> that one isn't. >> reporter: the top democrat on issa's house overitem"> > that one isn't. >> reporter: the top democrat on issa's house overitem" property="og:description"> > that one isn't. >> reporter: the top democrat on issa's house overitem">
worker replaies i believe so. >> "i believe so." totally not definitivdefinitive. >> that one isn't. >> reporter: the top democrat on issa's house overitem committee called his claims reckless saying so far no witnesses who have appeared before the committee have identified any irs official in washington, d.c.. issa says more interviews and transcripts are coming. >> this is a problem that was coordinated in all likelihood right out of washington headquarters and we're getting to proving it. >> reporter: but two democratic sources complain issa released the excerpts before making them available to democrats, what they say is supposed to be a bipartisan investigation. the sources tell cnn the excerpts are taken out of context and issa's claim they indicate direction from washington is misleading. they say their impression was the workers were talking about consulting with tax attorney specialists in washington about