Goodell says he got it wrong in the ray rice case. But promises to crack down on domestic violence. I made a mistake. Im not satisfied with the process that we went through. Im not satisfied with the conclusions. With a number of major sponsors turning up the heat, where does the nfl go from here . Well talk with sports commentator jim gray, and our sunday panel weighs in. Plus, its jurs 44 days to the midterm elections. With control of the senate up for grabs. Well handicap the key races and get some predictions from our political gurus, karl rove and joe trippi. And our power player of the week, bestselling author daniel silva on creating one of fictions top spies. I think that secretly, we hope that there are people like gabriel allond out there. All right now on position news sunday. Hello again from fox news in washington. The secret service has stepped up security around the white house after a man with a knife made it inside the president s home friday night. Fox news correspondent joins us from the north lawn where it all happened. Hi, chris. Security has been enhanced all weekend after a texas man carrying a 3 1 2 serrated blade jumped over the fence and charged the white house. One secret Service Director said the location of his arrest is unacceptable. It was all caught on video. 42yearold Omar Gonzalez sprinting toward the pillars of the north portico. He wasnt stopped until he had passed through the threshold of the white house doors. A source says at least one officer was outside the front door with his weapon out but decided not to shoot, using his own discretion. Gonzalez was not taken down on the lawn, or met by dogs. I cant understand why the dog wasnt released. Why no one intercepted or tackled him, none of the personnel. Its baffling to me and i think to a lot of folks. Reporter the president was not home at the time, having left just minutes beforehand with his daughters for camp david. The first lady was also away. Its only been about a week and a half since a man wearing a pokemon costume jumped the fence in a similar fashion and charged the white house property. However, he was met immediately by officers with guns, and a dog unit. On saturday Law Enforcement officials conducted a shouldertoshoulder sweep of the white houses north lawn, the front plaza and adjacent park. Just hours before new jersey man kevin carr was arrested and charged for trying to enter a barricaded white house entry with his car. Gonzalez was charged with unlawfully entering a restricted building or grounds while carrying a deadly or dangerous weapon. The secret service said just last night theyre conducting a comprehensive review. Chris, back to you. Elizabeth fran reporting from the white house. Elizabeth, thanks for that. Congress is now on record giving bipartisan approval to president obamas plan to train Syrian Rebels. But it was a hold your nose and say yes vote, as members of congress and some of the president s top military advisers expressed strong doubts about the obama plan to fight isis. We want to explore that with two members of the House Intelligence Committee who both voted to approve the president s request. In new york, republican congressman peter king, and here in washington, democrat adam schiff. Before we get to isis, congressman king, youre also a member of the House Homeland Security committee. I want to ask your reaction to this terrible Security Breach at the white house, and what does the secret service need to do better . Chris, i have Great Respect for the secret service but this is absolutely inexcusable that he went over the fence, and i believe it takes 35 to 40 seconds to run across the lawn. A dog can be released in four seconds. Their senses were working there and then he made it all the were a to the white house and actually entered the front door and the fact that they said he wasnt brought down because they didnt think he had a weapon. He could have had a vest on. As we know he did have a knife. So, this demands a full investigation, and investigation into what happened, why it happened, and whats being done to make sure it never happens again. And im on the Homeland Security committee, and im sure that chairman mccall will be holding a hearing as to what happened. And also, as to how the recommendations are being implemented. There can be a lot of conspiracies against a president. A lot of very complex assassination plots. This is the most basic, the most simple type of procedure and how anyone, especially in these days of isis, and were concerned about terrorist attacks, someone could actually get into the white house without being stopped is inexcusable. Lets turn to isis. The wall street journal reports that the u. S. Wants other nations to agree to take on syria before we launch airstrikes in syria. Perhaps as early as this coming week. Congressman schiff, how dependent should the u. S. Be on this International Coalition . Especially for military support so that we dont appear to be going it alone . I think its going to be very important that we get the support of our regional allies. And i think we will get that support. But it will be tempered. And its not as if we could say, okay, we have their support, we can count on it. Were going to have to go back to them time and time again pressuring them to do more. Pressuring the turks to shut down their borders to foreign jihadis coming in and oil revenues going out. Pressuring the qataris and saudis to cut down on the financing. Pressuring them to put an overt and sunni face on the opposition. I do think its significant, chris, that saudi arabia is now willing to overtly openly host the training for this rebel force. Thats a very significant step that will put a big target on saudi backs, so we are getting some meaningful cooperation, but theyre not doing it because they love us. Theyre doing it because they recognize isis