think this was a good case for prosecution and opined against it. so it's really interesting, the interplay. we've seen this entire case really backwards. you know, one side that you usually think is going to be for the prosecution is on the defense and vice versa. i'm interested in seeing why they're calling serino. i think it's a bit risky. they got a lot of beautiful information from the defense perspective with the state's case. hopefully they don't go too far, at least from, again, the defense perspective. >> it has been fascinating, actually, to see it kind of flip -- turn onity he its head,u will. sunny, serino talked about how the guy was truthful or honest in some way, but i'm not sure that that's admissible, that that was struck down. if jurors are asked to ignore that, does that really work when they're in the deliberation room? >> you know, i've got to tell you, i mean, i find that jurors definitely listen to the judge's instructions when they go back to the jury room. and i believe that most juries, when told you cannot consider