Influence the investigation. Its arguing that the Mueller Report is far more damning. Its not pretty. An ugly, damning piece of business. I agree with him that its absolutely damning. Democrats say the report is damning. The report, apart from the special counsel is more damning than all the reports. Far more damning to the president than the attorney general initially indicated. But its still very damning. Tucker as we told you damning. That is what the geniuses concluded before a single one of them read the report. In fact, they still havent read it. But other people read it or skimmed it and those people let Television Journalists know it didnt say very much. There was no collusion. Much less treason. Not much of anything. At that point they had a choice to make. They could have moved on and worry about americas actual problems. There are many of those. Or double down on a weak hand and demand Robert Mueller testify before congress. They chose the latter. Mueller himself didnt want to participate in this. He didnt see the point of it but democrats insisted. So this wednesday mueller shuffled to capitol hill, and the democrats prodded him like a zoo animal to hope he would transform to clarence darro and denounce trump as a traitor to the nation and a war criminal. But he didnt do that. So californias ted lu pushed him. He tried to make mueller explain he didnt indict trump but trump should still be in prison. I would like to ask you that the reason you did not indict donald trump is because of the opinion you cannot indict a sitting president. Correct . That is correct. Tucker get it . Orange musilini was a criminal all along. Finally, ted lu was able to extract the truth from Robert Mueller. President trump is a criminal. Except not. A few hours later mueller backtracked and clarified he had not called the president a criminal. Watch. Before we go to questions i want to add a correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning but mr. Lu who said, you didnt charge the president because of the o. L. C. Opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we said in the report, we did not reach a determination whether the president committed a crime. Tucker as we say in the report and i said in the opening, in other words mueller wasnt saying anything new. He was repeating what he had been saying forlon. Congressman ted lieu was not convinced and instead he smelled a rat. There has to be a reason that mueller was unwilling to disavow two years of work and his prior statements for a talking point for ted lieu. What could the reason be . He had a good idea. Clearly, the russians had gotten to mueller, too. You were at the center yesterday of one of the most dramatic moments of the hearings with Robert Mueller. He had to walk back his testimony to you in response to your questioning. It wasnt until there was a recess, and the intel committee, he started to walk it back. I dont know who got to him or who talked to him but that was very odd what he did. What are you suggesting . Are you saying he only did that because of pressure from someone . I dont know. But he clearly answered the way he answered to me and then he at numerous times had numerous times to to walk it back. I dont understand what happened. Tucker hmm. Now to be clear, this is a diagnosis, this is how crazy people talk. Tinfoil ted is a nutcake. Like your cousin who convinced the moon landing was staged on a stage. Ted lieu thinks he knows everything. How did they get to mueller . Crash bribe with rubles . Brain waging . Wage brainwashing . Did they get to his kids . We hope someone will ask him for details. We would like to know. But first it might be worth checking in with his colleague sylvester stallonstall eric swae around th Eric Swalwell, if you think lieu has gone around the bend. Watch this. I fear we are more vulnerable than we were in 2016 because russia and the other countries will see the United States as open for business when it comes to interference. Do you worry that the russians developed the capability to actually change vote counts in the United States . Yes. Tucker yes. And to think there are people who believe we should legalize hallucinogenic mushrooms. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Its a sad thing to watch. They have to exist in tangible reality. The Democratic Party no longer does. For two years they read anyone who ever read a tolstoy november of being a russian agent. They mean it. Alexandria ocasiocortez told us recently that the border enforcement is a plot to build the nazi death casms in camps ao on. These are not minor figures in the Democratic Party. These are the leaders. What will happen when these people get to run the coupes. Buck sexton is host of the Buck Sexton Show and he is a frequent guest on our show and we are always glad to have him. Buck, i have been dismissing the claims as absurd but i want to run them by you as a fact check. Is there any evidence that the russians are controlling Robert Mueller . No, absolutely not. But lets remember that there have been former very senior members of the Intelligence Committee where i used to work as a c. I. A. Analyst, there have been people who have come out, former directors who have also indicated without any evidence, by the way, without evidence that the journalists say about some things, maybe someone got to donald trump. They have something on him. He is a russian asset. He is a traitor. There is nothing that is too extreme for them to say in this regard. Yet, they never provide any evidence. It used to be oh, once the Mueller Report comes out, then well see this elusive evidence. Now its well mueller didnt get it, but the gumshoes in congress are somehow going to find this stuff out in time for the election. Its just bad faith at this point. Its been bad