>> so avery, if we're talking about seating a new jury, if it does proceed and season the case that the family and the judge making a decision, but instead there is a new jury seated, are we talking about revisiting testimony? not just the character witnesses of travis alexander or to even jodi arias herself delivering another statement, but we're talking about revisiting some of the trial testimony because with a new jury seated, don't they have to have a clear understanding of why the conviction took place in the first place before even trying to find a suitable penalty? >> yeah, i mean the complicated thing here, fredricka, is we are limited to penalty. but basically in the penalty phases, it's a legal free for all. the statements by the foreperson in this case were rivetingly revealing.