Hottest group that is now known as Isis Al Qaeda in the incarnation. It is our relationship to be the war is to el paso so he, a tribe and he knows everybody in this region and. For the purposes of the book you will not write a book 1 2 to understand the nature of the enemy that more important and that their family members how is it the 16 yearold boy that studies Electrical Engineering wanting to the west will cast his lot with headlock been barbarians . What is that driving mechanism . So the purpose is to explain common not justify but explain the rise of the terror are me that by last geographical to oculist note controls a swath of terrain roughly the size of great britain. I also did a lot of media a june 2014 to inaugurate this Coalition War and the question i would is asked is where did they come from . Out to the verge from nowhere . This sounds like the most absurd question never heard. In my book is like the viet cong concord Southeast Asia but they changed their debris betty says merger they come from . Outside isis was al qaeda in iraq up until now they have been a primary enemy and a primary target of the United States. So they just changed their branding the and marketing and strategy with a very direct and a sophisticated manner so this is a work of history to go back to the founder of the feast go to liturgy needed jailbird liturgy needed jailbird after the call the schaede campaign in afghanistan and essentially set up this organization but the cable and after a series of spectacular terror attacks so we want to give the average reader so brazen riyal have targets on our backs. To do everything that they can to try to lead a and humiliate the United States and frankly every civilized country so it culminates with the indepth reporting of essentially food they are and what they want. Good morning welcome to the Heritage Foundation we welcome those whod driven some of the website and will be joining us on booktv in the future. We want everyone in the house to check theirself of a last comment as a courtesy we will oppose the program on the frontpage for future reference to the gym reviewers are welcome to send questions or comments our guest today is dr. Paul kengor professor of Political Science the author of over one dozen books from which you can see what is available today. So with that carbon curb archives. He also serves as a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution at stanford he received his doctorate from darcy and Pittsburg Graduate School of so audrey battery doctorate welcome the today from communist to progressives out the left with family and marriage. [applause] thanks for coming. And also cspan as well. People always say thank god for cspan. There isnt any outlets out there thats simply put it out there to let people watching and decide for themselves a up the shelter and interpretation of somebody telling you how to interpret. Also to people who watch this on cspan and it is a provocative topic. I know that in this will upset a lot of people. Maya understand that. But if you believe in dialogue a in a diversity i am open to that. If you cant avoid streams of fourletter words, that would make the dialogue easier so i would be happy to communicate with you this. I am a cold war historian and friends of mine why would you attack it tackle marriage to a family and jumping into a culture war. Do you really want to do this . Now. Is not fun to be called the bastides of 99. 9 percent of people have their views of marriage and family but to put it all belonged i would rather not do this but precisely because of my background in these areas to lecture over and over again with the marxist views on thinly that i had to write this because i come from a historical alogical perspective as someone whos studied the intellectual history. So i have a power point presentation did that id never do. The really good student of mine put together this fabulous power point presentation as long as i can press the buttons correctly and will be okay. This is based on my book takedown decade not just a few months ago it is an electronic form as well as hard copy and i dedicate this to those with the courage to resist to redefine the teachings of god and faith of their ancestors by liberals and progressives in the debug tolerance denounce the base and dehumanize and seek to destroy them. This is what happens when you disagree with the forces of tolerance and a diversity of issues of marriage and family. They seek to destroy you. So those of other courage to stick to the courage started with a quotation from pope francis i love this quotation but its perfectly with the history that i lay out in the book the reforms the idiological colonization and to destroy the family that is good that descries were facing. Theyre not bored of the mission of what god gave us they come from without the family is threatened by growing efforts on the part to redefine the very institution and of marriage with relativism and every threat to the family is a threat to society itself. The one theme that conservatives and communists agree is the absolute fundamental importance of the family which is right conservatives want to preserve that why the most radical leftists fought to change it. There is nothing more fundamental than the family. Every threat to society itself passes through the family said pope Francis Parker i wrote a barrel recently in response to his trip to the United States called cherry picking pope francis c. You can find of a lead so lets go through the history. Karl marx for crowfoot for as part of the communist manifesto. And nothing bothers me borer when people all come up to be to say it is a good book if you stop to read it talks about sharing in helping help at t ad that i know that there really have not read it because it is an awful book and it doesnt take long to get through it. It is sure you can go online to get it for free read the 10point