football is part of the dna. it's like oxygen, and maybe even a little bit more important. i understand the bas south we can contemplate on actually who's going to be better at the sport. that being said, let's put on your board hat 1st. how does this ruling from fin actually impact the olympic standards for participants? well, what it basically told, lia thomas is kid, enjoy law school because you're not setting foot in an elite, a leak competition in swimming any time soon if ever. but let's talk about what this is really about. why is this rule in place? and why is this rule directly contradict the new i osi framework for fairness that went in effect in march? and mainly this was due to his theory and fear signifying absolutely nothing. this was done as a response directly to one person, namely leah thomas. this was done under the quote unquote threat of lia thomas. not the reality of the fact that lee is just going to be one in the scrum. if she does show up with you, with patrols in 2024, it was the mere threat. and also the simple fact that been up and the you see i, the cycling world governing body. you also put up a rule 2 weeks, new rules 2 weeks ago. they don't want to deal with the smoke of what happened at the n. c double a swimming championships in atlanta where you had 2 groups of protesters. one came from 4000 miles away across the atlantic. strictly to do one thing harass and hound one person. that's what these governing bodies are really afraid about. that's why these rules exist. ok, so you say it's not the porters that i would actually focus on the person is lia tom thomas. you have to admit they came out sports illustrated interview and said she only competed for fighting. it had nothing to do with waiting. but you look at her past history competing as her biologically born male didn't do so well, a stop stop right there. burst the words you're looking for assist gender? not biological, says gender. well, she was born biologically born, but she was for black biological. she, he, she was born a male and the competing that goes into it. i mean, you have to look at that and go to the record on tuesday. the problem saying is, says gender and transgender. it's, it's, it's scientifically more sound it, scientifically accurate. it's medically accurate and you know what else it doesn't make you look like a transfer. oh, that's all. well, it's respect, but i wanted to human human eyes trans people please. let's try doing that. i. yeah . as far as talking about the competition though from 400 thought to the heart later, i get it. they're trying to avoid that happening. god. but at the same time body, i know to respect that. scottie, i know you worked for trump. let's get a little trick. actually. i never worked for java. i never was paid a dime for tribe. i never worked form well, but you, but just apply my journal. it'll just like you. i've always worked for journalism companies. ok, i know you're in alternative, but here's the real facts on li thomas. first off that the foreigner and 62nd raking thing that's sound in hysteria signifying nothing. let's take a look at her sophomore year, a pin. when she was also number 2 in the ivy league in 3 events, ivy league champions. you're saying this is all been twisted. you're saying this is all been twisted to demonize late on. oh, oh absolutely. it's been towards the ever maria thomas has been demonized. this entire plan past sees, let's be real about that this one kid has been demonized in so many circles. now let's bring the truth and little. let's bring the truth in. let me ask this question. let me ask this question. let me pause here. here's the question. well, how about her teammates, though, because her teammates were put pressure on to say to sign this letter, saying they agree with her competing now that they've graduated no longer under their coaches, they come out to guess what we were pressured into agreeing to, or we never did if this was such a legitimate situation, wire coach is having to put pressure on that. they don't face the backlash of the public relations. that seems to be happening now. now years to number one, where was that reported one dirt letter. they've all come out to sign a letter saying it sport, nobody's writing, came out and said and published the letter of all of her teammates and we were pressured to accept her as a competitor on our side. we didn't agree with it and asked about, they said, oh we did that, but we can't give her a name to it. see yours? and like i said, the bio on because of the, the mass hysteria there where it would attack them out. mass hysteria. let's talk, no, the real mass hysteria was, was give, was placed on the person who can't. hi. if it was really that much of a matter, you know, i'm like, i believed in the herman edwards rule, which means it's really important. put your name on it. don't door rock behind a tree. you had a lot of you had a few kids, you said i was silenced, but they weren't silent. going to fox news and out kick now weren't they it who media and i thought of a cloud that had demonized. if it was, if it was that important, put your name on it. if it was that important, put your name on it. and i think that response to the mom mentality that these women felt like they're going to be pressured. but that's my legal. no, no. the mob mentality was 2 sets of protest. do that and go other connection to an event. like all the way down, monroe has, you know, the women there was probably, they would protest these women coming out as you said, looking to just they know want to look for a road. they were, they were protesting one kid and around and harass. and now we didn't, it went in her life who did every, who did everything by the rules and regulations in fact read it at not actually non british. i got change that. but let me ask this question. here's my thing, inter henley, i really want to be a female. she's not gone through the full transition. she is not and understand that surgery