Transcripts For FBC Cavuto Coast To Coast 20161020 : compare

Transcripts For FBC Cavuto Coast To Coast 20161020

That would be more dramatic example. It was ultimately defeated by electorate. Anything can happen. Brexit comparison, just to see that filled, the polls would have to tighten up. They might. We have 19 days to go. That does not look like it is happening, i stress for the timebeing. Welcome everybody, here in las vegas where were sort of gauging the morning after, and im trying to push this into multiday event. I really like las vegas and not just for the breakfast buffets though dont get me started. One of the things we can tell you right now, both campaigns are doing the postdebate spin. We expect to hear from donald trump shortly. He is speaking in delaware ohio, that is battleground states he is polling quite well. One of the few battleground states that is the case for him. Things can change, what stuart was saying earlier, polls could be, underreporting his strength. That has been the trump campaigns lament throughout this process. Well see where they stand with that. Probably, like i say in 19 days. Meantime, blake burman spells out the posteffect of the last and final debate. Hey, blake. Reporter hi there, neil, so much focus is coming on one comment donald trump made in particular. You remember leading up to the debate how donald trump talking about, he felt there was rigged election. For most part he was talking about how the media was in the bag for Hillary Clinton you but in the last few days, the last week or so, he broadened that out to largescale voter fraud. Well that led Chris Wallace to ask trump this question here listen. I want to ask you here on the stage tonight, do you make the same commitment that you will absolutely, sir, that you will absolutely accept the result of this election . I will look at it at the time. Are you saying youre not prepared now to commit to that principle . What im saying i will tell you at the time. I will keep you in suspense. Reporter that is generating all headlines this morning or many of them. Trumps Campaign Manager Kellyanne Conway was out on all morning shows and she seemed to suggest at least, should the results be verified and certified, then at that point trump would accept whatever the results would be. With respect to the rigged system, and the certification results, he basically is saying that until he knows, you can lay out any hypothetical. Until he knows results are certified and verified he will not completely concede an unknown. Reporter as far as reaction to all of this, this is all across the board. Even some republicans are jumping in to criticize trump for his comments, just to give you a couple here. Senators jeff flake and lindsey graham, who have been very skeptical of trump throughout, did the following. Flake said it was beyond the pale. Lindsey graham says if trump loses because he failed as candidate. Neil, many are pointing out, including republicans, wait, wait, this talk about election results. Remember what happened in 2000 with al gore . Hanging chads, attorneys, United States Supreme Court justices. We know what happened then. Well see potentially what happens here in 19 days with trump. Neil . Neil well, its a good point. There wasnt much media outrage at the time when al gore was challenging that, perfectly valid reasons. That was then. Not the case now. Blake burman, thank you very very much. Those comments seemed to be wiping out what other inroads donald trump was experiencing in the debate. Whether that is premature or people missing fact or media missing fact maybe donald trump scored on other levels, that there were other issues brought up in this debate after all. Lets the read with tara rosencrans, democratic strategist out of washington d. C. Ned ryan, former bush 43 president ial writer, adam goodman, big trump supporters. Very good in machinations of this campaign. Adam, many look at that say, this is where donald trump blew it, but could he have finessed that better and said, the gore example or said, look, there are many districts and localities and reports of dead people voting in the past where im not automatically going to put my rubberstamp on this . Was there better way to for him to frame it . There was and still is. I think kellyanne was really touching on that. He should come out and say i will support the lawful winner of this election. I come from florida. I was right in the middle of 2000 recount a woman who became somewhat infamous, catherine hairs. Neil sure. Experienced all controversies of overseas military ballots undercounted, 67 counties have 67 different systems, hanging chads, controversy of butterfly ballot in palm beach county, there were enough things going on at the end of the day, when it was 537vote difference, determined, we do not know neil, to this day, frankly whether or not george bush or al gore won that year. It was so close, there were so many variables neil did a lot of different recounts. Take out intended versus unintended votes, well never know. His point was there is precedent for this, that is why im not going to jump on it. But i do wonder, ned, if the message was garbled a little bit, when you have to have your people come out after the fact. Absolutely. Neil many joining me in the spin room last night, what he meant to say was again, what do you think of, is this debate a bit too much or what . Hing that frustrated me a little bit watching debate last night, he scored some great points, Supreme Court, abortion, second amendment, all these things and he make this is comment which i think what he said, listen, chris, one of the great aspects of our democracy is the peaceful transfer of power. I will accept the results, however, if in the various states, state law triggers recount because of closeness i will ask for the recount and i will abide by the results. I think he could have finessed it a lot bert. Neil i think a problem if he doesnt and has to dial it back a little bit. Keeping story going. Its a okay. Trump had a trump moment. He had more than several