trump friendly judge and a potentially trump friendly jury. >> it is a very interesting legal strategy for them to employ at this point because what they are attempting to argue is no harm no foul as katie just talked about, they are going to set up a defense that says these documents were already highly classified in a way that they should not have been, and therefore, the fact that donald trump -- should not be something that results in them being a convicted criminal. the problem with that is what you look at when you see jack smith and the government filing today. what they filed what they wanted to get information around sulfone data from the codefendant in this case, because when they are trying to do is basically say, look, we are going to line up, or all of these documents will be moved, and hidden, and moved, and hidden lucky government was trying to recover them. and that directly undercuts the notion that you believe that having them wasn't a big deal, that you are trying to assert that now that it wasn't. and that is a problem that donald trump has not been able