a rooted commitment to imperialism that began in europe. he serves as the founder of the federal congress project in george washington university. this runs about one hour. >> i'd like to get things started. a little after high noon. i am the chief historian at the u.s. capital historical society. welcome to everyone making it today. i feel a bit of a fraud introducing our guest speaker because i can't imagine anyone a member of who is the society that does not know ken bowling already. for untold years he has been a editor at the multi-model congress relating to the history of the first congress to meet under the constitution. in addition to welcoming all of you, i would like to acknowledge peter, who is your next wednesday to tell us about how artists interpret history for the canvas. hopefully we will see many of you, if not all of you next wednesday. kenneth's cannot talk to us about the vision of the west as a motivator in the american revolution. the expanded concept of revolution through the hamiltonian revolution into the early congresses. it is an invitation to think of the west not just as a place where people could invest certificates after the war make quick money. but as a way of giving scope to the aspirations of the american revolution. not a turning away from, but turning towards something. in this case it's turning towards a vision of the u.s. that reaches transcontinental he. -- transcontinentally. i am glad you are here for this. i am happy to welcome ken bowling. [applause] chuck.: thank you i am going to use the word "vast" many times today. first time to describe this painting. it's vast indeed. i know you probably know washington crossing the delaware. it's in the metropolitan in new york city. this one is even larger. it's in the house wing of the capital on the staircase. i would say it's at least 30 feet long and 15 feet tall. its westward the course of empire takes its way. whenan see at the bottom the lights are off, you can see it much closer. that is the golden gate before the bridge was built. i will invite you to come up afterwards and take a look at this. it's very much 19th-century. it's very much manifest destiny. the idea coined by john o'sullivan, editor of annexing. and americans as myself were taught about manifest destiny in 19th century. but like so many things we really talk about in the 19th century, like slavery, these issues date back to the revolution itself. paper,i will read my because i have lots and lots of quotations. i don't want to mess them up or mislead you. the paper is entitled "the idea cause of thea american revolution." revolutions are spurred by ideology. the american revolution no less than those that followed in its wake. republicanism is a well studied one. equally, if not more important was the idea of empire and its westward course. the two separate ideologies combined to produce the utopian vision of a republican empire that would be a refuge for the downtrodden of the world, with a mission to spread liberty and the american form of government to the rest of the world as the united states fulfill its manifest destiny to spread westward across the north american continent. it would be in empire based on liberty rather than an empire based on domination. and it would be an empire that carried with it the enlightenment. as repeated references to reason, progress, secularity, and particularly the arts and sciences, including technology, demonstrates. concepts spurred the idea of the american empire. the first was millennialism. historian ruth bloch concludes that the american mission, the idea of america multiplying in population and reaching to the pacific ocean and america as an asylum for the injured and oppressed from all parts of the globe, permeated evangelical theiotic statements from 1760's through the 1780's and became a common feature of american nationalism. envisioned the american empire as characterized by its intellectual prowess. the arts and sciences would be improved and religion, learning, and liberty would be diffused over the continent. the united states would become a large and glorious empire, found to exceed all other empires of the world, while at the same time being the abode of the scholar, the philosopher, and all the sons of science and genius. fun great works of greatamerica would spawn works of art and science. continentalis sts. that the residents of 13 thinly populated colonies on the eastern seaboard chose the word continental to describe both the revolutionary congress, and the army informed, is the best indicator of the influence of continental thinking during the revolution. both terms proceeded the declaration of independence. neither were official. both became commonplace because of the american people and press deemed it appropriate. speculation that the american colonies might one day become in dependent and concerns about how the keep them within the british empire date back to the 17th century. thegreat debate in england french and indian war over what to do about canada in the aftermath of the removal of the french was only the culmination of a century of concern about the possibility of american independence. consequently, many patriot followers hadeir a continental vision for britain's american colonies will be for they advocated independence. foremost among these were benjamin franklin, john adams, and thomas jefferson. the pacific ocean was the national western boundary of the united states. at first of course, it was a british westward coursing empire. the resident of massachusetts predicted in 1759 that america could become a mighty empire, but i don't mean, an independent one. widely reprinted in the colonies, a 