islamphobic. after all, avoiding the word "terrorist" for fear of offending your viewers implies that your viewers see themselves in those actions. weird. he also said and i quote one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. it's old. but what does it mean? i mean, are these jihadists jihading for freedom? do freedom fighters kill children for watching soccer? i'm thinking maybe we should help van meek with alternative names for terrorists. how about savages? maniacs? future executives at al jazeera? anyway, this is no different than christiane amanpour who still has her cnn job somehow after referring to the paris killers as activists. for them it's just easier to fight the language than terror. it's why the media focuses on mean words rather than deeds. as men are being thrown from buildings to their deaths for being gay and women are being murdered for adultery, where's the left? they're busy dissecting bobby jindal's speech for islamohatred which shows you what we're up against. it's the fifth column defending evil while chasing phantom phrases. but maybe the hacks at al jazeera avoid the real threat because they don't want to lose their job, or perhaps their lives. for them, heads will roll isn't just a figure of speech. k.j.? >> yes? >> it was a moving monologue. >> it was so moving, i felt it. >> yes. >> throughout my body. >> they won't use the word "terrorist." so i understand -- i understand they don't like the word "islamist," but they don't even want "terrorist." so what are we going to call it? >> it's awkward. i feel like we have to send a little memo out via carrier pigeon to get permission in a peaceful politically correct way so we can choose our words more carefully when going up against extreme evil. it makes no sense to me whatsoever. but when you look at who's saying it, it does. >> juan you know if they're refusing to call terrorists terrorists, would that suggest a bit of bias on their part? >> gee, you think so? i don't know. the thing about you, and you're so quick, i've noticed that about you. i don't see how they can avoid using the language. i mean, this is a problem for the obama administration because they want to be sure to keep muslim countries on our side in the middle east where it's possible. so you're thinking saudi arabia with where the president recently visited, jordan, some of these other countries you'd even extend it to indonesia you know, muslim country. this is, when you come to news, when you come to telling people the truth about what's going on i think it's important that you say hey, you know what? these are islamic terrorists that are cutting off people's heads. how about that one? >> yeah, they're not methodists eric. should we help them come up with better terms? >> they know the terms. so everyone has a style guide, right? a.p. puts out their style guide how they treat names, how they treat -- just the way they write. that's what they do. al jazeera has their own style guide. i happened to see a video of al jazeera's style guide regarding this. and in the video, it says islamist. do not use, we will continue to describe groups and individuals by talking about their current actions and aims to give the context required. well, if you go by their current actions or recent actions they're islamic, they're radical and they're jihadists. i'm not sure why they're steering away from all of these things when that's exactly what they're describing. for some reason, they're really pulling an editorial decision not to call them that because frankly, they don't want to look at what the reality is. >> yeah do you think they're just scared? >> well, it's called al jazeera english, not al jazeera english as a second language. this is our language. >> right. >> this is language that we use. we are not going to change our culture or our language to conform to some sort of politically correct view of the news. there's -- guidelines are one thing, and sticking your head in the sand is another. you accidentally said earlier, and i loved it al jazero. i think that was on purpose. i think maybe we should start using that. it's not that different from another debate we've been having with the white house which is what kind of language are they willing to lose? >> exactly. and they don't present a coherent reason why they aren't saying it. like if they could convince me i would just say drop the story and let's move on. but they have yet to say why we are afraid of using these terms. good transition because i want to talk about a number of retired generals who are actually talking about this incoherent terror strategy. this is, i think retired general jim mattis and general jack keenan. >> the need to adapt to changing circumstances to come out now from our reactive crouch and take a firm strategic stance in defense of our values. america needs a refreshed national strategy. >> i say to this administration has been paralyzed by the fear of adverse consequences in the middle east. so they're totally handcuffed in terms of establishing a strategy, a vision and a desire to solve the problems that are put on the table in front of them. >> k.g., isn't that the point we're operating from a platform of fear? >> you're absolutely lost. i got lost for a moment because i would like general jack keane to take me as his prisoner. he's strong on national security and foreign policy. he's not afraid to tell it like it is and he makes sense. and he's calling them out. it takes courage to be