weapons? my concern with the speech, my concern with the line at the end is that i think it works against that. what it has done is in some ways taken what has been up to now a disciplined, limited war, and in some ways made it existential for putin. i don't want him to think he has nothing to lose by escalating against nato or by using chemical or nuclear weapons. i want him to feel that he does have a lot to lose. i want us still to be able to negotiate with him to bring this war to an end, again, on terms president zelenskyy can accept. so i think the president went too far. let me just say why the reagan parallel doesn't work here. tear down this wall, that was a policy push. this is something much more fundamental and existential against putin and against the nature of a totalitarian system. second of all, this statement was made by president biden in the middle of a hot war in a country bordering on four nato
Related Keywords
Speech , World War Ii , Syria Drop Chemical Weapons , Line , Concern , Ways , The End , Lot , Nato , Putin , Nothing , Joe Biden , Volodymyr Zelenskyy , Wall , Ronald Reagan , End , Doesnt Work , Policy Push , On Terms , Denouncing Putin , All Of Us , Something , Country , Statement , Nature , System , Second , Middle , Four ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.