1769 newspaper article from london commented on the spreading belief that america would be the future seat of the british empire. and london merely a provincial town, or perhaps just a historic ruin. benjamin franklin's 1751 pamphlet advocating the agricultural extension of europeans across north american continent predicted that because of the rapid increase of the a greateropulation, number of englishmen would be in north america than england within a century. after reading the pamphlet, a young john adams imagined the transfer of the seat of empire. once the french had been driven out of north america. in the early 19th century, he claimed there was nothing more ancient in his memory. memory thantion -- the observation that the art, science is, in empire had leapt westward across the atlantic ocean. the mid 18th century british empire in north america vision easily became an american empire when independence changed the equation. it was this viewpoint and not republicanism that the historian and loyalist governor of massachusetts, thomas hutchinson saw as the spur of the american revolution. speculative men had figured in their minds, he said, and 63.rican empire prior to 17 but at such a distant time when no one could have expected to live to see it. we discussed a gradual progress of the settlement through this vast continent from the atlantic to be specific. resulting felt a sense of grandeur and self-importance among his fellow massachusetts colonists. by the time united states declared itself independent, references to the rising glory of the american empire had deeply penetrated popular culture. noticed inist peter, his diary in 1748 that a number of americans have expressed their opinion to him that the english north american colonies would be able to form a state by themselves entirely independent of england. british traveler claimed that when touring the middle colonies in 1760's, he sensed that the people with whom he socialized eagerly and impatiently look forward to the time when "america is to give law to the rest of the world." the rising glory delivered at 2 american college commencement and 1771 were a sign of the times. reverend william smith claimed a year later at empire is already planted that promises to give law and happiness to every other part of america. a year later he told the american philosophical society, ever since i was capable of reflecting on the course of , it has been one of my most delightful employments. to trace the progress of the arts like that in the sun from east to west. that has dawned upon us. anticipating the future, the politically important 7074 suffolk county massachusetts -- 1774 suffolk county massachusetts resolutions envisioned "a boundless continent swarming with millions." by 1775, american empire rhetoric was not to be silenced. februarye observed in that this vast continent would seems to be marked out by providence for the grandest empire on the globe, and whose greatness and wickedness and the folly of great britain is hastening forward. blamed theamilton rigorous and unconstitutional actions of parliament on its jealousy of our dawning splendor. henry lawrence of south carolina predicted that a mighty empire will arise on this continent, and england cannot. progress. -- cannot hinder its progress. widespread acknowledgment of america's advantages, it size, climate, fertile soil, and other natural resources, as well as its rapid population growth, acted to rectify thomas payne paine's powerful image in "common sense" of a sheer absurdity of an island ruling a continent. this was especially clear after a decade during which parliament had repeatedly restricted the growth of the north american colonies. most famously by forbidding americans to settle west of the appellations -- of the appalachians. also by numerous acts regulating colonial land policy, immigration, naturalization, and manufacturing. july 4, 1776, enough americans wanted a separate american empire to publish it in a bill of impeachment against george the third. only has to read the declaration of independence to understand how much americans resented england's attempt to stifle they are rising glory. paine claimed in "common sense" that he never met a man in england or america that a separation was inevitable. it was simply only a matter of when. expressed itnley to a south carolina grand jury later in 1776, "the almighty has made choice of the present generation to erect the american empire. and thus has suddenly arisen in the world a new empire styled, the united states of america. an empire that as soon as started into existence, attracts the attention of the and bids e universe fair but the blessing of god to be the most glorious empire after record." ramseytorian to be david dramatically insistently 1778ssed it in his oration in charleston, south carolina. "we have laid the foundation of a new empire which promises to enlarge its self to vast dimensions, and to give happiness to the great continent. it is now our turn to figure on the face of the earth and in the annals of the world." new unitedr, thae states magazine editorialized that if you could have an adequate of the idea of an empire in embryo, your view would have to be from the hudson bay to the goal of california. the newly formed medical society observed the same here that no period in the role of time ever opened so bright and promising the prospect for the spread of liberty and science as that andh now dawns in america, about the all accomplishing hand of time and never erected. by 1782, an american diplomat believe "the public mind in america has been too intoxicated with the idea of independent sovereignty and empire