Goes without saying that its valid that you disagree with trump and have your own political set of views and disagree with ivanka trump. I wonder though screaming at a mom and her kids on an airplane seems like a violation of privacy and decency and good manners and it raises the question what are the venues where you shouldnt scream your political views at people . Would a funeral be out of bounds . Church . Her sons brisk . What are the rules on that . Well, i think what is a nonpartisan issue is that air travel is horrific and i dont think anybody should be intouring confrontations in the air be it ivanka trump with her children or just any other human being in a continue can and feeling dehydrated. And i think that the fact that she is with her children is significant. And i do also think that, you know, a mother in public, who is a public figure, you know, there are certain levels of decorum that we should be thinking about. At the same time, she does have an incredibly powerful position and she is not just a mother. She is a powerful, powerful woman who is connected very closely to the president elect. Not just as his daughter but in many ways as a business confidante and advisor and i think that we havent quite been able to define what all those roles mean. So while i dont you know, i dont want anyone being yelled at on a plane, i dont want anyone yelling at me on plane. I dont want anyone yelling at anyone on plane. But i think that you know, ivankas incredibly brand and presence and role as a mother and successful woman those are interesting and attractive elements of her brand but i dont know that, you know, where do those protections end, too . Kind of would ask you the same question. But thats not at all what your tweet suggested in addition to the one you just read i think we can put it on the screen. My tweet didnt talk about the plane at all, actually. So what are you referring to . Within the look, ivanka trump was in the news because she was screamed at on the airplane. And you say dont let her off the hook. And then you go on to say in another tweet ivanka has it all and by that i mean a job, a family, and sinister complicity in aiding the most aggressive antiwoman candidate of our time. She is his daughter. She with was a surrogate frequently throughout and represented him in terms of womens issues. She has. Isnt she pretty liberal on womens issues . And she has did speeches on his behalf where she represented a platform of womens empowerment and in terms of having it all. I think she is incredibly successful, brilliant woman. The fact that she was able to balance him out on these issues where he has talked about Defunding Planned Parenthood and being against abortion and these typically liberal womens issues that she sort of is a cushion for, i think we need to investigate those things a little more critically and rig columbusly other than the fact that she looks like she smells like vanilla. She looks like she smells like vanilla who is objectifying women here. My point is she a beautiful gorgeous force of nature. What exactly. Oh honey, oh my goodness. Im saying that she is incredibly welcoming. She is gorgeous and smart. I mean, she is in a lot of ways many elements of her persona are admirable and something to look up to is a joke. You said she is sinister complicity in aiding the most i absolutely believe that im not backing down from that at all. So its sinister for a daughter to support her fathers president ial campaign because you dont like her father . Its sinister for a daughter to capitalize on the power of feminism and uniting women and empowering women while supporting a candidate who is the most antiwoman candidate this country has seen in decades. What does that even mean . Is he anti she is antiwoman because is that what i said . Because. Im sorry is what i said. I think my ear piece might not be working because that is most certainly not what i said. She is guilty because is he antiwoman she is complicit in his antiwoman position. To continue to stump and support his position. But its her dad. I mean, i dont i guess the point im making is youre drawing this kind of world where everyone who is not on your side. No. Is evil. Thats not what i said even remotely. Thats not what i said tucker. Even though she smells good. Tucker, did i not say anybody who doesnt agree with me is evil. Im going to ask you again, what do you disagree with that she has said . What position that she holds do you disagree with . I disagree with her providing a surrogacy for her father based on an elm empowerment of women disconnect between the campaign. You agree with her but because she supported her dad she is somehow fair game . What are you saying . Im trying to understand what you are saying. What did she believe. Tucker you are not trying to agree what she is saying. You are shouting over me what im saying. Incredibly unprofessional. Im asking a simple question. You are being a partisan hack who is attacking me at nawz crumb and not allowing me to speak. I think we agree here. I dont think we do lauren. We both think she deserves to be attacked. Some guy yelled at her on an airplane and you are saying she is fair game. I very clearly and calmly said nobody deserves to be yelled at on a plane. I dont want to yell at you on a plane. I will yell at you here but not on a plane. On your twitter scream. If ump donald trump eat feces donald trump. I cant say the word you used as you well know. I said feces donald trump. Thats what i said. You said eat in effect human feces on twitter. Tucker, you are talking at this trivial mundane level of argument. Okay. Tucker, can i ask you a question . Tucker, in i would like to ask you a question. Let me ask you something that you wrote. No, tucker, do you or do you not agree that we deserve, as the american people, a level of transparency in terms of ivankas role . I think we need to take her seriously in that she is a positive role model. Look, lauren. She is a role model but still requires transparency. She is flying with her children on an airplane you shouldnt bark at a woman. I disagree. She is a mother. We do agree. Were