0 resisting at every stage. judge jeanine pirro host who countered by streaming now only on fox nation rakers her here. beware disappearance of natalee holloway is a warning we get to the river with natalee. what can we learn? nancy grace is shocking. new investigation streaming now only on fox nation. good evening. welcome to tucker carlson. tonight in the senate judiciary committee yesterday marsha blackburn of tennessee asked joe biden, supreme court nominee angie jackson, what should have beenrt the easiest question ever posed . can youou define what a woman iw now? imagine put yourself in a position and imagine how relieved jackson must have been when she heardea that question here. she stayed up all night trying to memorize obscurel case law for nineteenth century and court precedent. and when she finally gets the hearing room, all the republicans want g is a recp of day one of ninth grade biology. what's a woman for a world famous scholar like contends jackson, that should have been effortless. s talk about slow and steady right down the plate. a woman jackson might have said looking incredulous. that's simple. a woman is a human being with two x chromosomes. ask any geneticist it's detectable in a blood testn . but if you're still confused by what a woman is, you cant ask a doctor. women have wider pelvises and different bone structures for men, not to mentioner very different. it's usually pretty obvious that women, despite looking at women, are built differently because their bodies are designed to doreca different things. nature is real women, men,re straight women give birth and then breastfeed. men dotf not do these things because they can't. not a single man in all human history has ever had his periodv or delivered a baby. and i know this senator because i'm one myself. in fact that's why i'm here. joe biden nominated me to h the supremeer court because i am female and he has said so himself many timeses. the president knows exactly what a woman is. if he didn'tct knowly, he wouldt have picked me obviously. so please, senator blackburn, do not waste my time with all respect, that is an incredibly stupid question. imagine shehe said that . what an answer that would have been. do you know a single person wouldn't have cheered? we wouldou have.e honestych is a wonderful thing o watch no matter where it comes from. but that is not what cantante jackson said. he was her actual answer. can you provide a definition for the word woman? can i provide a definition? yeah, i can't. you can't not contact i'm not in biology. >> oh , i'm not a biologist. og sois only a biologist is allowed to tell you what a woman is. and cantante jackson, incredibly impressive as she is, is not she just reminded s us of biologisthe not that would make any difference if she were a biologist because no one the democratic party cares what biologists think about biological sex biologists have been banned i along with a lady who writes harry potter novels in twenty twenty two the power of science and literature crumble in the face of hathe transglobe. so actually cantante jackson's academic credentials are not strictly speaking all that relevant here but still eapause for a second and marinae in the awe inspiring stupidity of her answer. 's what's a woman? i don't know.i i'm not a biologist who we see how this works. haken jesse jackson is it raining? i don't know.in i'm not a meteorologist. how wouldd you respond to someone who said something like that ? you probably give up and find someone else towoyou talk to. that person was not capable of conversation so last night we said we wanted to see cantante jackson zelenskyy t schaus. that's no longer necessary. wewe can say with certainty she is clearly a subgenuse probablyd shouldn't be on the supreme court. what's a woman? definitely the most revealing question ever asked in a senate confirmation hearing and one of the many things it reveals is how utterly the democratic party as an institution has democratic party's institution has changed in just four years. changed in just four years. it's a mile marker that tells us the evolution of the party u so during the last supreme court nomination, you'll rememberhe we were commanded to believe that all women must be believed regardless of whether or not they were telling the truthheey. they're women. therefore, in thee name of social justice you must accept whatever you say at face value a woman's word is like a sworn affidavit. you can take it to the bank. ithere's kamala harris to expln . let's speak truth about what we've all been talking about the last few daysou and again this evening, which is that supreme court process. let's speak the truth. it was a sham and a disgrace. let's speak the truth that it d was a denial of justice for the women of this country. how amusing is to see kamala harris say let's speak the truth, throw beer can on the tv if you agree. so to recap in twenty nineteen it was called a sham and a disgrace to doubt a woman's word because by the virtue of their biology, women did not lie. that's what it was to beat a woman utterly truthful all the time. . e biden agree with this women were very different from men inherently he told us so and that's why you weren't allowed to hit them. >> watch. we in fact have to fundamentally change the culture, the culture of how women are treated. nono man has a right to raise a hand to a woman in anger other than in self-defense . d that's rarely ever occurss and so we have to just change the culture period and keep punching cha and punching out and punching it all. all right. so we got to keep punching at it. domestic abusese"kee. we made fun of him but he was on to something actually what he said was entirely true . ask yourself to men get in a bar fight. one of them punches the other in the face. one >> what'ss your response to that ? come on , guys, pick it up, saides a man and a woman.an get in a a bar fight. the man punches the woman in the face. w what'som your response to that with you're normal human being, you're horrified. punching a woman in the face is not just a felonyy though it is. it is a moral crime. decentnt people don't punch womene in the face perioddo. a man's best instinct is to protect women. t that's nothing to be ashamed of. it makes a civilizationiz civilized. that's what we don't send expectant mothers into battle. got that you degraded freaks, pregnant flight suits are an attempt to make us deny our most basic instinct and instinct that we should not be ashamed of joe biden had this instinct noted that he wass absolutely right. why was he right? because women, men and women are