And moved to get the former. He wasnt courageous or format and a statesman who dead to too many things. And they figured he did a lot of damaging things to our country. Were the ones facing the consequences. Well, let me, i had a little, much of a sand, leaned freedom that Russian Society youll go off with don, i think he wanted to show all countries and also the west, the, you know, i would say all countries around the world that we are a peaceful country that we are ready to disarm the left from ask them because gorbachev is one of those people who change the world and unquestionably changed it for the better even the acreage to humanity. And that to democracy and freedom became possible in europe via to the whole at germany could be united supplies, and b, i and cotton is a p. It the eyes and the form for funding. This also coming up for re unification of germany was possible because Mikhail Gorbachev did not stand in its way to day on the streets of berlin, expressions of respect and gratitude, and the law sizes of the well. And that is good for something good. You know, we have him to thank for our reunification home, but you dont think that was the most important thing for us. Oh, im had snuck no fit for freedom. I had i own the biggest thing was freedom to our viewers watching on p b. S. In the United States into all of you around the world. Welcome. We begin the day remembering the life and legacy of Mikhail Gorbachev, the soviet leader, who helped and the cold war gorbachev reportedly passed away yesterday at the age of 91. In the late 19 eighties. Gorbachev introduced policies that encouraged openness and reform inside the u. S. S r and he also forged wumer ties with the west, which ultimately brought down the iron curtain ending the division of europe. And it also put germany on track to re unification. As a political leader. Gorbachev wielded unprecedented powers that set into motion forces inside of his country, which he would soon no longer be able to control. Or he is often held as a hero. Here in the west, at home, his name is associated with the collapse of a mighty nation. His legacy is at best. A complicated one. We have this report that is given a very Mikhail Gorbachev, 1st speech as leader of the soviet union. It was clear he was a stark contrast to his predecessors. We is 40, was the old right. I live in peace and freedom is the most. Am you hold more basic right . Of each individual. Robert olivia. Gorbachev wanted to change the soviet union to bring it closer to the people. He promoted glass in aust openness and perestroika reforms to words that will forever be associated with him. His new outlook was popular with many his policies also applied to the military, despite the resistance of soviet generals it to us in severe thought, his honest, im convinced that we will also have to reform our military law. We have far too many weapons law safely. We have to seek dialogue with other superpowers and reduce our arsenals to a reasonable extent in that yourself. As a result of that dialogue gorbachev and you as president reagan find the 1st of many disarmament treaties in 1987. It was the beginning of the end of the cold war in october 1989 when he visited east berlin for the g d rs, 40th anniversary celebrations. Gorbachev urged eric hanukkah to implement reforms. He warned the eastern leader saying, life punishes those who come to late a month after his visit. The berlin wall fell and with it, the iron curtain that had divided europe for decades. It was gorbachevs, reformist, policies that helped unleash a peaceful revolution across eastern europe. In 1990 gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his key role in bringing about a new Peaceful World order. Internationally, he was highly regarded but at home he was increasingly under pressure. The Economic Situation was dire. The soviet union on the verge of falling apart, communist hardliner stage, a coup against gorbachev in august 1991. At the end of that year, Mikhail Gorbachev announced his resignation and the soviet union was dissolved with Many Russians holding him responsible for its demise. Will the passing of Mikhail Gorbachev has triggered across the globe waves of emotions and reflections. And they all speak to the impact that gorbachev and his policies had far beyond the borders of the former soviet union. Joining me tonight to discuss the legacy or to authorities on soviet and russian history, as well as foreign policy. Angela stent. Shes the author of hootons world, russia against the west, and with the rest. Professor stant is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. She joins me tonight from washington, and im also happy to welcome to the program william tubman. He is a Pulitzer Prize winning author. His latest book is entitled gorbachev. His life in times. And mr. Tillman is also in the u. S. Capital to night to both of you. Welcome to the program. Im glad that you could take the time with us this evening to talk about the life and legacy of Mikhail Gorbachev. His death became known Public Knowledge about 24 hours ago. The west has been emoting ever since about a great statesman inside russia. Weve had a telegram from the kremlin, sent to the family, and thats about it. We in the west, it seems wish that we had had more gorbachev. And in the kremlin, you get the sense that they are wishing that they had never had any gorbachev. Professor stent. Let me start with you. What do you say to that . Is that how the dividing lines or tonight . Well, they can be a certainty like that in western europe and the United States. Gorbachev is a great statesman who and ended the cold war, allowed germany to unify peacefully and really liberated millions of people inside the soviet union, free political prisoners. And then in eastern europe, who have been part of the soviet block, thats not how you see clearly either in the kremlin or among Many Russians who been mon, the full of the soviet union. After all, who himself is said that the class of the soviet union with the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century, because