able to say this is what we're doing wrong. this is how we can do it better. and by the way the time is now. not waiting because we're already behind. this is the issue right now. we're not -- we're in this position because this administration has failed to move forward, and now this country has been in retreat. >> why -- the president seems to have problems admitting the obvious. is it just about ego with him because he said that al qaeda is on the run and now it's jumped -- terrorists jumped fourhold in five years? is that it? >> you know look, i disagree with so much of this. one, i don't think we want to say that we are involved in a war at all against islam. i don't think we want that. and secondly, i think if you -- and i hear this from the general, the generals always want war. >> not true. >> unfair. >> that's not what they said. >> they're saying -- >> they want to protect the country. >> what? >> they want to protect the country. they don't want war. >> i'm saying there are different ways. you can't constantly go back and fight the last war that this is world war ii. it's not world war ii. >> they're saying we need a refreshed strategy and they're not alone. the other people that have said this include all of the former secretaries of state and defense of obama gates, panetta, even tom friedman said you've got to call it what it is. >> calling it what it is is different than saying you know what? the solution is more war. more troops. >> that's not fair. that's not what they said. >> i think all the soldiers and generals say hey we know how to fight wars. let's solve it. >> these guys have responsibility. they have the responsibility to protect. they're going to be responsible for this long after president obama is gone and is making billions of dollars in the post-presidency. >> i think anybody who's president of the united states is burdened by the responsibility of keeping us safe. >> i agree. >> and that if the minute something goes wrong they are going to be held accountable to no end. >> no -- >> gee, our current president is not doing enough to keep us safe. >> i didn't say that. i said they are going to be responsible for a lot longer after president obama leaves office. they are looking at a 70-year ideological war that they've got to try to fight, and they're asking for a refreshed strategy. and they did the right thing. they didn't write books like others. they went directly to congress testified in open seating. they were honest. they were on the record. and that's the kind of transparency i think that america is looking for. >> some of them have written books, i'm thinking of leon panetta. >> i'm saying the generals that were talking yesterday were not doing it for any financial gain. >> okay, that's fine but i'm saying there's diplomacy there's sanctions, training and support, sharing intelligence, there's obviously a social media war. this is where we are. this is what the generals don't seem to get. >> are you saying that we shouldn't employ all of those? >> these generals are only talking in military terms. >> you're conflating -- the topic and issue is should the obama administration call islamic radical terror or should they not? >> no, no we passed that. we agreed. they should call it that. i worry about, you know, antagonizing all of the islamic world. but that's them. >> i think we they'd to stop worrying about that because it hasn't helped. >> good point. good point. >> he's right. >> we have al qaeda on the march. people are being beheaded. the jv team has become the lakers. so why not try something different? why not call -- let the world know we know who they are. there's another -- may i stay on this a little bit? >> yes. >> there's a great piece in "new yorker" magazine. jonathan chase. have you seen this piece? he talks about the left becoming too pc. president obama is the leader of the left and the leader of the pc police. and jonathan chase points out that it's becoming more and more dangerous in america to say anything. you have to have a qualified opinion by your skin color by your sex, by whatever in order to say anything. >> hey, hey. >> it's dangerous -- >> skin color didn't help me with npr, brother. >> and therein lies the rub. and that's exactly the point. >> he wants me fired sooner. my man. >> leading. >> talking points memo, they're out in force trashing him for having that opinion. that's a shame. >> yeah. i want to -- and it's not just republicans and it's not just retired generals that are questioning president obama. democrats in an iraqi bet gabbard had this to say last night on the record. >> first i think we've got to understand that this is not just about words. it's not just about semantics. it's really about having a real true understanding of who our enemy is and how important that is, that we have to understand what their motivation is and what their ideology is. radical islamic ideology that's fueling them. it's a real problem because of a very simple reason actually. and that is something i learned in military 101. if you're at war, which we are, you have to know who your enemy is in order to defeat them. >> k.g., i would call her a rising star. >> i think she is there. let it happen. yeah, i love her words of what she has to say, and it's true. you have to be able to name and identify with courage and conviction, unabashedly, who the enemy is. that's what we need to do in this country. and the generals with all due respect, we're not being