I have a staff. Thats why. Hannity thanks for sharing. Laura i love having you. Okay, take care. I am laura ingraham. This is the the ingraham angle. Coming to you from washington tonight, including in his First Television interview, the exboyfriend of cavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick. He says that there are major issues with her credibility. Also, as the obsession over his High School Yearbook continues, what about dr. Fords . The ingraham angle got our hands on three years of these textbooks. It is fun to look through them. It is like a walk down memory lane. We are going to share our findings. But first, Christine Blaseyfor Christine Blaseyfords credibility gap. That is the focus of tonights angle. Rachel mitchell, the prosecutor hired by the Senate Judiciary committee to question Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blaseyford last week hasnt produced a report. Her findings are fascinating and speak to dr. Fords credibility. Her overall appraisal, she finds the assault allegations against kavanaugh to be weak, and in the legal context, here is her bottom line. She writes he saidshe said case is incredibly difficult to prove, but this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and they either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, i do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case, based on the evidence before the committee. Nor do i believe that the evidence is insufficient to satisfy the preponderance of evidence standard. Thats a lower standard. Mitchell then offers a ninepoint critique of fords account based on the evidence at hand. She writes dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened. In her july 6th text, she said it occurred in the mid1980s, and then, she changed her story in the letter to dianne feinstein, where she claims it happens in the early 80s. But in her polygraph statement in august, ford said the assault happened one High School Summer in the 80s. It changes there. She explicitly crossed out the word early. Ms. Mitchell continues, saying dr. Ford has struggled to identify judge kavanaugh as the assailant by name. It dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in questio. Details that could corroborate her account. In your letter, you said that they went down the stairs, and they were talking with other people in the house. Correct. Were you able to hear that conversation . I was not able to hear that conversation. How do you know there was a conversation . I am just assuming since it was a social gathering, people were talking. I dont know. You said you do not remember how you got home, is that correct . Speak out i do not remember, other than i did not drive home. Has anyone come forward to say to you, hey, remember i was the one who drove you home . No. Laura fort cant recall who invited her to the party, how she got to the party, the location of the party, where the alleged abuse occurred. It doesnt know where it was, nor how she got home or even how she arranged a ride there. All of this leads mitchell to her next point. Dr. Fords account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified as having attended. Including her lifelong boyfriend. Judge kavanaugh, mark judge, they all deny any such party ever occurred. Fords friend, leland kaiser, goes further, saying that she has no recollection of being at a party with kavanaugh and never knew him. Now, recall that when dr. Ford was questioned about her really good friends testimony, she kind of threw her under the bus. Do you have any particular motives to ascribe to leland . I guess we could take a little at a time. Leland has Significant Health challenges, and i am happy that she is focusing on herself and getting the Health Treatment that she needs, and she let me know that she needed her lawyer to take care of this for her. Laura so, guys, we have inconsistencies, we have discrepancies, and inconsistencies, and shades of changing the story. It goes on and on and on. Now, if the media cares to examine kavanaughs credibility on questions of whether he drank too much, whether he blacked out, fine, have added. Do it. But youve got to hit these other issues as well. To me, it is just fair. That is the question of media credibility, reporter credibility. It cant be off limits. If youre going to happen up substantiated, uncorroborated allegation after the process of confirmation has already concluded, and youre going to go before the committee, and youre going to say all this stuff, and then the media is not going to question you, i just find that to be absurd. By the way, Rachel Mitchell goes on to suggest that in her professional opinion, forward, as i said, has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault. And so, this just keeps on shifting and shifting. The therapist indicates that four boys were in the bedroom, then forward it told the Washington Post that four boys were at the party, but only two were in the bedroom during the assault. In her testimony, she says four boys and her friend, leland, were present at the party, but she couldnt recall the name of the fourth boy. No one claiming to be the fourth boy as he had to come forward. Now, perhaps the most damning of her critique was this one. She has struggled to recall recent events relating to the allegation, enter testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory. Did you show a full or partial set of those marriage therapy records to the Washington Post . I dont remember. I remember summarizing it for her what they said, so im not quite sure if i actually gave her the record. Laura okay, forget or recall about the assaults 35 or 40 years ago. She couldnt recall events from just a few weeks earlier. During her testimony, ford couldnt remember if she gave the Washington Post a complete or partial list of her therapist notes. Thats a pretty big deal. Or whether she took her polygraph the day of her grandmothers funeral. Thats a pretty big day to