over the country as large as europe and its entirety. to make or to attend to any proposition for a reunion with paper -- with great britain." comments public and private about the empire tapered off during the darkest days of the revolutionary war. but as news of the victory at yorktown and later the international recognition of american independence, americans again took up the course more ecstatically and you for going -- more ecstatically and euphorically than before. they were called to finish the illustrious task of rearing and empire, which from its situation and circumstances must surpass all that have existed. in magnitude, felicity, and duration. in 1783, the society of cincinnati was founded in part to promote the future dignity of the american empire. referred toamilton the papers of congress as the "archives of the empire." capitaladelphia as "the of america." a term rarely used to describe what people considered merely a please where congress recited. -- a place where congress resided. letters in the 1780's provided the perfect form for empire congress. the ones in charleston, s.c. in 17 83-1785 proclaimed the introduction of freedom, happiness, independence throughout the greatest continent in the world, and predicted that succeeding ages shall bow to the rising glory of america. and rome, once mistress of the world, shall fade. one man told his hartford connecticut audience in 1787 that "every free citizen of the american empire ought to consider himself as the legislature for half of mankind." the french have always had a gift for analyzing the american character. years in ther six united states, a french diplomat captured the pride and chauvinism of the revolutionary generation in his description of americans as "inpatient to act and play a role in the world. egotistical t accesso, imagining that all nations on to sacrifice their interests to america's theirrity, and that revolution has changed all government, measuring the importance of their country by the immensity of their territory, and anticipating future greatness." these sentiments were echoed by another french diplomat in 1789. who was rather amazed by the american assumption of greatness. in this, they are like a child named to a great inheritance. they are reveling in anticipation, and they had "a mania to play a great role in numbering themselves among the premier nations of the globe." which they flatter themselves to surpass already in many ways. in which they imagine one day they shall succeed in every way. 1784, a cartographer estimated a habitable area of the continent at 3.5 million square miles, it, i expect want it will certainly ours." the maiden issue of columbia magazine in september 1786 mr. the market by 1 -- missed the mark by 1 when it predicted in 1850 the 30th state would be admitted to the union. actually it was california on the pacific ocean that became the 31st that year. in november, the magazine devoted considerable space to an explanation of charles thompson's great seal of the united states. focusing on the eagle, long a familiar symbol for empire, but this eagle was special because the ball eagle flew only on the north american continent. politicalc and problems arose in the 1780's, americans, reflecting the impatience that french observers considered a key component of their emerging national character, began to question whether the dream of empire would actually materialize. warneddivinity professor in 1785 that americans should not "flatter ourselves too much with the idea of future prosperity and glory of these united states. although the foundation is laid, the superstructure is not yet finished. nor ever will it be unless we use the proper means. and whether we shall use such means remains a matter of great uncertainty." by 1787, the year the federal convention that, such questioning was widespread among political observers. a newspaper writer discoursed that "when peace was established, most of us mistakingly thought that we had nothing left but to reach out to either hand and take hold of happiness." but an arduous task remained. we had an empire to build. the december issue of the columbia magazine commented on the empire of the united states, noting that "the first dawning's of the american empire seem to presage its future presage ---- its future greatness. but we have precluded ourselves from the means of calling for the strength and resources of the empire by a failure to strengthen the federal government." before leaving congress to attend the federal conventionm james madison expresse concern that its failure would result in the partisan -- would result in the partition of the empire into several rival and hostile confederacies. a newspaper writer described the convention as the united wisdom of america, now forming a government adequate to the ones over rising empire. wants of our rising empire. franklin called for a daily prayer as a means of breaking a political deadlock. a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aide?" hamilton worried to convention president george washington " i fear we shall let slip the golden opportunity of rescuing the american empire from this union anarchy and misery." madison was pleased to inform jefferson after the convention published the constitution it drafted, that's not one member had advocated a partition of the empire into separate confederacies. the debate over ratification of the constitution from the fall of 1787 through the summer of 1788 provided a widespread form for expressing empire consciousness. comments on its age, size, feet, greatness, and rising glory abound. expressed conviction that under the constitution, america will become "a great