anyone making decisions how the federal government runs should have to answer questions about those decisions. Absolutely. I dont think you should hassle people because you disagree with them in public, period. And i didnt say you should. Tucker, hey, we agree. We agree. Here is your description of the trump administration. You wrote this piece in teen vogue which i guess you right for. Which you guess i right for . Yes. Thats not fake news. Thats real news. You guess . [ laughter ] oh, you guess, tucker . Thats really patronizing. I havent read teen vogue because im not a teen vogue. Your producers asked me if i wrote for teen vogue. My name is lauren ducca and i write for teen vogue. The rode ahead is a treasurtreacherous one. From deciding whether a president can be an admitted sexual predator from figuring out how to stop him from figuring out the insovereignty of an entire religion. Yes. What does it mean to threaten the sovereignty of religion . What does that even mean. That means an entire agenda, a platform based on banning muslims, which is Still Available on his website. How does that threaten the sovereignty of religion . Thats moronic, lauren, you are a writer. Pardon me for taking you literally. How does what threaten the sovereignty of it. Threatening to ban muslims. That threatens the sovereignty of it. Yes. That completely profiles based on the basis of religion and reduces people to their beliefs and dictates what they can and cannot publicly believe. That doesnt threaten the sovereignty of it so, you also accused him on chelsea handlers show quote of committing a former psychological abuse of making the victim feel like they are tracy. Does trump make you feel like yu are crazy . Thats the impression im getting. Are you calling me crazy . Thats adorable. Thats so cute. Committing psychological abuse on you, do you believe that . On the american people. I believe the american people. Trump supporters, hillarys supporters, jill and her can you say vin a victim of trump. He contradicts objective evidence. Not that is he abusing me personally. I think you are smart enough to know that arent you, tucker . I dont know. I just take your words at face value. So did you read the entire article . I did. I also read lima pain is 100 percent certain one direction will continue. Aid ran that grande rocks the boots and kardashian went through the messiest break up in 2016. Im trying to get what you write about trump from the thigh high boots and committing psychological abuse on you. A woman can love air air an darianna grande. I read teen vogue as of today. Those things are not exclusive. You treat young women like they dont have a right to a political conversation. And cannot be. Threatening the sovereignty of religion. Worry about the future of this country. And those things are not mutually. I did write about the abusive. Whole religion. I got to go. Stick with thigh high boots you are better at that. You are a President Trump down at maralago for christmas. Joins us from palm beach. Late this afternoon. The president elect thinks that the terrorist truck attack in germany is just further evidence that the United States quickly needs to start using a different Counter Terrorist strategy. He tweeted this. Quote the terrorist who killed some people in germany said just before crime by gods will we will slaughter you pigs. I swear we will slaughter you. This is a purely religious threat which turned into reality. Such hatred when will the u. S. And all countries fight back . There have always been a lot of questions this week about why the president elect has been talking about expanding the u. S. Nuclear arsenal and whether or not that talk is mint as a signal to putin. Today for a first time we saw a Christmas Card sent from moscow to marge to the o to putin himself. Merry christmas he hopes to quote take real steps it restore the framework of bilateral cooperation in different areas as well as bring our level of collaboration on the International Scene to a quantitatively new level. Mr. Trump says president putin is correct and calls that a nice letter adding that, quote, i hope both sides are able to live up to these thoughts and that we do not have to travel an alternate path. We are also now a day closer to inauguration, and there are scattered reports of different celebrities saying they dont want anything to do with the once every four year celebration. Mr. Trump doesnt care tweeting, again, the quote the socalled alist celebrities are all wanting tickets to the inauguration. Look at what they did for hillary. Nothing. I want the people. The highest profile entertainerrers booked so far are the radio city rockets. Some of them have come forward saying they dont want to dance for the next president the weekend january it 20th. One even complaining that she is being forced to dance for mr. Trump. But the corporate owner of the rockets came out to see any event you see roc rockette s event they volunteered for. They had more than enough volunteers for the new orleans. Tucker . Peter doocy, ladies and gentlemen in palm beach, florida. Some states americans convicted of a felony are stripped of Voting Rights. According to one estimate a quarter of the states black population cannot vote because of it new referendum could change that that is in the works. Joining us is spencer who wrote a piece on this. Thanks for joining us. Thanks for having me, tucker. The idea is that because the estimate is as you said a quarter of the states black population could not vote because their Voting Rights were taken away, because they are convicted felons that really the election turned on that fact. And that thats one of the reasons Hillary Clinton lost. Am i understanding that . I mean, my article said that people have questioned the effect of this on election outcome. Right. I mean, if you look at the bush v. Gore election. For instance. Spanned more than a million, the math is easy there. If you give more than a Million People the right to vote in a certain state, put them in the electorate, thats going to change outcomes. That is a lot of people. So donald trump won florida by a little