Remember two prominent components, exxon mobile and of course chevron are very promptly featured in the dow and also weighing in on the s p 500, which is also taking on the chin. One of the safest places to go for the time being, those prices have been going up and the yield coming down, thats a safe place to park, i think we have the tenyear note to show you, five basis points to just under 2 and a quarter percent. Phil flynn follows all of this stuff very constitutely, whats happening, my friend . Whats going on . Well, i think the market is still shellshocked from that lack of a decision by opec last week. To have any quota at all and that markets dont know what that means. Does it mean its every opec producer for themself . And to be honest with you, we dont know. Right now we have a supply and any fear that we could add to that glut and going to weigh on prices. But look to whats happening to these exploration companies, neil. You mentioned theyre all getting crushed today. These companies that have to go out and look for oil and build pipelines, theres not going to be a lot of that going on in the future and that could create a problem down the rho he. But in the near term this is ugly. We may like it he gas pump but these high paying jobs theyre going to be getting pink slips and thats not good and thats why the market is taking at the negative today. Neil all right, flynn, they very, very much, we are learning more about syed farook and Tashfeen Malik, the attack in San Bernardino, california, but whats interesting about syed farook is that he wasnt this placid character hes been deemed to be from neighbors and those who knew him, his own father is saying that not only did he never meet his sons wife, but the two different sharply on ideology and his son was becoming much more sharply on the United States but b israel and more supportive of isis, particularly baghdady of course, the key isis leader. Jeff flock more on those warnings signs. Hey, jeff. I think there were clearly signs there, neil, that no one picked up on and perhaps evidence 1 i want to show you a photograph that was obtained by abc news of syed farook and Tashfeen Malik his wife as they gathered together the first time in u. S. This was u. S. Customs in chicago, dated 2014 and weve seen a lot of pictures of mr. Farook in western garb, but this gives you another picture, he was interviewed by an italian publication and just said to just quote it, he said that the son agreed with the isis leader ideas for creating an islamic state. His father knew that and also said his son was quote obsessed by israel and the notion of fighting against israel. This is in direct contravention from the mother, of course the mother and father were separated but it just goes against what she had to say and she of course lives in this townhome behind me with the couple. She says she had no idea. She didnt see this at all coming, she had no idea that he was radicalized in any way. Kind of a conflict of parents there. Neil thank you very much, jeff, it was not baghdady who was killed in that strike last month were learning from the pentagon, but the head of isis in libya. He is the one who died. Goes by the forme formal name is saying hes an Iraqi National before assuming much grander posts with the islamic state, but hes dead, but there are plenty more of these guys crawling around. So we keep on to be of that. Also a lot being asked now about the signals that we knew ahead of this attack. But if youre finding a pattern here on the anniversary of pearl harbor, keep an mind this has been an ageold problem, 74 years ago ahead of the pearl harbor attacks remember we were not aware of maybe seamen monitoring in things what appeared to be a large arsenal of planes heading toward pearl harbor not communicated and how many incidents since did you hear the same thing . Antiterror robert on what we can do to correct this because every time you and i talk on a tragedy, its the one consistent theme, isnt it . Yes. Its all about information, its all about intelligence, its all about trying to stay one step ahead of whats happening. And, unfortunately, with the changes and the terrorists, the changes in the way theyre dealing with the United States, its becoming very difficult. Theyre using encryption, theyre dealing with less communication and social media, and its becoming a huge problem for enforcement and for intelligence all across neil well, how much do you rely on family members . If the father was notifying that his son was expressing allegiance in isis, then the wifes family would often hear her speaking arabic over the phone, they didnt know arabic but they said she was becoming more distant, do we just live in a vacuum or what . Yeah. Of course they have an obligation and the family here should have done something. Clearly they knew something was wrong and thats really going to help us. You go across the big cities in our country and pockets in our country in michigan, new jersey, take a look at the muslim community, take a look whats happening, theyve got to help us police this system. We cant do it from the outside in. Theyve got to be able to give us information, tell us when something is wrong and work with us. And about because were not picking it up any other way. Neil do National Agencies i ask this with a preconceived answer, convey that to the local police forces. We learn certainly in london that was not the case in two separate attacks, we learn in paris that local were not made aware of the presence have some of these later on assailants. And im wondering why that happens. That was the case in boston with the brothers, but in california thats another theme. It is another theme, and i can tell you speaking with the counterparts across the country, most of this information is developed locally. Most of it is done on street level informants, done on relationships with your local Police Department and the local community charles who is monitoring the possible bad elements, though . If it