and boundless empire, flourishing in the arts and sciences, commerce, and agriculture." paraphrasing thomas paine, a greater in the boston gazette claimed the debate in the constitution was not a concern of the city, a county, or a state, but of this events continent. immensef this continent. the federalist essays were opened with one of the consequences was "the fate of an empire. in many respects, the most interesting in the world." the ratification debate divided a form for opponents for the idea of american empire to speak out for the first time. the agrippa essays postulated that no extensive empire can be governed by republican principles. one opponent saw the constitution as a document "which in its vortex, swallows up every other government upon this continent." "it can be said to be nothing less than a hasty stride toward universal empire in his western world." very flattering the young ambitious minds, but fatal to the liberties of the people. a newspaper article condemned the constitution because it annihilated "13 free sovereign and independent states, and established on their ruin a monstrous unwieldy empire more extensive than that of rome at its rome at its height. later this year of the 22-volume documentary "history of the first federal provides us with the ability to see how deeply the idea vampire impacted the institution that implement the constitution between 1789 and 1791. its members, serving in what a newspaper termed as "the great court of our empire," was clearly conscious of laying the foundation of a rising empire. correspondents, the official documents, and the aboundsr commentary with reference to its vastness, newness, youthfulness, rising nature, and such other dignity,istics as its prosperity, and mission. well, of course, as its relationship to the enlightenment. newspaper articles mention the american empire directly when discussing several issues before congress, including amendments to the constitution, ones that became known in the 20 of ,entury as the bill of rights the excise system, regulation of these slave trade, the organization, coordination, and tail of the public lands, the location of the federal seat of government, and the organization of the militia. in this piece, complaining about male commands are militia exemptions, likely written by benjamin franklin bashan -- concerned that females should have to serve in the militia and a female int up buyer that will laugh at all the male governments in the world." 1790, congress open in they congratulated for commencing a new the road to empire, and, in honor and for setting in motion the great sheen of government for this extensive empire. the year after congress completed its three sessions, gilbert inlay published his description of the western territory of north america. that becauseerved the united states is the center of the earth, governing by the laws of reason and humanity, we see it calculated to become the emporium and protectors of the world. imlay was the first person to advocate that the federal government be seated on the mississippi river. the it never happened is influence of george washington and his obsession with the potomac river. rising glory -- not republicans turned washington into a revolutionary. the widespread printing of george berkeley's famous poem about america with its memorable conclusion that westward the course of empire takes its way and its implications that america would be the final could hardly have escaped a serious reader like washington . andeen the critical speech his inauguration as residents of , he referredates to it at least 30 times, suchying empire with familiar adjectives as new, extensive.ng, and it culminated with the new empire rising in the west. it's so impressed washington in 1787 that he purchased 20 copies for distribution and the geographically obsessed virginian must have treasured his copy of jedediah morris's and american biography first published in 1789. he asserted that it is well-known empire has been traveling from east to west and we cannot but anticipate the time as not far distant when the american empire will comprehend millions of souls west of the mississippi. i should point out that these people think of empire as the rising fertile crescent in the east, going to rome and then into western europe. sohington's empire was not extensive as jedediah morris's. that is because he was blinded by potomac fever and it only extended to the mississippi river. he believed that centering the political and commercial wouldum on the potomac see the north and the south to thingst and that was the on which its historical reputation depended. family -- byn it was composed between 1789 and 1796, and it vision ofashington's the rising glory of america and to the nation.p iny surround a small table mount vernon on which is displayed the washington, d.c. plan. washington rests his arm on george washington parke custis's shoulder. the boy, symbolic of the next generation, as his hand on the globe, a familiar symbol of empire in paintings and that is turned to north america. window, the potomac points westward. i don't know if you can see the slave in the shadows -- there .re many.'s about who it is maybe it's just an artistic trope. i cannot help but wonder if savage was saying something about, this is all very good, but you have something in the shadows you better deal with. washington knew only one person capable of designing a seat of empire that reflected his vision for the united states. his 1784 proposal for a permanent army corps of engineers gave him the information for constructing the capitol. congress debated the location of the state of askedment in 1789, he president