warmongers. they were being visionaries about a future for america that is strong and safe. for all our future generations. sometimes is war necessary? yes. but if you engage in the right tactics and you have a strong military approach that is respected in the who rld, you shouldn't have to get to that step. but we must have the mettle and wherewithal to do it if it's called for. >> we should have a unified command like general eisenhower did back in world war ii. these guys are lost in the path. >> no, they're not. >> i want to tell you something. >> no, they're not. they're not lost in the path. >> if you think that the united states -- hang on. >> but i've got facts. >> if you think that the united states of america is not fighting this war right now, go talk to the italians, the germans, the french, the british. we have more skin in this game than any of those people. >> nobody is questioning that. but you can put all the skin in it you want if you don't have the right strategy and approach and you're not doing it in a defiant, strong way, it's not going to give you the outcomes that you need. >> i thought you weren't all about war a minute ago. >> when you say talking about the past, general keane is one of the key people that advised petraeus on the surge that worked. ha, recent. >> a surge that worked, right. you think that most republicans right now -- forget the general public -- most republicans want to follow him back into war? no. ha. >> i didn't say that. a thoughtful and deliberate process. >> all right, you two. you go to your room. and -- >> can i go with her? >> this is what happens to me. when i get sent to my room. >> it doesn't happen on "the view." all right. frankly, we're all more attractive. ahead, is the obama administration deliver rat deliberately holding up the investigation of bowe bergdahl? that's next. your clever moves won't stop the flu. but practicing healthy habits with lysol can. the cdc recommends washing your hands often and disinfecting surfaces. this season use lysol to kill 99.9% of germs and help keep your family healthy. did president obama swap five dangerous prisoners for bo bowe bergdahl to score political points? that's what they're saying over at msnbc. >> when you bring bergdahl and his family into the rose garden and you take to all three sunday shows, you are embracing and politicizing the decision. in the summertime, as you recall, the president's numbers weren't very good. there weren't a lot of good news stories for him. i think they made a strategic decision at that point that this was something they wanted to highlight. and i think frankly it would be much less of an embarrassment if they hadn't gone on the sunday shows or brought bergdahl and his family into the rose garden. >> nbc news is reporting bergdahl is going to be charged with desertion. and a guest on fox news said so too. cnn is reporting we'll know the decision in days. so has the white house been delaying an announcement? elisabeth hasselbeck asked rear admiral kirby about it this morning. >> is there pressure on the pentagon to delay any charges on bowe bergdahl? >> oh my goodness no. that is the most ludicrous claim i've heard in the last couple of days. the general has complete freedom to take his time with this, and he has complete authority to come back with whatever recommendations he wants. >> oh my goodness, no. well, that's quite an answer. let's see if it holds up. eric, what do you make of it? >> so i think kirby is 100% right. there's no rush. bergdahl was gone for five years. why rush a decision. let's get all the facts. >> what if it's been made? >> well so a lot of times -- i'm guessing a decision can't be made. if it gets leaked to the press and the press runs with it they could sit on it. i don't think they have urgency -- no speedy trial situation. the question is what's he going to be charged with? if he is charged. is it going to be absent without leave which would be he left with an intent to come back, that seems like it would be way way too soft on him. >> awol. >> yeah, awol. >> that's the lower spectrum. >> six people may allegedly or could possibly have died searching for bergdahl in the aftermath of his disappearing. there are other levels obviously he could be put to death. i'm guessing they may not do that. i would hope that they would go a little bit further. but in the meantime everything in this white house the administration is about optics right? so if they come out and have a guy on fox news and nbc saying oh, the decision is made. he's going to be charged with treason and then they follow it up, it makes it look like another leak from the administration. if they say no, we're still thinking about it, they can come to that conclusion later and not have to be accused of leaking it. >> all right dana, talk about the communications aspect of it. they're now kind of behind the message in the story trying to play catch-up. and if it comes out now that in fact, it's true, how does it make them look? >> i think both things could be factually true. rear admiral kirby says no decision has been made or the final checkmark has been made. that might be true. they could be waiting on something. it could be that it's not going to be desertion. it could be totally different. i agree that the timing is not that important. i think that glen thrush of politico who was on msnbc in that clip, that's not a new revelation that this was probably a political -- they thought that at the white