banded together and sued a hhs and the fda saying we want you to ensure access to preston and the judge came out and said yes , i don't think the hhs or fda really opposed this as defendants in the case, and this is where we're going, so we have these two dueling rulings. but the washington state ruling only applies to the states that suit it doesn't apply to say alabama or texas, but texas ruling look, i come from a conservative background and i think the texas ruling is garbage. i think that a the judge shopping was despicable. i think that all judge shopping no matter who does it despicable. there was 100% chance in this court that this judge was going to get it because he's the only judge in this particular courthouse. and then what did he do? he did the exact same thing that we republicans have moaned about for years, if not decades. he legislated from the bench. and lastly, what did the judge also do, he said, i know better than the fda and the medical professionals there. we've had this drug on the market for 23