faith all along. This someone believes trump is controlled by the russians, they are very cynical or not very smart. Tucker but not just trump. Now its Robert Mueller. And now its the voting machines. I wonder how long it will be until the russians control our polling companies. There is that will explain why sylvesteericswalwell had to gete race. The russians dropped his polls to negative numbers. Do they believe it or are they just saying it . Im starting to think they believe it. I think there are some who believe it. The audiences of cnn and msnbc have been so thoroughly brainwashed to thinking that the big reveal was coming that i dont believe at this point the democrats could walk it back. I dont think that the hosts on the networks could say you know maybe we got this mostly if not entirely wrong all along. So they have to double down and play this. But the big reveal this week was that bob mueller was not, in fact, running this investigation. Was not the paragon of virtue that mueller was supposed to be. He was used as a front and he was essentially a cover story for a whole bunch of people that everyone knew all along were democratic, prohillary operatives with law degrees. But we were told dont worry about it. Mule maualuga would never let them run wild. It couldnt be a political vendetta. But he was a figure head and it was a political vendetta. Now theyre talking crazy because they want to change the topic. The day that Eric Swalwell dropped out was the saddest day in democratic history, but by planting the seed there will be nutcases on the left with the major platforms and when trump is elected again to office, i think he will, they will make the claim that is based on swalwells speculation on television. That has been the m. O. The whole time for the democrats with the mueller probe. Tucker of course. They dont believe it because if they did, they wouldnt be for internet voting. They would be for sameday paper ballot voting with i. D. S. They are against all of that. They are for voter fraud. So if they really were afraid that the russians were subverting the voting system, they would do something about it. Its all about National Security until someone says what about voter i. D. Guys . Then they dont care anymore. Tucker its great to see you tonight. Thanks. Tucker, thanks. Tucker its getting harder and harder for people who make wild claims like the ones you heard to win the elections on substance. But coming up, they may not have to. Americas Largest Tech Companies are overwhelmingly in the democratic column and not afraid to use the power for the ideological purposes. Tonight we have a remarkable guest joining us, current google employee who says his company is far from politically neutral. A current Google Engineer and he joins us tonight. Greg, thank you for coming on. Thanks, tucker. Good to be here. Tucker so first, im grateful that you are here. Im surprised that you are willing to come on and speak to us live. But we are thankful. Youre telling us that google is what they claim not to be which is partisan and political. Is that correct . Here is what i would say. I would say as a user of the various tech products, i notice a lot of the same biases that a lot of people have been concerned about in terms of the end result. Tucker yes. The one thing i want to communicate to anyone maybe who isnt used to launching Software Productions in to production, basically any software launch reflects the outcome of thousands of human decisions. If you made different human decision, you would get a different result. If you see a result, if you see a resulting end product that seems to encode a bias of one sort or another, there must have been that bias in the process that produced the end result. Like i say, different human decisions that went in to the process would produce completely different results. Tucker so this gets to the core business at google and the core question about google, which is google search. So all human information essentially flows through this portal. If you ask google and i have, how is it sorted . They will say by an algorithm. And the suggestion is that its unbiased because a machine is doing it. You are saying that is not true. Right. In fact, in my experience, as algorithms get more advanced, it means they have more human decisions going into them. So there is actually more opportunities for human beings to influence, you know, the final product. Tucker so, this is a meaningful this is not an academic conversation. We have a president ial campaign on the horizon. And again, all American Voters get the bulk of their information about everything including candidates on the internet and google, of course, is the portal to the internet. So, do you think that the biases you are describing will influence the outcome of the election . How could they not . I think it is going to. If people arent able to think critically about the information theyre given, especially if there is this illusion that maybe somehow technology exists in a world apart from humans or you can create a computer to think for itself and be free of human biases, people could be easily mislead or manipulated. Tucker so you are basically saying that google is a liberal company and its liberalism will tilt the president ial election . Are you going to be punished for coming on our show to say this . Im not sure what is going to happen. Im on administrative leave at the moment. Im not sure about the future. Tucker okay. I hope you will come back and tell us what happens. Greg coppola, thank you for that. Thank you very much. Googles agenda is not just a concern for the conservatives. Its worrying to anyone who believes in free speech and anyone who wants to challenge the status quo. After last months democratic debates, Tulsi Gabbard was the