Transcripts For MSNBCW The Cycle 20150603 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For MSNBCW The Cycle 20150603

His brother claims he was shot three times in the back. That is contrary to the Police Version of the story that he was shot in the torso and chest. There is security video of the shooting and the d as office wont release this yet publicly until collecting further eyewitness account. The boston pd did play it for area religious leaders in hopes of correcting what they say is inaccurate information. It certainly makes it clear that the gentleman was not shot in the back that he was shot in the front. The video is inconclusive. I dont think he was shot in the back by virtue of that. Theres no detail enough clear on the video to tell us exactly what happened. However, he was approaching them. They did back up and evidently by evidence of his death, he was fired upon. The weapons arent clearly visible but you can clearly see officers approaching the suspect here with no weapons drawn. Boston police emphatically standing by the deadly use of force and Loretta Lynch also weighed in today, all the way from germany. What i can tell you is that wherever we see evidence of a potential terrorist activity we will take the appropriate Law Enforcement steps. Even as these investigations and threats continue washington has proven a rare bipartisan ability to rebalance our approach to security and Civil Liberties with president obama signing the usa freedom act into law last night and Administration Working to shift the program out of government control. We have more on that this hour but first go to sarah dallof. These investigations are active what can you tell us about these men . Reporter well lets start with 26yearold rahim, ari, shot and killed in this parking lot in front of a cvs store yesterday. He had been under 24hour surveillance going on for several weeks. Law enforcement say his level of threat had increased. They felt it was in their best interest to try to speak to him, to approach him. Yesterday morning when all of that went down. The chair of the House Homeland Security Committee Said today rahim had been communicating with and spreading propaganda for isis online. As for david wright, hes scheduled to appear in court in just under a half hour. Well find out what he will be charged with and his connection to this case and rahim, when that begins. It is set to take place in the sake courthouse where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was tried for his role in the marathon bombing case. Thank you for your reporting. All of this is happening as the nsa has to restart part of some of its controversial data surveillance programs and now have six months under the new law to work with Telecom Companies to find out how a carrier held data program will work and what does it mean for u. S. Intel. We go to Patrick Tucker tech editor at defense one. Good day to you. Thanks for having me. You bet. One of the interesting parts of this, reasonable people can have disagreements about how to balance this. Part of the security debate up to this point suggested we would be somehow completely handicapped and now saying it will work fine moving forward. How will it work and can we get similar levels of security assurances with this extra privacy . When the president first issued an indication that he wanted to move the country beyond the collection of bulk telephone metadata, he had the Intelligence Community come up with a study to look at how they would achieve the same capability but without that controversial program. That study was released in january of this year. And what it says is this pretty much the Intelligence Community is unanimous in saying that they do use the bulk metadata. They wont tell you how exactly but its for their regular work connecting the dots between one person and another, seeing where a person was. And so they have say that even though they use that they can to some degree not fully but to some degree replace that with new capabilities. Under the freedom act, its the Telephone Companies that contain your metadata and the nsa could ask for aspects of it with a fisa court order. Some of the ways that the Intelligence Community is going to do that and retain the capabilities that they had when all of the date at a was on their servers is potentially to have much smarter software that does some of the job of an analyst, looking through metadata as it exists on Company Servers then pinging the Intelligence Community when it finds something that might be of use to them to take that potentially to a fisa court and get that warrant. Its very interesting how you lay it out and that will happen over a period of six months. Six months from now when this does kick in and the companies have all control over the bulk data what will it mean to be under surveillance and how will that be different than how its done in the past . Well one of the big differences is that now the entire country is not under surveillance in the same way. We can all feel a little better about that. The Intelligence Community would need to have more probable cause in order to begin to listen in on everyone or on a particular persons exchanges. And more importantly, when we communicate with anybody, thats not something that would be stored with the government. So it changes that. Theres a couple of other changes and couple of things that stay the same. The fisa court would have to go to and employ certain instances special advocates for privacy rights in particular cases. Were not going to be sure which cases they are, but youre going to have someone in the room during certain hearings where these fisa court orders its not a one sided court anymore. Right exactly. Thats one thing. One of