is a real threat to them. Secretary of state kerry was at the u. N. This week trying to round up international support, and he made this surprising statement. There is a role for nearly every country in the world to play. Including iran. Congressman, king, a couple of questions. First of all, are you as surprised as i am that secretary kerry would be inviting iran into the International Coalition . And generally speaking, how do you feel . Are we getting enough support, especially military support, active military action by our International Allies . No, chris, so far were not. And where i disagree with the president on this to me attacking isis, attacking isis in syria is in our National Interest. Now if we can get allies, 23 we can get a coalition together, thats fine, and we should work on it. But we cant be beholden to a coalition because were not doing this out of humanitarian purposes and quite frankly were not doing it for the people of syria or iraq. Ultimately were doing it because its in our National Interest to do so. And if thats the case, we cant be holding back. We should attack and strike and do all we can to the command and control centers that isis has in syria. That is a key component of isis located in syria so we shouldnt be waiting for other countries. What about iran . I think its a terrible mistake. First of all the fact that theres shiites, and theres so much involved, sunnis, also iran is powerful enough, i mean they are ultimately they are the main threat in that part of the world, and to be doing anything at all to build them up, to give them sanctuary, to in effect have them on our side, what does that do to israel . What does that do to their Nuclear Development in plan . I think it weakens our position. I cannot understand why we want to get iran involved. Were continuing to see this remarkable split between the president who has doubled down this week, and said absolutely no u. S. Boots on the ground in a combat role and his top military advisers, current and former civilian and military, all saying that we cant rule that out. Thats a real possibility. Congressman king, your best judgment, will u. S. Forces at some point have to get involved in some kind of a combat role if only to call in air strikes, and to help iraqi and Peshmerga Forces on the front line . Well, chris, we already have american troops on the ground. We have special forces there. They are obviously, you know, theyre in harms way. And i dont see how ultimately we can avoid putting combat troops on the ground in some capacity. But more than that, i dont know why the president says up front that were not going to put boots on the ground. Dont take anything off the table. Never let the enemy know what youre going to do or not going to do. We had general madison before the Intelligence Committee on friday and he was saying theres two parts to this. One you should never let the enemy know what youre going to do. But secondly if we are going to expect Coalition Troops on our side from the region if the president takes one step forward and one step sideways saying hes not going to use combat troops that to them shows a lack of seriousness of purpose and thats why its going to be hard to get the saudis or jort danians or uae involved because theyre afraid that the president is not going to stick this out. Why should they be . Let me bring congressman schiff into this. You oppose the use of Ground Forces in a combat role in iraq. But the chairman of the joint chiefs, general dempsey, the army chief of staff, ray odierno say that they may be needed. And so, in fact, does robert gates the first obama secretary of defense. Take a look. There will be boots on the ground if theres to be any hope of success in the strategy. I think by continuing to repeat that the president in effect traps himself. Congressman, are gates and odierno and dempsey, are they all wrong . No, i dont think theyre all wrong. But i dont think theyre at odds with the president. What dempsey has said is if circumstances down the road pose a threat to the United States hell make a different recommendation. That is what he should do. His role is different than the president s. But i think the president the president isnt saying well if circumstances change, hes saying no. No u. S. Combat forces. Yes, thats what hes saying. But delvesy is also saying that he subscribes to the strategy of utilizing iraqi and Peshmerga Forces on the ground, not americans in the combat mission. I think thats the right call. What the general is saying im in agreement with that strategy. If that strategy doesnt work or at some point theres a threat to the United States im going to make a different recommendation to the president. And thats exactly what we should want and you think the president will be open then to a different strategy . I think the president will be open. But chris i want a president who is not going to accept everything that the military says uncreditably. Look we have tried massive occupations in iraq earlier, and in afghanistan. Were in afghanistan now 13 years later, we still havent solved the problem in afghanistan. Do we really want to be in a position where 13 years from now we are massively occupying syria and iraq. I dont think thats what we want. And one other point, chris, that is, the president s role is obviously different than the military commands role. If the military commands job to tell the president what they want, its the president s job to decide what they need, and the president has to bring our country along. Thats a tough job. We have a couple of minutes left. I want to ask you each one more question. Congressman schiff im going to ask you about congress because this week as we pointed out, you did approve 500 million to arm and train the Syrian Rebels. On the other hand youre going to go home, without a larger vote to authorize what in