an algo, using our allied triumphs in the battle. or if they are political position is strengthened on the international arena, then this is a win for us all. from a 2nd perspective, rushes power today constitutes a restoration out by partial of an international equilibrium. this re balance that we are witnessing impact smaller countries, including syria. this is my strategic view that the bottom line without going into other legal battles, the russian officials say that it is a battle for a new world order. mister president, do you see this as the final throws of american hedge money or are we still far away from multiple world? i believe that there are those who refer to this war as the end of the unit polar system was created as a result of the collapse of the soviet union. this is an accurate, initial, partially correct if we are referring to nato after the disappearance of the warsaw pact. or we view it from a political perspective and the dominance of the western powers that under the lead ship of the united states with the un security count like this. however, in reality, the unix system was created after the 2nd world war when the bretton woods conference established a new monetary order that made the u. s. dollar the world reserve currency. today, what is more important than the military outcomes, or at least one is equally important. so as not to exaggerate the economic outcomes of this war, particularly the status of the dollar. if the dollar continues to govern the world economy, nothing will change regardless of the results of the warrior. the thing with the dollar and the many people say that the united states is using the dollar to blackmail the world. and those who opposed it. 100 view this western economic in the war against moscow. and can it be compared with the economic sanctions against syria? first, using the dollar is not blackmail. it is robbery because after the 2nd world war, the americans pledged that the dollar would reflect the gold reserved. but they handle the dollar to gold at the beginning of the 1970, starting the next administration, the united states decided to abandon the gold standard of separating the dollar from gold. and consequently it became a working piece of paper. but in fact, the united states continue to trade around the world using this worthless piece of paper, and this is robbery, and it applies to the whole world. recently, the u. s. raised interest rates and as a consequence of the value of all other currencies drop affecting the economically weaker countries above. yes, it is a tool for sanction. we'll see as long as the dollar is a mobile currency and continues to be settled in the us banks, or what is called the american federal reserve. if you are under the authority of this dollar, and therefore your future as a stage will my country or society as an economy is under the mercy of the united states. it is a central part of the sanction. without it, the dollar america would not be a super power at all. what mister president, i also asked about the comparison between sanctions against moscow in the experience of damascus and disregard. what the stand is, this comparison valid subsidy and you mean the sanctions regardless of the dollar. of course, the same mentality, the mentality of her gemini colonialism and aggregate little. they still believe that the situation is as it was several decades ago. and that the west controls and everything the world today, the world has changed over there is russia, china and many other rising countries. yes, we are under sanction, but many of our basic needs are not bought from western country. we have severed our relation that in these countries don't have the same mentality and this will lead to the same failure for every country can. now, since your basic livelihood and growth requirements without american permission, more than this could be a positive message for russian citizens. but let's talk all some mr. president about the syrian citizens and all the economic challenges they face on the sanctions. the only reason for this crisis, the collapse of this year and pound the difficult living conditions and other challenges. bob was going to have a lot of it and i don't know, not at all. and i have stated this publicly yet. the sanctions are part of the problem because they raise costs and slow the economic process. but there are other global reasons, like coven, 1900, for example. the west is presenting a narrative that the current problems are a result of the human brain war and more precisely, a result of russian policy. the reality however, is different than some of the national challenges are due to internal economic plan and not only external factors. so it is important to distinguish between challenges arising as a result of sanctions, as a result of government plans or as a result of the overall economic environment which could be due to policies of companies or habits, a citizen or these all impact the economic situation. both positively and negatively. part of it has to do with corruption to exactly the economy is affected by numerous factors, including management as well. let them stop a little with your plan for competing corruption, doing how to do most countries in the state of war tend to delay or halt many core processor, and one of which is fighting corruption level in syria. our view is different because of the war we need more than ever to combat corruption. this is for the simple reason that wars weakened state institution. when state institutions are weak, corruption becomes more widespread. this is a common unfortunate consequence of war in any countries, and it is not unique. it's a serious problem. therefore, during such a times, you need to increase your efforts in combating corruption. and this is what we are doing. of course, there are obstacles. a war of self is an obstacle, the weakness of state institutions as a result of the war is another obstacle, as well as the administrative system that requires a lot of reform and is the most important factor in fighting corruption. so we are proceeding with this approach across all secretary, political, economic and administrators. but due to our current circumstances, there is no guarantee that we won't be able to achieve our ambitions, fully gender. this is true particularly that the syrian people have renewed, they trust you, mr. president, your campaign slogan of us hope in action, but in our tour of the country and when talking with syrians and start frustration because of the difficult conditions they're facing. but here we are. to what extent can this whole be revived