Listening to us. They live. We all know that. Other countries understand that they dont use electronic voting because they know it undermines confidence in democracy. A system cannot function if no one trusts the vote and thats true here, too, as we are finding out. Going forward we need to find out exactly what happened in this months president ial election. We need to find out how long it takes the investigation to enfold her how much it costs. Once we get answers to that investigation, we will refer immediately to the traditional system of voting, the one that served our democracy for hundreds of years. What we are doing now is not working. As of tonight the state of new york and still hasnt managed to count the votes in five house races to mailin voting and thats a disaster to stop pretending that its not. But at the same time we should let our focus on Voting Machines distract us from all the happened earlier this month. The 2020 president ial election was not fair. No honest person would claim that it was fair. On many levels the system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another. It was raked in ways that were not hidden from view. We also might have been. The media openly colluded with the democratic nominees. Joe biden and Kamala Harris refused to explain what they would do if they were elected. Thats never happened before in any president ial election in american history. But the media allowed them to do it. At the same Time Beginning in the spring, Democrats Used our Public Health emergency for nakedly partisan ends. They punished them for getting to gather the restrictions they did and for us . A small businesses, the heart of the republican party, and yet they made their own donors fantastically richer. Jeff bezos alone saw his net worth jumped by more than 70 billion during the pandemic. Then, Democrats Use the coronavirus to change their system of voting. The vastly increased number of mailin ballots. They knew their candidates would benefit from less secure voting and they were right. They use the single most effective get out the vote operation which for generations had been the National Rifle association. Not enough has been written about this but anyone on the ground saw it. Thanks to legal harassment from the left, the nra played vastly reduced role in this election, and that made a huge difference in swing states like pennsylvania and others. But above all, democrats harness the power of big tech to win this election. Virtually all news and all information, the englishspeaking world travels through a single company, goog google. If you use technology to censor the ideas that people are allowed to express online, ultimately you control how the population votes and thats exactly what they did. They rigged the election in front of all of us, and nobody did anything about it. Dr. Robert epstein saw this coming, one of the worlds foremost experts on the effective big, big tech on politics. Epstein is not a partisan trump supporter, in fact hes a democrat. But he believes in democracy and for years he has warned that Silicon Valley could still this election. This is what he said when we spoke to him about a year ago. Google and Similar Companies like facebook are completely unregulated in the United States, so they can do whatever they please. If they all Work Together in 2020 to support the same president ial candidate which is very likely and probably, it will be a candidate that i support, by the way, they can shift upwards of 15 million votes with no one knowing that they have been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. Tucker dr. Epstein has tracked to the effect it has had on this months election and he joins us now to explain what hes found. Thanks so much for coming on. What effect do you think, have you measured come of big tech on the voting outcome this month . A couple of things that we have looked at so far. First of all we had 733 yield agents in three key swing states this year. Arizona, North Carolina and florida. We preserved more than 500,000 ephemeral experiences, thats a lot. Thats about 30 times more data than we got in 2016. We are finding a couple of things that are pretty clear. Number one is that googles search results were strongly biased in favor of liberals and democrats and this is not true on being or yahoo. The bias was shown to pretty much every Demographic Group we looked at including conservatives. They got slightly more liberal bias in their search results than liberals dead. How do you account for that . We also found what seems to be a smoking gun which as we found a period of days when the vote reminder on googles home page was being sent only to liberals, not one of our conservative free comic field agents received a vote reminder during those days. The good news is we went public with some of our findings and google backed off and literally shut off that manipulation that night and so for four days before the election they were showing vote reminder as to everyone finally. Tucker what effect and we are thankful that you are apparently the only person monitoring this. Google singlehandedly controls our view of the world, and yet no one seems to care. But what do you imagine the effects what if you measured the effect of this manipulation that had on the outcome of the election . There are multiple manipulations, we are also monitoring youtube at this time and facebook and bing and yahoo. The bottom line at the moment is that these manipulations, the ones that we have so far quantified could easily have shifted at least 6 million votes in just one direction. Thats the bare minimum at this point that im confident of. The maximum, we havent even begun to estimate that yet because we have so much data to look at. Tucker so thats a margin of the election right there. So you are saying what you feared could have been may indeed have happened, that the manipulation of one company, google will come up may have determined the outcome of