is required and be a woman. and scotty and, well, 1st off surgeries are not required according to yet normally it's god and how you're born place. but in this case, if we're going to try to play with i and she's not really god and, and you know that how are you her, her doctor her or her endocrinology. you still had the mail, georgia mail body parts. yeah. you know, and again, you know that how are you her doctor endocrinology uses gender. people really have to cut it out with this fixation about people's genitals. it's kind of creepy. well, you really get it because how we get an idea that it is a calling names. no, i want to talk about no one looks at anybody hands. scotty. no one does really do you, do you actually do a past check on somebody when you're out in public? when i'm not, i will not in the locker room when of when a born male is walking around with male gen a tell around other women and they are wanting to be modest in the pin any longer. and these women felt awkward about it, but they weren't allowed to tell the coaches. these are the good women that were on her swim, team, her customers. what about their right now today? not are they not allowed to have rights? first, the 1st one woman, everybody always been on the way, who's that know who is saying that the team is assigned that letter a sports illustrated that made. they could not him why he made the teammates were sign this letter that they can't put their name. one, but leah thomas has nowhere to hide. really. okay. we're obviously, i would, it was that important. if it was that important, you put your name on it. and in fact, because nobody wants to be labeled, we ran our mo, when they're going into the career world. that we are looking for job, they do not want to be labeled that because they know how bad it can be around them when they're not really friends. oh, they're just don't want a man competing against them. no, no. what you're really saying is you don't want people accountable, i don't know about you, but i am, i will i love the accountability when they're born with and that's the why we're having this question. but you know, it gallop poll, found 2 thirds of adults actually think transgender athlete should play for teens, matching the gender on their birth certificate that gallup not a conservative organization. do you believe that this is a fair ruling to uphold the scientific differences between men and women? or do you also agree on this idea of creating a 3rd level of competition for this category? well, i'll put it 2 ways. number one, the fina rule. once again, was a response to hysteria and fear that has no medical basis, no scientific basis or competitive basis. that's my feeling on that one. as far as the, as far as a 3rd category, really with the current, with the rules that were in place before fear, hysteria changed them. it was, it was were if it would be useless to have them. they were not necessary. we already had solid rules in place and solid regulation in place. but because, but because a group of transforms went, went to a swim, meet and said blue, we have these rules now. now we have this, this knee jerk response, the fear. now as far as the gala, as far as the gallup poll, a lot of the quote that i have a lot of question that in terms of methodology of the, of, of these polls. because i've, i've read these, pulls up down right, left and center. the last 2 years, and oftentimes you point a question, some in a certain type of way where you lead people in that direction. ultimately, i look at results, the sporting events, and i look at largely what competitors, who don't their names are saying. and most of those competitors, including some people that leah was in a pitch battle with in the 500 free at those at the n c double a championships. who all said a lia competed by the rules were ready to swim against her. let's do this thing and they did m, we a won a national championship and is a 3 time all american. and again, did a, did natalie by the rules that were put in place, but by rules that changed 3 times during the season. now you want to talk about fairness, scotty, where was lia thomas's fairness and all this. where was the baroness in this kid? now remind you a college kid granted a college senior who took 6 months of vitriol getting smacked around every day by a number of media outlets who took, who took teammates saying i was silenced and en route, but they worked way, but they were open in their mouths to everybody with a microphone, as long as they kept their names out of it and then has to go to a national championship and has to walk into a nut atoria with protesters all over the place. and with protesters even bringing their vitriol into the venue, where's her fairness and that would you what if it was your daughter, would you want that for her? well, i would know if my daughter you can put me down, are there like that. but listen here, calling me say this in the end, we might disagree on this topic in the perspective of, but let me say, i respect you and i respect you for coming on and sharing it. and once again, i always trust the viewers to make up their own mind, and i appreciate you sharing your perspective. thank you for joining us. carly web, thank you. thank you for having me. we should do this again. sometime any time i would just say right there, i'm sky now use and we're going to be back with more $360.00 view all after the break. ah ah. ah ah mm oh, ah no one. no, sir, no, no, no, no, no, no. what door was real to what they should end up unit 73. 