not the same. let's say what is morally. better than the other. they're morally equal but they're different on the deepest levels beginning with biologygyly e. every person on earth knows this is true . we are born knowing itt. but now they're commanding you to pretend otherwise to deny nature and suppress your most instincts. luable they're telling you you have noa right to bend more upset when a woman is injured or a woman gets your ear bitten off in ain bar fight the when a man does,e are you ready to suppress those instincts? are you ready to live in a t society that won't acknowledge them? what happens to our justicens system if we pretend menen and women are exactly the same or don't existtem continually? jackson's claim that we can't say who's a man who's a woman will transformxiji j the way wen administer justice starting with our vast regime of anti discrimination law. if we can't't say anti certain who's a woman, how are we going to enforce joe biden's famous violence against women act? why do we have such an act? who would care? a how can we set aside a huge percentage of federal contracts for women owned companye if we don't know what a woman is? oh , i guess that scam's going to have to end tomorrow because it no longer t makes any sense. and by the way, how is sexism even a meaningful category in a world in which has no meaning? well, it's not. why have title nine which bans discrimination in schools if we don't have biological sex, how can we havee discrimination on the basis of n biological se? thinking is through the trumpas administration thought it through actually saw this coming. we should tell you that the trump white house tried to preserve title nine by arguing that the concept of as defined in that law derives from biology, not from how you're feeling about your personal identity on any particular day. that's the case they made in response to that . they were denounced right wing lunatics. the aclu declared that quote the trump administration is l race trans people really maybe it was bigger than that . now the bush administration is in charge of everything. and in less than a year the worst, most fervent predictions have come entirely true . female athletes are losing nrsce championships to men dressing up as women in order to cheat their way to victory. every person in america sees this happening. very few are brave enough toew say a word about a. but here's one of them.ho this is a woman who happened to be watching an ncaa swimming championship in which a male swimmer going by the name leah thomas dominatede every woman in the pool. women. that's not how are you research people? av iran.eon. i'm not a vet, but i knowno what a dog is.tut yes, you do. we all do even contend you, jackson no. she's had a few children of her own. she probably learned exactly how the process works. the point of the trans movement is to convince anyone if biology isn't real, they're noti even trying. that's anol impossible i case tu make. you would sound ridiculous if you tried to articulateic that , much less explain it.mu the point of this exercise is p very different. the point is to make the rest of us repeat a lie. to say something we know perfectly well is not true . yes, n thomas is a proud, beautiful woman who won the swim meet because she practiced harder than the othere girls. lisa thomas deserve toah win her victory wasn't cheating and no, i don't notice her bulging swimsuit. i have no ideaa done what you're talking about. that's what theyey demand.t you say not because they care about lisa thomas or any other trans person they couldn't care less making you pretend to believe something you don't. that's the point because if. they can make you pretend to believe something you know is untrue, they've won. they have . they control your they control your brain. so this isn't about trans about. it's about people. it's about a all of us .ta and the stakes are very high and that's where the censorship is so intense. have youte noticed ourns nationl conversation y abouts transgenderism is completely defined by censorship, by makingim you shut up, not t allowing you to notice.o the obvious is why they're doingth there's no attempt to persuade you. there's no fact based argument . you can't respond. oh , so men can become women just by wishing it.ng so tell us how that works. canp i stop male pattern baldness?rn baldness the same way? can i the same way? can i grow six inches? please explain how this remarkable new power the transmm community has discovered might apply to me. >> can i do it to the power of positive thinking? >> that's a fair question. they'll never answer it. they'll just be quiet. their first move always isth censorship and their second move inevitably is punishment. wewe learn that again lasts nigt when we were suspended from twitter quote we have determined that this account violateded our twitter rules specifically for violating our rules against hateful conduct. twitter wrote to us the only way out of twitter, jack, was to delete ourdu tweet to pretend we never said it to cleanse america's conscience by just waiting out the past. ay what was our crime, by the way?o well, we dared to highlight two accounts of twitter has banned from charlie kirk in the babylon b was nothing hatefulabl about either one . we say look him up but you . n't because you're gone now but both merely noted that biological is fixed at birth. this has been universally acknowledged by hope. those homosapiens for at least three hundred thousand years. so it was a factual statement. i but on twitter, as in our public life, truth is no offense, twitter is now run by a man called parad agrowillnl who has said plainly he doesy not believe in free speech. everyone came this country as an adult to get a degree from stanford. now agarwalam controls the singe for aimportant forum for america's political conversationme that ii a big and important job. on it's such a public company. it's much more than that . it's a kind of public trust that allows this democracy to function so that you would thino you'd want a guy like that in g a position like that to have some respect for his adopted country's core institutions beginning with and primarily the first amendment. but iowa has no respect for first amendment of our constitution. he explained that openly in a 2020t speech.02 what our goal is not to be bound by the first amendment, but our role isbe - to serve as legalization and our move moves are reflectiven an of this that we believe lead to a healthier public opposition. the kinds of things that we we do do about this is to focus less on thinking about