the things that the Intelligent Community retains is the ability to do roving wiretaps to watch a target as they move from device to device and also to monitor lone wolf targets and this is a provision that they say theyve never used but this case really highlights the potential there for people that arent formally affiliated with any particular group that dont communicate necessarily with isis that often. And their potential threat level, the Intelligence Community says we need to watch those. I think most folks rg are okay with tarkted targeted investigations based on probable cause. But when we get into fishing expeditions when folks are looking to see what they see, thats what makes a lot of people nervous. You seale a way to get us out of the fishing expedition business . This is what is potentially promised by new Software Tools, we dont know if those particular Software Tools will be available in six months its sort of something that this National Academy of sciences report laid out as a solution. But what it does it sort of works the way spotify works, when you turn on to the spotity, you dont own the songs but you get access for a period of time because a bunch of rhythms determine you can play it but dont own it and the Software Solutions they could begin to develop would look a bit like that. The Intelligence Community still says the reason we have all of this stuff is because we sometimes dont know who to target yet and having access to all of the telephone metadata records that we can get our hands on allows us to do that targeting. They are pretty clear. They still use that stuff and still want it even though now its basically prohibited from their use. Telecom companies and many other companies as well are already collecting our data in a variety of ways. How secure is the data when its held by these companies . Well thats a matter of some mystery. How secure was it when it was held by the nsa . Not very you had a Third Party Contractors with a couple of flash drives hauled the family jewels to hong kong and now lives in russia. The thing about data is this when you use it you expose it the more you collect and more of it you use in some way, the more likely all of it is to get out. I think we all have to kind of get used to the idea theres no place where this data is perfectly secure. The military and the National Security complex in general actually do have an interest in enabling more secure sharing of data with the understanding that we share our data with lots of devices all the time. Where we see vulnerabilities is where in the process of that sharing data goes missing and goes to one place or another and thats what actually opens up a lot of hacking activity that we see. Right now no matter where its held, our data is not perfectly secure and its hard to believe that it will be because we want it to be. And the snowden example is one that senator leahy mentioned this week that gave him pause about combining it all, what the nsa was doing was more valuable than the individual companies had on their own. Coming up later, a guest who says america hasnt really won a war since world war ii and what we need to do is learn how to lose wars better. All of the 2016 candidates seem to be antiwall street do you think the big banks are the enemy or attacking a convenient scapegoat . Right after the break, if its a day ending in y, that means any day, then a new candidate thanks for clarifying. Look at the new bybies in the race in general. Thats next on the cycle. So smart. Vo with beyond natural dry pet food, you can trust our labels. When we say real meat is the first ingredient, it is number one. When we say theres no corn, wheat or soy its not there. Learn more at purinabeyond. Com guys, its just the two of you. The setting is just right. But heres the thing, about half of men over 40 have some degree of erectile dysfunction. Well, viagra helps guys with ed get and keep an erection. And you only take it when you need it. Ask your doctor if your heart is healthy enough for sex. Do not take viagra if you take nitrates for chest pain; it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. Side effects include headache, flushing, upset stomach and abnormal vision. To avoid longterm injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. Stop taking viagra and call your doctor right away if you experience a sudden decrease or loss in vision or hearing. Ask your doctor about viagra. You are looking at two airplane fuel gauges. Can you spot the difference . No . You cant see that . Alright, lets take a look. The one on the right just used 1 less fuel than the one on the left. Now, to an airline a 1 difference could save enough fuel to power hundreds of flights around the world. Hey, look at that. Pyramids. So you see, two things that are exactly the same have never been more different. Ge software. Get connected. Get insights. Get optimized. The former governor and senator from americas smallest state is hoping to make a big splash on the 2016 scene. Tonight Rhode Islands Lincoln Chafee declares his run for the white house. Chafee has a fascinating political story, wasnt always a democrat. In fact hes never held office as a democrat. I talked to him on sirius xmt m radio how he abandoned the Republican Party because he felt the Republican Party abandoned him. Kind of conservative on fiscal issues but liberal on social issues is the general cliche about rockefeller republicans. As the party changed as you know room for us became less and less accommodating. On the republican side rick perry announces his bid tomorrow. Donald trump has a special announcement set for june 16th and louisiana governor bobby jindal is calling his announcement major, wonder what to could be, thats expected three