Death toll still stands at 17, far too high, but there are a lot of people on the ground who ground who thought it might climb some more because of the carnage they were seeing yesterday. But for the fact that you had a remarkable amount of people at the hospital behind me who worked through the night on people who were going through surgery, and Critical Condition and they basically saved their lives and for the first time, we talked to those Doctors Today to tell us what it was like when they called that code green, all hands on deck to deal with patient after patient as we are also getting, harrowing experiences from students inside that high school. Listen. We kept on getting phone calls, are you ready to receive more patients . Are you ready to take this one, are you ready to take that one question michael im still scared. I have that the sound of the gunshots right in my head. I just hear it constantly. He got us in. I would say 3040 students into the teachers classroom at the same time and as a result of their heroic actions, they saved probably all of our lives, about 40 of us. Speak out listen to that last a student talking about a janitor, an unsung hero and all of those who realized that when the shooter pulled the fire alarm come out there were about 40 barricaded students, as you heard there who then rushed right towards the shooter. They didnt realize it at first. The janitor told them to turn around. They went into another room, they went to safety. They believe it 40 more could have been killed. Again, 17 is far too many, but i can tell you a glimmer of hope tonight which is despite all the patients last night who were in Critical Condition here, tonight there is only one in Critical Condition and theyre hopeful that ed will soon be zero and everyone will be getting out and going home very soon. Tucker and had me force in florida, thanks a lot. Any decent person is horrified by what happened yesterday and parkland. Every thoughtful person knows of something horrible is going on in american society. Tragedies like this happen for a reason and it doesnt have a lot to do with guns. The percentage of american households with firearms has dropped dramatically over the past 35 years. Meanwhile, the number of Mass Shootings has risen. If youre over 40, you did not grow up in a country like this. The question is, what happened . It could be a lot of things. Far more americans than ever before take psychiatric medications. Our outbursts of violence a potential side effect question right we dont know, but its possible. Does the social atomization play a role . Spending life online does cause alienation, we know that. Last week we interviewed author johan hari who is studying a dramatic rise of depression in this country. He pointed out the most common answer to the question how many Close Friends do you have now zero. The lack of meaningful relationships does cause despair. Perhaps in rare cases, it drives some to mass murder. Meanwhile the Nuclear Family has collapsed and nationwide. Does the generation of boys growing up without fathers pose a threat to this country . Of course it does, why wouldnt it . Fatherlessness is one feature common to many mass shooters. Nobodys surprised by that. What about men more broadly . As a group, men are not thriving in this country right now. Ignore the propaganda, theres a lot of it. Instead, look at the numbers. Men kill themselves more, graduate less and commit pretty much 100 of Mass Shootings. Its a disaster which for some reason we are persistent on ignoring. In march, will begin a monthlong series everyone stay for whats happening to men. Why we havent been talking about this for years. Were not seeing any of these factors because the massacre we saw yesterday, we dont know that. We are saying we ought to do our honest best as a nation to figure out what is going on here, but were not doing that. That vital conversation has been drowned out and made impossible by mindless reaching about gun control led by blustery charlatans in the media, you know that we who they are and also in Congress Whose only real agenda is moral preening. Theyre trying to solve the problem, their aims are darker than that. Press a little bit and youll see it. Sensible gun reform, you heard that phrase a lot. You heard it all day today on cable news. What does that mean . Banning bomb stocks . No. A piece on vox. Com today calls for a landmark guncontrol bill like the one australia past 22 years ago in 1996. Thats what a lot of liberals are always telling you about, but the australian law wasnt gun control and it wasnt a voluntary buyback matter what they tell you, it wasnt gun confiscation. A wholesale disarmament. Imagine what would happen if he he tried that here in this country. America is not australia for a bunch of reasons including our history and our bill of rights. Imagine federal officials mulching from hearts to house using hundreds of millions of firearms and then finding and imprisoning those who resist. Its a recipe for bloodshed and civil war. Its nuts. Its a common fantasy on the left. Dan pfeiffer was a Senior Advisor to barack obama, now he is an contributor at cnn of course. Last fall, he wrote an article attacking his fellow democrats for what he called a fake a moderation on guns. Stop pretending to respect the constitution and instead focus on appointing judges who will it. The goal, gun seizures, ammunition regulation, the disarmament of the american population. A country where only the people in charge have guns and everyone else obeys. In the wake of the shooting, his pieces going viral on the left. What he wrote is what they believe is lets stop lying about this. The calls are hearing today for gun control have nothing to do with protecting americans from violence. What youre witnessing is a kind of class war. The left hates Rural America. The america that elected donald trump, they hate them. They despise the autonomy of an armed population. They want collective punishment for the sins of a few. They seek to obliterate our core constitutional right rather than trying