For vilifying nunes while ignoring the substance of that story. Heres part of it. You seem to read be really focused on who showed up and where. To answer your question, yes it is appropriate for a member of congress to contact someone who has contacted him in accordance to this report. Is it appropriate for congress to come up here . As he said himself, he was not hiding or roaming. He was asked to come over by an individual. That happens daily. He is cleared. Nothing that is inappropriate exactly the opposite. What he did, what he saw and who you met with was 100 proper. Tucker the question is, why is the press focused on what nunes did and not what he apparently revealed . Sean Patrick Maloney is a democrat from new york. Thank you for coming on. So, heres what i think the chairman of the Intel Community is telling us. He says there are dozens of documents gathered by intelligence agencies run by the Obama Administration. Information about trump officials. The documents was not about russia or the investigation in russia. They were written in ways that made it clear who is being talked about including trump officials. In one instance for a trump official other than mr. Flynn, he was out right identified. And these documents circulated the highest levels of governmen government. To sum it up, and looks pretty clear that from what the chairman of the Intel Community is telling us, the Obama Administration spied on the trump transition and campaign. Why is that not a big deal . I would be careful throwing around that accusation. We should have it out in the open for all to see. But it should not get in the way of the very Serious Investigation of what the russians were doing in our election. Tucker im not going to let you move on to russia before answering a question which is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said he saw this week documents collected by the Obama Administrations intelligence agencies that pertain to donald trump and his associates. That is a big deal. Is it not . Is he lying about that . How do you respond to that . Is very difficult to know what chairman nunes is saying. Most pointedly from the senate committee, doing a good bipartisan job, the fact that most people dont take the chairman very seriously right now. The problem is not that hes being a partisan. The problem is whether he is competent or impartial. To get dragged down to the white house and to Say Something contradictory things really does not help his credibility. I was on the white house senior staff tucker i know you have been in and around government for a while but he said things that are not just a concern to republicans but of concern to anyone who lives in this country. If there is evidence that the Obama Administration spied on the Trump Campaign, lets have it. Lets also do a full investigation on what happened with the russian tucker we already have evidence. Do you . Tucker general flynn, what everyone thinks of him, we know that a conversation he had with a russian official was accorded the market recorded and leaked illegally. He was destroyed by it. Thats a crime. Im very glad you mentioned that. We do know there was an investigation going on. The fbi director has told us they are investigating collusion between the Trump Campaign and the russians. You do know that Michael Flynn was talking to the senior russian spy and lied about it. That is why President Trump fired him. That is why he is under threat of criminal prosecution and seeking immunity. Thats very, very different from someone spying on the campaign. Thats called an investigation. Tucker thanks for clarifying. I want to make it totally clear i know what you are saying. You are saying its okay for an Intelligence Agency to listen to an american citizen, transcribed the conversation which is classified and then link it to the press. No, i did not say that. Tucker are you going to take a breath to thats a crime and wrong . You dont know that a crime has been committed. Let me finish. The fact is that there are legal ways for the fbi in a counterintelligence operation to lawfully examine the communications of americans with foreign nationals like the ambassador. That is not spying, tucker. That is enforcing the law. Tucker you are willfully ignoring what im asking. Is it okay to make that information public . No, its not. Tucker why lie to i disagree with you. It doesnt make with general flynn was doing right. That is why trump fired him. You should care about that too. There are many things that general flynn did, taking money from foreign governments is appalling. But heres the point, you have intelligence agencies operating independent from the elected officials whose job it is to oversee them. They are refusing to turn over information to the Intel Committees which again provide oversight over them. You are saying nothing because it seeks your partisan end. Shouldnt you be raising alarm about this . Be careful. I would not go maligning our intelligence professionals. They are good people who protect our country. Someone leaking classified information is wrong. I agree with you on that. Tucker you are not listening to members of your own party. As you know, adam schiff who is the ranking democrat has complained publicly that he cannot get information pertaining to the Russian Investigation from the fbi. Nunes has said the same thing. Harry reid said the same thing about the cia. In case after case, members whose job it is to oversee this cannot get the relevant information. Its a problem of course it is not okay with me. The fbi director did testify in front of adam schiffs committee in response to that request. They should continue to be so. Anyone in those agencies leaking something that is