single most searched candidate. She was the only one on the stage saying anything interesting and sane. It was a great opportunity to buy ads for her campaign but google wouldnt let her. For several critical hours, Tulsi Gabbard was blocked from buying new ads on google. She is now suing google accusing them of censoring her ads. Is that true . We cant say for sure. It sounds true. Given what we know about google, it is definitely possible. We hope her lawsuit is able to find the truth and well keep you abreast of what it does find. Tucker bring you a fox news alert. Supreme court handed the Trump Administration a moy juror victory major victory in the fight to build a wall at the southern border. Last february, the president declared a emergency at the border and got money to spent for a wall. But court blocked his funding. But now Supreme Court overturned that administration will have access of 2. 5 billion of the pentagon funds. Final ruling is not issued but the administration can now begin wall construction before the litigation finishes. The president treated in response. Wow, big victory on the wall. The Supreme CourtOverturns Lower Court injunction and allows border wall to proceed. Big win for Border Security and the rule of law. We will continue to follow the story, of course. Congressman ilhan omar finally getting attention she deserves for her radical views and her obvious duplicity. There could be real drama in her personal life. Trace gallagher has the story next. Plus, the white house plans to execute five criminals. The democrats are outrage. Why exactly . That as our special report continues. Were the slowskys. We like drip coffee, layovers and waiting on hold. What we dont like is relying on fancy technology for help. Snail mail we were invited to a y2k party. Uh, didnt that happen, like, 20 years ago . Oh, look, karolyn, weve got a mathematician on our hands check it out now you can schedule a callback or reschedule an appointment, even on nights and weekends. Todays xfinity service. Simple. Easy. Awesome. Id rather not. Tucker welcome back to our inside the issues special. Congresswoman ilhan omar is facing increased scrutiny for her views and she is getting attention for a Story Building for years. Her unusual marriage history. Several journalists looked closely into her background and they believe she had a fraudulent marriage to a man who could be her biological brother. The local paper has been unable to get anywhere on the story because omar refuses to answer basic questions about her family. A new report in the daily marriage saymail says her curt marriage could be in trouble also. And Trace Gallagher has more. Its reporting she is splitting with her husband. This would be her second divorce. But legally its the first. Stay with me here. She religious married hersi in 2002. Had two children and religiously divorced him in 2008. They got back together in 2012, had another child. But didnt legally get married until last year. When asked about the latest separation she said, wow, i cant comment on that. Im sorry, i cant say anything. Then there is controversy surrounding her other marriage. In 2009 she married another man. Investigative reporter David Steinberg and Judicial Watch claim they have significant evidence to prove that her first husband is ilhan omars brother. And she married him as a sham to get him in the country. Fox cannot confirm the reports. But we can confirm that ilhan omar was found to have violated Campaign Finance laws by filing joint tax return with hersi when she was still legally married to somebody else. Tucker . Tucker byzantine. Trace gallagher, thank you so much. Well, thanks to the recently passed First Step Act, more than 3,000 criminals have been released early from federal prison. Do you remember when the First Step Act was being debated, we were all told that only nonviolent criminals would be the beneficiaries of the law. Some, like senator mike lee of utah, told us that the bill would not provide Early Release to criminals, only incentivize participation in the socalled recidivism reduction programs. But that turned out to be completely untrue. In less than a year, the First Step Act granted Early Release to a lot of dangerous people and it didnt require any of them to do anything to earn it. Here is one example. In 2008, white participated in an Armed Robbery of a brooklyn department. During that, he and the accomplices tied up two children, including a 7yearold woman. They pistol whipped a woman and threatened to kill her and her family if she didnt reveal where the cash and the drugs were hidden. Every victim of the robbery had to be hospitalized. One for more than a week. White would still be in prison right now where he deserves to be, but thanks to the First Step Act he was released last week. Here is the key. He didnt join any recidivism reduction program. Instead, since the bill retroactively increased his Good Behavior credits, his sentence was simply shortened. He didnt have to do anything. He is at a federal prison along with hundreds of others like him, convicted of sex crime, robbery, assault and other acts of violence. Remember, these are the nonviolent marijuana users who are getting out early . Right. Its not true. But washington doesnt care. For them, crime is an abstraction. They dont live with the consequences so its not a big deal. They can feel virt yours and your neighborhood gets more dangerous. And tom cotton represents arkansas and he joins us tonight. Are you surprised . Im not surprised at all that almost 5,000 serious felons, as you say, murders and sex offenders, robbers, drug lords have been released early under the law. I predicted it would happen as it has. You can read the plain texted law and know that thousands of felons would be released months after