hundreds of hours of testimony. thousands of questions asked. thousands of answers given. the number of times that witnesses have been asked any question about whether or not president trump's conduct constituted bribery before ambassador yovanovitch was asked by congressman stewart last thursday is zero. >> zero. now that's really interesting. it's kind of a lawyer's trick. let's discuss. he had two visual aids. one, that dramatic stack of transcripts saying they weren't discussing legal term bribery and two, full disclosure over his shoulder at times view uers might see, he had a visual aid that referred to actual msnbc reporting about bribery and the constitution. what is he doing there? he's trying to make it sound suspicious that these fact witnesses weren't discussing law. of course the reason why you have fact and legal witnesses is the fact witnesses discuss what they saw. they don't issue, they're not supposed to issue legal