book at people. and they're saying there at the committee and kind of wondering where is the justice in this -- the justice department has not yet spoken on that. they're waiting for supreme court ruling on executive privilege. the archival materials i want to look at is in litigation. so the news they got today is, okay, maybe merrick garland was a little reluctant but he came down on the side of being tough on these people. so i think it gives them hope that when they say that people should be held in contempt, they might be backed up by the justice department. it is not a slam dunk. nobody knows what merrick garland and the justice department will do about meadows for example. but i think they would say, you know, this is how we see the narrative. this is how we see these people, they are domestic terrorists and they are seditious and we ought to treat them as such.