Supports is if i walk into a Grocery Store and i buy a gallon of milk and paid 3. 50 per gallon if i get 10 gallons, i pay 35. Say you canant to use as much milk as you want feeling up to pay 3. 50. That is wrong. Netflix is the biggest user of the internet here it lets people download their movies. Sometimes there is much as 30 of the total volume of the internet. Netflix should pay more than somebody who uses the internet once a month. Im being very simplistic. That is the genesis. These companies have spent billions and billions of dollars to set up their systems and to provide the fiber optics and all of the megaspeeds that we take for granted on a volume metric basis. They should be allowed to charge. Issues, monday on the communicators on cspan 2. Members return to that house Prime MinisterDavid Cameron answered questions. From london, this does just over 30 minutes. Questions for the Prime Minister. Question number one, mr. Speaker. Thank you, mr. Speaker. We had meetings and then dishing to my duties, i shall have further such meetings later today. Thank you, mr. Speaker. I think we should also congratulate on his tremendous win in that winter olympics. It was announced a bonuses of 2. 3 billion pounds. 140 pay rise for the chief executive. Many it is an insult to government. Work. Ur people back to congratulate the olympic team for the best Metal Performance since 1924 at a winters game. It was a huge honor to welcome them. We had an explanation of the task of the skeleton bobsledding and the turning. Congratulation goes to everyone involved and all those who helped to train them. The issue of bank bonuses what we need to see if the proper control of all forms of pay. What i do not want to say and what i think we are getting is andsing only on bonuses clawing back bonus but you cannot clawback pay. We do not want to go back to the days where you could be paid well for a poor performance. Does a Prime Minister recognize it as part of the job at Church Leaders to challenge governments, but will he discuss whether that can help you pull out of poverty, like cutting taxes . There is nothing particularly money ifut barring or the system which can trap people in poverty has [inaudible] friend who is a distinguished richmond himself talked perfect sense. The is nothing moral about running up huge deficits about out of control welfare bills. We do not do with these problems, the whole country will be poorer. We should listen to the former arch bishop of canterbury. He said the churches should be aware of the dangers of blindly defending a gargantuan welfare budget that every serious alliteration would cut as a matter of economic common sense. I think serious politicians have to engage in it and that should go for everybody. I join my honorable friends and congratulate the team on their brilliant performance at the winter olympics. As immediate threat of flood passes, some levels are still underwater and hundreds of businesses and farms are still struggling to recover. The committee on Climate Change, the u. K. Statistical authority have all said the Government Investment in flood defenses in the likes of this, does the Prime Minister think it is right to revisit the plan for investment in flood defense . We will look carefully at the plans. We have set out spending figures all the way out through 2020, not all of which are fully committed. I said two weeks ago as the waters reside and has that ea and others can look at what happened, we can review and see what you measures might be necessary. Let me repeat the point that this four year period in this parliament, overall spending has gone up. Im afraid that figures he is quoting is phony and i believe he meant it. This is why that u. K. Statistical authority they say this governmentfunded for flood defenses is nominal and real terms during the current spending periods. The only way to claim otherwise is ignoring inflation and claiming credit that others spend. Why wont the administrator admit it . He has been called out. You look at 2010 when i became Prime Minister through 2014, the spending has been 2. 4 billion more than the 2. 2 billion in the previous four years. 5 yeark at the period. The spending is higher than the previous five years. Those are the facts. I think having this debate is going to be pointless. The whole country should be coming together to deal with this. That is, from the moment he turned up in a bloody village, a completely misjudged the mood of the country. Completely misjudged the mood of the country. First of all, it is a simple choice between that u. K. Statistic authority and him. People will believe the u. K. Tistic Authority Sta authority. There are risk posed by manmade Climate Change. He said in opposition to Climate Change this it is easy to do the softer things like riding your bike and rebuilding your house to make a green. But it is only clear you make it one you do the tough things as well, like helling the truth about Climate Change. Mr. Speaker, what is the truth about Climate Change . The truth is that this government has a program to reduce carbon for our economy. We have done it with the government itself. Compared with the government he left in 2010 when he was Climate Change secretary, the government own Carbon Emissions are down 14 . Lets return to the issue flood defense spending. The people will want to know this. He is committed to zero spending