Be enforced and when the planner of the ports want to exceed those limits they should put the question to the voters. The yes on b campaign is really part of the out growth full only 8 Washington Well have a highrise twice the size of the old embarcadero freeway and fortunately over 67 of the voters said no, we dont want a wall on of the or high towers but proposition g or b says if the planners seek to exceed the height limits then the voters have a changing chance to say yes or no its a vote and choice by the voters and mr. Valenzuela 10 a statement thank you to the league for having you will say here today first of all, im a volunteer in and out a developer no are developers are involved in our support of the no on b campaign were a coalition of Community Activists my environmentalists and small Property Owner and housing advocates. Were in the middle of our greatest affordability in San Francisco and the problem with prop b is takes the complexities of the balance and boils it down this is a concern we should be discussing how to build more Affordable Housing but we are talking heights limitsthanasia thats an important discussion but it leaves out the Public Benefits that may come out of the progress one or two Tall Buildings may gives a significant amount of Affordable Housing this proposition could kill 6 hundred Affordable Housing units and 20 millions of housing fees and cause significant problems for the ports so far as developing and fixing the problems with the port lands. Were in the enforcement of the nova valley club and the indemnification and a host of others mr. Valenzuela 10 bring up the perspectives of job how do you feel about that. There are 3 issues that were brought up first, the ballot box planning no, it isnt if the planners dont exceed the height limits no problem only if they do if you look at San Francisco history since 19th street 68 when the bureau ton act theres been 18 other ballot measures effecting the front the ball was effected and the Hunters Point shipyard were talking about port property that is owned by the public. And if you take a look at port property its held in public trust and the housing agreement is a red herring because as a matter of fact, if port property is held in publicly trust you cant build housing there and number 3 if that were done theres nothing in prop b that says you cant have a project being approved so the howards altering argument is truly a red herring and weve seen the kind of housing the port as proposed highrise luxury condo and now theyre saying only building low Income Housing a id like to see it and b thats not going to happen mr. Valenzuela 10 any comments. Yes. The housing is not a red herring, in fact, if you look at what the port is considering and the project in the pipeline if you follow the draft sheets thats inclusionary housing on site the problem is this is getting boiled down to if the voters like it thats great but developers can come to the ballot box with a specific or gentle thought and in the 0 voters sigh yes, no chance for mitigation under sequa or the planning process to hopefully get parts for example, an increase in Affordable Housing in exchange for heights when it the park going to be developed at the front of the process or backdoor back is the Affordable Housing going to be done in the beginning or at the at the end e end so theres quite a few of the challenges were not talking about the of her building or them changing their bulk and height but off the waters edge they use the word welfare because they want people to think that. Last year the decision for the height is washington project should the voters be asked florida the height be waived on this project. Were saying on port property publicly owned property not privately but on public property which for the most part under our state constitution mass been held in the public trust yes, the voters have is a say because unfortunately, we we have fined and im sorry to have to say this is the port and planners are not listening not people 8 washington was clear evidence of that clear evidence where a good project is proposed i have great confidence in the voters for example, at t park was approved by the voters the of her building the Hunters Point shipyard critical waterfront projects. But what worries me about the current trend and ive gotten involved there are too many people out to make our unique San Francisco waterfront look like miami beach and if so, i think this would be a shame isnt it a fact i think it would be a really bad sign for the economy were unique its a our waterfront that makes us unique mr. Valenzuela 10 should the voter be asked about the height. I think once again when we focus on the height we dont get into the discussion of the complexity of the getting the mitigations on a project and i mean folks there could be a Tall Building on this parcel the proponents make it out this is miami beach and its not theres no proposal anywhere in San Francisco that looks like miami beach. There is a Community Process in plays thats you figure out hard to make sure that the cultural your current proposals in place have articulated buildings where we have maybe a few tall slender towers in shorter blocks and integration with Affordable Housing on site. Theyre creating an enormous distraction and pushing things into one or two word to wall and miami beach those are not the projects that anybodys it interested in seeing again, were talking about rental housing and the projects the port needs to have the income to fix the problems they belong to all San Francisco as well as the Sea Level Rise this is not jew just about who the developers are we have a little bit of time left i want to get our final thoughts ms. Reigning. I think yes on b is extraordinarily important 0 so San Francisco doesnt look like miami beach. Who wants to see all along our waterfront those wind tower type buildings you see as you come across the bay bridge and interestingly enough when the voters wanted to take this off the ballot they said they explicit is have to Pay Attention to the height limits they can build whatever they want 10 empire state buildings its critically important that the citizens of San Francisco have a say on what happens on their property. Yes on b applies to public property. Public trust property and the citizens villaraigosa a right to have a say we have in the past why not now. Mr. Valenzuela 10 any final remarks sure once again theres an numerous distraction by focusing on miami beach no one is talking about miami beach and the current process has not produced anything in prop b passes tall and short everything is going to focus on tall because they know that folks are going to be against that we could get short buildings no park and no Affordable Housing. And possibly not solving the problems at the port at this time. So i think i think so that we have a big challenge to our waterfront what p that looks like the public process is open and prop b is a Political Campaign to focus on heights to challenge the developments that could be creating parks and Affordable Housing and bring people to the waterfront and do good for the city. Thank you both for your comments we hope this discussion has been forgive for more information please visit the San Francisco sf elections. Org remember earlier vociferating is at city hall and you can vote on the two weekends before elective days please vote on june 3rd if i dont vote hi im david canoei running to represent