Actions months after the redacted pages from the 9 11 commissions report revealed that some of the 9 11 hijackers were in contact with and received support or assistance from individuals that may be connected to the saudi government while they were here in the u. S. Were going to get to the implications of all of it in just a minute. First, turning to politics, donald trump has been hit with a firestorm of criticism by the Clinton Campaign for treatment a form Miss Universe who says trump shamed her over weight gain after winning the crown. Alicia machado teamed up with the Clinton Campaign to take aim at her former employer in a newly released commercial. What were the names he called you . Miss piggy, miss housekeeping, miss eating machine. All to your face . Yes, all the time. That was really normal for him. You are the new Miss Universe [cheers and applause] [speaking spanish]. Of course you also saw her there on the today show talking about how difficult her experience was with donald trump at that time. How much will a controversy from decades ago affect his standing with women . Gina loudon joins me as well as former miss America Kirsten haglund. You know, i actually remember this, i remember it well because he held some kind of press conference in a gym where he had her working out. She was on the bicycle or the treadmill or something and he was talking to reporters, invited reporters in there at the time to talk about the need for her to lose weight. You know, kirsten, youre a former miss america. There it is. The cameras around, and shes exercising and trump brought everyone in saying okay, she needs to lose weight. She looks great to me. It seems a little extreme to say a woman like that needs to lose weight, but he made quite a spectacle of this at the time, kirsten, any idea why . Certainly, you can tell from the comments he said about women before, he thinks of them in this way. Its so much about weight and appearance and their looks, and you know, im not for Hillary Clinton, im not supporting Hillary Clinton, i consider myself a conservative woman. So im not here just to attack donald trump. What i am concerned about is when i was miss america my platform was raising awareness of eating disorders. I struggled with anorexia for a long time. Since the broadcasting shaming her on television caused her to struggle with anorexia and bulimia and people dont understand it is comments like this, the social construct that women are only worth their weight in a job that can lead to the dangerous illnesses, and i dont know about her background, there is probably a lot thats going to come out. This is more about his view of women. Hes stuck to hang on, lets call it what it is, its a beauty pageant. Its so much more than a beauty contest. There was talent, there was talent, 40 of your score, there was interviews, 30 of your score. The Miss Universe system is known for pretty much bringing a beauty pageant. There is no talent involved there. Knowing that, gina, to a certain extent, if a woman signs up to compete in Miss Universe, is there an expectation . This is a business and your business is how you look, should she have seen this one coming in any way . Not that we excuse the public shaming of her, i think this could have been done a little more discreetly. Should she have had obligations to watch the weight . Actually, this is sort of a very blown out of proportion story. Were taking all of this on hear say from a 20yearold story. Nobody wants to see women ever scorned, especially for things as sensitive as weight. Theres no proof this happened. Whoa, whoa, whoa, im going stop you there, gina. In fairness to all sides, tonight run this howard stern clip where it certainly doesnt look or sound good. Here we go. You whipped this fat slob into shape, i dont know how you did it. I see all the diet plans, everything else. God bless you, you whipped her into shape and held the pageant together, congratulations. How did you whip her in shape . She went from 118 to 170. And you got her to 118, didnt you . She is probably 145. She gained 55 pounds, she ate a lot of everything. He definitely went on the attack there, gina. There is proof he did go after, he invited the press into the gym to watch her exercise. I can just say can i just Say Something . The first thing i did when i heard this, i called my close friend who was first runnerup in miss usa, she said mr. Trump has never been anything but extremely supportive of all of the girls and all of the people she knows ive heard very Different Things from people in the Miss Universe program. If i could finish, she also said that the organization itself sets the parameters of weight, and when this particular contestant went over her weight, she asked mr. Trump for help. He came in out of compassion to help this woman. And if people are so concerned about the story, why arent we looking at the women hillary has repeatedly bullied. Paula jones and Gennifer Flowers and people like that where we know theres a history with these women. All of that is legitimate and i agree the way the clintons treated women was horribly. This is about our children. I care and work with children who look to people in the media. Look to our future president to set our standard for how you treat women. You and i and gina youre a beautiful woman even what people consider a beautiful weight is subjective from Kim Kardashian to gisele. Its not about weight, its about character. The last thing you got to get to is questions, the motives behind this woman coming out now. I mean shes done a spread in cosmopolitan, shes been all over the cable tv shows. They had the commercial ready to go, so it was very deliberate, gina in the timing. In