of innocence, which is nonsensical, because, of course, if a trial court were to look at the dna evidence but then only consider all the evidence of guilt, the court wouldn't be considering everything that makes a compelling case for innocence. >> let me ask you a question, mr. riordan. let's focus on the evidence situation. and let's say that i agree with you, that maybe the trial judge was in error with respect to just limiting the evidence to evidence of guilt. what evidence then would be considered? would it be the evidence that was presented at the trial or everything that has occurrd over the last 17 years? >> i don't think that it can be rationally read other than to say the court must consider, that is placing the scale not only the evidence of guilt, but also all other evidence, whether or not admitted at the first trial. >> the court will recognize

Related Keywords

Baldwin Case , Question , Evidence , Dna Evidence , Everything , Course , Guilt , Trial Court , Innocence , Court Wouldn T , Doesn T , Mr , Situation , Respect , Trial Judge , Focus , Terror , Oriordan , Let , Kellys Court , Trial , Scale , 17 ,