forget. Now, none of this is of interest to the media. They spent the weekend factchecking, questioning the credibility of judge kavanaugh. It has to matter, in my view, to the senators who are considering their votes, but whether or not judge kavanaugh actually lied about his activities and his behavior over the course of his younger days. There were a lot of places where i thought he was not forthcoming, not telling the truth. Questions into whether or not he lied in his testimony, relevant to his broader credibility. It is not so much about the accusers as it is about kavanaughs credibility. Laura and lights of mitchell sober analysis, release without the input of republicans or others, should we not be word about the credibility of dr. Fords account. Its relies on recall, sometimes of long ago, corroborating witnesses, and evidence. But when all three are called into question by a seasoned prosecutor like mitchell, isnt it time for the media to at least entertain the possibility that they may have gone too far in their coverage . And thats the angle. Joining me now for reaction, democratic strategist and former advisor to bill and hillary clinton, richard good speed and former secret Service Agent and nra tv host. Why arent they taking the report from mitchell a little bit more seriously . This whole notion that we are looking at this as a criminal proceeding as a misdirection. And i think actually people feel sorry for Rachel Mitchell, that she thought she was being brought into a series proceeding and is being used as a pond. As evidenced by the fact that when she started questioning kavanaugh about july 1st, man, she got cut off, right . And now the last we have ever heard of her, when she seemed to be getting close to something that was fairly damning. A real prosecutor would have spoken to witness his face to face, not just in that kind of perverse setting. Laura hold on. I really want to keep us focused. One thing at a time. My question was a simple one. Why arent the democrats, journalist, for that matter, why arent they more interested in examining the facts of this case . I understand people are emotional. Dems come at their conclusions in different ways. There is false memory syndrome, people who suppressed memories. I get all that. However, there are real discrepancies in her own account that she has sold to the Washington Post, dianne feinstein. Ms. Mitchell is not a political actor. She did not come in here as a trailblazing pundit and say i want to exonerate kavanaugh. It seems like it is way overboard on the other side. But it seems like no one wants to touch fords credibility, which i think it is odd. Lets let the fbi question everybody who was there, including my charge, whose girlfriend set at laura i get what you are saying. I am focusing on christine blase ford. She was very specific about the bedroom, the bathroom, the stairway, the running outcome of the configuration of the house. This is traumatic for her in a way that it wasnt for anyone else, so it they said didnt remember. Laura her closest friend said that she never met Brett Kavanaugh. The lawyers letter said okay, listen to dr. Ford. Laura threw her under the bus. So lets let the friend get examined by the fbi, and we will see what she actually believes. Laura all right, dan, your reaction to just what we heard from dr. Ford last week. About this very detailed, very kind of matteroffact report from mitchell. Welcome of the report is devastating. This is a trained prosecutor in these matters. I did criminal investigations for many years, granted i did not do sexual abuse, but interviewing people, and hes playing a democratic activist on the show, and frankly, im going to pray for his soul. I mean that because his role as the democrat goons, who took part in the shaming of this mans character, not willing to answer an honest question about the credibility of ms. Mitchells report. Janet napolitano is all people, refusing to answer a simple question. By all means, her story was heard, the republicans were very respectful. Ive been respectful of that. I think its time that everyone else pay the same respect to judge kavanaugh and start to answer honest questions about the massive, gaping holes in christine blase fords story. It is only fair. I will concede that the fbi should get to the bottom of every one of these facts. They should put Chirstine Blasey Ford through the mill and make sure that if there are holes have you ever done a federal Background Investigation . Just asking. Have you ever done one. I have tried cases in federal court. See, i did that. You dont know how this works. What you are saying is that the fbi does criminal investigations. They dont. What they do they get facts. Because they dont do criminal investigations into areas they have no purview on. This is not what the fbi does. You are making this sound like theyre going to put people on polygraphs. It is a lie and a misdirection. Come on. Laura i want to talk about how the goalposts have shifted in this case from whether an assault occurred to you whether Brett Kavanaugh drinks too much or drink too much in college. Lets watch. Reporting that kavanaugh and his crowd were characterized as loud, obnoxious frat boy like drunks. The hardest drinkers on campus. The former friends and classmates, and roommates who say that he was, as we heard yesterday, they say that he was a sloppy drunk. You have these other people from parts of his life who have said that he was belligerent when he was drunk and other things. Laura well, i i dont know. Having been to a few dartmouth attorney parties in my day, thats a lot of people. I think you lose so many people. He was a sloppy drunk. Is there a neat drunk at . I have never heard of that . You can be a happy drunk. But i just think this is looking so ridiculous. It now its like an animal has kind of deal. Is that where we are. Hes a sloppy drunk. Oh, come on. Trying to give him this opportunity to say look, he didnt really