i know that you have been reporting on the president's comment, and he said whoever provided the information to the whistle-blower is close to a spy, and how does that attack tell us about how this story is weighing on the president? >> what we are seeing is again to go back to what i was saying before the commercial break, now that almost sort of kind of not really transcript is out, who put forward this information is overtaken by the events, but it seems like the early stages of the repetition of the mueller playbook even though the investigation is over to try to discredit the substance of the investigation by casting doubt on the origins, and the whistle-blower is partisan or who are the people who told the whistle-blower the information that he put in the whistle-blower complaint that led to this sequence of events as if it makes a difference that the actual information is public