bit over 100,000 votes. Size, decent marginal. But, the states disenfranchised population is 10 times that number. More than 10 times that number. Im kind of sympathetic to the idea both because i believe people ought to be rehabilitated and i think once someone has paid his debt you ought to bring him back into society. I have two questions and no one has been able to answer them. The first is, will this result in a better government . Are we certain because thats part of the consideration. We want the best, best qualified people we possibly can have. And i never hear that discussed. That factor discussed when this topic comes up. Its all about political power. Well, we would have won if felons would have voted, et cetera. You have heard anybody bring up that . Well just give us a better government . You know, i think its always good to have representation in the electorate of people who are affected by government and a wide variety of ways. So to shut out people who have felony convictions certainly blocks a large perspective from weighing in in elections. Another aspect of this is that i did a story for fusion earlier this year where i went to one of two states in the country that allows people in prison to vote. Maine and vermont allow felons, exfelons and people in prison to vote. Only two states that impose no restriction on people who have criminal records on voting. And the inmates i spoke with in vermont said that it actually the ability to vote made them feel more excited about reincident grating abou integrating with society and becoming a productive member of society because they felt. I get it im sure they like that. There is also me to consider and you and every other nonfelon living in this country. We have to live under the government they help choose. So our rights are also affected by this. My second question is, if were going to restore peoples Voting Rights because they are constitutional and we think that if you are a full citizen you ought to be able to vote, why dont we restore their gun rights, too . I mean, people really making the case that you ought to be able to choose my president but you cant go hunting . The group of exfelons disenfranchised in florida who are spearheading the campaign to end the states prohibition on flown voting, theyre not focusing on gun rights. I dont know if there is a comparable group. Why is that unfair question . If were going to trust someone to make the most important civic decision of all, who governs us and say simultaneously we dont trust to you go deer hunting or to have a shotgun at home, like, that doesnt make any sense, does it . I would venture to say that, you know, one answer to that could be that people who have been who have interacted with the criminal Justice System to the level they have been charged with a felony, you know, a lot of felonies are involved violence and that is one way that i think gun control advocates would think you would keep guns out of the hands of people who in previous interactions with Law Enforcement have been proven to be so they are not hold on, so theyre not actually rehabilitated. They are not ready to live among us as full and equal citizens but we ought to allow them to pick a president . I mean, you know, i think kind of got you there, didnt i, spencer . I mean, come on, really . Hey, i mean, access to guns is just a completely different question. Its a question of trust. What as a citizen what do we trust you to do . I trust you enough to pick my president but i dont trust you enough to go hunting . I mean, meditate on that. I dont know. This is an interesting piece and thanks a lot for coming on and telling us about it time now for twitter storm nightly forecast of social medias most intense weather patterns. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority metro as it is known here is catching some heat for the 2017 president ial inauguration card they created. Take a look at it tell us if you notice anything weird. Compare it now to four years ago the card they did then. Do you see the difference . Yes, you do. The next president s face is missing. Donald trump is not on the new one and twitter, of course, noticed that as well. Twitter Melissa Johnson said this people who will be hungry in this christmas and belly aching over a smart trip card . Privilege. I will accept dc metros selfdisgracing snub for finally having a real president any day. Adam says this dc metro makes me forget how bad metro is, almost. Metro has really Serious Problems metro card is not one of them. Finally this petty crap is why trump won. Now there is still a chance we could see trumps face on the commemorative sleeve all over the card plus fixing the problem. The Transit Authority working with the president ial Inauguration Committee on a design. Thats tonights twitter storm. Up next the Obama Administration abstained from the United Nations vote that many are calling antiisrael. What is the president elects response to that . Steve hilton joins us next. Take one. Directv now. Stream all your entertainment anywhere anytime can we lose the all. Theres no cbs and we dont have a ton of sports. Anywhere, any. Lets lose the anywhere, anytime too. You cant download onthego, theres no dvr, yada yada yada. Stream some stuff somewhere sometimes you totally nailed that buddy. Simple. Dont let directv now limit your entertainment. Only xfinity gives you more to stream to any screen. U. N. Security council west bank. Critics call it annual at this israel measure. President elect trump had intervened and said the u. S. Should veto the resolution instead the u. S. Under barack obama chose to abstain from the vote joining us is steve hilton ceo of crowd pack. This is a pretty clear contrast between world views, styles of running the u. S. Government, et cetera. What is the Obama Administrations decision to stay out of this, tell us about them and their priorities. Quite a lot, actually, when i heard the news, tucker, do you know what came to my mind is actually Hillary Clinton testifying in congress. I heard that and i thought what difference at this point does it make . Is he on his way out. This is tot