Deblasio, he says the city is very comfortable putting officers with weapons out in times square with the message dont try anything here. The city is putting final preparations in place for tomorrow, one of the largest events here in the city, thats the new York City Marathon that attraction some 50,000 runners and 2 million spectators along the 26. 2 mile route through the citys five boroughs. The city says that this will be the largest deployment of n. Y. P. D. Officers on record. They will be both seen and behind the scenes and there will be a number of officers on the ground and up above watching things from helicopters, from roof tops, there will be a number of sand trucks deployed and blocker vehicles, all to keep everyone safe. Meanwhile, in chicago, there is an increased Police Presence there at high traffic areas and landmarks, like navy pier, Millennium Park and police there say they are tightening up security even more activity working with local ap federal Law Enforcement partners as well as homeland security. The police say they have a large patrol presence and the Los Angeles Police department are on the lookout for any threat that might be in the city and new york city senator kristin gillibrant looking at concrete planters, to have local traffic barriers, like planters, designed to protect pedestrians and cyclists and this would be 50 million over the next decadement already at the site of tuesdays terror attacks on the west side highway bike path, new york city officials are planning to install more barriers there to prevent cars from entering into that area. Well send it back to you. David of course, tomorrow we have the marathon in manhattan. Tracy, thank you very much. Yes. David well, meanwhile, terrorism is at the top of the agenda for President Trump. Hes on the way to meet political allies in asia. Does he need to look at global terrorism after this weeks attack in new york. John bolton is joining me. Ambassador bolton, i think he did a good job protecting the sunnis to fight terrorism. Can he do the same in asia . Well, i think he needs to because, obviously, finance is global and even if you shore up protections in one geographical region, the terrorists are going to get their financing elsewhere and asia itself faces an increasing terrorist threat in indonesia, in the philippines and elsewhere. So, i think this is something that is a priority for him and his stops in north asia and when he stops in vietnam and the philippines, too, with philippines engaged in its own antiterrori antiterrorism. David he says hell hit them ten times harder than new york, does he mean niger and what happened there and missions all over the world or what . Well, i think the antiterrorist campaign has gotten complicated, really, in the past several years, as governments have fragmented. The government of yemen has come apart, theres no effective Central Government there, libya came apart some time ago and we saw some consequences of that in benghazi on september 11th, 2012 and the government of egypt, the countries of syria has collapsed and youre seeing boko haram in nigeria and terrorists can put their people in a lot of places rather than concentrating and that dispersal makes it that much harder to go after them. David we dont want to be the worlds policemen. Weve tried that and we cant spread ourselves that thin so dont we need other countries, even if theyre splintered, to help us out . Well, we do and they would in different ways. In asia, the financing aspect, in africa, france has been a real partner with the United States in antiterrorist activities. Some of the other European Countries could step up there, obviously, work with the arab countries in the middle east. It just takes a lot more work, a lot more political effort, a lot more international diplomacy, because the terrorist threat has not diminished. Its really metastasized in several respects and i think even with the elimination of the isis caliphate in what used to be syria and iraq, their leadership exfiltrated out of there long ago and what we saw in new york this week, unfortunately, were going to see more of. David lets bring it back to asia and a terror state in asia, thats north korea, a Nuclear Terror state. Do you think they are going to try to pull anything off during the president s trip . Theres some suspicion they may. Look, north korea may have their own rationality, but theyre not our terms. I think theyd be ill advised to try a nuclear test. And theres no accounting for the north korean leadership, if they did Something Like that, it would underline one more time why we cant leave that bizarre government with nuclear weapons. David and probably why we cannot rely on china. The president , of course, is going to be spending time with president xi in china and he essentially has more power than anybody in china since mao tse tung, but it teams seems clear hes not willing to use that power to dam up north korea. Look, i agree. I think the chinese have been twotiming us for 25 years on the north Korean Nuclear program, but youve put your finger on an important point. After this 19th communist committee parliament, no one is going to challenge him. The president who is an optimistic man will hope that china has increased the pressure on north korea. Im just skeptical given the history, but i think thats going to be the central subject, the most important subject of the president s meetings in beijing and hes going to impress on the chinese that we can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way, but one way or another, what he said in new york in his speech to the u. N. In september is that denuclearization of north korea is the only way forward. David what he said to president xi, the last time the two met, they were having a dinner and the president announced over a beautiful chocolate cake, he said, a dessert for the chinese leader, that he was using