Type of care at the right time . The minister for health. Thank you very much, mr. Speaker. Intent i think the member for his question about the tablet key Structural Reforms in Mental HealthService Delivery. I was delighted to join the prime minister, the chair of the national Mental Health commission, and professor hickey this money to talk about what he key called a breakthrough. The government, the federal government started the neighbor is ejected. [shouting] the member for begin. The member is ward. Mr. Speaker, its always sad when the opposition plays politics over subject as important as Mental Health. [shouting] because i know that many people listening are actually interested in what these reformed our, i will just keep talking and try to ignore those interventions. So for the first time, Service Delivery will be tailored to the consumer and to their needs, depending on where they are on a spectrum often called i the sector, step care. This is why today that the stitches to the bottom and finished up a topic what this means is that whatever your needs are dependent on the steps that you were on you should receive them. So coming back to what professor hickey said, quite, but a very well this said its not about me as a clinician or i may want to practice and what i might want to do for my geographic location. Its about where the consumer is in what they are entitled to and what they can access. One of the key benefits of this reform is it will actually see professional resources, away from our Capital Cities and into our region. Original contracting and commissioning that will be done through the primary Health Network will pick up on what local needs are. And the consumer advisory committees that primary health work levels will be informing the model coming for the best practice, and making sure that those who have up until now been missing out receive the care that they need, such as people discharged from acute Mental Health facilities who fall through the cracks every time. Discharge from an acute episode into nothing at all. They will have an individualized care package. They will have something and someone to wrap the resources around them. Digital transformation will mean that one digital Mental Health gateway would exist for everyone. Not take a ticket and wait, but help right here right now when you need it at the time that you needed. For example, a young person at 2 a. M. , an older person when normal phone lines have closed. There will be a voice at the end of the phone navigating your way through a complex system. Mr. Speaker, we are delighted that the 10 billion, almost 10 billion the federal government allocates for primary Mental Health care will finally be used come every single cent of it, to the endpoint of looking after the consumer, they care, the patient, the person on a difficult journey. The high cost of childcare is another big issue for australian families, particularly in the suburbs and the government has been keen to ensure that parents are able to reenter the workforce as soon as possible. As such the government has released the shakeup of the services and assistance it provides but as with any shakeup there are people who are better off in some who are worse off. As the opposition wanted to know who it was that was going to end up with less. Thank you, mr. Speaker. My question is to the minister of Vocational Education and skills represented the minister for education. When will the government released a detailed modeling of its childcare package that shows will be worse off, including how many families that rely on grandparents were childcare will lose access to the registered childcare benefit . And does this modeling include the impact of childcare of a 15 gfp . The minister as the culprit the treasure and the leader of the house will cease in detecting. The minister asked to call. I thank the member for question and a must for question and this government understands the importance of childcare. We are committed to high quality child care for australian families and we certainly understand the importance of the contribution thats made by grandparents to fulfilling important childcare needs. Thats why this government is investing heavily in childcare come almost 40 billion in child care over the next four years including an additional 3 billion, an additional 3 billion in funding, mr. Speaker. This is the single largest investment in Early Learning and child care that this country has ever seen, mr. Speaker. We are targeting to support parents. It is vitally important that childcare is accessible, that childcare is affordable and that childcare is sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of parents. We want to ensure that childcare can meet the needs of australians in the 21st century, particularly those families who are seeking to transition often comes support in the world of work, mr. Speaker. It is very difficult. It is very difficult, mr. Speaker, to get back into the workforce if you cant have the childcare support that you need to do that, mr. Speaker. From the first of july 2017 a single childcare subsidy will make it easier, mr. Speaker, for parents to navigate. Childcare will be more affordable. Families will be better off. Those families on incomes between 65,170,000 figure will on average be 30 a week better off, mr. Speaker. That is 1500, 1500 a year, mr. Speaker. And childcare will be more flexible. We on the site of the house understand the importance of flexibility. Thats why weve got a new Nanny Pilot Program is going to workers, particularly who with unusual our such as shift workers, particularly those people in remote and regional locations where theyre not been easy access to childcare