it left millions of russians outside of russia and hes right now trying to remedy and really he has systematically gone about reversing many of the reforms that gorbachev himself did you know, were going to talk about then just a moment mr. Kelvin. Let me ask you about the notion of gorbachev inside russia. You have written that gorbachev was too decent to be the leader of his country. Why do you think that is well, just look at his predecessors, soviet leaders like when and stalin herself, but bridge enough, ah, they were all to ready to shed blood in the case of stolen, especially on a mammoth scale to attain their aims. Gorbachev was reluctant to use force and violence of gorbachev. Huh. Was very optimistic about the possibilities of people coming to govern themselves in a democracy. Gorbachev trusted reagan, thatcher meter on coal, to work with him to in the cold war. These qualities of optimism, of trust, of revulsion against force and violence, of these turned out to not be sufficiently suitable to a country in which had experienced so much force and violence, so much authoritarianism. Totalitarianism huh. I got to know him fairly well when i was interviewing him for the book and in person, he struck us too, as a, as a decent man, warm, informal, natural, with a sense of humor. I often wondered how the hell he had managed to defeat his rivals to become the leader of this country. And then how he dared to think that he could get away with transforming it and the world in the ways that he dreamed he could. What mister tell would, thats it, thats a good point. You make gorbachev. He set into motion forces that he would later not be able to steer or control at all. I mean, we, after remember he was a communist leader. He wanted reform, but there was no guide book for him to turn a command economy into something that resembled a market economy. Im wondering if, if you think, did he push forward with these reforms somewhat blindly and with a considerable degree of naivete. Well, i would say yes, he was naive and even utopian and of sense that he tried to do what turned out to be impossible. You can make a pretty good case that his whole project was doomed from the start by russia. What it was, by its own history, by the forces who remained from the soviet totalitarianism, who were allied, arrayed against him. Um, but nonetheless, he tried. And in that sense, you know, one has to respect him, admire him, and almost wish for more leaders in other countries who would dare to try and professors didnt. Gorbachev of course, was not. He wasnt a simple man. He was complex. He was complicated. He was a complex, complicated, russian. He considered the annexation of crimea to be correct in 2014. But he was quoted as saying that war with ukraine would never happen. And he said also, even if you cant prove it scientifically, the russians and the ukrainians, they belong together. What picture does that paint then of gorbachev . I think his attitudes were very much those off. So we had people in Many Russians today, after all, ukraine, you know, was part of the soviet union, ukrainian, russian have a history, a very complicated history that goes back centuries. And so most russians found it very hard when the soviet union collapsed to accept that ukrainians were a separate nation. I had the right to a separate state. So i think its remarkable that he sent those things. But we should also remember that he unleashed a process. And i think when i go came to the United States in the early ninetys and he was speaking at the library of congress, somebody asked him, what was your biggest mistake . And he said in an understatement, i underestimated the nationalities question. So i think like many soviet leaders and soviet citizens, he didnt realize how much the non russian nationalities actually wanted their own independence. And as soon as he opened up the us, nothing people were able to discuss these issues. Their desire for freedom and independence became stronger. But he did not mean to process where the ukrainians, while, while the soviet union still existed, were able to elect their own leader within the soviet union. And so again, these were processes that young leach, that he didnt fully understand and that he didnt intend to do at the beginning. He did not intend to see the destruction of the soviet union. But we have to remember that he and me and did nothing to stop it. I think that again, hes, unlike most fresh leaders that he voluntarily stacked to back, admittedly under pressure from Boris Yeltsin and the ukrainian, or russian leaders. And, but he didnt fight to stay in power. He didnt have the army come and support him. So i think we shouldnt criticize him too much for what he said about ukraine because for a man of his generation. And its not surprising because i want to pick up on the, on the, the polluted factor here. You, along with fiona hill, wrote an article in Foreign Affairs recently in the title is the world putin wants, has putin succeeded already in dismantling everything that gorbachev was able to achieve inside russia in terms of greater openness and ex, extending freedom to just freedom of expression freedom of the press. Well, russia is a far more oppressive place now than it was. The soviet union was under gorbachev. And it resembles to some extent what life was like under the breaking the breaking up period. The only difference is that russians can still with difficulty leave russia. He really has a dismantle most of that. And primarily is how bent on subjugating ukraine on, reabsorbed in ukraine into rush or into some kind of a slavic federation. So he is deliberately progressing, in essence, the collapse of the soviet union. He said that the collapse of the soviet union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe. And hes determined to reverse that, whether he can do it, i dont know, but its certainly the direct opposite of everything that gorbachev set in motion. And mr. Tell me, do you see . Then the invasion of ukraine is this Vladimir Putins remedy to the disaster that occurred during gorbachev