to mitigate its downsize. They call it gun control, but its not. Its people control. For the left, voters who cant be controlled cant be trusted. Why have we seen such a massive increase in shootings like this . Judge alex far as a former Miamidade County judge and they both join us tonight. Judge, to you first. Were going to find a lot more in this specific case because usually this shooter is still alive, but we have seen a pretty big spike of shootings like this. Why do you think that is . It would be very difficult to jump into the mind of these shooters and come up with a very simple explanation for why theyre behaving that way. Clearly society has changed and its relationship with violence. I remember when i was growing up, there was nowhere near the level of violence we have today. We certainly had guns back then, but we didnt have the level of violence we have today. In some ways, society has become very desensitized to violence. Back then as a police officer, parents took a much more key role in educating their kids about right and wrong. We seem to have lost at that up dissension between right and wrong. Thats not to say that applies to this case because nobody would ever think its right to do this horrific act. Like mayor giuliani discussed, as the Little Things that lead to the big things and as a judge, i used to tell the parents coming in my courtroom, you can discipline your child now or somebody like me is going to be disciplining them much later and that discipline is going to be a lot harder to deal with because it is a rolling stone. Once it starts moving, culture does change. We see culture are now very violent, very desensitized. It doesnt phase them anymore. Tucker guns arent magic or tools. Attitudes are what matter and they have changed. How have they changed . The society we live in is not the society i grew up in as a kid paired this generation is being raised by social media and smartphones and theyre not spending enough time with the family dynamic. The kind of content we see on social media, whether its the hatred from peoples views and so forth, we see this anger and this hatred thats occurring getting into peoples minds. Lets take somebody who is mentally ill like the shooter, imagine him absorbing hours and hours a day of video content which is what i presume he did and imagine what thats doing to his mind. Our actions as human beings are a reflection of whats spinning around upstairs in our minds. Weve got to get ready to the basics of family. Parents need to sit on with their kids every night, get back to the dinner table and have at the president said today, deep, meaningful interactions with one another. Tucker judge, why isnt there a National Conversation about this . It seems like something thats important and its an obvious problem and people feel like theres something deeply wrong with the culture amount but there isnt a conversation about it, why . I think its a lot harder to get people to change the way theyre living their lives than it is to say if we just ban this type of gun, this problem would go away. The reality is if somebody is a homicidal maniac, and i completely agree with the doctor, theres a sentiment out there that gets created especially in social media where theres so much hatred in todays day and age, it becomes a triggering effect. At some point, somebody snaps. If somebody snaps and they want to kill a lot of children because they think im going to become infamous, you dont need a gun to do that. I was sitting here talking to you and i can think of three ways right now that i could kill a lot of children if i was a homicidal maniac and none of them would involve guns. Its an easy answer. Its easy to say lets ban guns and we can solve the problem. The u. S. Without ever finding guns, its a lot harder to get people to change their behavior and the way they are raising their children and especially the way society has been moving away from religion which like it or not, did set moral parameters for people and teach right and wrong. The other answer is a lot easie easier. Tucker gentlemen, thank you both. The park when shooting appears to have happened despite some advanced warning. The fbi was tipped off in a way to a youtube commenter who is discussing his want to become a professional school shooter. How to be affair respond . To speak out they responded pretty amazingly. I had a field agent contact me and meet me in my office the very next morning and i wasnt able to provide them with much. You gave them the users name which is the same exact thing as the shooter. I wish i had more time and effort to finding out who the years and he belongs to. I dont know how many nikolas cruz as there are on youtube, but they may have been able to find out who this person was. Tucker as you heard, the fbi was not able to identify nikolas cruz. In 2017, the fbi received information about a comment made on the youtube channel. The comment simply said im going to be a professional school shooter. No other information was included with that comment which would indicate a time, location, or the true identity of the person who made the comment. The fbi conducted database reviews, checks, but was unable to further identify the person who actually made the comments. Tucker what happened here do you think . At first look, i think the fbi worked within its guidelines. The fbi is bound by a document about this thick. They take that bible very seriously and its really a document thats meant to limit the power of the fbi, keep them from excess and that guides when the circumstances in which they can open a case, the techniques they can use in pursuing a case, very often when they must close a case. We heard that conversation with some terrorism cases that had been closed and then so many strikes. We saw it in boston and other places around the country. That document is intended to protect the organization. Its intended to protect uni from fbi excesses. Tucker how did it affect them from moving forward . Theres a couple levels of cases that they can work. The lowest level of that is