supreme court review. here there was a presidential commission also established by president obama who, in the end, said you know, probably it violates the fourth amendment, but we're not real sure. we don't want to go there quite yet. there's a split in the country and the supreme court is is going to ultimately have to decide abo decide. avery, does this case have all the criteria that would, you know, satisfy the supreme court to even want to tackle a case like this? >> well, i think there are great public policies involved. again, the balance between fourth amendment, personal privacy, and the power of congress to deal with terrorism, while, yes, i would agree with that, fredricka, we've got a long way to go. we don't know what the federal appeals courts are going to do in this case, but i think one way or the other it's going to be one of the top ten cases for 2014. there is no doubt about it because everybody's affected. >> all right, well, very perfect segue because we're going to