house that this was going to be a good communications strategy for the white house. it backfired on them and they've been playing catch-up ever since. but regardless what happens, they will be able to point to it wasn't our decision. the pentagon ran the investigation. this is all on their shoulders. i think that's what they'll do. >> well, let's see. i don't think it's a good situation for them either way, especially with they mentioned about look at that, at the rose garden, all the big press, the patting on the back. >> and the consequences of a decision and how the prisoner swapping does that lead others like in jordan who's facing a difficult decision now with their -- with isis holding one of their hostages. >> that's the real fallout. obviously the loss of u.s. lives. >> it goes back to what i said yesterday. the president doesn't know the value of things. he doesn't know how to negotiate. you can't negotiate if you don't know the value. he thought this trade was a club sandwich. it was a crap sandwich. this may be the worst trade since boston sent babe ruth to the yankees which created the curse of the bambino. this is the curse of the obama. every single negotiation he make says s flounders because he refuses to understand the value of the things he's bartering with. >> what are you saying the president should go on "the price is right" to learn the value of things? >> absolutely. >> i'm good at that game. >> or "let's make a deal." >> i think what greg just said is right the right wing in this country has decided we don't like this trade. we didn't like the idea that you swab bergdahl swap bergdahl for five terrorists. now everybody is waiting on the news. what's he going to be charged with? is the administration going to force the pentagon to go light on him? i think that's way way lost. that's not the issue. i think this is a young man, and i think that he should have had -- president obama should have had the parents with him because you're bringing an american soldier back home. i think there's great pride for everybody in the country. where they went wrong, susan rice on the sunday show saying oh, he served with great honor. i don't see that. >> they want the optics to begin with. >> what was wrong was to put the parents in the rose garden to do a big photo op before they had all the facts. like did he walk away? there were people in his battalion who said he walked away. he deserted. >> that's not the issue. the issue is bringing an american home. >> which is fine but you don't need to do it with pomp and circumstance in the rose garden because they know enough, if we knew it that he was left under suspicious circumstances and potentially a deserter. >> how do we know if he was a deserter. >> that's fine. it looks bad for him. but as far as we as americans are concerned, we should bring our soldiers home. >> no one is quarrelling with that. >> we let go five guys who traded a howitzer for a water balloon. >> i don't know how dangerous those five were. i'll leave that to you. >> it's well documented. >> i would say pretty dangerous. wait a minute. hold on a second. yeah, it says pretty dangerous here. my packet. >> working. yeah, it's working. okay ahead, are democrats hurting our kids by putting unions ahead of education? thousands of americans across the country think so and they are demanding change. details next. a lot of folks across the country are demanding change to our broken education system. that includes me. as a lifelong democrat a minority, i'm looking into this camera, and i'm challenging president obama, hillary clinton, elizabeth warren and the rest of the democrats to stop savoring unions start savoring what's best for our kids. republicans have long supported the idea of school choice. and according to a recent poll done by a democratic polling firm by the way 69% of likely voters polled agree accident, school choice is best. let me tell you a quick story. >> you go. >> two sons and my daughter could not go to one day of district of columbia public schools growing up. i had to pay the bill. why is that? because they were bad schools. for a middle-class black parent, anybody, bad schools. my grandson, guess what? he won in a lottery to get into a charter school. and now, you have an average in this country of 300 people waiting for every single charter school. in other words, parents want in. 300 people every single charter school in the country. that's what's going on. that's why people need school reform in america. and that's why the democrats are behind the eight ball on this one. they are letting down minorities. this is a civil rights issue of this generation. if you deny someone a good education, you can talk about ferguson. you can talk about whatever you want. you can talk about affirmative action. if the guy can't do the job, if he's not educated, what are you going to stand up and fight for? you've got to fight for education first, democrats, wake up to it. >> william! >> hear, hear, everybody. feel it. >> i'm fired up about that one. >> this week is school choice week, and it's grown every year. they have these democratic mayors are coming out. there's a big rally in montgomery am balabama today. and the rule is there's no partisan ship. no one's demonized. so why don't the democrats take this issue and run with it? why don't they make this their issue? >> you're too smart. you're setting me up because you know that the unions, especially teachers unions put big money