called an assessment. I have very Little Information to start, i do not have enough predication to start a preliminary inquiry and use all the fbis tools. I have very little. The guidance of the dialogue also does this. The fbi is a federal agency. Here on its face, you may have neither of those two things, you have some words that some would say thats freedom of speech. Im not threatening somebody directly, im just throwing up some hate, supposition on the internet and stirring people up. Tucker thats a fair point. Weve been pretty tough on the fbi recently on this show and a way thats warranted, but i also think in cases like this, are we investing too much confidence in all of our Law Enforcement that they could prevent people bent on mass murder from committing it question but that seems like a lot to ask. It is a lot to ask. Law enforcement absolutely has to tried to connect up and i do think the fbi probably owes us a little bit more clarity on what steps they took. However, if i dont like something you say on this show and im sitting with the fbi and youve been critical of them recently, they dont get to start a case on tucker and start following him because one of those things with an authorized purpose is it cant be for protected First Amendment right rights. Can you tell us what the diag is . Its the handbook. This thick. Everyone is tested on it, get lectures on it from internal legal teams. They adhere to that, its audited. Their conduct is audited, theres somebody looking over their shoulder to say you did this right or youre outside of the balance on this and the First Amendment protected speech is one of those key areas that the diag talks about repeatedly. They may have an authorized purpose to start an assessment, but they can use very few tools. They can do database checks, other Government Agencies and thats about it. This is not the type of case where youre going to the u. S. Attorneys office and say give me a stack of subpoenas. Tucker if somebody says im becoming a professional school shooter, who knows what it means . But if he says im screwing up this school on this date know you have a better starting point. If im listening to those words and i have this experience, one of my first questions is is this prosecutable . The answer is no. Tucker thank you for that. The left is using yesterdays tragedy as a pretext for disarming the population, no surprises there. Up next, youll meet someone who thinks thats a good idea. Stay tuned. Some moments can change everything. You cant always predict them, but you can game plan for them. For 150 years, generations of families have chosen pacific life for retirement and Life Insurance solutions to help them reach their goals. Being ready for wherever life leads. Thats the power of pacific. Ask a Financial Advisor about pacific life. nadia white the moment a fish is pulled out from the water, its a race against time. And keeping it in the right conditions is the best way to get that fish to your plate safely. dane chauvel sometimes the product arrives, and the cold chain has been interrupted, and we need to be able to identify where in the cold chain that occurred. tom villa we took our world class network, and we developed devices to track environmental conditions. This device allows people to understand whats happening with the location, but also if its too hot, if its too cold, if its been dropped. Its completely unique. dennis woloshuck if you have a sensor that can keep track of your product, it keeps everybody kind of honest that way. Who knew a tiny sensor could help keep the food chain safe . Run your business at cloud speed. And do more with systems you have in place. The ibm cloud. The cloud for smarter business. Tucker its now a wellestablished tradition, gun control for politicians. No right is absolute and common sense is consistent with the second amendment. Its absolutely acceptable under our laws. And states and communities that have looser and lacks her gun laws, there are more gun crimes committed. Ive said over and over, id rather pass gun safety legislation then when the election. Tucker ethan is a california radio host enjoins us. Thanks for coming on. The 1996 australian example theres a piece going around today about how thats a model for this country, the gun buyback which is mandatory. Theres hundreds of millions of firearms in the United States. What would happen if liberal dreams came true and federal agents try to confiscate hundreds of millions of firearm firearms . Speak out thats not a rights approach. I dont agree with the australian example, i used germany, finland, and switzerland. They have psychological backgrounds exams before your issue the license to have your firearm. Switzerland has as many as we do, but they have zero School Shootings. The question becomes what are we doing to make sure people who shouldnt have firearms dont have firearms and that is where we need to be addressing it. Tucker its interesting, there are so many in this example is a great one. Its a very High Percentage of gun ownership. You have very few Mass Shootings, and fact little crime. Im wondering why there are no calls from the left to ask real questions about American Culture and perhaps the family structur structure, may be something to do with the fact that a quarter of the population on psychotropic drugs. What is in a mention those . Theres something to what youre saying, but lets talk about it from a bigger picture. If youre going down that route, there are significant changes that happened not just affecting the family, but also in terms of consumption of drugs that are prescribed by doctors. Tucker i dont know the answer to this, im not a social scientist, but ive seen how the country has changed. Guns are tools and it can do with them a lot of Different Things print they dont shoot themselves. Thats silly. Fed semiautomatic weapons for both of our lifetimes and they havent been misused like this. Why this willful blindness to obvious causes instead of blaming the tool . That makes me suspicious, do you see why . I want to disagree with