free speech but thinking about how the times have changed. one of the changes today that we see is speech is easy on the most people can speakte where our role is particularly emphasized is who can be heard . >> oh , so the new standard isn't your right as a citizen to say what you believe is true ? the newsstand is achievingin something called healthy public conversation. by the way, this isg one man's i opinion. you grew's up in a country wheru people are free to say what they want. but now that political speech in fact all speech isic s disseminated topeech, their cits via social media. this is the guy who actually controls which you're allowed to think. so what is healthy t public conversation? what does that mean exactly? we're interested. so wee texted agrowill very first thing this morning and then we emailed his office and then him personally all to find out everyone was too cowardly to respond to us . so we're going to have to assume that a healthy public conversation issad whatever aggarwal wants it to be. he decides the meaning. in other words, a single man who has total and undisguised contempt for america's most basic valuess gets to decide what americans are allowed to talk about. prek agrowill doesn't think you should know about biden's laptop. that's unhealthy. so we censors the story. youuhe don't get to see it. he doesn't think you should beo allowed to discussdi basic biology in public. we're racing all science because it's unhealthy so now you're not allowed to talk about it. in fact, you're banned . silence censored. wece can't control perak agrowil but we can ask how do you feel that this new standard not so long ago this was a free country. now prag agrowill and nine other billionaires whose names w you might not even know who certainly were not elected to anything yet to determine the limits of your conversations. get are we okay with this? what happened to all the liberals and the t self-described civil libertarians we used to have in america? they don't seemhi t to be fightg the power anymore. they seem to have joined it. how liz cheney and adam kinzinger and everyone else who's constantly lecturingey serfs about democracy, is this the kind of democracy they'ree talking about a democracy in which a tiny sliver of very rich peopleng control everything, includingl your mind? doesn't sound like democracy sounds suspiciously like oligarchy, don't you thinkd?d? they can let us know all those people are welcome on that this show anyho time including and very much including you aggarwallu we promise a healthy public conversation. in the meantime, we are proud of jason whitlock. join us now. jas we thought about this question deeply and has written aboutly his incisively today. jason whitlock, thanks so much j for joining us . so i'm just going to stand back and let you explain what this moment means. well, i'm going to go all the way to voltaire againto and just t those who can make yu believe absurdities will make you commit atrocities. and we're in the midst of t a great atrocity going on here in america. people who have no respect for american values, our constitution and our founding fathers, the founding principles of that have made america great. they have no respect for and they want to dismantle the constitution. and this is a long process that we're in the middle of. we're naming supreme court justices who aren't committed to truthth, but they're political activists. and so a simple question like what's a woman she can't't answr because the goal is to create chaos and disorder by dismantling the truths if there's no agreed upon truth as simple as men and women, youa can't have an organized properly functioning society. and so they are creating chaos and division and building an argument that the founding fathers outdated oh , they were . and the documents" the declaration of independence ,the constitution, those weren't documents infusedho by christians and christian values and principlesse. those were documents infused by racism, oppression and all this other stuff. that's just not true .e. those documents made this country great and made the freest country on the planet and the fairest and safest countryrereon for pee like me who are black. i'm just sorry. that'si' what america is in twenty twenty two and they want to dismantle that and hand power to a small group of people like the guy from twitter. and i'm so glad you called him out. i'm not going to attempt to say his name. i can't. but he has the ultimate power. he is now in control of our constitution, in control of free speech and a handful of other billionaire elites and globalists are in controlirl of something that we allites a d to take for granted and was fundamental to our country being the envy of the world and being the safest fare's most opportunistic land in allst the world. they're trying to destroy all of it. and i got to admit there being successful, they're about toth put a woman on the supreme court who's qualifications wens know nothing about. we know she's not committed to a truth and there are legitimate questions being asked aboutit how does she feel about and child and we can't get straight answers and the people that are asking these questions that are legitimate based on her sentencing record are being labeled h racist, sexist, whatever name you can put put on them. we should be able to ask someone that gets a lifetime position these questions and wonder about their commitment to truth, honesty and the constitution. she's there too interpret the constitution, not help a group of revolutionaries overthrow the constitutionns really quickly atti a time but for those viewers, including myself who want to write down that voltaire quote, you just repeat that oneo more time dow because i think it gets to what exactly is going on here if they can make you believe absurdities, they can make you commit atrocities. i wish we did have more time. i hope people watch my show tomorrow because we're going all the way in on this . i think this ketanji supremena court nomination is critical for people to understandti where they're taking this country and it's not a good place. i agree with jason whitlock, great to see you sayingth thank you . thank you . so even if youan voted for over the years, i think if you're a fair person, you have to acknowledge hillary clinton did not leave the world better a place after four yearse as secretary of state. then she foundaf it. but don't say that out loud or working for vladimir putin. well, the same nrcc the five star backyard's you don't want to suffer big time means it's time to take zeisel. >> zeisel released