Fully informed about what is taking place on the january 6 case in washington, d. C. And i think by the time i am done you will be shaking their heads in disbelief it will not be the usual static that you hear or the surface of a politics that you hear and all the rest but lets dig in and specifically i want to dig into the judge judge Tanya Chutkan. This is very important. Lets start with the facts, with the law. There is something called the Code Of Conduct for the United States judges, did you know that existed . So they have a Code Of Conduct for the United States judges just as they have for lawyers and they have them for doctors and other professions and the judges are compelled to comply with. I am here to make the case that judge Tanya Chutkan is unqualified as a federal judge to handle the january 6 case and in fact really is unqualified to be a judge of any kind. That is pretty harsh but its exactly correct, here is the Code Of Conduct for the United States judges. This is not optional, this is required. The judge must follow. I want to read some of it to you. And independent Honorable Judiciary is indispensable, the justice in our society, a judge should maintain and enforce high stakes of Conduct Interpersonally observe those standards so the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved, the provision should be construed to further objective, deference to the judgment and rulings of courts depends on Public Confidence in the integrity and independence of judges, the integrity and independence of judges depend on their active without fear or favor although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law and should comply with this code. Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain Public Confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely violation diminishes confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under the law. The canons are rules of reason, they should be applied consistently with constitutional requirement statutes, other court rules and decision laws in the context of all relevant circumstances. The code is to be construed so it does not impinge on the essential independence of judges to make judicial decisions. It goes on. Im reading the relevant sections this is can into a judge must expect to be subject to constant and accept restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizens. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts that prohibition is necessarily cast in general terms an extended conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the code. Actual impropriety of the standard include violation of laws, court rules or other specific provisions of the code. He goes on, canon 383, the duty under to act in a manner that promotes Public Confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary applies to all the judges activities included the discharge of the judges adjudicative and administrative responsibilities, the duty to be respectful includes a responsibility to avoid, or behavior that could reasonably be interpreted as harassment, prejudice or bias, the Code Of Conduct for the United States judges. Lets apply real clear. Com julie kelly talks about what takes place on determining the date of the trial of the january 6 case and she writes in part, having gone through a thousand of the judges decisions with respect to generate six defendants as well as the case involving donald trump she said chutkan has issued charged rulings and incendiary statements of her own while presided over 30 cases involving trumps supporters charged in connection with the generally 62021 at the u. S. Capitol. She writes a review of thousands of pages of Hearing Transcripts which she did we know that chutkan has repeatedly had strong and subtle opinions about the issues at the heart of the u. S. Donald trump the Criminal Case she is presiding over, these include Republic Assertions of the 2020 election was beyond approach, the januare orchestrated by trump and the former president is guilty of crimes. She is described january 6 as a mob attack on the foundation of our democracy and branded the issue at the heart of the case, trump claimed the 2020 election was stolen as a conspiracy theory. These are all opinions have nothing to do before this judge and she spewed all these editorial comments and essays particularly during the sentencing. Of the various trials. Although judges often make comments from the fence, anwar chutkans language against the gop nominee president in 2020 for the u. S. Code that has recusal states and any justice or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding which is impartiality might be reasonably question, one reason to recuse is if the judge has demonstrated a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party. She has over and over and over again. At least one occasion chutkan suggested the court shouldve been charged for his alleged role in routinely described as an attempt to overthrow the government on january 6 before sentencing christine preola a trump supporter from ohio that pleaded guilty to obstruction of a official proceeding to 15 months in jail chutkan appeared to lament the fact that trump was not yet imprisoned. She said the people who Mob The Capital were there and loyalty to one man, not to the constitution which most of the people that come before me seem woefully ignorant, not to the ideals of this country, not to the principles of democracy, she said on october 28, 2022 it is blind to one person and by the way remains free to this day. Chutkan accused matthew ms. Oka another january 6 defendants over choosing trump and rejecting his argument that he traveled from texas to washington to engage i in legal political demonstration and chutkan declared in his october 2021 Sentencing Hearing that he went there to support one man who he viewed had the election taken from them in total disregard but lawfully conducted an election of capital in support of one man not in support of our country in support of democracy, the case of Robert Palmer at Sentencing Chutkan said mr. Palmer you made a very good point, the people who exhorted you and encouraged invalid you to take action and delphi have not been charged. That is not the courts positi position, i dont charge anybody and i dont negotiate plea offers Anatomy Charging Decisions i sentence people who pleaded guilty or have been convicted. The issue of who has or who has not been charged is not before me. I dont have any influence of that. I have my opinions but they are not relevant and you are correct, no one encouraging everybody to take the capital has been charged as of yet but i dont think that means you should get a lower sentence. There is so much. Throughout the 45 page indictment, smith is the prosecutor repeatedly accused trump of promoting falsehoods about the 2020 president ial election. He could see the judge sounds like the prosecution for more than two months following the election on november 3 defendants spread lies that there was outcome Determinative Fraud in the election and he actually one these are claims were false and the defendant knew it but the defendant repeated it and disseminated them anyway to make this knowingly false claim appear legitimate and intense atmosphere of mistrust and anger any role in the administration of the elections, that is smith talking about trump. Chutkan clearly shares that you on many occasions the judge has insisted the 2020 election was legitimate for leave added by the court system and disputed by trump that lies at the heart of the case she is now hearing, ladies and gentlemen, there is case after case and sentencing part of these trials and Plea Agreements were chutkan comments on the election and comments on what took place and makes comments about trump, either directly or in an ambiguous way that is intended to raise the fact that it is trump and shes an Incredible Intent Animus Towards Trump and she is supposed to be the judge, the judge set the date for march 4 for the trial, your Sixth Amendment requires that you have affected representation of counsel, that you are not just going through the motion and at the very end it says to have the assistance of counsel for his defense, what did the judge do, she cited a possible trial date, and possible trial date President Trump lawyer was in court that day and he said to the judge that this day means that my client will not get affected representation of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The prosecutors are talking about 12. 