1 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short, then build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program. that the world had ever known a production issue or short notice that they're not killed when you suddenly we're going to put you on more more general manager thought this is meant nguyen from all one of up on there and i got the owner myself. i got your name. i understood. i wish to know about jewelry. whoa, whoa, knew he didn't or gotten more or less than a jail it's i had to put on with their mother and all your body build you could have pushed out nice. oh boy, that's good. to go on what the on the wall, she my and new on i'm all i can send more on all 7 mom. good student. i don't the year you'll not on all of them are going to give us a lot with hello. welcome back to the 360 view. i'm your host, scotty. now hughes is the influence of the trans at gender community transcends beyond the sports world. we are now seeing a doubling of people who identify as part of the l g, b t q plus community. and each generation, and this is leading to schools, politics and entertainment, to integrate these conversations and to not only everyday life, but also younger and younger ages. the discuss if this is leading to the over sexualization of children who want to bring a visiting fellow at the lauren burrow university. joanna harper. joanna, thank you so much for joining me on this. you're welcome. yeah, there's this big debate going on right now. and children under 18 and it's about puberty blockers and undergoing irreversible gender changing surgeries. and some are even going as far to call it as child abuse. as someone who's actually transitioned, do you think it's appropriate for children to start transitioning as young as 2 years old and is it their own mindset or is it more the influence possibly of their parents? you know, when you say transitioning, no one goes, undergoes any medical procedures at age 2 or even at age 7 or at age 8. and if they change their mind, it's not a big deal. so when did those, when, when is the encouragement right now, why are we seeing this talk? where is this conversation coming from? that there are sort of puberty. brocker blockers being offered to children at a very young age. what age is that? are you seeing? well, there's no point in blocking puberty till it starts, and that's usually from 10 to 12 years old. and so that idea and having that conversation about period buggers, do you believe a 10 year old? is nose enough at that point on their own to make that decision? are we still seeing the influence of not only society but their parents? well, the reason that puberty blockers are initiated is because they are entirely reversible. and so it gives children a chance to mature and get older and, and make informed decisions later in life. okay, so that being said, you're right. and, but that, that's puberty blockers. we know, surgeries for children to transition are not reversible. so what are some of these irreversible effects and side effects of puberty blockers the parents should be aware of before they give them to child children. what consideration conversations need to be happening in these households? so again, puberty blockers are reversible. surgery does not happen before 18 and so there's, there's no irreversible surgery in minor children. so these decisions are not made lightly, but they should be made. the child, the parent and the physician, the what sort of our, our, their conversations about mental health going on. i mean, i have teenagers and they are confused about everything from what alpha to where to what friends they're hanging out with confusion just lives in being a teenager. what about the mental health though? especially considering we are in a post corona virus society that we're finding these children are go, or these actually teenagers, or children are going into is their concern possibly for the mental health ramifications if this conversation is not being handled properly? well, it didn't most important mental health consideration is that transgender people face huge rates of depression, suicide attempts, and if they are allowed to access puberty blockers, hormones surgery later in life, this is shawn to reduce depression, reduce suicidal ideation. so yeah, there are important mental health considerations, and transition generally improves the mental health of transgender people. so i and i have sent and this is obviously a conversation has been relatively new, also social media involvement in this. and i don't know if you're familiar in fact, and probably pretty sure you are of, there was a, there's a to count on tick tock, all the lives of tick tock. it's on international fame because of twitter. she was docs, the creator takes videos that were posted by far left showing how they are influencing and basically grooming children and schools and bringing them to light, leading some teachers to be even fired by their school districts. you are seeing an uptick of quote, family friendly drag shows for children and lives of tick tock of expose publicly those funded libraries and schools hosting field trips to night clubs and bringing drag queens to perform for students. do you believe that this is appropriate adult entertainment for our students and for a curriculum effort, kids at a young age? that's not my history of expertise. and i would recommend that people spend less time on social media. well, that's always a good one, especially if we're talking about mental health. that's always helpful. but, you know, i mean, this all incorporates in this conversation that is happening not only on social media but also in the streets of america junior pride month. many parades our host in cities across america. there was a washing post article, it was getting rip for saying kink, and nudity to go hand in hand with these celebrations. should be seen by children and i get it. it's not your expertise, but it's also just as, as a human, do you believe that we are introducing sexuality and sexual acts to children across the board. so young, and is this a positive thing for society to be doing well? being transgender isn't about sex. so by talking about transgender issues, we are not introducing sex, but b, yeah, i agree that we shouldn't be introducing high sexualized content to, to, to young kids. ok, so then why, how do you not introduce the concept of sex when you