in syria? that is losing its oil resources because they're under control of other parties and we'll address this shortly as well as having to deal with other challenges. wheat, for example, what you have available to mr. president, and i will get it for you 1st, what you were saying is correct. i suggested hope because there is frustration. i recognize this frustration which led me to adopt the slogan. second, these words are not a slogan you, but they are the title of a solution. hope doesn't coming from the sitting around and waiting. it comes from our attempts to be proactive and productive. do we have the necessary tools to be productive? yes, of course, we do help on otherwise the state would not have endure on medical care and syria is free despite the decline of services. education is free and despite the decline on the quality of education as a result of the circumstance of subsidies are still available despite the but all of these basic services are available with no change in our policy. similarly or their new facility. you say no, the enterprise is growing or emerging during this period of war. of course, there are, there are many people who love their country and are ready to take risks and invest in this current climate, which is not strategy for investment. when what is required of the syrian citizens? how can they accommodate meeting their daily need to under deteriorating living conditions? calling i considered to be attached to the doctor, but up on the island, i know 100 well if we agree that an increase in productivity is the best solution to improve living conditions and the services that we would identify what we call our main obstacle is electricity and as such, our focus since 2021 has been to find solutions to the electricity shortage, which is a result of the sanction. we have been successful and it is safe to say that during the 2022 and we will witness and improvements in this field towards no doubt will have a positive impact on our production capability. so both the problem and the solution have been clearly identified while we are moving in the right direction. we should not raise or expectations too high and we'll leave that all our problems. that will be result. you will not at all. there will be an improvement and it will be graduate. well, we must be aware that there are circumstances that are not in our favor. there are attempts to undermine every step will take words development. we must deal with each problem and as it arises and continue to find the standards solution. luckily, this is all part of the war. when i say there is hope, it means we have the tools capabilities to face all with chambliss, from external forces to undermine growth and serial. had he also liked to political pharmacy, perhaps some talk about the constitutional committee. why did not make progress in europe? emerald was a lot of know this is totally different and has nothing to do with the sanction. we're referring to the constitutional committee, then the requirement is to arrive at an constitution, a constitutional that expresses the desires, the values, durations and the culture of the syrian people. one that is a middle ground between all the different segments and currents that exist in our society. this is the results we aspire with children with them. logically, we are talking about a dialogue between syria or what we might call a syrian syrian dialogue under the assumption that there are 2 partners with regard to the constitutional committee. we are also referring to 2 parties. first party was proposed by the syrian government. its members are neither diplomatic nor government employees, or if they do represent the views of the syrian government. the 2nd party is appointed by targeting. so the logical question is, how is it possible to have a syrian syrian dialogue when one party is syrian and the other party is turkey. so this is the problem that can, this is why we are not machining anything because quite simply, the 1st part for us is the aspirations of monsieur in people. while the other party expresses the aspirations of the turkish government and he was not been accept that another letter mister president, let's talk about what the other parties are. those who say that the syrian government just concerned that the constitutional committee will do something that interferes with their story of the president. what do you say notion, this is not an issue. the, the syrian constitution does not express the views of the president or the government or the ruling party, or it expresses the unanimous views of the syrian people. is there anything agreed by the syrians as correctly at any rate that is created in any form should be in alignment with the new constitutional? this is fine and it was not, there cannot be instability. that is at odds with the wish of the you know, this is why whatever outcome is read by the constitutional committee now or later or under any other circumstances, must be put to a popular referendum here, taylor will not be passed by the government. this is definitive, it should reflect in their wishes, and hence the people either approve or reject. the confusion to those consensus among syria might be the objective of the general issued which opened the door for the return of steering refugee and in reference to unless there is a criticism can be found on those who when i was president, the charlotte not being in our will be treated as traders of the homeland will be and you know, there are laws in syria. we do not have what is commonly referred to as political prisoner. this term does not exist. there are national, given that we have to be careful to not can use political freedom with transgressing against national, giving a csc to someone might say, why don't we give up our occupied territories to israel. so this is punishable by law and it is a national issue and not a political one. the same principle applies to other things, like opposing with president what's on you. and there are many syrians and syria who do not agree with me on many public opposition to a person or a government is one thing for transgressing against the national government. there's another those who are the host can do. so there is no problem. and this does not affect me person. this also apply to the kurdish forces. look at the more the kurdish issue is different. if we look at it from a national perspective, the kurtz concert, an ethnic city that has existed in syria throughout history for the majority of them, are patriotic issues. however, there are some who are not the justice. there are also some arabs, non arabs who