washington for the responsibility of laying "the foundation of the city which is to become the capital of this vast empire." most spokesman for an american empire and its magnificent its glory reflect wanted something like this -- for wanted a new by san tm ages yet to come or even a new sciencethe patroness of and art, the dispenser of freedom, justice, and peace to unborn millions. witherspoon argued that its buildings should not just be elegant, but magnificent, so they might not denigrate the dignity of the empire. empire thatseat of would be in david humphrey's words "the delight of the earth." as advocates of empire who envisioned a magnificent had not-style capitol reckoned on a tall challenge facing them. it was named thomas jefferson. this is not to suggest that jefferson had abandoned his commitment to american empire. .uite the contrary as much thougen to its exploration as he and jefferson shared with other proponents of the american empire the belief that the united states had a role in history as an inspiration to other people's to burst their chains. unlike the other instruments in the symphony of empire, however, jefferson played his own tune. he had a theory. for jefferson, one of the lessons of the 1760's had been the domination of the american colonies by london, a distant and corrupt metropolis. these unnatural concentrations of wealth, power, and aristocracy that would regenerate a monarchical empire in north america and threaten the nature of the american republic. lightened empire for liberty must avoid the .etropolis vision jefferson's empire of self-governing states would be sustained not by force, but by the virtue, vigilance, and patriotism of a united people held together by ties of affection and interest. only such an empire, he believed, could sustain a union over the vast american continent. huge city as part -- reachingalist ofk as far as the drafting the constitution and they made the expansion into a political issue. jefferson and the democratic republicans assumed command of experiment and finally brought the american to conclusion. nothing better symbolized their triumph than the removal of the government from urban philadelphia to washington, d .c., very rural indeed. the of it was to toss out plan and with it washington's vision of a grand european-style government. in mere federal town, a sort of wigwam of empire as a friend of termed it.once in sylvania avenue woodland and trees. nonetheless, jefferson's 1809 farewell address expressed his growon that the city would and sure and steady steps become a seat of wealth in the world. it followed the vision of republican empire. referred to washington, d.c. as the seat of government, not the capitol. in 1780, following the long moving theight of government, president ulysses s. grant and the republican party made the construction of washington, d.c. physically and symbolically part of their plan for the reconstruction of the union. the unitedould states at last begins to construct a military -- ,etropolitan seat of empire which would have been easily recognized at its centennial of 1900. thank you. are there any questions? yes, sir. did anybody ever mention native americans? bowling: who? >> native americans. bowling: they certainly in the painting -- george washington believed in a multiracial society. returning support african-americans to africa and he did not support the isolation and annihilation of native americans. he wanted to include them. but that's another subject. it did not really come up in empire consciousness. empire consciousness was the expansion of europe. yes? -- the roman empire, , democraciesire had been the eye foundation of slavery. like the united states. how important was slavery in the building of empire in the united states and the building of democracy? mr. bowling: it was certainly essential in building the city. buildingse public were built by rented slaves. certainly provided some very prominent revolutionaries like george washington and thomas jefferson the time and the wealth to make revolution. but franklin and john adams were not slaveholders -- at least at the time of the creation of the constitution. >> [indiscernible] mr. bowling: by the american revolution, americans were aware of the north american continent from panama. extensively toed the mississippi river. beyond the mississippi, the knowledge that americans had obtained primarily through canadians, for traders who went out to trade on the missouri jefferson had tried twice, before he became , to launch an exclamation of the missouri river, all the way to the civic. -- to the pacific. the founders of this country thought of mountains, they thought of appellation mountains. any other questions? yes? >> when did the concept of empire or the exploration or the settlement of the west, did it transition into that? mr. bowling: i don't know if i would use the word transition. from the beginning the idea was to settle the entire continent from the atlantic ocean westward to the pacific. in the 19th century, particularly the late 19th century it really became a dirty word. american historians have not discussed and talked about this, how much the idea of empire lay behind the american revolution. much that iit so have come to believe in recent years it was more than the idea of republicanism as a driving behind the revolution. republicanism being the ideology that people are capable of self-government. they don't need a strong executive like a king to make decisions for them. in my opinion, empire was equally important, if not more so, and i think historians need to pay attention to it. all of these things i quoted -- american missions, relationships