maine is looking at the supreme court, illinois looking at the supreme court, do you imagine the supreme court will also try to address all of these different ballot challenges that we're seeing from other states? is that even possible? >> i believe so. senator boxer raised a good point, which is that it would be a disaster if we had essentially a patchwork of donald trump on the ballot in some states, not on the ballot in others. i don't think the supreme court is going to let that happen. i actually think that the reason the supreme court took this case on such an expedited schedule is essentially to put this to rest early on, given the makeup of the court, like i said, i think i could see them having some outs here and otherwise to say that the amendment doesn't apply to the presidency, just as it applies to every other officer of the united states. but they've got a number of outs in which they can essentially put him on the ballot anywhere. i think that's likely what they're going to do. i'm not saying that's the right decision, necessarily. obviously, this has never been decided before and no court has decided it. but the legislative history, i

Related Keywords

Supreme Court , Wall , States , Barbara Boxer , Maine , Illinois , Ballot Challenges , Reason , Ballot , Donald Trump , Case , Point , Patchwork , Others , Disaster , Colorado Supreme Court , Presidency , Outs , Makeup , Officer , Schedule , Amendment Doesn T Apply , U S Capitol , Number , History , Decision , It , Anywhere ,