involves terrorists, thats thats the fbi; right . Or the. But ive got to tell you, if you look at the fbi or, much of the good information we get in the federal system is coming from right here in our own local neighbors. Neil so why is communication a problem . I mean i guess one agency deems it less than important than some other info so it holds back, what happened. Well, thats why you have to have Something Like the task force. Youve got the fbi separate from the homeland security, the u. S. Department of justice, you have your state agencies, all of your local Police Departments, and then step back for a minute and take a look at the nsa, our military intelligence, this state department. Its complicated. Its complex, and its big. And we have to be able to combine all of that information, Work Together at every level and really weve been very lucky and been able to do that through task forces and other types of Law Enforcement corporation. Its not easy, and it is still happening as we speak today. But at the end of the day whether it comes from nsa or military intelligence agent in the middle east or comes from right here in brooklyn, new york, it could be the same bottom line. Good information that has to be used to prevent an attack. Neil all right, robert, thank you very much. Thank you, neil. Stuart well, he was mentioning in the nsa a big effort to put out real authorized the nsas acts like to go after and get the information it needs but not necessarily whenever it wants to get. Scott, former navy seal on what he makes of that. There are a lot of free speech groups saying no. No. Dont try this. What do you say . Well, neil, its great to be with you as always. I think its very important that some of the pro ram obviously needs to be kept in place and other parts need more oversight, i think its somewhere in between to thread the needle where ive heard a couple of president ial candidates some are opposed, some are completely against, and because of those folks who are against the program itself has created more oversight which is absolutely needed, we need to be cognizant of our Fourth Amendment rights and we can never have 100 security, so we cant trade all of our liberties in hopes of guaranteed security. Neil all right. But the way things stand now in the nsa and other government authorities want to get some information lets say from Facebook Information that might have been realized on any number of pages, they have to go through facebook; right . They cant leap in there and get them themself. Yes, absolutely and because of folks that were against it have brought about page if you will and the public has brought about change too and rightfully so. In fact, i would take one further there are numerous different surveillance programs and some of those programs are under different legal authorities, so quite frankly i think we need to take a look at the whole apparatus and ensure that the public has transparency on what can and cant be done and theyre brought under one Legal Authority umbrella to make sure that the government isnt stepping outside of its boundary intentionally or unintentionally. So i think we need the tools to combat terrorist activities of course but at the same time we can never give our liberties away in the hopes that were going to have guaranteed security and there should be transparency, and there should be all those things pulled under one Legal Authority. Neil you think in this heightened scrutiny weve avoided the attacks we saw last week or would we still be facing them because something always slips through the cracks . Well, i think theres an argument to be made on either side. I think youre absolutely right, something does slip through the cracks, just because you have massive amounts of data doesnt mean you can use it in a practical way, but at the same time, yes, it could mean that. So i think theres an argument to both sides. But what im most interested and what i want to see happen of course is not us give up all of our liberties and hopes that were going to have perfect security, which we wont have but at the same time given those folks who were there to protect us, the ability to do their jobs. Neil thank you, my friend, and thank you to the service to our country, unique breed of men right there. By the way, weve been finding out were taking out quite a few or prominent terrorists, getting indications not only the top isis operative taken out last month but just a couple of days ago a senior leader, this was taken from senior operative top leader went out as well, went by the name of ukash, i don i dont know any longer name than that, but anyway hes dead. Either would have influenced what went down in california last week . Hard to say. Well have more after this you totalled your brand new car. Nobodys hurt,but there will still be pain. It comes when your Insurance Company says theyll only pay threequarters of what it takes to replace it. What are you supposed to do, drive threequarters of a car . Now if you had Liberty Mutual new car replacement, youd get your whole car back. I guess they dont want you driving around on three wheels. Smart. New car replacement is just one of the features that come standard with a base Liberty Mutual policy. And for drivers with accident forgiveness,rates wont go up due to your first accident. Learn more by calling switch to Liberty Mutual and you can save up to 509. For a free quote today,call Liberty Mutual insurance at see Car Insurance in a whole new light. Liberty mutual insurance. Neil all right. A quick peek of the dow shows its down 141 points, within the s p you can understand why a third of the Energy Stocks in the s p 500 have just hit their lowest levels in more than a year today. Weve got oil in and out of a sevenyear low, and sort of selling injury here growing expectations of those stocks will continue to slide is Oil Continues to slide. Now a little bit north of 38. It had touched down as low as 37. 