tomahawk missiles to attack positions, and he tried to make an impression. I wonder if it stuck. I think that xi jinping enjoyed the cake, but president obama is not the president anymore. Nuclear weapons in the case of north korea, this is the most serious threat the United States faces. North korea, not just a threat because it could launch missiles to hit the United States, but because of the desperately poor Totalitarian Society would sell Nuclear Technology to anybody with enough money to pay for it. The regime in iran or terrorist groups, who knows who . You cant leave the north korea regime with nuclear weapons. David ambassador john bolton, thank you for being here, we appreciate it. Thank you. David the g. O. P. Tax plan is supposed to help Small Businesses. So why is one Small Business group slamming it . Were on it. And Army Sergeant jonathan mo morerita tells me its unacceptable that Bowe Bergdahl gets no jail time. The reaction from rob oneill is next. And it really shows. Weve got auto insurance, homeowners insurance. Had an accident with a vehicle, i actually called usaa before we called the police. Usaa was there handson very quick very prompt. I feel like were being handled as people that actually have a genuine need. Were the webber family and we are usaa members for life. Usaa, get your insurance quote today. Only new tena intimates has itproskin technologyiend designed to quickly wick away moisture to help maintain your skins natural balance. For a free sample, call 1877gettena. Well, the republicans say their new tax plan will help Small Businesses, but not according to my next guest. Small business majority founder and ceo john joins us now. Whats your brief . Theres really nothing in this tax proposal thats going to benefit Small Business. David nothing . Small businesses dont pay at the corporate rate for the most part. So theyre not going to benefit from that. The passthrough provision to lower the top rate on passthroughs, combined with the change in the rate structure is only going to benefit about two large passthrough business entities. This proposal makes the tax code even more complex and worse of all, this blows a 1. 5 trillion dollar hole in the deficit at a relatively time of prosperity where we should look at closing that so the government can fund. David and you say there are 55,000 businesses across the country . When we do polling, we poll all Small Businesses. David how many of these 55,000 businesses that you directly deal with will go from the 39 1 2 level of taxation down to 25 . About 2 . David 2 . If you combine that with the 2 because youre eliminating, because the proposal eliminates the 26 and 28 amt and the 28 and 33 levels. Even now, only 12 of Small Businesses pay above 25 . So, youre talking about a topdown proposal that really doesnt help most main street Small Businesses. What the drafters of this could have done was look at a bottom up proposal that weve proposed, allowing all Small Businesses to deduct the first 25,000 worth of income. So theyre really thats pretty good. By the way did you make that proposal to anybody in power . Did you receive any was there any receptivity on the part from the g. O. P. On that proposal . Weve spoken to both sides of the aisle. There is some receptivity. Thats not in the proposal. David moving it forward, if the g. O. P. You know after the debacle with the health care thing not passing, if they dont get a tax bill done this year, theyre probably endanger in the 2018 midterm elections and youd have a Democratic House of representatives. Youre not going to do better with democrats, are you . Look, were not its not up to us who is in power. We deal with whoever is in power and we make proposals and right now were looking at the merits or the lack thereof in this proposal and weve come to the conclusion by the way, i should add there isnt a single Small Business organization in the country left, right or center to support this bill. David im just wondering, there are certain things, there must be something in here like the depreciation schedule or something is better. Im wondering if a little bit of progress on the tax front is better than nothing. Theres not much here thats going to benefit many main street Small Businesses. Its a proposal that benefits large corporations and very wealthy individuals and very wealthy business entities, essentially the lobbyists, investment bankers, and the like. This is not an about the pizza shop in iowa or the body shop in texas. This is about are you going to actively campaign against this and lobby against this . Yes, weve made it clear that it does not benefit the vast majority of businesses. David would you rather see it fail than pass . We would, yes, we would rather see this bill that blows a 1. 5 trillion dollar hole in the deficit, doesnt do anything to help main street, we would rather see that not pass. David the only thing, frankly, thats going to deal with the deficit is if those politicians learn to spend less money. Thats the only thing that will help it. The growth will help a little bit, but in terms of spending, nothing is being done on spending so youre not going to get anywhere on the spending front. Im wondering, again, if there is anything in there positive, even if its just for the big guys, wouldnt something be better than nothing . David, theres really not much in there that benefits the average main street Small Business, it makes a lot less money than these provisions are affecting, and what it does, it removes money. You talk about the deficit, theres two sides to that, yes, its spending, but its also taxes and if you take 1. 