8 million pages of documents, god knows how many videos and other information and that does not include the work that we have to present in testimony and so forth and by making the date march 4 you are giving us effectively five months to prepare with millions of pages of documents in a case the kind of which has never been brought before and constitutional complexity and not only that she picks the date right before Super Tuesday because she wanted to have maximum impact it is worse than that. We have a memo from the Attorney General republican democrats, they say to prosecutors of the department there right in front of me we have them from michelman casey march 5, 2008 we have one from Attorney General eric holder march 9, 2012, Loretta Lynch april 11, 2016 they also the same thing politics must play no role on federal investigators and prosecutors regarding any investigation or criminal charges. Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election for the purpose of giving them an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or Political Party this is the official position it has been of the United States department of justice for decades. So the Special Counsel purposely brings to criminal charges right in the heart of the republican primary in the president ial election working for the Opposition Party of president being biden for maximum political impact but it is worse, judge chutkan goes even further. She said march 4, the date specifically intended to cripple Donald Trumps campaign by setting the beginning of the trial for the day before Super Tuesday. The most important primary day were republicans on the calendar, not only that judge chutkan jumped the line, the First Federal case brought was the case that is in florida. Judge cannon is in charge of that case weeks before judge chutkan set the trial date for march 4 they already set the trial date for the First Federal case in may when she issued an Order Setting march 4 as the initial trial date is the second smith case she created great difficulty not only for the Trump Legal Team violating the six amendment rights this is no reason to have this on march 4 or to have it this year. She intentionally undermine judge cannon may order for her trial and all the issues related to the document case, she jumped in front. Chutkan is extremely before the democrat d. C. Jury as fast as possible and help the department of justice get a conviction so trump is printed for the rest of the election as a convicted felon he may have incredibly strong arguments on an appeal like her violation of the six amount like her violation in my view of the judicial called by interfering with an election purposely so like your treatment of the defendants and so forth that it wont be heard in time on an appeal to have it even impact on the election. So she knows she can do virtually anything at the trial, she wants donald trump ran as an evicted felon so reprobates and Chris Christie can run around rather than condemning in the situation thats going on in his too busy defending himself in the court. Thats exactly why past Attorney General said youre not supposed to do that. I hope this all makes sense to you, the bottom line is this, judge Tanya Chutkan is absolutely not fit to be the judge in this case. She has already demonstrated that, she created a very diabolical situation by jumping the line in the first case we also know when she set that date on March 4 Surety Talk to the judge in the case in manhattan and surety made up her mind issues going to pick march 4, she is not a fool it does not mean shes a good judge but shes not a fool, she knew exactly what she was doing, denied trump and his lawyers the six amendment due process rights, denied Trump Effective Representation to counsel it will appeal later, set a date that interferes with the trial date in florida, obviously i doubt she called Judge Cannon And Fort Election called the democrat judge in new york so she jumps the line and she wants to get her case going first, she wants to interfere with the primaries as much as she possibly can, that is the date in on top of that she wants trump convicted of something so he is treated as a convicted felon by fellow republicans and democrats and of course the election that is judg judge chun you need to step down. Somebody has the Authority Like the chief judge or the d. C. Bar, she does not step down on her own then you need to tell it to step aside. This is the worst in the appearance of a conflict. Its a grotesque conflict. Ill be right back. To duckduckgo on all your Devie Duckduckgo comes with a builtin search eg but it doesnt spy on your seac and our browser blocks creepy ads that follow you around fro and other companies. And its free. Download duckduk every day, businesses everywhere are asking is it possible . With comcast business. It is. Is it possible to use predictive monitoring to address Operations Issues . We can help with that. Can we provide health care virtually anywhere . We can help with that, too. Is it possible to survey foot traffic across all of our locations . Yeah absolutely. With the advanced connectivity and intelligence of global secure networking from comcast business. Its not just possible. Its happening. Mark Welcome Back America we are here with the great civil rights. He also represented President Trump of one of impeachment cases i want to talk about judge chutkan for a moment. It made the case study the date on march 4 violates the Sixth Amendment effective with representation by counsel, theres 12. 8 million cases of documents and you have five months to prepare even the feds could not say that the ever had a case and five months was enough this is a complex case you have a lot of questions raised for the first time, complexity involving a former president and motion filings. She also sets the date one day before Super Tuesday the most important date in the Election Cycle in the republican primary and she jumps the line and already said her child the fridge may and im sure that created a lot of chaos down there on the other case. My argument david shown, she wanted democrat jury, she wants one conviction and one of the counts so donald trump is Walking Around with the Scarlet Letter convicted felon so the likes of Chris Christie and others as well as democrats can say hes a convicted felon. What is your take on this. And some of her words a lady thinks too much, shes made clear this is good to be treated like every other case like every other defendant and she wont kowtow to election concerns and that sort of thing very defensively, it is not like any other case. There is a great Public Interest the government spoke about a Public Interest in a speedy trial rather than the defendants interest. There is a greater Public Interest in the election and the democratic process and letting the democratic process run its course. At a Misdemeanor Case in the same district set for eight months in the future not this kind of schedule the schedule is outrageous, nobody can prepare in this timeframe certainly not these lawyers. It is once more, unfortunately a Political Press is reaching another branch of government where it has no place. Mark i earlier read the code of professional con