or witithout realilizing it. the e way that p people make mistatakes with accccidental plplagiaris, that's's just humaman nature. richarard busch: i if you can ne that you i independentntly cred a a song that't's substantntiy similar toto another bubut had no i idea, had n nr hearard of the p pre-existining, it's j just purelyly coincidene- that is a a defense. natete rogers: h he didn't d y thatat he knew t the song--- itit was a bigig hit-- but that i it was justst sometg that h he didn't p put togeth. and he thohought he hahad writn a totalllly originalal song. george h harrison lolost that e and d was requirired to pay y t ofof money. when youou have thesese discusss ababout music c copyright t c, you don't t have to prprove int. thatat's sort ofof impossibl. but you dodo need to p prove ac. in t the case ofof 3lw, acceces inherent w when your s song ws