5 trillion dollars out of the government, youre going to have that much less money to fund obligations, to Fund Key Programs that benefit Small Business and others. David yeah, of course, when we have drop tax rates, even if its just the corporate rate, youve ended up with more revenue because theres more economic activity. So that helps cut back on the deficit, too. But thats a whole other discussion. John, i wish you well, if i remember, i wish it was a bill you could support. Thanks very much for being here. Good to be here. David thanks. A disgruntled worker knocking out the president s twitter account. Why anyone using social media should be very concerned. Also, a treasure trove of bin laden documents, a half million, released by the cia. Rob oneill, the guy who took out bin laden, is here. E, andi had to make a claim and all that . Is that whole thing still dragging on . No, i took some pics with the app and. Filed a claim, but. You know how they send you money to cover repairs and. They took forever to pay you, right . No, i got paid right away, but. At the very end of it all, my agent. Wouldnt even call you back, right . No, she called to see if i was happy. But if i wasnt happy with my claim experience for any reason, theyd give me my money back, no questions asked. Can you believe that . No. The claim satisfaction guarantee, only from allstate. Switching to allstate is worth it. Only from allstate. His family. His steinway, which met a burst pipe. So grant met his insurance you are caller number 12. Which didnt quite cover the steinway. But what if hed met pure insurance . Owned by members. Hed have met lisa, your member advocate. Whod introduce him to gustav, a temporary address, and help him get tickets to the mozart festival. Excuse me, grant likes beethoven uh, the beethoven festival. Pure. Love your insurance. So what did President Trump do after an outgoing employee took down his account . Guess what . He tweeted. Saying my twitter account was taken down for 11 minutes by a rogue employee. The word must be getting out and having an impact. That shows how much power and influence big social media tech giants have. Are they right or wrong . Weve got all the guests for this one. First of all, fbns kennedy is here. Fox news contributor jehmu green and amy holmes. And what do you think about this, amy, does the president have a point . Should we do something. It was 11 minutes that rocked the world, 11 minutes of silence from President Trump, but i do think he does have a point. While on the one hand i know our good libertarian on the panel might say its a private company, they get to set the rules of the road, who they censor and who they allow, but twitter is the Public Square and theyre engaged in trying to have a cast system, the blue check marks, who is more privileged and who is not. I dont have a blue check mark and i dont care because i do believe in equality. David kennedy, im wondering who needs whom . Doesnt twitter need the president more than the president needs twitter . There are plenty of options out there. The president would probably get just as much notice if he put up notices on facebook or created a blog or whatever. I know that twitter is perfect for him and thats why he uses it, but theyre benefitting more from him than the other way around. Its a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship. For years the president has extold twitters virtues. I think hes relied too much on one social media platform and maybe he should diversify his digital portfolio a bit. Now its interesting because this has given a little incentive for rabblerousery at twitter. If there are employees with leftist communities, they may do the same thing and twitter may snuff this from within and go after the employee who played a prank on his or her last day and twitter has every right to do that. If you dont like it, dont it. If youre offended by it, dont use the platform, there are plenty of places to go. David jehmu, weigh in here. First i want to buy that rogue employee a beer on me. I would say that this relationship between the president and twitter is more parasitic and we knew the power of twitter when it helped elect donald trump to the most powerful position in the world, but twitter is in trouble here. They just reported that they were overreporting their user numbers, and had to, you know, take a step back. David thats true. They are they dont want trump to diversify because theyre relying on him and how powerful he makes their platform, but weve also seen that, you know, they make decisions about who theyre going to ban from the platform, the president s good friend roger stone was just banned after he made threatening remarks to don lemon from cnn and think dont hold that same standard to the president. Maybe if they did that, that would be more of the equality that amy called for. And twitter. Hey, twitter, give amy a blue check mark. David hold on. Hold on, first of all, the president has not been tweeted profanities in the way that roger stone did and i dont think that anyone supports that going on twitter, to be doing that. Let me finish, jehmu. Secondly and i wasnt and go ahead, amy. And President Trump has been so reliant on twitter that it makes it easy for twitter i think that twitter social media more broadly does have a problem when it comes to democratic eggs expression the way that they want to guide viewpoints. Google this their algorithms might push down conservatives. Are there no conservative billionaires . Because maybe they should band together and create their own platforms because if you find hold on. People either a great point. Hold on. Hold on, whoa, whoa, whoa, one second. Jehmu, whats wrong with in fact, facebook has talked about this as a possibility. They have algorithms, as you know, that could spot whether somebodys a conservative or a liberal, depending on what they read a lot. So, maybe even within one platform like facebook, you could have a conservative group of people talking and a liberal group. It might divide the country even more, but thats happening. Yes, it would. No, thats not what we want. We dont want more division david. David like it or not, thats whats happening.