Theres letters i stopped doing emails and i made certified letters i put another certified letter in yesterday i believe the person maybe out of the country if in their not ronalds i have no idea it is possible that because the other person is acquit responsible and really doesnt hold anything against me like that but could you been out of the country likely i dont know and it would be embarrassing without kg people id rather than find out Family Affairs are messy like i said i dont think that if the person was aware of the situation that the person would not the person would do it, its not a big deal it was done a long time ago and i contacted the lawyers that originally did the document and the lawyers i have the email from the lawyer saying that shes stressed the document and said she didnt remember the case but shredded everything too much information. Thank you. Thank you. Does someone want to make a motion. Is there room for Public Comment or do we have to have do you want to make a motion commissioner. First, id like to is that things come before us and not being Movement Towards resolving it we have in this case given a lot of leeway and tried to provide every opportunity even through the Mayors Office of housing i hear that it is overwhelming im hopefully as i make the motion it allows for surveillance by i move to uphold the order of abatement and provided 60 days to get the permits and allow for the work to be done and ask that maybe our Code Enforcement people who might have please sit. Yeah. Mrs. Lobe. Thank you. That we try and get counseling from our Code Enforcement group theyre well versed at trying to address some of the situations as we do it so uphold the order of abatement hold in abeyance for 60 days we have a second. Second. Okay take a roll call vote. Commissioner melgar commissioner mccarthy commissioner mar commissioner mccray and commissioner walker. Okay. The order of abatement is held so well go to the next case case no. 67991 2 35 z samson street. Good morning. For the department the address 1, 2, 35 v samson street a vacant lot the violation is u. S. Bancorp stabilize hillside now the abatement was issued november 6th of 2012 were not showing a permit that deals with the violation and staff recommends to uphold the order of abatement and that that concludes my report. Thank you. Is there representative for the owner . Come on up please. Yes. Im eric woods im the owner of record for 1235 sanderson street i apologize for putting everyone through so much trouble i had we have just currently started a soils report that covers 7 of the properties between sanderson, union and alta so union street its the entire vacant ill call it a hill some people call it a cliff problem with it taking time has been that there are 6 Property Owners involved in the forest now and possibly wrongly but i felt inspector matthewer at the building inspection felt that to take on soils report piecemeal was one it is inefficient not getting the information you need but frankly in my opinion it leads to quarrels between the Property Owners how shall i put it with whos loss rock belongs to who were Going Forward on this basis ive done what i could to get the adjacent commercial building owners appraised of what were doing the problem being that over the years the slides on union street are controversial theyve come into the newspapers and now engineers out there with ropes and orange hats and people wondering what were up to so im sorry, i didnt pickup on the fact i was supposed to prepare 20 copies or so but hopefully, youve got the proposal that is the one theyre doing they started last week and theyve frankly the very last page it was actually not part of it the front of the proposal indicates which properties were talking about and theres actually, one more included under a separate contract that is one of the im sorry 202 union street and so that brings us to the 5 owners and the 7 properties engineers will meet with us when were done with it. Commissioner walker. Yes. Thanks for coming in what is your assessment that the time is needed to go through the process and come to some sort of solution to the notice of violation. The engineers report just putting that many Property Owners and thats not that many together was like herod cats so i think that the final engineers ought to be out at 90 days theyre proposing to meet with us in 2 weeks. So it comes to us because theres an imminent hazard we have to try certainly one of the things ive noticed the photographs some of the topographic models in the package one the keys things in there i think is were making a current took up gravel survey and locating the property on the hill it is not entirely clear and the photographs in the package it is not entirely clear where the properties are actually 1235 sanderson of the of those is the most stable that actually is the rock faced next to the Baker Building that has the sewer lines on the street on the surface and so i think one of the key things here is when the properties are marked then we can determine which property has hazards. I dont think im being clear well, no i understand that but i mean that can be done whether we act or not so that issue can be resolved and the other issue i dont know. I think that what im asking to move forward with this solution to stabilize the hill regardless of what youre discussing your civil issues how long would it take to get 30e78 people out there to do that the directors hearing is thirty days to get an engineering report and 5 days to obtain soil recommendation and thirty days to do the work. Thats impossible. Well, i mean. The work its the work itself when it goes youll see it maybe no secret that on the lower sanderson street footage im planning to build a building there on that is one way to stabilize the hill as part of the Foundation Design well get into issues with basically putting grade beans on the surface and drilling into the surface so its all tied together with the entire hill you know are you saying that you want to wait until i r you get our building approved. No, thank you theres the other issue so you know and this will come out of the work thats going on is the fact that the private property didnt begin at the because of the hill as youre driving along sanderson youll see the vegetation and everything the city rightofway actually will be found to be located up the slope and union and alley to street that are undeveloped on either side of the properties and the slides that make the newspapers are actually in the union the citys union street rightofway so the engineers are going out to the mid point in the pt of union with their work. I would think that well have the first informed look at the hill and many, many years here shortly but i would have to say it is 60 to 90 days. Okay. Thank you. The department back up for rebuttal please. Just to mention that the generated were there on december 2012 so we have all this time past and like to see something solid thats my comments thanks. Thank you do we have a chance for Public Comment. Rebuttal i think. Oh. Rebuttal. laughter thats sort of expressed it well like to see something happen but i think it needs to as actually that was steve your department that suggested we all get together and not have a war here. A few years later and i want to remind the board under the life safety hazards there are time constraint to be followed. Can you tell us what they are. The board finds there is a life safety hazard that shall provide for immediate protection for the public and this must be completed within 90 days. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah. I mean obviously this is a complex Going Forward this reporting is done the next question will you have to get everybody together i dont think this is going to be it is not everybody is on board with the properties here so i dont think whatever timeframe were dealing with here this is something thats going to go open for quite a few and the 90 days is going to be the report everybody is going to concur that you know this hill can slide further so i dont see how we can go forward with this appeal at this stage. Commissioner walker. I agree i think it is complicated but a lot of the complications need to be resolved youll ill move to uphold the order of abatement and have 90 days as directed as we identify an imminent hazard which this is so that requires that something begin within thirty days and work complete to stabilize efficient to reduce the hazard by 90 days. Second. Would that include the assessment of cost. Assessment of costs yes thank you. Commissioner walker is it possible to be more specific as to what needs to be done in 90 days. In that this is identified as a unstable imminent hazy move to uphold the order of abatement that within thirty device soil engineers report on a remedy to correct the unstable hillside and 5 days for the soil recommendation and thirty excuse me. 90 days including the inspection and uphold okay. Is that good . Yeah. So and we have a second on that. Commissioner a roll call vote vote commissioner melgar commissioner mccarthy commissioner mar commissioner mccray and commissioner walker the order of abatement and assessment costs is upheld. Okay. We are now on youre showing item g and h but it should be item e and f at the end item e is general Public Comment do we have any general Public Comment Public Comment as it relates to the abatement i abatement appeals board. Seeing none item f adjournment may i have a motion for adjournment second. Commissioner walker were adjourned it is 946 well be starting with the Building Inspection Commission meeting at

© 2025 Vimarsana