50, others say it could easily get to 30 in this, we have opec boosting production. Some say thats a goal on opec to choke off our own fracking industry so that they can be in the drivers seat again, theyre hurting themselves while doing it, but well keep an eye on it in the meantime. Mobile and chevron are energy components, so they account for about a third of the selloff there. Liz with some other terror related reports that are focusing particularly on Tashfeen Malik. She is the wife of the bomber syed farook who might have had a more prominent role in this. But whats interesting in her case, liz, and youve been following this very well is how she got in here. How she got into this country. Explain. Liz yeah, so the worry is in the part of Law Enforcement intelligence officials that terrorists are gaining the visa system and heres how. Malik got into the United States via whats called a fiance visa, also a marriage visa. It says if you get married within 90 days to a u. S. Citizen, you will get permanent legal status, she did get a temporary green card as well. So there have been about 512,000 fiance visas issued since 2014 and basically terrorists are using our immigration system as a weapon, a new weapon in their terrorist activity. So she arrived in july 2014 and then married her husband in august of 2014. She passed two rounds of criminal and Intelligence Security background checks, neil, and then basically was asked a series of questions that is sort of a box checking exercise that was examined, for example, if she had any terrorist activity in her past or any terrorist affiliations and that box was checked no. So there was nothing red flagged to u. S. Intelligence or authorities that this was an individual who should have been on a terror watch list. Charles does anybody answer yes to that question . Thats a good question. We know the president does last night says he wants to have more scrutinize paid attention to the k1 v visa process, the fiance visa process and also cruz out of alabama sent a letter to u. S. Attorney general lynch asking more scrutiny of this system. We know congress is now debating a funding bill for federal agencies. Whether or not this comes up in the debate is remain to be seen. Back to you, neil. Neil incredible reporting as always. Thank you, liz. Liz sure. Neil when you go to the airport have these bags ever left your sight, do you ever say, oh, yeah, there was that time when a guy was rifling through them . Incredible but thats wait this procedure goes to retired general who says that this whole attack line and this woman got in here without too much inquiry may have us rethink our system. General, good afternoon. Good afternoon, neil. Neil obviously no would be terrorists is going to answer any question like that voluntarily or with a yes. Right. Neil having that said, pakistan wrote off on the general and said essentially shes good to go, no problems here. We had the same doubts being about the turks and how loyal they are to our cause and theyre supposedly friends. Right. Neil and im defending to think more about our friends than our socalled stated enemies. Well, we need to make sure were engaged with our friends and allies and those we have some common purpose. But our channel we can execute. In my experience in my 34 years largely done through the military channels as well. Im sure theyre very active right now between us and pakistan and so forth. But things politically on the surface that can get in the way cant interference what were trying to do. Thats one thing with the 9 11 commission back in the events in 2001. Neil right. Showed that we need to not only shore up our relationships inside the United States but also across a whole spectrum of our International Friends and allies and those who we would want to be friends certain into your, well, to your point, general, i can specifically remember pakistan put dragging response to our noting to, you know, conducting aggressive war on terror. They were not willing or happy to comply. Mainly money changed hands. But it does raise an issue here because you hear this woman might have been radicalized in pakistan or family members were talking about she would be speaking on the phone in arabic with god knows who. So whether that started in pakistan or somewhere else, it does make you wonder about the countries we know of the people arriving here let alone the swarm of refugees from syria from there is no one to recommend or have a paper trail. Its going to make us have to adapt. All good nations adapt well, for instance, one is in the virtual world, in cyber. We have to make sure were much more effective in tracking, you know, social media and cyber wherever neil but if what did if she left no social media prints . He did on facebook. Well, thats where weve got to now increasing the diplomatic relationships of these other nations intelligence communities as well. See, you have essential elements of information, its not just one certain thing, its not just one nation but weve got to have much more capable effort to then integrate all of those essential elements of information in order to put the entire picture together. Not only that but we have to do it in a timely way to make sure we can track, fix, and target and in case we have to kill. Now, that doesnt sound defensive, it sounds offensive, and thats another area as well. Neil you know this region very well. I do. Neil i get the feeling not trusting them, i dont trust pakistan, i dont trust the turks, do you remember that soccer game halftime the moment of silence they didnt honor, but, again, i see a lot of this evidence that the love for us isnt exactly overwhelming. Its not but flust certain parts of government, you can find them in my experience in the military. Neil yeah, but oftentimes thats as a result of money. It does. Neil and we can buy our friends, i dont want to put a down payment on our enemy. Right. But also where we can build trust or confidence is leadership in the region. Neil yeah. The fact that the United States needs to not bac