swatch. Well, putin, obviously think, so i dont think so myself because its hard to characterize a bloodbath with all kinds of horrendous consequences as a, as a remedy of. But he said this is putins way of saying that without saying it, that gorbachev was responsible for allowing the soviet union to fall apart. And, and that falling apart, included, as angela just said, the, the attempt successful in the end by so many of those soviet republics to break away and become independent and sovereign and try to determine their own future. Id like to get both of you give me your opinions on, on this assessment, there are some americans who may be tempted to call Mikhail Gorbachev. The soviet jimmy carter, a leader, a man who had the best intentions for his country and his people, but whose policies left voters feeling worse . Not better. Mister tubman, what do you say it was he was he the soviet jimmy carter at the end of the day . Im sorry. Are you asking me . Yes, yes. Yes. Well, im to, im rolling that around in my head of the as i said, there was a certain i e, j to gorbachev. There was a certain utopianism. But on the other hand, that gorbachev was tough and canny, and his ability working within the still confines of the soviet system to get commerce communist hard liners to give up their power until they change their mind and tried to get his a, get him to give up is, was really quite extraordinary when you go back to 985. When he took over and assumed the leadership of a poet bureau that included the the brushing of cohorts cohorts and lackeys. Its really remarkable what he was able to do. In fact, the irony, i think, is that he proved to be a more successful ruthless manipulator of the old levers of the old soviet system. Then a sort of entrepreneur of democracy. It was better at forcing out camico and in the kremlin. Then in mobilizing electoral forces to back as policies, once he had opened up the system to free voting elections and created a genuinely functioning parliament and president , whats your take on this . Because after he left politics, gorbachev, he set up this institute that was trying to help Civil Society in russia. I mean, there are analogies to what weve seen with former president jimmy carter. But other us president s do you see americans maybe being able to draw this compares well with all due respect to present conduct i think what present a leader gorbachev did with fall, consequential. Because even though he made mistakes, i clearly vacillated between economic reform and then going back to the centrally planned system. And he was a very good tactician. But in the end, i think he didnt have a very good strategy given all of that. Freeing the russian people, giving them greater liberty and freedom of expression that helped laugh than him. Its losses. And i think we can discuss what happened in the ninetys. But this, this feeling of greater empowerment than he gave russians outlasted him. This is something now obviously that the mutant regime is trying to crush and to try and reverse, but even the younger people to them today, you can follow the tweets that alex saying of only the opposition need in solitary confinement in prison. That job gets the tweets through his lawyers praising gorbachev, not only for the freedoms that because hes an example of a leader who wasnt corrupt. He could have accumulated well and all the find the things of life and he didnt. So i think he set an example that which even though its very difficult to follow it at the moment in russia, is something that is out last of him that even younger people on the staff president , id like maybe if you could help me here and try to connect the legacy of gorbachev to the situation we see in modern day america tomorrow evening. You as President Biden plans to speak to the american people, reportedly about the battle for the soul of the country. Hes concerned about that. Is there a connection to the death of gorbachev. Gorbachev represented ideas that made our current world order possible. He has now passed away and do do a lot of americans feel that the world that as we know, it also seems to be slipping away as well. Will certainly gorbachev promoted successfully greater democracy within the soviet union. And what we see today in the United States clearly is an erosion of democracy and, and, and ha, if not half of the country significant part of the country, no longer believing in normal democratic norms in the rule of law. So i think its a very, its a very serious situation, and i think it behooves us to look at other countries where, where the freedom is and the rule of will no longer exist and remind ourselves that if we go down that path than in fact that will be the end of this democratic experiment in america. Weve got 2 more minutes. Ive got a final question to you both. Mister tillman of start out, start with you. Gorbachev imputed never criticized each other publicly, at least, not directly. Putin did not praise gorbachev to day, but he also did not cast him in a negative light, even in that telegram that was sent to the gorbachev family. Does gorbachev in your opinion . Does his legacy, does it present any type of threat to putin more in death then gorbachev did in life . Well, you know, among low, currently tens of thousands may be hundreds of thousands of russians who have emigrated, fled from putins russia after or, and ukraine began. Where at least one person was telling me the other day that there are a lot of russians who believe another kid is throwing class, is necessary. Now i can readily believe that among those who have fled from putins russia, i guess the question is, are there among those who have not fled, especially the Younger Generation is, is a dawning on them the, the kind of reforms that, that gorbachev favor the kid is throwing co is again, something that they hope to see happening in russia. I guess im skeptical as to how wide that sentiment is after all these years and which russians of accustom themselves to despising russia. Gorbachev. Unfortunately, were out of time, but i want to think both of you angela s