effect is a new war. And the presidequestion i have congress forfeiting its constitutional responsibility . Absolutely. Absolutely. The president has said this is a war. This is going to last years. That is quintessentially something that is the power of congress only to declare, and i think we are really advocating our responsibility. Congress should take up an authorization to use force as you know ive introduced one that would be very narrow but would i think bring this fight within a constitutional framework. I dont accept the administrations argument we can rely on the 2001 amf which applies to a different conflict against a different enemy at a different time. So i think its an abdication of constitutional dimension. Finally, congressman king, and as we mentioned youre a member of the House Homeland Security committee, there was this extraordinary event in australia this week where 15 people were arrested in australia for allegedly planning public beheadings that theyd been urged to carry out on the internet. How concerned are you about the threat here to the u. S. Homeland, either from isis or from other Al Qaeda Affiliated groups in syria like a new group were hearing about. How concerned are you about the threat to the u. S. Homeland either from selfradicalized people who hear about these things on the internet or foreign fighters who are in syria or iraq and then come back . Chris, i am very concerned. We still have al qaeda. We still have al qaeda in the arabian peninsula. We have this new group you mention the Corazon Group and other isis affiliates plus home grown. I dont subscribe to this belief that isis is not a threat to the homeland. Not just from fighters coming back but they have thousands of europeans who can come into the u. S. They have more money, more fighters, and more sophistication than al qaeda had on 9 11. They are a real threat to the u. S. In fact back in 2011 they real briefly real briefly. We cant take our eye off the ball, because al qaeda, the al nusra franchise in syria, poses a more immediate threat to our homeland than isis does at the present. Theyre trying to work with aqap bomb americas to smuggle on bombs on our planes. We cannot lose sight of that threat. Thats really the more immediate threat to americans adam i would say theyre all a threat. Theyre equal threats. Theyre coming at us and we have to be on our guard at all times. If isis went into australia they could certainly come into the u. S. In 2011 they attempt to attack or not. All of them, i say, are threats we cannot let our guard down at all. Gentlemen you have thoroughly scared me. Congressman king, congressman schiff, thank you. Coming up the latest on the scandal involving the National Football league and commissioner Roger Goodell. But first, how much of a coalition has president obama put together to fight isis . Our sunday panel joins us next. Well lead a Broad Coalition of nations who have a stake in this fight. This isnt america versus isis. This is the people of that region versus isis. Its the world versus isis. President obama talking about the Broad Coalition he says hes put together to fight isis. And its time now for our sunday group. Brit hume, fox news senior political analyst, julie pace who covers the white house for the associated press, syndicated columnist george will, and fox news political analyst juan williams. Julie from the white house officials you talked with, are they satisfied with the military support theyre getting from other countries . Do they really intend to wait to get other countries to join in before they launch air strikes against syria . And why on earth, a lot of questions for you, would secretary kerry invite iran into the coalition . Well, in terms of the coalition that they have right now, theyre certainly not satisfied really with just france publicly on board to airstrikes. Saudi arabia is committed to training Syrian Rebels in their countries. Theyre looking specifically for commitment from arab nations to get involved militarily. Thats key to this mostly symbolically. If not that the u. S. Cant carry this out on their own. But symbolically they want to have this Broad Coalition. You will see the president and secretary kerry at the u. N. This week trying to build that coalition and get public commitment. When it comes to iran, though, this is really tricky. Because, we know what the u. S. Has largely ruled out doing with iran, according militarily, according to intelligence channels and yet you continue to have secretary kerry and others publicly talk about a need to work with them to some degree. Whats that involve if youre not coordinating militarily or through intelligence channels i think is a big question. Its also a problem because theyre a shiite nation and it only increases the shiites against the sunnis which is a huge divide. Brit, let me ask you, so far, this is not exactly the coalition of the willing that george w. Bush was so widely mocked for when he went in to iraq in 2003 . The numbers are not bad in terms of number of countries. But whats missing here is the elements of a commitment to support what is going to end up having to be a military ground operation. Isis holds territory. Territory needs to be retaken if youre to conquer isis. You cant do that, you can do a lot more from the air than you used to be able to but you cant do that without some Ground Forces and so far its not at all clear particularly when it comes to syria where these Ground Forces are going to come from and i dont think any serious military Analyst Thinks that the Syrian Rebels can be trained up in sufficient number to do away with isis. So whats lacking there is a commitment to help with this ground operation. One further word about iran. It isnt just that iran is shiite, its also that were involved in this Nuclear Negotiation with iran and the iranians are now talkin