are also not patriotic, and he'll act as agents for others, especially americans. issue has nothing to do with the president of the war with political opposition with the issue here is the unity of the syrian homeland mobile one notion of multiple necessities taking the form of canton. it's a war federation is the beginning of division, whereas the syrian diversity within a framework of national unity is enriching. and we view this part of the training and your neck, religious, and terry and diversity enriches syrian society. not the other way. however, when it is presented in the wrong framework, it becomes a courtesy and this is something we do not allow you to do is open for dialogue with everyone, with the exceptions of i don't know how to describe the agents, particularly of the united states, but sometimes we have to engage in our nevertheless, i'd like to focus on the curtis you're working on a particular dose that control the oil wells. i'm with american support and what are your views on this? and what cards does damascus have in order to restore its acid enters toria? danica, how all the, the problem with any occupation of a country or any invasion is not the invasion itself, regardless of how big the army it is. have you, the problem lies with the agents who support the invader model of this is the issue and it exists in syria or not. there are forces acting under the authority of the american. yes. and on their behalf against the unity of syrian society. and we're still not the normal reaction, which is what we're starting to see in those areas like eastern area is popular resistance. since the vast majority of the population of do not accept these deviations and refuse to deal with the occupier and this treason, this has started the conflict between these forces and the located population. as long as there are people who act as age am i, the occupier will remain strong usually. so 1st of these agents should be purged, they should be weekend timid, and then the occupier will automatically leave because popular resistance will increase again to set up of the solution. then in facing any invasion, particularly when you do not have the necessary military capability. soul is popular resistance. ah ah, with school ah ah, i think that could a hotel and we're not talking here only about the american challenger for you also have turkey which no longer hides some sessions agreed with it describes is the same zone inside syrian territories. what are your plans to promote that? maria holcombe. women that have enough loopholes. it is within the same framework on, if there is an invasion, there will be popular resistance in the 1st instance is to was of course, the syrian army is not deployed and all the syrian territory, but in the areas where it is deploy, wind a month and when conditions allow for direct military consultation, we will not hesitate. well this was the case 2 and a half years ago when there was a clash between syrian and turkish army. in the syrian army destroyed some turkish articles that had moved into syrian territory a little. this the same will happen again as much as the military capabilities will allow us could be all done, but a click on a quote on that. and what about in libya, and what's your vision for the situation there like any occupied territory? it is subject to the syrian military and political plans for liberation of the mill . there is no doubt about the yes, any land occupied by the turks or by the terrorist she will be liberated and blind . my. that is fine. this and with the existence of all these problematic files, there dells heard talking about reconstruction. are there any urgent plans in that regard? other states which have expressed their willingness that take more it took there also bills. mr. president who had made the length between this file and your visit to united arab emirates, the camera, adobe winnetka. he caught up at a thought up with him with our companies from various aero est and not the state which have expressed a desire to take part. if we take into account the extreme pressure applied by the west, through sanctions, on any accountability that might investigative area, we recognize that the process will be slow and risky for many. nevertheless, there are those that are preparing to invest in syria in the ways which circumvent the sanctions. if we want to talk about reconstruction in the broad sense, i cannot say that the current political, economic, or security situation allows or large scale reconstruction will never the less a process of reconstruction has started out by the limited. this is partly through investors and companies or individuals were rebuilding their facilities and partly throughout the state. so in rebuilding the art around kind of the core of economic life and some of the big i'd like to stop a little with you on the diving in serious returns to this large gain crime. you yourself see it it out of my whole case i, i don't know how a large aid is defined and what the word return means because we never left syria has remained in place with the same positions and the same conditions dealing with them in its own way and according to its principles and perspective, oliver, i would like to say that in their essence, syrian arab relations have not changed much during the war. sarab states have maintained their relations with us and stood with us hold on doing all. even those that were true, their diplomatic mission is yes, even those that went through their diplomatic mission was changed their relationship and capital. was it a feeling of area, despite not being able to do anything, the position is the same as formal changes happening in this relationship as a result of the change in work, or stances, whether regional or any other matter that i cannot go on their behalf. whenever i do not believe there is a great change in the big change that is happening in terms of form could be working on it doesn't have any grudge against the countries which amanda her during its crisis. one of the 1st of all, to grudges proof of witness. secondly, begrudging doesn't lead anywhere but does not create any positive results, especially in relations with countries. thirdly, and we have to distinguish between policy errors are made by holidays and the people in the for that. we seek arab are of relations, which means relations between people. and in this case, there are no grudge unless you mean and fourthly, we know that our countries have their own circumstance level. but we are able to say, you know, on many issues with our habits, many or countries are unable to do the same loca