witnesses, if you talk about jurors, there could be consequences. we pray not. but in response to your question, when you see issues like this, it brings to mind the realities of what tuesday's hearing about the gag order is all about you incite people to action. and this could be the result let's go back to the conversation has how much dean about the jurors he says, maybe the judge suits your the judges decided not to do that. >> i think for humanity reasons, you want these, you take these people away from their families, their lives. it's going to be stressful enough. you want them to go home, sleep, they're on bad, see their own children, partners, friends, and things like if that how does th balance out though? what are the risks? is that the right thing to do on a high-profile case? and what are the risks? well, luck. i think a happy jurors are thoughtful juror number one. number two if judge marsha wants this case to move along, and he decided to sequester jury at the outset. this we wouldn't be talking about opening statements come monday. so i think look through an anonymous and they can take
Related Keywords
Jurors , People , Witnesses , Question , Issues , Hearing , Gag Order , Response , Consequences , Realities , Judge , Judges , Conversation , Action , Dean , Let S Go , Humanity Reasons , His Civil Fraud Verdict , Things , Juror , Thing , Number , Sleep , Risks , Marsha , Lives , Home , Partners , Families , Enough , Children , Friends , Balance , Ith , Luck , Number One , Two , One , Jury , Statements , We Wouldn T , Outset , Anonymous ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.