and used i it in theirir own chororus, i'm sure tayaylor swift t will be sg fofor copyrighght infringegem. peteter andersonon: we've got two exextremes, whwhere it's identicacal copying g of this exact nunumber of rerepetitio, anand we've gogot the plaiaints work whehere there's's no repetitition at allll. but i i think no r repetitiont all l means it's's not protete. i think k there's anan argumet with thihis number o of repetit, it i is protecteted. intervrviewer 2: t thank you. peter ananderson: ththank you,u, your hononor. maririna v. bogogorad: i thik thatat was also o a point tht inflfluenced thehe ninth cicircuit sayiying, yeyes, this cacase should d pr. [m[music playiying] julilian wright:t: the thing that s stood out t to me was me than jusust the wordrds. there e were quitete a few structuralal things ththat i w within thehe compositition thatat's in bothth songs. they're e both used d as the ho. a hohook is-- ththat's the c c. that's thehe part of t the sog that eveverybody rememembers. lilisa respersrs france: i n the e "shake it t off" lawsus, tayloror's team hahas been argg ththat the phrhrase "playeyersg to play,y, haters gogoing to h" that t those two p phrases arert