classified is breaking the law. Having said that, lets get into why Michael Flynn is facing criminal prosecution and what the heck was going on between the Trump Campaign into the russians. The fbi is investigating collusion and it would be great if you took that seriously too. Tucker i do take it seriously and in fact i have asked in a very specific way the ranking democrat on the Intel Committee to explain the question. The hacking of John Podestas email account and the dnc. Ive had heard you say that many times. I asked him very specifically and here is what he said. Watch this. You look right into the camera and say i know for a fact that the government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of John Podestas email. The government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hocks of our institution. Tucker of John Podestas email. But also in europe. Tucker say i know they did John Podestas emails. Ronald reagan is rolling over in his grave. Carrying water for the kremlin. Tucker you cannot say they hacked you are going to have to move your show to russian television. Tucker its so dumb and your you are being complicit. These personal insults, talker. Tucker carrying water for putin . An apologist for the kremlin. That is what youre doing. Tucker one last time, congressman. You cant and you know you cant. You are hiding behind weasel words. A really simple question, congressman. Do you have evidence that putins government hacked John Podestas email . Instead of answering, he called me a water carrier for the kremlin and a tool of Vladimir Putin. He could not answer that question. I am hardly a water carrier for putin. Thats insane. You have evidence that the russian government did that . Thats a basic question. I dont think that you do. Before you start questioning your pearls, the fbi and our intelligence agencies say so. Thats good enough for me. Tucker oh, it is . So the director of National Intelligence saying to the congress the nsa is not scooping up email data from every american, was not good enough for you . It turns out he was lying. When the head of the cia said no, we did not break into senate email accounts, was not good enough for you . Because he was lying too. You should get actual facts before going out on a limb. You are the only person i know, who are so skeptical of our own intelligence agencies. Tucker for asking questions . You can be skeptical but when all of the intelligence agencie agencies and the fbi tell us that these actions were undertaken by russian actors tucker so dont ask anymore questions at that point . You can ask all you want. It was good enough for me. Tucker have you seen any evidence at all . I have been in briefings, classified and unclassified were the conclusions were unanimous and have been relayed to us. They are absolutely crystal clear, tucker. The russians did it. Full stop. Tucker on the basis of what evidence customer you are calling for an investigation. Describing this as collusion. Is there anything at the bottom of this and you say how dare you be skeptical of intel agencies . Dont put words in my mouth, please. When the intelligence communities and the fbi after months of investigation give us a unanimous conclusion, i take it seriously. Excuse me. When it involves trying to undermined our elections, you should take it seriously. Tucker and i do, seriously enough to have you on this show. What is it based on . You are impugning me just as your colleague adam shifted. The fact of the matter is, i cannot relate to classified information but what i can tell you what has been publicly reported. If you look at what has been publicly reported, then all of the senior officials in our National IntelligenceCommunity Say on the basis of their investigative methods which include lots of things that are sensitive but i would prefer not to go into detail about that is their conclusion. You cannot deny that, tucker. Tucker im not denying that a lot of people are making claims. How dare i be skeptical of our own professionals. I must be unpatriotic. Its fine to be skeptical but tucker apparently its not fine with you. Build money spent 30 years at the nsa working there. He quit finally after violating the privacy of u. S. Citizens. He told us it is a near certainty that the nsa spied on the trump transition team. Here is him talking to trey gowdy. Would have to get a warrant. A warrant application, a fisa cord. Foreign to foreign is a separate analysis. U. S. To foreign, it is still a separate analysis and one that would require going to the fisa court. Tucker what is the truth about all this . We asked him to come back and explain it to us. Mr. Binney, thank you for coming on. I just dont think that Representative Trey Gowdy is aware of what the intelligence agencies are doing. He has been kept in the dark by these agencies. Even representative nunes who is a member of the gang of four and the gang of eight is supposed to be exposed to everything the Intelligence Community is doing. In including covert programs. You only need to notify at most the gang of eight in congress. Even nunes who is a member of the gang of eight and the gang of four also did not know about the programs that were being exposed through the conversations the president was having with other members of other governments. Reading about people who were not involved in rush at all but were involved with the Trump Campaign. These are the things that tucker he is the gang of the gang of four and the gang of eight are members of congress to get the see the highest level secret documents the intel agencies. Even they dont know. Should they know . Yes. Thats a direct violation of the intelligence sect. They are required by those laws to notify