San Francisco and were San Francisco the recent noose in sacramento with the abuse of power we need to do better and thats why after 6 years of your board of supervisors im running to bring an sdpint voice im the first kid in my first name born in the United States and went to law school and 18 years ago i moved to our great city ways i love San Francisco shared progressive values and i began work as a sifted lawyers and at night i chaired a Neighborhood Association and an Affordable Housing nonprofit. In 2008, i decided to run for officer because city hall was dysfunctional elected officials were not able to Work Together and since then were going bringing people together. Just a few short years ago we had double digit unemployed and weve created 70 thousand jobs 2 3rds outside the rattle and manufactures we have one of the lowest unemployed rates were moderating forward Affordable Housing we have invested in Pedestrian Safety and social services for our most vulnerable were move forward your city forward we have opposition to Pedestrian Safety and helping our families opposition that moves our city backwards theres been negative talk about working together our campaign is about unity my effectively deliver results as we face new changes. We have a housing crisis making our city unfuneral our Transit System accurate and youre trying to see who to send to sacramento temples times as politically complex your our city history our legislators worked to deliver and we need leaders to build consensus if the state legislation for Affordable Housing and education for public transit. As a first board president alecky consequent active 3 times would whos been effective for tenants and homeowners and immigrant from every he neighborhood in San Francisco ill continue to work around the clock to deliver for your city thank you four watching this video please visit vote succumbing damn and join the Lieutenant Governor and gooiment and firefighters and the Alice Griffith democratic 11th hour club and Democratic Women in action and dozens of organizations that are supporting my campaign an june 3rd i ask for you to vote david chiu foreseeable thank you very much. Hello, im sxhooimz im a campaign for the eastern half of San Francisco. The younger that brought me started 29 years ago i was 14yearold and my parent is brought me and my sisters to the country we crossed the brourpd to get here. My job when we got to the country was to study and i dedicated myself to get a great education i was lucky to get into amazing schools schools i saw my partiality struggler my mom a janitor i had the ability to attend Harvard Law School i neeptd to give Something Back to the country. I ran for the board of supervisors because i believe that people like my parents people like most of us to be the underdog we deserve the voice in government since ive been on the board of supervisors ive been a voice for working people for middle income tax people in San Francisco im running for the seat because i believe the city is in a crisis ive been talking about how we truly have a tale of two cities we have one side of San Francisco this is seeing a great deal of prosperity and the other side of San Francisco that includes most of us left behind its not surprise that 0 San Francisco has an inequality and were growing unless by the change course and do something to address the inequality well no longer have a marked in San Francisco im going to sacramento because i believe the person should be a champion for American People and tom who has represented the district is sporting me because ill be a champion for the people theres a saying in Spanish Speaking foreign language. tell me who you walk with and ill tell you who you are im proud to walk with the California Teachers Association the teachers which the city of the city and state that knows me, im proud to work with the California Nurses Association they know youll make the health care in this city a priority for everyone californian i walk with the Hotel Workers because of the people struggling im supported by quality of San Francisco as an openly gay man, i know how to be discriminated against i have Women Leaders supporting me because the commitments that impact the men and women families in San Francisco i work on the free muni Program Three years ago before the issue of affordability was popular its important for San Francisco to keep 70 Families Together more than thirty thousand kids have benefited from the program and more families with staying in San Francisco because of that effort. Sacramento is broken we need in sacramento is a representative who is going to be a champion for regular people and not going to be afraid to stand up to the special interests i ask you to join me in this champion if you believe that San Francisco has begun too far and Pay Attention to the Big Corporation and start to prioritizing our Small Business and stop the eviction and building we need to make it a city to work and live here i ask you to join the champion were fighting for the soul of San Francisco please vote on june 3rd for david campos for state assembly hi im a Assembly Member ting im running for reelection representing districts 19th street which includes the western neighborhoods of San Francisco and daily and part of south San Francisco thank the league of women voters and the voters of districts 19th street by electing me. Upon my swearing in john appoint me the caucus chair im pursuing proud to put San FranciscoBusiness Owner back on track when democratics one the two hours the legislation working with governor jerry brown weve spent our tax dollars wisely by paying off our debts and the results speak for themselves. Our States Economic is approved our unemployment is going down and revenues are up my priorities are vesting in Public Education and jobs and building a clean and Green Economy and giving the money to state governments to insure the equal rights and opportunities for every californian. In any first year in the motional 8 of my bills were signed by governor jerry brown my bills created a tax center for the upper center in yerba buena gardens and the Health Benefits for the same sex couples and made our streets safer for pedestrians for sign and saved accident Tourism Business and in my roll on the budget subcommittee own finance im fooirthd for more money because our categorically system is the key to our Strong Economy i lead the fight to reallocate sources to nonenglish is it so. Starting in of all the local control that about empower student population and theyre fighting to keep city college open. City college has touched the lives of almost every san franciscan to help people it must stay open. As the chair of the committee on asian promotion im continued to work in china sf bringing people here we go to create jobs. Additionally my office were proud to be part of the history to enroll people in california. The States Program to offer quality equality of Affordable Housing. Im working to make it better for the bicycling structure by allowing them to install bike lanes that are safe. Oakland imic to increase the use of working vehicles and increase health care and streamline financial add for high school students. And lastly we must do everything to make sure that housing is assessable and affordable im working with the landlord to assist protecting citizens and tenants during the changing times. My background in finance making multiple government work for citizens has allow