into the party. and i think what essentially they've cut the vocal cord. >> that's very nasty. profiting off the backs of children's education? >> oh that's nasty. >> no but it is. >> that's what i'm telling you. >> i'm telling you. >> back to your point here, they showed us -- they just sent us these numbers. service employees at seiu, $146 million, nea, $89 million. you're 100% right. that's why. but can we talk about one quick thing? >> follow the money. >> what is actually going on in our schools that makes juan's point even more important? we're falling against the world stage across the board. in math we're number 31. in reading we're number 21. and in science, we're number 28 on a global scale. there are countries that you would never expect to be in front of us. >> it's unforgivable. it's rotten. people say you're just talking about the minority. no, we're talking about all our children. when you look at the numbers, you can segregate the white and the black and it's still not good. i think we've got to go beyond the point of somehow thinking it's some other kid. >> it's not just a race issue. it's an education issue. it's about children regardless of your ethnicity or where you come from. it impacts across the board and it's significant. if you have to continue to give out entitlements where the system is broke? no, how about the education. that's where the investment needs to be, right there nurture it. it's got to be in the soil. equip them with the skills they need to build their future. >> let me tell you something that makes my head blow off. you thought i was getting upset before. president obama went to a private school. his mother put him in private school. guess what? okay. so then comes the opportunity to have what they call the d.c. opportunity school act. and to offer vouchers to low-income kids. the minority kids in the destruct of columbia so they can have the opportunity, their parents, to have some choice. and he and the democrats tried to block it. today speaker boehner on the hill and said this is about opening doors for young people who otherwise can't see the light of day. >> well, you raised probably the most interesting point of all. why are liberals pro-choice when it comes to preventing life but anti-choice when it comes to enhancing it? >> good point. >> that's all i'm saying. >> ponder. >> carl cameron just e-mailed saying that washington state democrat party approved a resolution announcing the common core, the republican party had done it. so now it's bipartisan. they want to take the control back to the states. the states say there's too much control going to the federal government. >> but is common core a school choice issue? they're apples and oranges. >> it came from the states, from the governor. >> i know, but it's apples and oranges. you can't say that common core and school choice are one and the same. one is about standards and one is about schools being high performing. >> i was simply saying that carl -- the point is this. how's this? maybe people like juan democrats, liberals like juan are saying education is a big issue, one of the most important issues. we need to start rethinking, it doesn't have to be along party lines or necessarily along the lines of who the donors are donating to. >> i couldn't agree more. coming the obamacare architect who got heat for calling americans too stupid to understand the health care law. well, he's back. the rap video starring the m.i.t. professor. you have to see it next. ♪ take me into ♪ welcome back. time for three serious stories seven minutes, one convergent host. first up they say everyone has a teacher or professor who leaves a lasting impression on every student's life. hold that thought. here's m.i.t. professor jonathan gruber. you know the guy who called americans stupid enough to vote for obamacare teaching those brilliant minds at m.i.t. get ready to get gruberred again. >> what about me? why should you care about a rapping fool with thinning hair ♪ ♪ i was once a pre-frosh just like you ♪ ♪ went to grad school and got a ph.d. ♪ ♪ now i'm a teacher here at m.i.t. ♪ ♪ and my research on health research helped this u.s. get insurance that's universal ♪ >> but we're stupid huh? >> we know that he's kind of a dope that is desperate for affection. that was at a talent show. but in a way, every one of us has been a gruber. what you're seeing there is we failed to see ourselves as the way others see us. and that creates a sense of embarrassment. so you know when he was preparing for this, he was excited about it. he wrote it. he thought it was going to be great. he thought it was going to be awesome, and then he embarrassed himself. the worst part and the lesson is this stuff now lives forever. this in the modern area any idiocy caused by the fact of you not knowing who you really are is alive forever. we've all been there. who hasn't done a talent show and made a fool of himself? >> i think there's only one rapper at this table. >> i am a rapper aficionado. >> tiny d. >> oh, i thought you were going to play that thing again. >> i should have. >> i'm going to take an alternative view. i think those students will remember that. they don't care if the last six months of being -- how gruber told every american that they're stupid. they're thinking about their futures, and they're at m.i.t. and they're excited. and they'll remember that. so i would say as a teaching tool, i thought it was probably pretty good. >> but he did call