to the rest of the world, taking in refugees in the world, all of these things americans think about are still involved in our consciousness, go way back to the beginning of the nation. anything else? yes? >> you mentioned very early on in your talk, kind of land speculation in the west. could you speak more about that? mr. bowling: no, because that was not me. that was the person who introduced me. if he is still here, he might be able to say something -- was specifically did you want to know about them? was just curious about that aspect? mr. bowling: what they were? >> we were talking about, we think of empire as a sort of economic thrust into another part of a .eography i was wondering a little bit about that economic -- mr. bowling: the relationship -- -- i'm talking about the economic aspect of empire and what was going on. mr. bowling: the revolutionary andwas funded by patriots gave money to congress to fight that war. of patriotism.t then as things did not get resolved i the military in a year or two doug, they had to get -- a year or two, they had to get money from france. iou.aper said they had to pay people, the farmers whose cattle and horses they confiscated. and the promises of land in the old northwest territory -- and of course, when there was no money to pay them, they deflated in value. one of the things about the constitution was all of this paper was going to be brought up to par. so, people were buying them from the soldiers and the farmers and using them to increase their private wealth. in and in some land, by large tracts of for speculation purposes in the old northwest territory. but largely, the old northwest be soldy will jefferson's way, by small farms. yes? i wanted to mention the word -- i wanted to discuss the word "empire." i only think of the british empire. i mean, when you think of empire, and i was thinking today think it iserica, i such a kind of a negative word. i was wondering if other people would cringe at that and i wondered if you had any comments on that? mr. bowling: my comment would be when the founders of the country talked about empire, they were not talking about an empire of domination, although empire had spread throughout north america through conquest and domination. naivety tocertain the concept. yes, ma'am. >> spanish settlements in the southwest, california, how did they intend to incorporate them? florida,ng: spain had the lower mississippi river, maybe 100 miles in from the gulf . louisiana -- at the end of the french and indian war, when france realized it was going to lose, it gave all of louisiana to spain. the land, the watershed from the rockies to west of the mississippi, and of course, mexico and texas and utah and , that was all spanish territory. the position that people who believed in empire took was very simple. spain is a rotten empire. it is going to crumble on its own. we don't need to waste to the resources to conquer it or in vedas. the americans would move into spanish territory and take over. jeffersony clear to especially that spain was not a threat. anybody who had new orleans would be a threat. that is why he sought to buy it when the french got it back. any other questions? sir? >> what about landownership or real estate issues driving this need for empire? were they forced to go further west to get what they wanted? mr. bowling: not necessarily. -- the 13all it colonies were increasing so rapidly -- it was not for them that the west was settled. on thents tended to stay east coast. the next generation would probably move west. the west was going to be settled by people who were born here. yes? terriblys not a weighty question. realized that st. louis was in the running for a capital city. is there any record of attribute attributive comments by missourians who would save you keep the capital in the east, you will not spread west, etc.? it is quite an exciting story. there was something called st. louis, the future great city of it was backed by powerful newspaper interests in new york city and they debated all sorts of things like we need now after the civil war to move the the potomac to mississippi and the home of lincoln. we are a new, different nation. we are the middle of the continents. we should be the capitol. -- thethe last time issue of leaving the potomac river was debated in congress. it was still sometimes talked about. thank you very much. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] >> american history tv airs on c-span3 every weekend, telling me american story three events, interviews, and visits to historic locations. our programs include lectures in history, american artifacts takes a look at the treasures of u.s. historic sites, museums, and archives. america" revealing history through archival films and newsreels. "the civil war" and "the presidency." american history tv, every weekend on c-span3. >> next, on american history tv, a panel of scholars and national park service personnel talk about improving and expanding the teach in of the reconstruction era at historic sites. they called for the better use sitesil war battlefield for presenting reconstruction history. this is part of the annual summer conference hosted by the gettysburg college civil war institute. >> good evening, everybody, and welcome back for our evening session. it is my pleasure to serve as moderator for this evening's roundtable discussion on finding reconstruction at historic sites. i would like to begin by introducing our three panelists. gregory downes is an associate professor of history at the university of california-davis rid his research focuses on 19 entry u.s. political and cultural history and the transformative impact