weeks from today. Lts to get to with jimmy williams. Always good to see, executive editor of blue nation review. Good to see you, bud. Hey, guys. Another day, another president ial announcement. Theres a lot to get to. Lets start with Lincoln Chafee who makes it official today, running as a democrat but as you heard in my interview with him still fiscally conservative but socially out of step with the Republican Party. Theres no place for him there but theres no pathway for him as a democrat either. Where does someone like that fit in todays politics . Im not really sure what chafees motivation here is its not like for that matter heres my thought process on chafee where youre a United States senator and think you can be president of the United States only two of those for the record and once you leave the senate that vacuum and void is there. Hes no longer the governor of rhode island. What is he going to do . Hes not terribly old so he has a career ahead of him. Im not sure what it gets him. When i worked in the United States senate he was a republican. He was a liberal republican and by the way he says hes conservative on fiscal issues but voted against the bush tax cuts. Im not really sure where his conservism is on fiscal issues but hes a thoughtful guy. If trying to get into the democratic nomination platform if you will hes going to have to explain his positions from the path in his vote and that could be very tricky for him. I think on entitlements hes been more of a fiscally conservative side of the equation, of course republican parties move far right in terms of fiscal conservatism as well. Lets talk about another long shot candidate, carly fiorina, i got to talk on my web show earlier today with two republican congresswoman really genuinely excited by fiorina fiorina, mimi walters. Lets listen to what she had to say. Its a big challenge to run and big commitment for your family if you take on running for president of the United States. I say you go carly. I think thats awesome. I thought it was interesting, carly the only woman out of the like 400 or so republican contenders that have decided to throw their hat into the ring and it made me think talking to these women generally enthusiastic, there might be something there, not that shes going to win but you can see republican women in iowa and other places looking at carly and being excited by what they see. Women are not monolivic but they like women to run for office. What we do know is is women determine the outcomes of every single election if they show up or dont show up and vote. As for fiorina, she is a long shot. And republicans have a problem and that is if you have 35 republican men who are sitting on stage and baseic basically beating the heck out of Hillary Clinton over and over again, that optic is very bad. Now whether she makes it into those debates or not, i dont know. Shes got to get her name i. D. Up. If i have a women attacking a women, thats a far better political optic than republican men doing that to Hillary Clinton. I will say this women, wives, its one thing for the men and republican men in the country to go i dont like Hillary Clinton. If have a bunch of men saying that on stage their rifz will raise an eyebrow, stop bashing women, thats not correct. Shes credible and qualified to be president. Judge her on that. That is a problem for them. Some folks in this country may feel that she is qualified to be president by their own metrics but i think we can degree, shes not going to get the nomination neither is Lincoln Chafee most of the folks, 95 of the folks in the race have no chance to get the nomination look abby no chance to get the nomination. But some of these folks dont know they have no chance. They may have convinced themselves they have a changs. Some of them surely do know they dont have a chance. Why do all of the long shot candidates, youve known some do all of the long shot candidates know they dont have a chance . If they know that why do they run . Some of it is humorous and trying to position themselves for what happens in 2017 when theres a new administration. Some want cabinet secretary positions, linds si graham is running for president. He certainly would in a Republican Administration make one hell of a defense secretary. Ive not spoken with him but i think that plays into it. I think thats part of it. They like cabinet jobs and want to get out of the senate where not much gets done. If they run a department or agency thats a good thing and not a bad way to cap stone your Public Service career. Thats part of it i think. Dont you think for some candidates theres a desire to shape the debate. I dont agree with toure i dont think theres any way to project this far out exactly who is going to be in or out of viability and there are examples throughout history no one expected lbj as an incumbent president to not run again. That was a direct result of mccarthy which brought rfk in. Theres so many things unpredictable in politics because it is up to voters even if Money Matters more than before. Dont you think there are people who maybe are long shots but want to get in or shape it rand paul, pushing the party and making i think Immediate Impact on surveillance and security . The saying is the last man standing wins right, if youre the last two or three standing on stage, that gives you some viability but were a long way off from that. Youre right, we do not know whats going to happen. Think about in 2007 we all knew Hillary Clinton was going to run for president and we thought she woob the nominee. Then some freshman senator named barack obama ran against her and won and sits in the white house today. So there are lots of things that happened and we dont know until we know. We alw

© 2025 Vimarsana