> and there was one in "the washington post" also this weekend so "> > and there was one in "the washington post" also this weekend so " property="og:description"> > and there was one in "the washington post" also this weekend so ">
sunday in "the new york times" that basically was like the preobituary of her campaign. >> and there was one in "the washington post" also this weekend so in that sense, the writing was on the wall coming to pick up to your question for peter. the bottom line is money and organization and she has been letting people go and it caused a lot of consternation among the democratic staffers. it caused a backlash among democrats. the second thing to say, and if she got into trouble by waffling on medicare for all, she was the first thing. it's never been clear, and this is like we are going back four or five months, ever since that is her position. and it never proved to be and almost occupying the biden lane.