remember things because he did drink to excess, which a lot of his friends say. Look at this. If the woman was up for Supreme Court justice and reported herself, she would be labeled hysterically. It is amazing that a guy can do that and act like oh, well, what do you expect . He is under attack. Im sorry, those are the issues that people are trying to get out. Laura i wouldnt say a woman was being hysterical. If she was actually defending herself against all charges, i think people have a right asking how much they drink. Laura he was there for hours and hours. I mean, he apologize. I think it was smart for him to do that. Guys, thanks so much. Doubling down on the cabinet charges might have seemed like a good idea for democrats, but how will that strategy play out in november . One democrat perfects that the kavanaugh allegations could be responsible for our red wave. If democrats this fall fall short this november, they will suffer the rightful consequences of using the victims of Sexual Assault to advance a political agenda. Obrien joins us now to discuss. Brian, this tactic has worked in the past, why wouldnt it work now . We have seen it at different points. People have used peoples backgrounds to slime in d. C. That is not new. So through the middle of december, there was a victim of assaults with allegations that could have been held, or investigated with the degree of discretion. The degree of care for this woman, but instead, it is dropped as a political bomb right before the final. I am telling you, that not only victimizes her again, but those of us who have been victimized by different folks in our lives, sexually, it has retraumatized millions. So for folks that are watching this out in america, i guarantee you a whole bunch of people are incredibly frustrated, left, red, and center, on having to go through some of these accusations in their own lives, let alone watching this woman be dragged through the mud. There is a line that has been crossed. Laura there is some polling that indicates it is kind of split. Most republicans believe kavanaugh, most democrats dont. Independents are kind of split. In north dakota, Heidi Heitkamp now has a deficit and issues that voters are sizing is the cow kavanaugh hearings. We will see how that plays out. It is still early, but that is not great news for her. In missouri, Claire Mccaskill is down two points and one poll. Obviously, she is the incumbent. Has been fairly popular against josh hawley. Also after the kavanaugh issue and after she came out against judge kavanaugh. Could this be, when it all boils down to the end of this whole saga, could this be that the year of the woman that we saw in 1982 becomes the year of the man, or the year of the women who are sick of all of these charges . Not to try to put too fine a point on this, maybe it is going to flip . It could happen. You know, i think there is two things. A less gender, and more of a partisan issue at first. We are seeing a lot of republicans who whether or not they show up in november, rising up and saying this is a land that has been crossed. It is way too far. The real question is independence, which right now, they are split. If you see an nci investigation come back and say theres nothing there, independent voters and a whole lot of other people, even conservative democrats are going to see through this for what it is, and it is an absolute flop that is unforgivable. Laura all right, bryan. Thank you. And as democrats push to investigate the wild allegations made by Julie Swetnick it, her former boyfriend joins us and asked her to explain why he thinks she is not reliable. Stay right there. When their windshield got chipped. So they scheduled at safelite. Com. They didnt have to change their plans or worry about a thing. Ill see you all in a little bit. And i fixed it right away with a strong repair they can trust. Plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. Customer really . tech being there whenever you need us thats another safelite advantage. Singers safelite repair, safelite replace. The more you know ththe commute is worth it. , you and that john deere tractor, you can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. Its a longer drive, but just like a john deere, its worth it. My mom washes the dishes. Before she puts them in the dishwasher. So what does the dishwasher do . Cascade platinum does the work for you, prewashing and removing stuckon foods, the first time. Wow, thats clean cascade platinum. Laura now the claims of Brett Kavanaughs third accuser, Julie Swetnick, are so outlandish that we were skeptical from the start. That doubt seems to pressure has numerous of stories from her pastor trickle down, one from our next guest, richard vinneccy, the exboyfriend of seven years, claiming she threatened him and his family. We are joined in a Television Exclusive by mr. Vinneccy, along with his lawyer, mr. Hanson. Thank you for joining us tonight. Richard, what are your motivations for coming forward now . Yes, there have been political issues. I want to tell the truth. That is one of the reasons why i came. Laura now, you claim, richard, that ms. Swetnick threatened you after you broke up with her. What types of threats threats are you alleging . She basically called me many times and said you will never, ever see your unborn child alive. And im just going to go over there, im going to kill you guys. Laura she said she was going to kill you . Yes. And that has told me a little bit. Laura well, you told politico originally, richard, that she threatened your family and your baby. Correct. Laura but you mentally unborn child, is that right . I meant the unborn child. I was not married at the time when this happened. Laura did she ever discussed with you in your seven year relationship, from 19942001, the issue of Sexual Assault, or did she mention ever having been sexually assaulted . Never, never once she mention that to me. Just to talk about everything, she