americans stupid and he did -- $5 million? >> yeah if this was the gong show, i would have gonged him for sure. you know, students, they think it's cool. guess what? my teacher, gruber it's, like, hipsterness. whatever. he becomes more stupid by the minute with that rap. >> you want to take this one, juan? >> i think it's, you know, it's fun. if you're a student as dana was saying, i think it's memorable. this guy's trying to be a rapper. you know, i'd just leave it alone. >> is he coca-cola? >> he's more like snow. remember snow? >> no. >> informer? >> well, he's no vanilla ice. that's all i know. the true standard of excellence in rap. >> that's true. the 87th academy awards are just 25 days away and the controversy of dearth over african-american nominees continues to simmer. there's "selma" director on the topic of racism in hollywood. >> the bottom line, i don't think the question is so much about the awards. the question is why weren't they in the running with people of color for the award? it's systemic. it's a system that's been set up in a certain way. times have changed. ideas have matured. and the system might not have caught up with that or stayed up with that. >> all right, juan, your thoughts on racism in hollywood and the dearth of "selma" saying we're coming along. >> and do it in ten seconds. >> as chris rock said hollywood is a white industry. there are black stars, nears no question about that. but in terms of the executives and the like. but i think this woman has a bigger problem, which is people didn't vote to nominate her for the oscar. why? because the film is beyond fiction. it is a distortion of the history, and to the point where it does damage to us as american people because i think it further divides us instead of giving us common inspiration. >> anybody? like it? like "selma"? >> i would just say there's some pretty strong competition. so could it possibly be on merit? >> yeah, check it out. >> that's the thing. there's supposed to be affirmative action in film selection for best picture? >> no. >> no, no. but i must say, "12 years a slave," that was no easy movie to swallow, and that did pretty well. maybe that's a hint for her. >> right. so you're making the point -- you're refuting her statement. >> i'm disagreeing with her. it's hard for you to fathom. >> there is real bigotry in hollywood, but it's not black people. it's brick people. "the lego movie" not only wasn't nominated for best picture but best animated picture. that is true bigotry. bigotry against legos. it's against the brick people. unfortunately, though, the brick people, they don't protest because they're tiny. and you have to put them together. >> and they're plastic. ♪ everything is awesome ♪ some sad news. can we actually say that we saw this coming. the rent is too damn high guy. listen. >> allow me to introduce myself. i represent the rent is too damn high party. that's it. end of subject. there's nolsthing else to talk about. rent is too damn high. it boils down to one thing rent is too damn high. >> jimmy was right, the rent was too damn high. he's being evicted because the landlord wants to get full price. k.g., i love this guy. >> $872 a month, rent-stabilized east village apartment. i didn't even know that still existed in new york city. choosers. >> the landlord is claiming that's not his primary residence. >> right. >> so he wouldn't qualify. >> i like the guy. i met him here when i was on "hannity." >> your thoughts? >> i don't know. i don't understand rent-controlled apartments. they're like easter eggs in new york city. and if you eliminate them, apparently then all of the rents will go down. and i don't know what's going on between him and his landlord. it's probably a more complicated story than we have time for. i feel bad for the guy, but i don't know the story. >> "d"? >> i just think supply and demand is out of whack when you have subsidy. that's the problem. >> i'm from out of town at this point even though i grew up here, but i must say i don't understand how if they did away with rent control, all the rents would go down? >> well, i guess it would be -- yes, because people would be -- >> more inventory. >> more inventory. >> supply and demand. >> yeah, more inventory for the chinese and russian billionaires. >> you're filling in for bob nicely. >> what's going on here? did bob, like, infuse you with a crazy elixir? >> an apartment for $890 something a month. >> yeah so somebody who could afford it would buy it. >> there's something wrong with that chair i think. >> by the way he said gasoline was too damn high, too, and gas has come down. ahead on "the five," the ad you won't be seeing during the super bowl because animal rights activists have complained. you'll see it here next. ♪ hooked on a feeling ♪ test ♪ you've got it all figured out ♪ ♪ that smile ♪ the super bowl countdown is on. they say i don't know much about football, i am an expert on dogs. remember budweiser's puppy super bowl ad? well, godaddy tried mocking it this year, and now the internet company is under fire. here's why. ♪ >> look it's buddy! i'm so glad you made it home. because i just sold you on this website i built with godaddy. ship him out. >> godaddy yanked the commercial after annal rights activists called it cruel and irresponsible. budweiser's ad isn't getting the same type of backlash. watch this. ♪ ♪ i know i'm gonna be ♪ ♪ i'm gonna be the man who wakes up next to you ♪ ♪ when i go out ♪ ♪ yeah i know i'm gonna