The 2012 president ial election. The Washington Post reporting it knew it wasnt just secret Service Agents who had partied with prostitutes ahead of the president s visit to colombia in 2012. A member of the advance team also had a call girl in his hotel ram, ram, and thats not room, and thats not the only bombshell, an investigatorrer says he was told to keep a lid on his findings until after the election. The white house dismissing the report as old news. But gop congressman Jason Chaffetz says hes not buying that. The white house needs to come clean. This theres a white house staffer that was very involved in this. Remember, there were nearly two dozen secret service and military personnel that were either fired or reprimanded, but the concern is that when it came to the white house and the white house taking care of its own personnel, a totally different standard and perhaps misdirection and some cover up to make sure that that story never saw the light of day before the 2012 elections. The congressman demanding the white house turn over all documents related to its counsels review of the incident by october 24th. Chief White House Correspondent ed henry from the north lawn. Ed . Reporter good to see you, andrea. Look, white house officials do note in their defense that Senate Republicans were investigating this back in 2012 and did not find any evidence to suggest that a white house person was involved. And so theyre certainly pointing that out. But as you point out, the secret service had several agents who had their careers derailed over this, and here whats new is that the Washington Post is saying they have some Hotel Records that suggest a white house advance volunteer not a paid staffer, but a volunteer who was reimbursed for travel expenses, jonathan dack, about 25 years old, was involved, did sign a prostitute into his room at his hotel. And whats interesting about this is that jay carney at the white house podium when all of this was happening repeatedly told me and other journalists that there was no white house connection. Listen. There are no, to my knowledge, and have been no credible or specific allegations of misconduct by any member of the White House Advance Team or white house staff. But out of due diligence, this review was conducted, and there is no indication that, of any misconduct. Reporter now, he said that review was conducted by the white House Counsel at the time. In that same briefing, i repeatedly pressed jay carney on whether she looked at any Hotel Records as the secret service looked at records from the hotel in order to implicate their officials, and jay carney would not answer that question repeatedly. Interesting, because rum bler now, her name is being bantied about as being on the short list to replace eric holder as the attorney general. If she is nominated, you can bet republicans on the hill and in confirmation hearings will be looking for more documents as you suggested. I mentioned jonathan dack who was the white house advanced volunteer involved in this, he now works at the state department in the office of global womens issues. Guys . Oh, wow. You just cant make that up. Ed henry, thank you so much. Reporter good to see you. Stephen, theres so many angles to this story, of course; the safety and security of the president , the potential cover up by the white house and the hypocrisy about womens issues. What strikes you the most about this story . I think the apparent disparate treatment between the secret Service Agents, many of whom lost their jobs, lost their careers and this young advance person for the white house. I mean, if its the case that the white houses own investigation didnt find anything on him, wasnt able to confirm the allegations at the time, it seems apparent now with the benefit of hindsight and looking at what the Washington Post has produced in the way of Hotel Records and other things that the white house just wasnt looking very hard. Maybe they didnt want to find what they knew was true. Uhhuh. And, harris, very disturbing if its true that they wanted this to wait until after the Midterm Elections so there was a cover up for political purposes to cover the white houses duff. No doubt. We have seen how much play it gets when the secret service messes up. I mean, look at whats happened in recent weeks with the white house breach and so forth. You can understand why theyd want to keep a scandal under wraps because that becomes a bigger story, the idea of protecting a president. But with this young man who wasnt part of the detail necessarily, but a volunteer, its explained to these guys when they come from college that you repthe first lady. You are an extension of the secret service by reputation if nothing else. So for him to get a pass is really interesting because his dad is a big democrat donor. There are just some key points that as a journalist i would want to ask about some of the consistencies and inconsistencies in this story. And when david asked about why are we redacting his name in the documents were going to release in our report, he and another fellow were put on administrative leave for asking those questions. So, again, as a journalist it just makes me want to press in and ask more questions about who is this young man and does it matter maybe they should have been asking those questions in a white house investigation that only turned up what they wanted to hear at the time if these recent allegations hold to be true. Heres what im going to say, is that cause and effect might be the point here. You bring up the recent incident, case in point the fence jumper entering the white house. According to current and former employees, including the Washington Post, low morale among secret service led to some of those recent incidents, that led that low morale the result of some coverups that have happened, this potential coverup that happened in the past. So i thought that was a really interesting angle. And thats to your point, stephen. If youre