review. Yes, said the shadow chancellor. That zero base pending review means that they cannot ledge to match the blood 2015,ng we are making in all the way to 2020. They have no guarantee to the people of the country that they will take Climate Change seriously are flood defense seriously. The total nonsense that he noted it is interesting. Some of in opposition wanted to talk as much as he could about Climate Change and now is desperate to get off the subject. I asked him a question. For hisjust said now party in the country, his views about manmade Climate Change manmade Climate Change is one of the most serious threats that this country and the world faces. That is why we have the worlds first Green Investment bank here in britain. That is why i like 13 wasted years of labor, we are building the first station in our country here at that is why we have reduced Carbon Emissions by 40 since we came into office. That is why we have carbon budgets. They talk a good game about it, but it takes people to come in effectively and deal with it. Excellent. We are finally getting somewhere. I agree with what he said about Climate Change. The reason this matters, the reason this matters is that there are people in the most important positions in the government going around and questioning Climate Change. This is what the environment secretary says people get very emotional about it. People should accept the climate has been changing for centuries. The Energy Minister went on about Climate Change. I haventing to had time to get into the Climate Change debate. [laughter] he is the Energy Minister, mr. Speaker. As a happy that there are Climate Change deniers in his government that is he happy that there are Climate Change deniers in his government . I praise him for his commitment to Climate Change. I like the new style. I think this is much more refreshing. His government has a solid track record of cutting carbon and investing in nuclear. The Biggest Energy program we have seen in this country for the first time in a long time we are on track to the renewable target. Lets congratulate him on the record on the energy environment. The whole country would have heard they cannot answer the question about whether you need to believe in manmade Climate Change to be part of his government. Part to be ac matter of individual conscience. These to be the thing that was a passion above all else. Order. Order. The questions and the answers will be heard however long it takes for those who are exercising their vocal cords and the vocal what it ought to come down. It we will properly protect the british people against the threats that they face, we cannot have doubt and confusion in his government on these issues. Government needs to be discussed the have convictions until his party to get real on Climate Change. You can measure the current of the conviction by the acting government. The Green Investment bank. An investment in renewables. That investments in nuclear. He talks a good game, but he didnt achieve it when he was in office. Serious form of denial we have today in british politics is that reality deniers of the Party Opposite. What is their plan . Nothing. That is what im in change requires. Longterm investments like highspeed rail and Nuclear Power and fixing our economy. That is what this government is doing. All he does is get up and deliver a lot of hot air. Can i ask my friend with a public concern at work on whether he can get advice on the whistleblowing work . Say whether he could bring together recommendations and how to stop people being persecuted and others. For my friends questioned. The Public Interest disclosure act for text most workers from being unfairly dismissed by their employers when they have blown the whistle. We have strengthened protections. Especially in large organizations. We are happy to make sure to policy withing the further steps been taken in this direction. Does the Prime Minister get the depth of the hurt among victims families and the deep sense of public outrage across the country as a result of the outcome of [indiscernible] he needs to understand that for an official matter come a letter signed by the official to trump without any element or action is deeply offensive to the public and the country. Well you not scrap these get out of jail free letters immediately . Will he do everything in his power to reverse the despicable decision so justice can be done for the families of the bereaved . Let me say i completely understand that depth that people feel right across the country about the appalling events that happened in 1982 in the back of the person responsible is not going to be appropriately tried. Of course it is shocking. Our first that should be those 11 soldiers and their families and their friends. It might have happened 32 years ago, but anyone who is lost summit in a situation like that we should be cleared that the men never should have received a letter that he received. It was a dreadful mistake and a take that we now need you need to make sure it never happens again. We need to stick to the principles that we are a country and the government under the rule of law. Thank you, mr. Speaker. My friend has taken swift actions to help flooded communities. Lands there are scare mongering. In light of recent events, commence friend reassure those in my constituency that necessary protections will be given to their lands and