other words, Hillary Clinton brought her up deliberately during that debate and they had a whole shebang ready to go, and were witnessing it right now. Yeah, hillary wants to distract from the real issues, her illegal emails, illegal server, 33,000 missing emails, all of her Different Health issues. The scandals that belie her entire campaign, obviously, hillary would rather talk about just about anything else, and if its a completely manufactured scandal, hillary is going to push it off in the american people. Theyre smart than this are. Thank you so much. Weve got another story break right now. The house is about to vote whether to overturn the president s veto of the 9 11 bill just after the senate overrode obamas veto of the 9 11 bill. That vote was 971, only Senate Minority leader harry reid voted no. You can see where the consensus on this one. Fox news correspondent Doug Mckelway at the capitol. Looks like the president is out of luck on this one, an overturn on the veto at the house . I dont think anyone was surprised at the senate. What was surprising was the margin of victory, 971 with harry reid, the obama loyalist voting in conjunction with the president here and moves onto the house where theyre expected to take this up later this week and expect a similar result. The bill allows survivors of 9 11 and their families to sue Foreign Governments that are found to be complicit in terrorist acts here in the United States. It was borne from the belief by some, by many who believe the Saudi Arabian government may have at least been tangentially complicit in the planning or financing of the 9 11 attacks, but the bill made for strange bedfellows on capitol hill. Who could imagine that senator richard blumenthal, liberal democrat from connecticut who represents many 9 11 families would vote against the president in this case. Thats what he did today. I deeply respect the president , and the reasons he has given for vetoing the justice against sponsors of terrorism act. But i urge my colleagues to move swiftly and soundly to reverse the veto so that these families can have their day in court. Opponents think that jasta sets a bad principle, retaliatory measures against u. S. Soldiers stationed abroad. The saudi royal family who is very, very quiet because they think this is a domestic issue is undoubtedly very hurt by this, very angered by this. They have considered themselves a loyal ally in the fight against terror along with the United States, oftentimes sharing data and intelligence with the United States, and opponents of the bill say that u. S. Citizens already have recourse to sue Foreign Governments if the state department has designated those Foreign Governments. A state sponsor of terrorism such as iran. In this case, saudi arabia does not fit the bill, so the real drama is not whats going to happen in the house, but how other governments outside of the United States will perceive this legislation. Trish, back to you. Doug, thank you so much. All right everyone, so should victims be able to sue a country for its role in the terror attack . The president says no. Judge Andrew Napolitano says absolutely, yes, he joins me now with all of it. There is a gut reaction, you cant help but have to this. You think about the tragedy that all the families lived through and if the saudis had any role or any connection to the terrorists and lets not forget there were the 28 pages redacted. The 9 11 Commission Report came forward with that, and indicated there may have been correspondence between some of these terrorists for 9 11 and the saudi government. If they had any inkling, shouldnt they be held responsible . Absolutely. Basic principle of american justice where theres a wrong, theres a remedy. Sometimes in state court, sometimes in federal court. When the government uses politics and diplomacy much of which is hidden in order to bart remedy which is what happened here, innocent people are not able to seek damages. Doug mckelways report is absolutely on the mark. If the federal government declares a Foreign Government, a state sponsor of terrorism, then an american victim arguably harmed by that Foreign Government can sue the Foreign Government in an american court. But if the federal government intentionally shields a Foreign Government from declaring it a state sponsor of terrorism as we did with saudi arabia, the innocent injured cannot sue. After today if the president has veto overturned, an innocent victim of 9 11 can sue the Saudi Arabian government. Why does the president want to seal them . Thats the 64,000 question. You can ask george bush and barack obama. The United States federal government has a bizarre secret relationship with religious fanatics who are uber wealthy who run saudi arabia and we have permitted them literally to get away with murder until today. So were afraid of the relationship with the saudis . Heres the case, the president is afraid that americans who cause harm in other countries will be sued there, that they will not be free to leave, that other countries, particularly saudi arabia will retaliate by changing their domestic laws, and that is a legitimate fear, but it doesnt override the right, the moral and constitutional right of 9 11 victims to seek damages against the government that might have caused it. They have to prove their case in a courtroom. The redacted pages and i think i can quote you exactly what it is, indication that maybe the saudis were involved because it says while in the u. S. , some of the september 11th hijackers were receiving support and assistance from individuals connected to the saudi government. Thats what they want to know, were they or were they not connected to the saudi government . The American Government under president bush and president obama will not answer that question. They will use the discovery process where lawyers gather information and a jury here in lower manhattan, to give us all the answers. Seems fair to me. Judge napolitano thank you so much. Fbi director james comey in the hot seat on capitol hill grilled over investigation into Hillary Clintons private email server and the revelation her former chief of staff, cheryl mills got immunity, a visibly irritated James Comey Firing back over allegations his investigation was anything but partial . How could it be, right . You got a little conflict i would think given who james comey is working for. Thats next. This organization and the people who did this are honest, independent people. We not carry water for one side or the other. You can call us wrong but dont call us weasels. Were not weasels, we are honest people. We ship everything you atcan imagine. N, and everything we ship has something in common. Whether its expedited overnight. Or shipped around the globe,. Its handled by od employees who know that delivering freight. Means delivering promises. Od. Helping the world keep promises. With new cabinets this wfrom this shop,house, with handles designed here, made here, shipped from here, on this plane flown by this pilot, who owns stock in this company, that builds big things and provides benefits to this woman, with new cabinets. They all have insurance crafted personally for them. Not just coverage, craftsmanship. Not just insured. Chubb insured. Trish fbi director james comey getting a grilling on capitol hill today. He was questioned on a whole host of topics. The fbis response to recent terror attacks on our homeland. The hacking of the dnc, and why the fbi granted immunity to Hillary Clintons former chief of staff, cheryl mills . Watch. We, as congress and the american people, are troubled how such gross negligence is not punished and why there seems to be a different standard for the politically well connected particularly if your name is clinton. Trish following the hearings and joins me right now with some of the highlights. Blake, got kind of testy out there . Reporter it did throughout the morning, this was a nearly fourhour hearing earlier today. The fbi director jim comey says cheryl mills a top aide to Hillary Clinton was given an act of production immunity, thats what its called so investigators could get her laptop. Republicans questioning why the blanket was afforded to mills and why investigators couldnt just get the laptop by issuing a subpoena. They also wondered why mills, a witness in the case, allowed to act as Legal Counsel to clinton during the investigation . Separately congressman Jim Sensenbrenner said comey had no choice in the classified information. I would be in big trouble d should be in big trouble if i did Something Like that. There seems to be different strokes for different folks on this, thats what americans are concerned about. I think theres a happy hand coming from someplace else. Reporter comey said if one of his own colleagues had done the exact same thing, they would be disciplined, but like clinton would not be prosecu prosecuteed. Comey defended his department throughout the hearing. This organization and the people who did this are honest, independent people. We do not carry water for one side or the other. You can call us wrong, but dont call us weasels, we are not weasels, we are honest people. Reporter dont call them weasels, trish, he got that point across today. Congressman trey gowdy responded by saying it wasnt just the fbi he knew. Back and forth all day long. Trish plenty of people at fbi that are very upset about this for sure, they think that they didnt give them a fair shake in this. Blake, thank you so much. I want to continue this conversation with michael. Comey works for lynch and she works for the president. The president would have to have some selfpreservation instinct where he doesnt want his own secretary of state getting blown out of the water for all of this. This is a reflection ultimately on the administration. When you got the administration effectively investigating itself, i dont know how you possibly get a fair outcome . Two points. Number one is that the fbi director comey has a 10year appointment, and is supposed to be independent, but he was placed in an impossible position by attorney general Loretta Lynch who revealed herself to be a political hack when she met with bill clinton on the tarmac in phoenix, arizona june 27th, and later said of course, well, i cant participate in this, so comey was called onto make a decision whether or not to seek an indictment, which is not really his decision. Hes not a prosecutor, hes an investigator. His investigation showed facts on the basis of which no rational judge would dismiss indictment. Trish thats important what you are saying, no rational judge would have dismissed an indictment. She should have been indicted. Well, it showed she could have been indicted under section f of the u. S. Code on the basis of the facts that comey alleged in Morning Press Conference or press briefing that he made about that. The second point id make is that you say president obama is protecting his administration. Obviously, he wants to see Hillary Clinton elected as his successor. You know, did he tell Loretta Lynch to meet with bill clinton . The meeting was not publicized by either in advance. Was that the first meeting they had . Trish this is going to continue to haunt her, is it not, on the campaign trail . As comey pointed out in his i believe it was july 5th, statement. Secretary clinton told a number of untruths, inaccurate things or lies in th