going to penalize secret Service Agents but then give a break to a high dollar donor, jedediah. So its not just covering the president s butt before elections, its covering someone whos donated heavily the son of that person. The son of that person. And then promoting him, by the way, to be at the state department to run, oh, Foreign Affairs for women in the state department. I mean, really. And this is all that we know that he did. We dont even know what else he could have done. I want you to hit on something, and that is that woman angle. I think this tells us exactly how the white house feels about women. And theyll be the same ones coming out talking about a war on women. And i think republicans need to bring this stuff up and need to call them out on their hypocrisy. Republicans let this stuff go all the time. Call them out on this. This guy should not have a job doing that. Now, in terms of election politics, i dont know why they covered this up. I think coming to terms with it i dont know if that would have made a big difference in terms of elections, that people would have held them accountable for this in that way. But they dont realize the constant deceit is what hurts them. They dont realize its a problem to lie about manager and have months later it come out and this administration be viewed as an administration that doesnt tell people the truth, that doesnt do proper investigation, that isnt concerned about investigating these kinds of atrocities and then putting those people in charge of things that make no sense. Theyre making themselves targets. Republicans, take it. Run with it. Talk about the war on women. Use it against them. I think this is one of the reasons were seeing the Obama Presidency sort of crumble in front of us. You saw the sound bite from jay carney who said with some assurance, look, the white house didnt have anything to do with this. There have been no specific and credible allegations there was white house involvement. Remember, he said exactly the same thing about benghazi and the shaping of those talking points. Absolutely no white house involvement, no white house or state department involvement, and then, of course, we turned up 100 pages of emails that showed there was serious white house and state department involvement. So its a credibility problem. The irs scandal as well, when the president said heads are going to roll. Right. Well, from one blame game to another, president obama trying to blame the media now for his low poll numbers. At a fundraiser this week where he to thed a rebounding he touted a rebounding economy, he reportedly said, quote the press and washington, all it does is speed cynicism. Most of you dont know the statistics i just gave you, and that awzs because they elicit hope, and thats not what we hear about. We hear about how washington will never work. New york times reporter james risen says hes been targeted by the white house for years in an attempt to get information from sources for a book he wrote. Quote, i think obama hates the press, i think he doesnt like the press, and he hates leaks. Andrea . I think the president doesnt like anybody who criticizes him whether youre in the media or not, or whether youre a conservative group we just mentioned the irs scandal. Its never successful to criticize people who buy ink by the barrel, thats been an old campaign saying. It really isnt. But what good news is the president talking about . Hes referencing the good news doesnt get out there. Whether its the economy or Foreign Affairs, whats the media supposed to be covering . Theyve been covering his behind, i think, for a long time until recently. And by the way, at this same event he went after republicans for protecting the rich. This was a high dollar fund raiser, over 30,000 a plate, and we just saw today that president obama leads the way when it comes to protecting a rich donors son. I think theres two americas, the ones who are connect to the white house and the people who arent. Well, the president did, stephen, in this particular speech go through, and he cherry picked a handful of data he thinks the media should be touting as far as good news on the economy. He left out that ten million americans have given up looking for work over the course of his term in office and 7 trillion has been added to the national debt. Yeah. Well, its not the first time the president has cherry picked information, but if president obama thinks that the media have been a problem for him, hes sorely mistaken. [laughter] right. Look at the way the media, the media, in fact, havent as a general proposition been covering these scandals and certainly havent been obsessed. I think we would know a hot more about the a lot more about the indisputable targeting of conservative groups had the Mainstream Media shown some curiosity about what happened there. And it was certainly the case where benghazi. Harris, allow me to back up stephens point. Pew Research Found four out of ten stories, editorials and op eds have been clearly positive. Two out of ten were positive for bush. Well, and so thats whats positive. I want to talk about whats missing. Have you noticed since his numbers have come could down in polling, the Media Research center has looked at all the stories about polling, about the president s approval and disapproval, have managed from the alphabet soup networks,abc, cbs and nbc. [laughter] to your point, andrea, in terms of president and this donor talk that he gave, he said, you know, theyre not telling you about the numbers about the economy because those numbers would give hope. Again, hes talking to people who paid 1,000 a ticket to sit there. They dont need financial hope. Yep. So whos he preaching to . He could read the cat in the hat to that group [laughter] they would love him he could sit there and go and theyd go, wow. What hes also saying, though, is people are a bunch of dummies. Hes saying youre too stupid to realize that youre out of work. So he thinks