the president ial election. We have been told this for nearly a year by whistleblowers from google. We seen it in leaked documents from google and leaked videos from google and theres no question that they set about after the 2016 election to make sure that president trump, who might do not support, by the way, to make sure he is not reelected and the massive amount of data we collected is consistent with what the whistleblowers and leeks have been telling us for a long time now. So yes, the answer is yes. Tucker so why is this not at the top of a concern about anybody who cares about democracy . Why are we allowing this to happen . The answer is pretty obvious, google literally buys candidates and politicians, and my colleagues and fellow academics are often bought by google with the large grants. The fact is if you are a democrat or liberal, you like what these other Tech Companies are doing. We dont know who in Different Countries around the world dont necessarily support liberals. In some countries they support conservatives, in china, they work with the Chinese Government to help surveilled and of chinese population. Tucker this is the story right here. Dr. Epstein, i hope you get the funding to continue the research. I think its hard to think of many things more important and i hope that changes are made more immediately. We are doing our best. I hope that you will. Thank you. So big tech clearly influence the outcome of this election and this should be shopping comic is shocking and unacceptable to anyone who believes in democracy or Good Government and yet it was essentially celebrated by National Media with the goal of removing someone from office. Cheryl atkinson is the author of the book census. She joins us tonight. That title is chilling but true. Cheryl atkinson, thank you. What effect do you think the Tech Companies had on this election . I think it was big at looking at it in the nonforensic way. Looking at the influence that they have had over the past couple of years after a Concerted Campaign that began in 2016 on the part of political and corporate interests to try to control the internets landscape, the information we get online. These forces knew that anyone who largely controlled the terms of how we talk about new stories and new divisions, and on tv and on cable news, there was still this place that they saw people getting unfettered access to off narrative information. Opinions maybe they dont want you to have or know about. They set up their goals as we move into the internet in a way like we hadnt seen before, in a very overt way in the weeks before the election, to try to control that information landscape as well. Tucker i dont know how frequently we can sound the alarm, i hope something is done about it soon. But give us an example of what they did in the weeks before the election if you would. There are plenty of ways, and in ways that every day our information is controlled. Google actually made this announcement when coronavirus hit that they were going to direct searches to the World Health Organization which in retrospect admitted to w. H. O. That it had gotten certain things completely wrong. But thats where we were being directed because of the partnership that they developed because interests wanted us to go there and believe that. But right before the election, in ways that werent even partly hidden, i felt like there was a sense of desperation because a Tech Companies began overtly censoring and taking down accounts rather than minimizing them or minimizing their reach. In ways that could be denied. So you look at the New York Post story on hunter biden, and the audacity of that, but to not even care in those couple of weeks leading up to the election that we saw exactly what they were doing. We knew there would be no repercussions about the electi election. Tucker do you think that there is any way to reign this end before the next election . Even before the runoff in january in georgia that will determine control of the congress . I doubt before the runoff but if we are looking for years down the road, we are looking at strong technical minds and independent minds and information people looking in all kinds of ways where information can be disseminated without being curated by the and parties who have their own conflict of interest where people wont beat the platform that they share factual information, or if they want to share information thats not true but leave it up to you to decide what is and isnt rather than letting these unnamed faceless people with conflicts of interest do it for you. Lots of people are searching for ways to do that and i do think something will be born of all tucker that cant come too soon. Cheryl atkinson, thank you so much. If you are a trump voter and you suspect this election was stolen, it was rigged, you are onto something. Its a tech company above all that did it, keep that in mind. Up next, solar panels on signing International Agreements that destroy american jobs, it seems like something that would happen in 2009. Joe biden wants to bring it all back. Tucker turns out john kerry like barack obama is what they call a claimant denier. How do we know that . Well because like Obama John Kerry recently purchased a 12 million waterfront homes on the island of marthas vineyard. So obviously hes not really worried about rising sea levels. The passive indifference that most countries are excepting is basically a mutual suicide pact. Thats what people are on right now. Because we are not doing what is necessary to save the planet. Hes not helping the forgotten American Company is hurting him and the kids will have worse asthma in the summer. President trump pulling out of the paris agreement, that will cost lives. Thats not a simple political move, people are going to die because of the decision he made. Tucker its or joe biden wants to spend a lot of the next four years talking about climate. Whats interesting is that climate is very low on every