About the fraud. Thats been a central theme of the trump defense. Multiple vote. Its been, hey, if this happened, we had people handling this, it wasnt us. We didnt have knowledge of this alleged fraud. The other major prong of their argument is valuation. Realistic values could be anything. You add to that the trump brand, which is valuable, and now through even more nebulous. Thats consistent with the Trump Argument the and her time. This shows me, Justice Engoron is really listening to witness testimony, hes listening to the evidence, hes considering it thoughtfully. And hes not just lumping all the trumps engaging in any political association of history . Not at all. Its important he looks at it individually to figure out, you may see ultimately a decision that reflect the difference in how he sees the evidence against each individual trump, given protested many, given that documentary evidence. Like i said earlier, ive read his opinion on the summary
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.