react that this government is fun for the longterm security of this profitable industry. She makes an important point. Im glad she is advertising this fun that hope will be useful for those who have lost productive land because it has been underwater for so long. The point she makes about farmers and land owners and others about being nervous because of the a rules, i think the pendulum swung too far against dredging and that needs to change and that will change. It will not be the only answer, but he does have a proper part improperly managing the landscape. Tragic deathr, the of sarah childs devastated her family and shocked the community. A much loved his sister and daughter, she was killed and her sister, claire, pregnant and was severely injured by speeding driver going 64 miles an hour who got four years in prison. Does the Prime Minister agree that the time has come to look again and at the sentencing of those who kill with a car . First of all, my heart goes out to the constituents and the family of the constituents in this incident. I do think it is right to look again at the motoring offenses and the penalties that are given. I discussed this issue with the secretary of state justice you has made some proposals and changes in this area. Im sure youll be listening carefully to what the gentleman has said. Thank you, mr. Speaker. Recommendation for an investigation. Is the Prime Minister astounded [indiscernible] are not legitimate . Will he were to try to get his party to reverse the decision . I think the honorable lady makes an important point. The view should be respected and listened to in wales. I think the point she makes about what they have said today what they are saying effectively is that there are people who are dying in wales and a waiting list is too long because it is not in our poorly managed or reformed in wales. That is a matter for the neighbor Welsh Assembly government and they need to get their act together. Thank you, mr. Speaker. Accepte Prime Minister the overwhelming humanitarian case for guaranteeing longterm support to victims and survivors of terrorism . If so, will he agreed to meet of the and survivors london bombings to help with the services of survivors for Peace Program that is now faced with imminent closure . In doing so, would he remember his pledge that survivors of terrorism must know that they have the support of the whole country. Foran i commend the lady the extraordinary work she did in government and continues to do in opposition in helping the survivors of the terrorist attacks, particularly the dreadful attacks that took in london . I have seen it firsthand, the experience the hospice she brings to this work. Im happy to have the meeting that she discussed. In terms of the survivors of peace foundation, it is a unique charity. And does an extorting job in supporting victims and families. I have been discussing its future as well. Obviously we want to make sure that all of these institutions can continue their excellent work. Im happy to hold those discussions with her. We all want to see a more balanced economy. Does the Prime Minister agree that the upward rise in Business Investment over around nine percent the stock showed that British Business not yours are business and entrepreneurs are rising . Many experts have been saying that what we need is a balanced recovery, one that sees increase in exports as well as increase in consumption and business. The gdp figures show an increase in export. There is a large increase in Business Investment that is hugely welcome. Thank you, mr. Speaker. Even yesterdays court elevation of a secret scheme, as a Prime Minister believe the parties and Northern Ireland progress a need foraling with transparency for the two governments are guarding the confused ways in which they sort to deal with the past since the agreement . Particular street was involved in that matter. They were trying to deal with some of those difficult issues in Northern Ireland in terms of flags and parades. Perhaps the most difficult issue of all will take a lot of courage and bravery from people on all sites. She wants to point the finger at a particular street. I would like to deal with the report. Rolere happy to play their in bringing parties together and making sure we can continue with peace with Northern Ireland. Given what the Prime Minister has called the leader of the oppositions new approach and the chancellor Angela Merkels isnt there something we can learn from her about leaving broader approach to Coalition Building that we unite the whole country . He would have to give some red meat to them and red meat for us. It would have a huge advantage for all of us of leaving the liberal democrats where they belong. My admiration for agile merkel is enormous angela but ones enormous, thing i do not want to cap he is the idea of a grand coalition is a bit too much for me. [laughter] what steps will the Prime Minister and government take in the National Crime industry and Northern Ireland and cooperation . Can you give assurance that those involved in criminality in Northern Ireland [indiscernible] i think the gentleman makes an important point. I have been impressed with the work the crime agency is not doing. It is a huge improvement on its predecessor. It has got real strength in being able to tackle organized crime. I think it is bad for Northern Ireland that the nz is not able to pr