facilities, mr. Speaker. We have the 869 million child care safety net, mr. Speaker, which recognizes that Vulnerable Children and families need extra support, mr. Speaker. We are a government that understands the needs of this nations families in relation to childcare. Thats why were putting in place the sort of policies theyre going to provide flexible, affordable childcare for parents and grandparents. The member for herbert. [laughter] mr. Speaker, my question is for social services. I have a mobile population. My constituents are asking how we can make savings from a family tax care benefit and how this can help them with childcare. Can you outline, answer that question for me . The minister for social services. An excellent question. Of course, it was the case, mr. Speaker, that when originally the childcare reforms were designed they were designed in their first generation by than a treasure when he was a member of social services and he also bore the responsibility for finding the savings inside the benefit system to pay for those reforms. Is that the case because government changes that there minister of education. But member for herbert is usually well aware that genesis for the changes were suggested to childcare which are well aware needs to be paid for with appropriate rational savings out of family tax benefit systems found the genesis and the Productivity Commission who noted that 165,000 australian parents said that they wanted to and would work more but the that they were unable or inhibited to do so because of the access and arrangement surrounding childcare. They are the 165,000 we are working very hard for, and weve devised a plan for, that we wish to assist in engaging in the workforce. But as your constituents are no doubt keenly aware, that has to be paid for and perhaps its time to give you a response to relate to the procedure makes by which the payment will occur. We had a rare event in the house last week where members opposite the great with the savings initiated by the government. Doesnt happen very often but it did happen last week and that savings was with respect to a mechanism to at least pay for some portion of that childcare spent, 500 billion worth of savings was agreed to by members opposite which we will see in the nottoodistant future family tax benefit the ends for couples comes with her youngest child turns 13. They will be making a contribution i funded by dollars to sweeping reforms to childcare. Its now the case member i sure hope where we at the legislation that would be before the house this week with respect to all the data on the childcare package but that is if a significant expenditure of money and it has to be paid for. Want the benefits that we have seen is that the expenditure slightly less than expected, that there is less generosity to those on higher incomes and better targeting of the childcare on lower incomes. But what i want to assure you, member, and to constituents is that whilst, whilst, whilst speaking to you, whilst the child take the childcare package have been agreed to, the remaining savings will be back before this house this week with some slight modifications and ive said send the legislation to the member and that recalls about excluding the small group of grandparents and Single Parents both smokers and weve been able to do that because the spend on childcare due to work Education Minister is less expensive than we thought. And thats will be conclude the final question time route for this year. Hope to see you next year. Thanks for watching. Next on cspan2, a discussion on food and diet regulations at the National Constitution center. Event a talk on the internet of things. Later the communicators followed by Robert Courson on q a. Wednesday on cspan the charleston, south carolina, church that was the site of a mass shooting in june hosts a conference on gun violence. Clergy, Health Experts of all enforcement officials gathered to talk about the problem and possible solutions. To start off on, put a framework before the questions, we know gun injury and death in the United States is far higher than anywhere else in the developed world, by far. Over 30,000 gun deaths each year, over 60,000 injuries. Think about this. Some of those debilitating, horrible injuries. 30,000, plus the 60,000. Thats about 90 a day. 90 every day. We think of some mass shootings. We dont think about the 90 a day deaths from guns in the United States. More people have died in the u. S. Just in the last four years than the number of american soldiers that died in korea, vietnam, afghanistan and iraq combined. Think about that. Korea, vietnam, afghanistan and iraq combined. Four years. The last four years, take the four years before that, the four years before. Its done. Question, why does this happen . Does it have to happen . Why do the murders occur in this church almost six months ago . Spent watching the entire event at 8 p. M. Eastern on cspan. Tomorrow on q a, her drawings of the israelipalestinian conflict and of the Guantanamo BayDetention Center as well as videos she is me. Watch at 7 p. M. Eastern on cspan2. Harvard food law director jacob gerson about ethicist and Health Care Policy adviser Ezekial Emanuel talk about the governments regulation of food posted by the National Constitution center. This is just over one hour. Its now my great pleasure to introduce a conversation that is set up to celebrate the opening of a great exhibit we just opened called whats cooking uncle sam, the governments effect on the american diet. Please do come and see. Dud rate and fax of letters that Sinclair Lewis sent to president Theodore Roosevelt which gave rise to the first food and drug act in 1906. Its got recipes from president eisenhower