survey of voters actual concerns. They are worried about things like paying off their debt. Many people are drowning in debt. They are worried about relatives that are dying of drug o. D. They are worried about a stalled economy. So why do they keep talking about to this . Katie vance has thought more about the subject and anyone. The movie version of his book is streaming in theaters tomorrow and we wanted to ask him these questions. J. D. Vance, thanks so much for coming out. Before i ask about the movie, let me ask you about the Central Place in the elite liberal mind occupied by climate. Theyve never succeeded above in convincing the population that this should be a top concern, why is that . I think thats because people organize and they are fundamentally unserious. I think most people recognize if you are lecturing the average american about how much they drive their car but you are letting the two biggest polluters in the world china and india basically do whatever they want to, you are not interested in environmental damage, they are interested in gaslighting. So when people like john kerry want to preach about the importance of self denials to save the climate and then go and buy a 13 million mansion and say nothing to china and india, people recognize they are full of. Tucker but to keep trying. These are people who come by the way hate nature, are at war with nature and not interested in the actual environment at all. But climate is always at the top of their plan. Whats in it for them, why . Thats a pretty complicated question. I will give you one part of my answer, a lot of what these people have is they have lost any sense of real religious faith. They are often tied up with a sense of denial. They dont drive the car, they dont go to certain actions. They take certain actions that are perceived as virtuous and its an organizing principle around which they can kind of organize their life. A lot of people may care about the environment in a very real way and recognize that that sort of religious approach to the issue doesnt make any sense. I also think theres a component of basic power going on here. If you look at the agenda thats been pushed by people who care the most or at least claim that they care the most about the environment, its very often making industries that are important in the heartland more economically troubled and its making other Industries LikeDigital Technology easier to sort of push and make the centerpiece of an American Economic policy. So i think in a lot of ways these people have sort of a sense of virtue and selfinterest align and intersect in a way that makes the environmental issue pretty tough to bring any rationality two. Tucker nicely put. You wrote one of your bestselling books, the reviews of the film have been tinged by politics, why do you think that is . There are a lot of things going on. One a lot of people dont like that im a conservative and a talk about these issues in a comment on these things from a writers perspective, and im fine with that. I think it was something a little bit more pernicious that im starting to pick up on and its this idea that hollywood has made a movie about workingclass white people. Tucker, you know the story and a lot of folks have read the book, its a story about addiction, resilience, family overcoming obstacles but also suffering and really important and profound ways. Unfortunately those movies i think arent especially popular, those stories are popular among the intelligent and they dont want to hear stories about workingclass america. I personally think thats disgusting and wrong but ron howard in the team imagined and thought enough about it. I think the folks who watched a movie on netflix tomorrow when it comes out will hopefully find something about my family that they can sympathize with and that is i think really the goal of telling the story in the first place. Tucker i think urinalysis is exactly right. The reviews i have read it reject the idea of chronicling the lives of people who they think should just shut up or go away and die. I commend you for telling your story in a way that millions of people saw. I think thats very important. J. D. Vance, congrats on the movie. Sell l. A. County is shutting down restaurants and bars. Because of coronavirus. Heres a funny thing. Their own data shows that restaurants and bars are not responsible for the spread of the virus. What is that . We will tell you. Plus the governor of new york one his enemy today. A Television Critic reacts, when we come back. So for us, at newday to help those people at this point in time. Its a labor of love, its a noble service, and thats what were all about. Tucker los angeles is famous for its restaurants and law bars and restaurants in that area have done the very best to make coronavirus restrictions. They built it. Eric went fear to control and most importantly in this case the cruelty of closing restaurants come up with the timing is here right before thanksgiving. Governor newsom himself is a primquarantine because of expose and his family, and i wish him well. But the mayor says he wants the bubble to be as little as possible. The public cant afford to be small unless you can afford it cannot really afford it, the way that his family can. I want to point out some students statistics that come out of our local foxborough tonight which is shocking. But less than 3 of those are restaurants and bars. Tucker, you know whats more than 7 . L. A. Government buildings, they are more than the problem. You know what the problem is, its staffing, not even customers. If you are a customer that wants to go to a restaurant in los angeles on wednesday or thursday, but you cant do it even with Outdoor Dining. Even when its 63 degrees in los angeles, you cant afford to eat outdoors. At its poor people we are talking about here because the few cases weve seen of covid19 are occurring in dominoes or thats who the valley all the food you want to eat. So on th