the congress. Tucker here are a couple of questions. The presumption i have had and i think most people in washington have had its if one of these intelligence agencies wants to spy on an american citizen, they need a warrant. They need to go through a judge and have someone sign off on this. Is this true . No. Thats not been true since world war ii. I mean, in the nixon years they were you using programs like the nsa and fbi. Now they are saying these agencies are doing different programs now. Namely, the upstream programs. Representative trey gowdy should be asking about the fairview program. What are they collecting there . Its not foreign, its domestic data. That is how the nsa can do this Global Communication data that is being collected and stored. It is incidental bulk acquisition of data on everyone in the United States as well as the planet. Tucker i am confused why we dont know about what congressman chairman nunes has said this week about the information and data he saw. One of the things he said was the information on trump and his associates was not related to the Russian Investigation. What might that mean . Local communications, internally. U. S. Citizens with other u. S. Citizens. Hes looking at political conversations and things like that. Tucker is there a legitimate reason for the government to be collecting the information on u. S. Citizens . No, absolutely not. That is a violation of the fourth amendment. The constitution. A violation of the electronic privacy act. All of the things that should protect our privacy, we dont have that anymore. That is what ive been saying for years. Tucker tell us if you can, the mechanics of this. I pick up a phone or send an email through gmail and the federal government picks up the information how . Basically its by working with the companys that run the fiberoptic Networks Like at t and verizon and so on. They work with them by installing in the San Francisco at t facility, they take taps off a line. Inserting something. Its called a splitter or a wide connector. It is like a prism where you put the fiberoptic line into one prism and it duplicates it. Two ways. One way goes to the nsa facility where they use devices to reconstruct everything on that line. The rest of it goes down the proper channels for communication. Thats how they do it. Tucker pretty comprehensive. We just put up a map. A lot of people here listening think there are a lot of terror threats. Thats the purpose of the surveillance. To stop those. Is it to your knowledge used for other reasons other than stopping terrorism . Of course it is. Tucker such as customer internal police by the dea, they use that to go after common crime in the United States. Then they have to do a parallel construction to substitute that would implicate them in a crime, the reason why they were arrested. The nsa data to try them. Thats simply distracting our entire judicial process. Tucker thank you so much for coming back. You are an informative voice. One columnist says instead of obsessing over bathrooms, Transgender Americans ought to consider the existential threat posed by radical islam. The left is calling for barring the immigration arrests in schools. And churches. We will talk to an attorney that says living the reach of u. S. Says living the reach of u. S. Law is a good idea. Says living the reach of u. S. Law is a good y282uy ywty you totanobodys hurt, new car. But there will still be pain. It comes when your Insurance Company says theyll only pay threequarters of what it takes to replace it. What are you supposed to do . Drive threequarters of a car . Now if you had Liberty Mutual new car replacement™, youd get your whole car back. I guess they dont want you driving around on three wheels. Smart. With Liberty Mutual new car replacement™, well replace the full value of your car. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Hi, im frank. I take movantik for oic, opioidinduced constipation. Had a bad back injury, my doctor prescribed opioids which helped with the chronic pain, but backed me up bigtime. Tried prunes, laxatives, still constipated. Had to talk to my doctor. She said, how long you been holding this in . laughs that was my movantik moment. My doctor told me that movantik is specifically designed for oic and can help you go more often. Dont take movantik if you have a bowel blockage or a history of them. Movantik may cause serious side effects, including symptoms of opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain and or diarrhea, and tears in the stomach or intestine. Tell your doctor about any side effects and about medicines you take. Movantik may interact with them causing side effects. Why hold it in . Have your movantik moment. Talk to your doctor about opioidinduced constipation. If you cant afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. Tucker publishing a piece over at the hill newspaper saying the real threat to lgbt in this country is not President Trump, its radical islam. Being waged by islamic extremists who have pledged the global elimination of lgbt people. Isis released photos of extremists throwing a gay man to his death. Whats going on . What i think its strange, its fine and make sense to me. Why would groups that claim to advocate to the interest of gay americans also advocate for the admission of immigrants who hate gay people . It absolutely makes no sense whatsoever. We had a conversation over the last couple decades about evangelical question opinions on lgbt people. Thereve been a lot of judgment and criticism. We have seen a lot of changing hearts and mind. Meanwhile the left is completely and totally the fact that islam has a serious problem with people. Were not talking about people gay people n