trump's lawyers wanted to use mazara's decision to say there was no need for any investigation, but the judge overseeing the case was not having any of it. the idea that an accounting firm's announcement that nobody who rely on a decade of financial statements somehow exonerates that entity, that's reminiscent of louis carol. it just means what i use it to mean, either more or less. to proclaim that mazara's statement that the statements are unreliable is audacious as is it as preposterous.