have a transgender it transgender library reading time and kid that a young age? how do they go? why is this person different from this person? and that conversation happened. how is that not introducing sex? 2 children, a young age who might not understand the full picture of what all is involved. it's talking about gender and not sex. so it isn't introducing sex. we are just talking about people who are uncomfortable, living as they were assigned at birth and are more comfortable living in a different way. okay, so then let's bring it to another part of this because there are, there is a difference. i do a group believe in the transgender situation as well as the l g b. situation. and there's obviously conversations that happen between the 2 groups . they are not hand in hand. many, many actually disagree with one another and, and the approach that it's doing. but now we're seeing this rise, a teachers were coming out to students and the addition of a wide range use of pronouns along with teachers. encouraging heidi a students gender identity from their parents. how is this a healthy thing for society? and do you not only see people, you know, choosing pronouns based off their personality, not their gender. do you think this is causing teachers straight or trans to look for validation from their students and explain themselves to students. they're being forced because of this, and we're seeing this on social media. i'm, you know, i'm an expert in physiology and transgender athletes. and you haven't asked me a single question about that. and so i'm afraid i'm gonna have to leave but, but have a bye bye. thank you for joining us. you know, i think that's a part of the conversation. so many times when you do ask these questions about it, they run from it. i think that is why we're seeing such a confusion on the issue today. that doesn't help the situation, but i definitely respect our guests for actually coming on and having the conversation with uh huh. now, before our against was terminated, a conversation. i wanted to point out that women's rights prior to being a savage man often had to play the role of a woman in the arts and athletics. however, that was just about playing the role not established really it establishing this permanent new identity or taking into this next level and complete competing against her prior gender. these recent changes which are being discussed are not a positive step for in the forward for society. we're not talking about equality for race, gender, even sexual discrimination. rather, the modern day push in society for transgender acceptance and many aspects which has been counterproductive for the historical accomplishment. for minority writes, transgender writes are more about blurring these lines of identity and selling confusion and doubt. and what is the natural born standard? because those lines are not respected, it should be of no surprise. the lines of what is appropriate for our children is often disregarded by transgender advocates, and the conversations are not allowed to be had. this hurts their cause, as those on the outside are repulsed by the concept of introducing anything sexual to most innocent. as it so often leads to exploitation. it is impossible to establish non discrimination policy regarding transgender individuals without discriminating against another, putting others at a disadvantage or possible endangerment. nowhere in this various fight for quality in history have we seen this scenario presented, and yet those who care to point this out or do hateful until science evolves, there is no other aspect of human life which is absent of influence than the gender . we're assigned a birth. if we allow this to be blurred, then everything else is negotiable and nothing in society will be sacred and sky. now he's and this is been your 360 view of today's news around the clo hm. only one main thing is important for knox ism internationally speaking, that is, that nations that's allowed to do anything, all the mazda races, and then you have the mind, the nations who are the slave americans. proc obama and others have had a concept of american exceptionalism. international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist by turning those russians into this dangerous go. you man, that wants to take over the world. that was a conscious strategy. so some golf out of it on your own, i not leashed it. often zip on in tablet block. nato said it's ours. we moved east and the reason us, hey jim, it is so dangerous, is it? the law is the sovereignty of all the countries. the exceptionalism that american uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. if nato what disbanded shareholders in united states and elsewhere in large obs companies would lose millions and millions or is business and business is good and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion. ah, don't think that the united states or the united kingdom had the slightest interest in ukraine itself. that's said way something to mobilize people around. i think that all too badly their lowest undermine the russian federation and to gain dominance over russia itself with ah, and i had to business with us. do i pretty good. i didn't get them with key at the when ocean just keep the process to the dealer. molly, complete with what you see a professional in the city and the one you put on the list of all but yet with ah, a guy, but i want to with this with you, i guess with you i am with with full credit, gets approved from beach still easy, a a with a lower the work oil in another world war the opening day as the members, whatever the brain conflicts and the western calls to further isolate russia. meanwhile, moscow keeps increasing its operation with emerging world economy. that's as it doesn't add un member states at stain or vote against an adopted resolution to force russia to pay crane war reparation. the biggest fall and support for ukraine related resolution to start the war a dr.