moments during the campaign. People understand that about donald. He is going to say things at times that maybe even be maddening but at end. Day, last night he delivered other than that i thought he deliver ad great performance. Neil that is what you were saying . He had a very solid performance. Obviously i didnt think he did very good first debate. Second was better. Actually last night good debate, he stepped on himself and undermined some of his strong points. I hope he mentions something listen, one of the great aspects of our demock stirrings peaceful transfer. I want to make sure results i will accept them. Of course i will ask for he recount. Once all said and done i will accept the results. Neil could have easily asked the same question of Hillary Clinton, if you end up not doing too well, or you will you lose will you accept results . Again i would assume she would have said yes. Having said that, do you think that the challenge hears to knock out the incumbent, saying, calling her incumbent, her Party Controls the white house and he had to leave that debate with a knockout and he didnt . What do you make of that . Yeah, i think thats true. It is peculiar strategy. Neil really, that is so cool . I literally just made that up. Go ahead. Its a peculiar strategy in the last 19 days not sort of asking for votes or saying rightfully, of course i will accept the results because i will be the winner, to inspire confidence both to his base of support, who is maybe worried about some of these more recent poll results which show him lagging, whether it is just to independent voter and someone still undecided who is watching the debate not be sort of confident in that, i thought was really peculiar. Instead already like, just in case i lose, just know it is all rigged, right . Just wrong attitude for the last days when youre behind. Neil you raise a good point but here is where it morphed into weird stuff because i think his original premise, maybe adam you can correct me if im wrong, was, the process is rigged always favors democratic candidate or get disproportional press coverage that favors democratic candidate. Good example wikileaks and related stories, not mentioned on mainstream networks so theyre so cumulative and overwhelming that you cant ignore them but there was much greater interest what he said about women 11 years ago. Than emergence of sudden accusers last week, it is disproportionate. It is rigged in that sense how the media covers it. If he left it at that it might be compelling debate. Tell you why i really believe the debate did much more for trump than some people are giving credit for this morning because i think the bar was somewhat low for him. He had to neil right. He had to bring it and i think he did in major league way. I think he was talking to the American People as opposed to talking to the elites. I think they got the message very clear. Neil what did they get . What they got was a debate. They actually got a substantive debate. That was not something i think you could say on the scorecard was is first or second debate. This is substantive debate. I have to credit again Chris Wallace, he did tremendous job making this debate about substance and differences between the two candidates and philosophies. I think that came through. It was not the definition, first two times out. Trump really needed that. Neil you argue he got it . I think he got that. Neil you argue he got it . Yeah. Neil where were you watching debate by the way . I was at a Debate Watch Party neil were you sober . With hundreds and hundreds of trump supporters. It was fun to watch to see the crowds reaction. Neil they liked they liked what they heard. Again i think he scored a lot of punches just a couple things obviously highlighted today undermining message and you know, distracting from what i think he really scored on. Not only scored on abortion, Supreme Court, second amendment, i think he scored point on immigration. Went after the foundation again. Stronger points, criminal enterprise. I think he had good points last night. There was very strong reaction from the crowd. It is kind of interesting, we were talking a little before we went on, what we obsess versus what other people obsessing about. Neil tara, i know my producers, were running out of time here this idea she played it safe that Hillary Clinton played it safe, maybe her prerogative as poll leader, but almost too safe. One rap against her she played it too conservative, i dont mean that political sense, but stylelistic sense, what do you make of that . I think that she followed strategy from the second debate. He goes low. Goes high. Neil wait a minute. We can argue what is low and high but finish your point. When he said nasty woman, you saw, i followed the social networks as you all do as well that really got a lot of buzz last night, not in a positive way for him. It was interesting, that the two headlines that came out of it were like very end of the debate, when many viewers actually may have already tuned out but because of the buzz of those two things that he he sort of fell apart at end, i think erased a lot of what you guys were saying that he did have a great night. He did have a great policy positions and was able to get out there and be a little president ial. He sort of erased it. In the end the buzz was typical trump moment, where he fundamentally couldnt hang in there for full hour acting that way. He had to call her a name and go a little bit neil to be fair, they both, they both zinged eachthank you for your time. When you talk about surrogates and who said what, you can not mistake mark cuban in the spin room. They put him out there. Then we sat down to talk. Lets just say the censors were put on alerts after this. Neil youre saying is not trying to cause cones constitutional crisis. I think it is appropriate. I wish they would have been brought up a year ago. You both have a perfect driving record. Until one of you clips a food truck. Then your rates go through the roof. Perfect. For drivers with accident forgiveness Liberty Mutual wont raise your rates due to your first accident. And if you do have an accident our claims centers are available to assist you twentyfour seven. Call for a free quote today. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Neil all right. I want to take you to delaware ohio. That microphone will soon have one donald trump standing behind it. Donald trump will be making a number of stops in these socalled battleground states. Ohio is where he is polling the best for the timebeing. Some polls put it even. Others showing up anywhere from four to five points. Theyre kind of all over the map. I should point out in half the battleground states theyre within two to fourpoint margin of error. I hasten to add, whatever youre seeing in National Polls this race is technically more competitive than appear at first blush. When he goes there, we will go to him. Meantime, every time after debates you always have the Campaign Surrogates for each side going to something they call the spin room. You heard it mentioned again and again. It is where those who are backing donald trump or Hillary Clinton, make their case for why they think their candidate won. If you are as enthusiastic arguing for their candidate as one mark cuban, one Dallas Mavericks owner, loaded for bear last night the take a look. Neil so who won . Hillary crushes him. When you have a neil crushed . Crushed. For simple reason, when you have a candidate says they dont believe in the outcome of a president ial election in this country, that is denying democracy. That neil did you feel that way when al gore felt that way . Totally different. You know it. That was after the outcome. There were discussions of hanging chads. There were lawyers getting involved. That was completely different. Neil i understand, you were questioning the outcome of the election. Maybe for good reason, is that unamerican. That was after the fact right, neil. Come on now, you know better. Neil in the middle. Night . No, this i covered too. He was, slow down. Taking back my concession. Apples and oranges, right . Neil go through. One was after numbers coming through. Look at this way, neil, what if Vladmir Putin said you can not trust the outcome of the american president ial election. It is rigged. How would every single american respond to that . Neil do you think though that he really, that he would, if he lost, that he wouldnt accept it . Do you think that if Hillary Clinton lost, she would accept it . She would accept it no questions asked. Accept it no questions asked. Mike pence accepted no questions asked. The nominee of the Republican Party questioned american democracy. Again, of vladimir, not like there is some reason to question. Not like super close race to have a recount which is his right, right . This is scenario where were 20 days in advance and he questions american democracy. If Vladmir Putin said the exact same words that donald trump said, this entire country would be in an uproar. Neil when you look at this race, and you see some of, a donald trump and women and these accusations, all fair enough, i said on this air, go after him on that, there isnt same zeal in the media ive seen to go after wikileaks stuff. Come on now. First of all neil that is a fact. By factor of 10 to one. That is media comparison. Talk about wikileaks. Talk about what actually has been said in all those 15, 16, 17,000 emails. Have you seen one from secretary clinton . Neil actually ive seen a lot from her. About her but not from her. Neil let me give you an example. Here is one of the things, i like Hillary Clinton i see in wikileaks. You know why . Because she is open to unfettered and free trade. She is much more procapitallist than she appears. Believe me. I will let you talk. So that seems like a flexible Hillary Clinton, a bill clintonlike Hillary Clinton who can move and be pragmatic an not be so dictatorial or so onesided as she maybe was forced to be with bernie sanders. That Hillary Clinton seems to be the candidate who would get the stuff done. Now youre voting for her, is that what youre saying. Neil im asking, which is the real hillary . Look, as someone who manage ad lot of executive people i try to hire people who are smarter than me, one requirement of people i hire i dont care if you agree with me or not, i want diversity of opinion. Neil i understand that. You want a consistent opinion, right . Someone who doesnt walk up to you, i love mark cuban, i love mark cuban then later says i hate mark cuban. Youre not saying what second day said. Neil mark she is diametrically opposed told audience. This is discussion people work for her. Neil this is talking to banking groups. No. Just like today where she talked about open borders. Talked about energy policy. Neil talked about capital, be i wear what will happen in Election Year you are going to be a target. Right. Neil she is more or less saying, i dont buy it but i hope you dont either. Think about what you just said. Neil im not saying, that is when you were say, you were taking somebody elses email give and take discussion. Neil no, im taking transcript of speeches. Remarks, i dont have any problem with the remarks. All im asking you is this are we talking emails or talking transcripts. Neil im asking, which is the real hillary . Is she for open and unfettered trade . Is she for a Good Relationship with wall street . Is she for not painting them all with the same brush as she seems to say, or is she the won who got pushed far to the left. One at a time. Neil what do you think . Open prayed, i think trade. Certain things she is open about. Energy wants unified policy for all of north america, Northern Hemisphere she called it. Trade policy for tpp has nuanced position, when she first came out neil she called it gold standard. But went on to say there were things she didnt like about it and she said this is how neil mark, you are one of the best reads of people i know. You became a big success you could read events and people and times. I will agree with that. Neil i would too. Im not blowing yo

© 2025 Vimarsana