and clean elizabeth and its a fascinating history of food regulation. To discuss it with two of americas leading experts on government and fit and healthy this just a superb team weve assembled on this topic. First is the great zeke emanuel, my good old friend, a vice provost for global initiatives and chip medical ethics and Health Policy university of pennsylvania, and in his spare time a phenomenal shelf. He started to pop up brunch spot breakfast is on the table with chavez seek. It got rave reviews from the Washington Post and members of the Supreme Court again as a result of that is now on the james beard nominating committee. So this man is in addition to having done more than anyone else for Health Care Reform in the United States come is a great chef and a great friend and we are so lucky to have them. He will be joined by jacob gerson, professor of law at Harvard Law School. He is the director and founder of the food law lab at Harvard Law School and is working on a book called from court to table. Im telling you we could not have done better than seek and jacob. This conversation will be moderated by michael gerhardt. Michael is our new visiting scholar here at the National Constitution center. He is a super president ial historian. You may seem last year discussing his great book on the forgotten president s, their untold constitutional legacy. Is one of the most thoughtful constitutional commentators in the country and i am so thrilled to have him at my side to oversee all of this great constitutional content that we are hosting. So ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, please join me in welcoming our great guests, and enjoy the show. [applause] thank you all for coming. We really appreciate it. Its a great honor to be here tonight and went to Extraordinary People and scholars share with us their expertise and insights into whats cooking. I have to confess at the outset we will not be able to share food tonight but we will perhaps more poorly be able to talk about quality of food and particularly the reasons why the federal government regulates food and some of the major issues that are a rising right now with respect to food regulation. So without wasting any other time i want to jump right to jacob in having talked to us about wha why is the federal government involved in regulating food. Thanks for coming everyone. To start with the federal government is involved and recreated because the law has almost always been involved in regulating food. People can read the bible. The bible has a lot of food law. If you go back and look at roman times, runtime that a lot of law. The basic problems they were actually the basic problems we face today. Thetheir feud food purity and food safety. They are related but not the same. Food purity problem is potentially when i put in my body, am i getting what i see . How do i know that . When we take a glass of milk its hard to tell if its milk or milk and water or milk and water of some other, whether its poisonous per se for organic the its hard to tell by looking at it in drinking the product. Thats true for almost all food and that has always been true for almost all foods. We had ways of addressing that, weights and measures rules, purity Disclosure Rules today, labeling rules, safety rules, production programs. So much of what the government is doing that also the state and local government is doing is trying to fix that problem which we never fully fixed. Food purity problem and the food safety problem making sure what we eat is what we want and also doesnt make us sick or kill us. That gets us off in early. So zeke given all the regulations, what do you believe is the most pressing issue right now relating to food regulation . I think obesity has to be at the top of the list, certainly if youre a doctor worried about national Health Policy. Obesity is one, two and three just a small corner of it, a diabetes, we spent a quarter of a trillion dollars. So worrying about how the government is involved in food, promoting food, not promoting certain foods is clearly quite important. We have a lot to the subsidies for farmers, and buys up growth one way or another. We can issues through food stamps, wic, National SchoolLunch Program is a major with the federal government can impact what especially children eat. Labeling laws. The issue of should we change the labels . We have what are somewhat complicated labels of ingredients and nutrition. Theres been a lot come when i was in the white house we were trying to push for pak labeling. That can be done voluntarily or done by regulation. And we have the Affordable Care acted included a requirement for caloric menu labeling by any astonishment that has 20 outlets or more. And again all in attempt to sort of change have an impact on the obesity epidemic. So i think theres a lot of different ways the government does intersect with what we eat, and i think demonstrably its had a big impact on certainly what children eat if nothing else. Jacob come in terms of the federal regulation, what are the ways in which he believed the federal government could do more to help ensure people eat more nutritious food . I think a lot of that, theres two basic questions. Wind is making people aware and giving him access to more nutritious food. Thats basically an informational problem at access problem. Which foods are not the ones we should be eating. My friends in the Public Health say weve known that for a long, long time. All my friends outside of the committee think like we have no idea. Part of it is conveying the information window to the public in an effective way of telling us to make choice. Choice of. Even if one has that information if one doesnt have access to th