people are sitting and looking at statistics. Theyve been looking for jobs. He also thinks we in the media are pretty stupid too. Were just sitting back, waiting like lemmings to smelt waiting for him to deal out whatever he wants us to say, and it doesnt work like that. Well, theres some evidence for that [laughter] well, its all the medias fault, thats for sure. Well, Health Officials announcing new screening procedures at u. S. Airports to try to protect the American People from the deadly ebola virus, but will it be enough . And one u. S. School district is doing away with the term boys and girls to be more gender inclusive. Wait until you hear what they now want teachers to call students. And right after the show, get more from the couch on the web by logging on to foxnews. Com outnumbered. Click on the overtime tab with questions, comments and tell us what you want to hear about. I like your belt. I have a cold. I took nyquil but im still stuffed up. Nyquil cold and flu liquid gels dont unstuff your nose. Really . Alkaseltzer plus night rushes relief to eight symptoms of a full blown cold including your stuffy nose. breath of relief oh, what a relief it is. Thanks. Anytime. The ultimate arena for business. Hour after hour of diving deep, touching base, and putting ducks in rows. The only problem with Conference Calls eventually they have to end. Unless you have the comcast business voiceedge mobile app. It lets you switch seamlessly from your desk phone to your mobile with no interruptions. Ive never felt so alive. Get the future of phone and the phones are free. Comcast business. Built for business. Youre watching outnumbered. The very same day the first patient diagnosed with ebola in the United States died yesterday, as you know, breaking news right here the centers for Disease Control and prevention is announcing a new level of screening at five major u. S. Airports. Now, this will be for passengers arriving from the ebolastricken african nations, and it will start this saturday at new yorks jfk airport and next week at newark liberty, washington dulles, chicago ohare and hartsfield, atlanta. Screeners will take passengers fevers temperatures and ask them questions. Anyone will then be sent to a, quote, cdc quarantine station Public Health officer. Would any of that have caught thomas duncan, the patient who died yesterday . Reportedly, he showed no symptoms on arrival here and reportedly lied when asked in liberia if hed had contact with any ebola patients. We know from later reporting that a woman had died, a pregnant woman, who he helped carry, transport to get help just a short time before he traveled. Oh, and by the way, theres some other breaking news that i want to inject into the conversation now. Nearly 200 Airline Cabin cleaners have now walked off the job, striking over health and safety issues that include fears over possible exposure to ebola. Thats at Laguardia Airport here in new york, jfk, laguardia, youve got striking workers carrying signs and so forth. So thats part of the coverage this morning too. So my big question now is where do we go from here, stephen . The white house needs to get everybody on the same page. The thing we heard from dr. Frieden yesterday was meant to reassure the country that everything was going to be fine, they understood the threats, they understood the problems, and i think what people took away from that as this breaking news suggests is that things arent okay, that the government doesnt really have its ducks in a row and its going to require more planning. Yeah. And this is complicating when you talk about the people who were actually tasked with cleaning the planes. We have a situation in newark where a gentleman and his little girl had traveled enroute, he was getting sick in the bathroom, somebody has to clean that up. He turned out not to have ebola, but if the communication isnt right with these worker, theyre fearful. Thats been the fear all the long, hospital workers walking off the job, Airline Workers walking off the job, but, look, ive been hearing a lot of criticism about the airport screenings, and im not quite sure why. Even if it hadnt caught duncan because he wasnt showing outward symptoms, who cares . What if it catches one person . I mean, isnt it worth it . Yeah. So im not sure why i understand it could slow things down at the airport, there might be some added costs involved, but im for any added measure for security for people traveling into this country. You bring up a good point and, you know, i have to ask this because i wonder why did it take so long to even get to this point in and if were lagging behind on taking temperatures, what are we too slow on now . Well, im going to go back to what leon panetta said in his criticism of president obama which is he approaches problems more like an academic. This is the exact criticism from representative Pete Sessions of dallas when it comes to the president s handling of ebola. While i think there was probably some academics doier put together, theres things that you can plan for and other things you dont anticipate like workers saying im not going to clean this up or just not showing up for work in hospitals. And stephens absolutely right, and i lovedded your comments on special report last night. The contradictions coming out of the cdc and the kooky logic. When he was asked about limiting flights, his logic, his rationale was if we did that, it would actually make ebola worse. Now, i dont know where you deduce that, but if one more person comes down or contracts ebola, i think the administrations not going to have a choice. And i think going back to sandras point, i think the problem isnt necessarily people have a problem with these additional measures, its theres a concern theyre not enough. Why not actually ban travel from these countries and do it now if you think that these measures wont be that effective. One of complaints is people are saying in the airports theyre not being trained properly