be ♪ ♪ i'm gonna be the man who goes along with you ♪ along with you ♪ ♪ i would walk 500 miles and i would walk 500 more ♪ ♪ just to be the man who walks 1,000 miles to fall down at your door ♪ >> greg, wasn't that the sweetest thing you have ever seen? >> that commercial like budweiser makes me want to throw up. the first commercial was an excellent commercial. it was very clever and pretended to tug on the heart strings and then gave sentiment ality the shaft. they do not understand animals. people like you who grew up on a ranch you know what animals are. animal rights activists are usually stupid under grads who have never been by a horse in their lives. every animal in every movie you saw as a kid from rudolph to bengie to old yeller experiences hardship. it is supposed to move you as a kid. preventing and creating hoopla you are an idiot. you make me sick. go daddy you are wimps. >> well -- >> send me another e-mail. >> they knew what they were doing because they would get attention for it. you can't compete with budweiser. >> you can tell they are winners. go daddy. they knew it. >> i don't understand. >> i like the budweiser one because it is a mini movie. >> i like the budweiser one too. >> so negative. he has little negative ants in his pants. >> think about this for a second. the go daddy ad took the product and told you what the product was and sold the hell out of the product. that was fantastic. what is the budweiser ad selling you? >> it's getting the kids hooked early. that's what it was. >> i didn't think of that one. >> the kids drinking beers. >> one more thing is up next. time pr "one more thing." >> i was watching the fox business network today. guess what happened this morning. see this phone right here? apple sold 74 million iphones last quarter and put up $18 billion, a record for any company any quarter. they have $178 billion in cash in investments. that means they could give every american $556 if they wanted to which they don't. people are buying iphones. the big question was steve jobs passing when they passed the torch on to tim cook whether he would be able to handle apple he is handling apple just fine. >> i got the 6 but i want the 6 plus. >> you can't fit it in your pocket. >> i don't put anything in my back pocket. it would get crushed. [ laughter ] >> before i do mine i want to credit national review for breaking the story on the al jazeera e-mails. it's time for greg's top 40 music corner. >> this is a big hit. screaming up the charts because this woman has pipes. >> i love the hair too. >> where do you find this stuff? >> do you want to know? >> share your history. >> you can't make noise like that in my building. they'll throw you out. >> 29 years ago today this was the anniversary of the challenger exploding. and president ronald reagan marked the occasion with this speech. >> the crew of the challenger honored us. we will never forget them nor the last time we saw them this morning as they prepared for their journey and waved good bye and slipped the bonds of earth to touch the face of god. >> and that speech was written by peggy noonen. they said go get that girl that can do it. >> amazing. magic with words. >> well, 3:00 a.m. monday guess what on the white house lawn here comes a drone and it crashes into the white house lawn. they lockdown the white house and the eisenhower building. everybody is in a panic. what is going on? is this an attack? now we learn that actually it was a government employee who was drunk. a guy who works for the geo spatial intelligence agency was drunk playing with the drone lost control of it crashed and he has turned himself in to the intelligence agency and so far no punishment. >> did he have a security clearance? >> of course. >> i saw a picture showing joe biden flying. >> for once there is a drone outside the white house. >> who you going to call? ghost busters? remember that movie. if you didn't see it the first time you can see it again now but with all chicas. this is supposedly the new cast. melissa mccarthy, leslie jones, kate mckennen and kristin wig. i think this is going to be very, very good. >> totally bigoted choices. hollywood. don't go anywhere. bret baier has a big exclusive with house speaker john boehner. "special report" is up next. >> it is thursday january 29th td. a fox news lart. isis demanding a terrorist be freed or they will strike. we have the details as the deadline approaches. >> this as the white house once again refuses to call our enemies terrorists. >> i would point out the tal began is an armed insurgency isis is a terror group. >> why won't they call terror what it is? >> patriots powerhouse tom brady revealing big news that could throw a wrench into the super bowl. "fox & friends first" starts right now. ♪ >> good morning. we have almost made it through the workweek. it is thursday. you are watching "fox & friends first". i am ainsley earhardt. >> i am heather chilleders. thank you for starting your day with us. the deal must be done by sunset. isis setting a new deadline for a prisoner swap. a pilot will be executed if a terrorist is not delivered to the turkish border. >> leland what's the latest? >> they tried to negotiate with isis. as of now the jordanians are going through tribal leaders in iraq to talk to the terrorists who continue to make new and ever changing demands. this is the latest take believed to be the voice of this man kenji jodo. he says the jordanian air force pilot will be execute