plan that babies summed up in a single sentence the abolition of private property hand right there myofibril daughter cant tell you that if you abolish private property you will have to kill people. And marks even says for this to happen in despotism will be necessary for a time. Marks new that you have to be an idiot to not realize to abolish private property you have to use force but there is some light in their the abolition of the family even the most radical flareup so in the communist manifesto of 1848 already at that point in time not only talking about abolition of the family but the proposal for communists apparently it is of the best price didnt say professor what does that lead . I spent two chapters walking through that carefully with the pros and cons but i will move on and come back to that. Even before marx ever the ideological colonist to work out to be defined marriage and family. A number of them, some of them were american but they all try to set up different ideological colonies so to redefine family marriage is nothing new. Robert l. Wood with the oneida colony as it was called, a new party these people all sought to be defined and reshape the traditional understanding of one man and one woman of marriage the marriage based family. One other one father so they were all trying to change this. Robert allen stood atop his new party colony july 24th 1826 the 50th anniversary of the declaration of independence. John Adams Thomas Jefferson taking their final breath literally dying the country is celebrating everyone in america is all excited while this is going on there is a great document they are celebrating robert owen, a socialist is declaring his declaration of independence and said i now declare to you and the world demand up to this our has been a slave to a tragedy of the most monstrous evils that could be combined to inflect bid to and physical evil. What is he talking about . I have to read mower i refer to private property irrational system of religion and marriage founded upon the individual property with some of these irrational systems of religion with property and marriage all of these ideas are always swirling iran and. Always chipping away. We ignore that match our peril that the selfimposed ignorance and blindness. People that will even me and called me names. It is not possible to speak of family as marx wrote blessed is he who has no family. That when he said that it was partly in jest because he was completing about his potential situation but if you know, about the relations with his wife and children he had a very, very very bad family life. Marks was not a good husband and father. Several of his kids died before he did a couple committed suicide, one of the daughters committed suicide in a pact with her husband that marks denigrated with the most awful racist language because he was parked cuban. He cheated on his wife with the bears made who he seems to have been impregnated he never ate and acknowledged the child was his so he loved that idea he said right on. He refused to get married the all wanted him to make honest women and he refused to bury them he disliked marriage so much he did not get married the bridge what marriage is a system of housewives the communist revolution in the manifesto is the most radical relations and has the most radical rupture of the idea is to fundamentally transform marriage or the notion is the property our religion and everything else. Du charges stopping the exploitation of parents . To say we destroy the most hallowed of relations if you look at said 10point plan in the communist manifesto it calls for free Public Education for all children in public schools. They did not want children being educated at home or in churches or religious schools that wanted them educated public schools. They made it against the family of education what they hated the most was by robert owen was religion of private property and family and marriage and of course, marx called religion part of the masses that communism begins with the neediest begins. Legged especially despised religion of worship is the necrophilia. See what that means. Are eating fleet of cavity said avram jeffers said or washington . That is the founder of the soviet state. There qb in the big board abominable and religion. But they bore a bobble their religion compare that to venereal disease. He tries to say what is the worst they get out there . That is religion and. So year after he died eagles said this is the book that marx wanted to write remarking on the family and he says in there that with the transfer of the means of production to ownership the singlefamily ceases to be the part of society so what does he want to do . Housekeeping should be transported to a social industry to nationalize private housekeeping the care and education of children is a Public Affair society looks after all children alike legitimate or not. One of the obedient the minister of the bolshevik revolution per but anybody read him . One hundred years ago the leading feminist of the bolshevik revolution like the soviet roosevelt and she said the type of family the worker mother must learn not to differentiate the worker rather must remember there are children of russias communist Borders Society takes upon itself with the education of the child so i juxtaposed that next to a quotation from lois the harassed perry is very well educated. Very strong academic pedigree odd msnbc one of the leading intellectual progresses today and made a statement a couple of years ago mattel closed it sounds we have never invested as much Public Education as we should because we always had the private notion of children. She does not like that with the idea that kids belong to their parents to recognize that they belong to the whole community. When i had to find equitation for the book was looking for the source and among the other places was on fox news and i was reading the readers comments from different people who time and who said i have never seen anything like this before. To save our children dont belong to us they belong to society. That is not new at all. The bolsheviks have been talking about this 140 years it is a new. Not at all but what is new is now there is a Progressive Movement in america where they become spokespeople for the movement with wide public support that is what is new with the show was again and again 50 to 100 years behind the bolshevik i dont mean acrosstheboard but on abortion and divorce to redefine the family and education not on 100 out of 100 issues the american communist ed whitaker chambers talk about the communist party in the United States the party did bolick said to push into the industry this social unit i often talk of adopting children but the comrades dissuaded me be all embracing philosophy that determines the marriage that you have the relations with your children and your community and your profession ed whitaker chambers out of communism to conservatism talks about party there against a communist marriage that is usually was not in any way was temporary. They have huge rates of divorce long before high divorce levels in the United States today chambers said they regarded marriage as the birds flock convention with the same intensity of antimarriage before san country is russia i will go through this one of the first things they did was legalized divorce if you wanted to own private property or freedom of speech or freedom of press or religion all of the fur coat if you wanted a divorce the sky was the allotment you were the freest person in the world. Put his stamp on and you got it. There were not be in the bureaucratic state getting in the way of your divorce if you want a divorce then go the state will not get in the way but very soon they literally have not seen that before i state cites a study from par verge University Press from communist russia it is not unusual to meet soviet men and women that have been divorced upwards of 15 times the atlantic published a piece entitled the russian effort to abolish marriage remember marks abolition of the family of divorce was an epidemic in the ussr than abortion was the black plague the other day that the russians major that would be easy to do if he wanted abortion, ago, full privatization if you want an abortion go get it. When it had written as early as 1913 he promised the unconditional laws against abortion by 1920 it was made legally available provided free of charge moscow women were having three abortions for every live births. At was swept three one. Not become as you said a great promoter of life but said he would not have a population if this goes on. By the way stolid was reprimanded by trotsky. What you doing . But to say we will not have a population of this keeps up. Eventually he is replaced by christian of one of the things that he did was to bring back abortion. So by the late 1960s soviet women that is many as 20 abortions by the 1970s the u. S. S. R. Was averaging between seven and 8 million abortions per year. All those years several v. Wade between seven and 8 million per year. But then they realize it is a disappearing population than the National Fertility days to try to get our children in russia. So Margaret Sanger i have the chapter on hershey has been in the news lately the founder of planned parenthood which began as the mayor can Birth Control league she took a pilgrimage to russia in 1934 like Many Americans calling progresses George Bernard shaw Margaret Sanger had an affair with him. The founding father of the american Public Education and has several chapters on him because theyre all progresses. Theyre all on the left summer socialist some are communist party usa they say maybe the bolsheviks are ahead of us they want revolution we talked evolution. Lets go see what theyre doing so singer goes over to see if she can learn any lessons from the bolsheviks on Birth Control and at this point time singer writes she was not publicly on record in support of abortion. She wanted planned parenthood to have Birth Control for women to control the number of births and space out the birth we know garner heard negro project and other stuff racially speaking and to she also wanted Birth Control for sexual freedom she had an affair with h. G. Wells but at that point said people say we want Birth Control for purposes of abortion but we do not there is nothing more dangerous the borodin of laywomans offspring. We condemn that in the strongest terms. 80 years later now planned parenthood natalie supports abortion but once federal funding if you favor a war on women. So to say what you can learn from the bolshevik to write an article on the Birth Control review and then she said listen carefully the radically there are no obstacles it is accepted on the grounds of health and human rights week said take example from russia. Writes on the verge of the purge. They could take examples from russia are the founder of planned parenthood were there are no religious condemnation with the regular Welfare Service of the government. That is where we are. Birth control and structure and is part of the regular Welfare Service no religious condemnation she said this she was to a credit was aghast that the number of abortions. This was horrible the total number is not known. It is estimated at 100,000 per year. Here is of pitcher a progressive utopianism. With all the officials with whom i discussed the matter stated as soon as the economic and social plans are realized leader abortions nor contraception is necessary. A functioning communistic society will insure the happiness of every child and will assume the full responsibility for its welfare and education. So they just have more power. To give more state control the full faith of the progressives of the utopian state. To get serious change of sexuality and gender not the communist party usa. A l